Category Archives: Representation

Filters

Author:
Category:

Gender representation essay

Write up a 750 word formal essay (ie beginning, main body and conclusion) that compares the representation of gender in both Mens Health and Tomb raider 

In this essay I am going to argue that there are both radical and reactionary representations in Tomb Raider and Men’s Health. To do this I am going to analyse the front cover and contents page of Men’s Health and the front cover of the Tomb Raider game. I am going to apply Gauntlett’s concepts of representation and reception theory to these products.

Gender representation is the presentation of gender roles in the media, which can be displayed in many different ways. Usually gender representation in media follows common stereotypes (the common representation of specific groups in media). The most common type of stereotype that is represented in media, especially traditional and older media is the “cool” man, which will be discussed during the analysis of Men’s Health. This gender representation will be compared to Tomb Raider’s Lara Croft and compared to the dominant ideology of gender.

Men’s Health displays both radical and reactionary views about masculinity. For example, the cover of Men’s Health contains strong, bold fonts which reinforces that all men are strong and powerful. Furthermore, the cover of Men’s Health also contains a semantic field of violence, strength and power: “demolish”, “blast”, “slay”. This is reactionary, as it reinforces the dominant ideology of the “cool” man – that men are strong, cool and brave. This is emphasised by the image of Vin Diesel on the front cover, who appears to be muscular with a tough and serious expression. This presents a dominant idea of masculinity, which one could argue is a toxic representation of masculinity – as it creates unrealistic body standards for men. In this photo, Vin Diesel has been photoshopped to appear more muscular than he actually is. This creates the impression that the impossible is achievable, creating a sense of false hope for men trying to become something that isn’t real. Furthermore, this creates a ‘standard’ for how men are supposed to look, creating a negative impact on the body images of men and their desire to ‘fit in’ – linking in to identity. This image of the “cool” and “muscular” man is, however, juxtaposed by the plug “detox for foodies” at the top of the magazine. This reflects on Gauntlett’s concept of gender fluidity – the fact that gender isn’t fixed, and can be changed. This is shown by the trait of specifically enjoying and critiquing food – a particularly feminine trait, being shown on the front cover of a men’s magazine. This also shows that the magazine is radical. Looking at the contents page, the influence of masculinity within the textual features is still strong – but less so. There is no semantic field of power or violence, and the gender role of “powerful man” is reduced to seemingly almost a façade. The contents page contains the strong text and blue colour – signifying masculinity, but including other features such as pink backgrounds for icons and softer fonts. This breaks the dominant ideology – in which men have to be unfalteringly masculine all the time.

This is similar to the front cover of Tomb Raider, as Lara Croft is both radical and reactionary, similar to how Men’s Health is presented. Firstly, the dominant signifier of the game, Lara Croft, is presented with highly feminine-conforming features: a flawless face, long hair, makeup as well as sexualised clothing. This is reactionary as it holds to the dominant ideology that all women are beautiful and desirable. Furthermore, Lara Croft’s clothing designs present her as very sexual, as her clothes leave a lot of skin exposed as well as the rule of thirds being used to emphasise her butt and breasts. This connects to the idea of the ‘male gaze’ – that straight cis white men control the media, which as a result shows us their visions of how they view different groups. In this case, Lara is sexualised to appeal to male gamers. This is also reactionary for how society views women. Lara Croft’s character is also, however, also radical. Lara Croft was created in order to have a strong female leading character, which was rare at the time. Furthermore, her story made her independent as she did not need a man in order to be strong. This, amongst women in society, is reactionary. But, for the dominant ideology, it is radical. Furthermore, Lara Croft is in the position of a man, doing things that would have been deemed ‘too daring’ for a woman to do in the game, such as ‘fighting fearsome creatures’ as denoted on the back and scaling walls. In conclusion, Tomb raider and men’s health both vary – Tomb raider is mostly radical, but is also slightly reactionary while Men’s Health is mostly reactionary, but is also radical in some parts.

These two texts both represent reactionary beliefs and radical beliefs. Tomb raider shows a woman in a man’s position wielding a gun and doing amazing feats, while appearing sexualised, and Men’s Health shows strong motifs of masculinity – strong text and a semantic field of power, while presenting that men can have more feminine traits such as being passionate about food. These ideas are presented to the audience in different ways, and the entire audience is not going to immediately accept this. If we use reception theory, it shows that there will be a divide in the audience. The intended representation of these texts will not enforce or change the entire audience’s beliefs. For example, the message that “men have to be strong” in Men’s Health will be received by the audience and there will be a divide based on opinion, such as: the dominant response – the intended response, which will enforce the audience’s opinion that “men have to be strong”. Then, there’s the negotiated response, where the audience may partially agree and disagree with “men have to be strong”. Finally, there’s the oppositional response, which would be a complete disagreement with the message. This, in turn has an effect on the dominant ideology of gender in society. This could have a negative effect, such as stereotyping. This could make outside parties assume that, for example, all women are flawless like Lara Croft, which can have a negative impact on women, as they are pressured to look flawless. Or, it could have a positive impact. For example, for Men’s Health, men could be less ashamed to talk about their interests or hobbies if the dominant ideology of “men have to uphold masculine interests” is challenged. This, therefore can end up enforcing more healthy beliefs with gender.

Media Gender Representation Essay

Compare the representation of gender in both Men’s Health and Tomb raider

In this essay I am going to discuss both the portrayal of the male gender as seen in ‘Men’s Health Magazine’ and the portrayal of the female gender as shown in the video game cover ‘Tomb Raider’. I will discuss the representation of both and how it is conveyed as well as whether the texts are radical or reactionary.

The portrayal of the female gender as seen in the ‘Tomb Raider’ game cover is sexualised and objectified. The use of the character Lara Croft as the dominate signifier draws peoples attention towards her and her appearance rather than the game itself, detaching the protagonist from the context of the game and instead objectifying her and focusing on aestheticism of the character. This is seen through the strategic positioning of the character in the center of the cover, this is attained through the rule of thirds which draws direct attention to the character and the contortion of her body to emphasis certain features such as her breasts and de-emphasie certain features such as her waist. This is further seen by the title being placed across her middle and by the use of serif text forces the subconscious eye to draw attention to these features. Hence making her characterisation purely sexual. The representation of Lara Croft is representation the stereotypes and ideologies of the female gender. At the time this game was released it the portrayal of Lara Croft was radical due to the fact that prior to this time all protagonists in action games had been male and females were only portrayed as villainesses, victims or seductresses, the fact that this game created a ‘Female Indiana Jones character’ was initially to ‘avoid a law suite’ however, lead to the development and varied representation of female protagonists in future games. However, to today’s audience might view this cover as reactionary as the objectification of female is typical on most game covers. Also by creating a female character who has ‘typical’ masculine, action game qualities such as, the iconic signs of ‘the gun, muscles, backpack’ suggests that a female protagonist has to adopt certain stereotypical masculine qualities to be applicable/ associated with action games and to be supported by the dominate ideology of hero-sexual, Christian, Caucasian males.

Similarly, the portrayal of the male gender can be seen from the use of ‘Vin Diesel’, a stereotypical masculine male as the dominate signifier. The focuses on the dominate signifier is again emphasised by the positioning in the center of the cover, attained through the use of the rule of thirds. The representation of the male gender here is muscular and physical fit. This is shown through the position of the dominate signifier and how he is contorted to emphasises muscle and minims body weight such as ‘his arm slightly outstretched and shiny’. This magazine also uses a juxtaposition of colour and lighting to represent males, by using ‘a mixture of black and white colours’ which has the indexical connotation of good and bad, positive and negative. Light colours and shine have been added to define the muscles and muscular form and used black/shaded the un-muscle defined areas showing that the stereotype of strong muscles bound masculinity is ‘a good/positive’ thing and should be seen and supported whereas, less muscular areas are hidden and shaded supposedly ‘negative and non-masculine.’ Through the presentation of the male gender shown on the cover of this magazine we can see that this magazine adopts a reactionary, stereotypical approach towards the presentation of males as it demonstrate and complies with, the typical conventions of male stereotype. The audience would see it as the idealised version of a male and perhaps the unrealistic body aims and representation of masculinity as supported by the dominate ideology.

In conclusion of both covers represent genders in a reactionary way, compiling to negative stereotypes and unrealistic expectations by objectifying their dominate signifiers and manipulating the audience into believe these dominate ideals.   

CSP 3: THE BOSS LIFE

For our next CSP (number 3 of 9) we are looking at the area of ADVERTISING AND MARKETING, in the exam, you may well be asked to respond to this set text in terms of MEDIA LANGUAGE AND/OR REPRESENTATION. This CSP will appear in Section A of your exam paper.

So first of all here is the CSP that we are looking at:

TASK 1: TECHNIQUES OF PERSUASION

As this is looking at advertising the first task is to think about (and make some notes on) the way in which advertising persuades a specifically targeted audience to consume its product. In terms of the expectations from the exam board:

Students should be able to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the persuasive techniques used in the advert and issues surrounding brand values, brand message, brand personality and brand positioning should inform the analysis.

So please watch this advert a couple of times, discuss with your friends and be prepared to feedback your answers to the whole class, think specifically about the following questions:

  1. Think about how Maybelline created an advert for this product. What elements are used to make this advert?  What media techniques are used in this advert?
  2. What is the brand message and what values does this hold for a modern audience? What makes this advert different?

Have a look at some of the following articles to help your understanding (and note-taking)

https://www.glamour.com/story/manny-gutierrez-maybelline-campaign

https://yourstory.com/2017/01/manny-gutierrez/

Maybelline Recruits Manny Gutierrez as Its First Male Beauty Star

You should also read page 15 of this Media Magazine ed 63 and you could try reading small sections of this academic paper called: Persuasive Techniques used in Marketing and Advertising, a thesis by Elizaveta Baryshnikova

Finally think about how you are going to feedback your ideas and share your notes.

Oh and also . . . don’t forget about how different audiences may interpret the same message in different ways . . . (remember? Stuart Hall and the Theory of Preferred Reading?)

The Language of Moving Image

It is possible to look at the Language of moving image from 2 perspectives 1) TECHNICAL CODES & 2) NARRATIVE. So firstly, make up a table that looks like the one below and in small groups fill in as much information as you can – you will need to watch the clip several times to do this. Upload the completed (shared) table to your blog. You may find this page useful: http://mymediacreative.com/blog/2019/04/20/language-of-moving-image-2/

Technical CodeDenotation (ie what is it – simply describe what you see / hear)Connotation (ie what does it signify)
Setting
Clothing
NVC
Dialogue
Sound Effect
Music
Camera shot size
Camera movement
Editing

Next apply the following 3 narrative theories to the maybeline advert:

  • Todorov’s Theory of Narrative Equilibrium
  • Levi-Straus Theory of Binary Opposition
  • Propp’s Theory of Narrative Characters Types

Again use a table to show your understanding. You may find this page useful: http://mymediacreative.com/blog/2019/04/22/narrative/

TheoristWhat does it mean (in your own words)How does it apply to the advert (in your own words)
Equilibrium
Binary Opposition
Character Types

THE EXAM

  • Look at the exam papers on the planner page.
  • Look at the section A.
  • Section A is focused on LANGUAGE AND REPRESENTATION
  • Section A looks at 3 CSP’s / Media forms:

advertising and marketing
magazines
video games

  • That means we have finished this section!
  • Therefore can you answer the questions from this section (if they were based on this year’s CSP’s? Mens Health, Tomb Raider, Maybelline)

PREPARATION FOR THE EXAM

If this CSP comes up in the exam you can expect your question to be based around discussion of the Maybelline advert mainly on representation of gender, age, ethnicity and lifestyle with opportunities for direct comparison with other advertising CSPs.

  • The way the media through re-presentation constructs versions of reality
  • How and why stereotypes can be used positively and negatively
  • The processes which lead media producers to make choices about how to represent social groups
  • How audience responses to interpretations of media representations reflect social, cultural and historical attitudes
  • The effect of social and cultural contexts on representations
  • Theories of representation including Hall
  • Theories of identity including Gauntlett

Therefore make sure you are confident in this area and to test your knowledge can you present a comparison between this CSP and one other CSP that we have looked at so far. Again think about how you wish to organise your ideas and feedback your presentation.

Make sure you analysis is focused on MEDIA LANGUAGE  and REPRESENTATION. Try to make some insightful points rather than stating the obvious, for example, discuss the use of semiotics, the notion of preferred reading and the concept of self-identity in Modernity (Giddens) see below.

MEDIA MINI MOCK SECTION A

I suggest you look at this post of mine about Media Language to make sure that you understand what it means ie it is much more than spoke or written communication and is specific to each media form.


TASK 2: THEORIES OF REPRESENTATION

Read this extract from a book called Modernity and Self Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, written by Anthony Giddens.

here is an edited version:

“The reflexive project of the self, which consists of the sustaining of consistent, yet continuously revised, biographical narratives, takes place in the context of multiple choice as filtered through abstract systems. In modern social life, the notion of lifestyle takes on a particular significance. The more tradition loses it hold, and the more daily life is reconstituted . . . the more individuals are forced to negotiate lifestyle choices among a diversity of options. Of course there are standardising influences . . . Yet because of the ‘openess’ of social life today, the pluralisation of contexts of action and the diversity of ‘authorities’, lifestyle choice is increasingly important in the constitution of self-identity and daily activity.”

Can you translate some of his ideas? For example, what is reflexivity? If you need more help you can read this post from my own blog: Representation, Identity & Self

Non-Binary, Intersex, CIS and . . .

Ayesha Tan Jones is a non-binary artist and musician who goes by the stage name ‘YaYaBones’

Once you have thought about this, think about the concept of a ‘non binary identity’. Follow this link to find out more. What does this mean to you? How do you feel about it? What about the concept of CIS? Or Intersex?

Do these concepts help you to understand the idea behind the Maybelline marketing campaign?

Again discuss this with your group of friends, make notes and be prepared to feedback to the rest of the class.

So how is the traditional male representation adjusting to this new world from the perspective of Advertising & Marketing?


approaches to representation

PREPARATION FOR THE EXAM

I suggest you look at this post of mine about Media Language to make sure that you understand what it means ie it is much more than spoke or written communication and is specific to each media form.

Make sure you analysis is focused on MEDIA LANGUAGE  and REPRESENTATION. Try to make some insightful points rather than stating the obvious, for example, discuss the use of semiotics, the notion of preferred reading and the concept of self-identity in Modernity (Giddens – see below).

  • The way the media through re-presentation constructs versions of reality
  • How and why stereotypes can be used positively and negatively
  • The processes which lead media producers to make choices about how to represent social groups
  • How audience responses to interpretations of media representations reflect social, cultural and historical attitudes
  • The effect of social and cultural contexts on representations
  • Theories of representation including Hall
  • Theories of identity including Gauntlett

Therefore make sure you are confident in this area and to test your knowledge can you present a comparison between this CSP and one other CSP that we have looked at so far. Again think about how you wish to organise your ideas and feedback your presentation. Or as part of your revision you could complete this mini mock?

MEDIA MINI MOCK SECTION A

If this topic comes up in the exam you can expect your question to be based around discussion of the Maybelline advert mainly on representation of gender, age, ethnicity and lifestyle with opportunities for direct comparison with other advertising CSPs.


REPRESENTATION, REFLEXIVITY AND MODERNITY

Read this extract from a book called Modernity and Self Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, written by Anthony Giddens.

here is an edited version:

The reflexive project of the self, which consists of the sustaining of consistent, yet continuously revised, biographical narratives, takes place in the context of multiple choice as filtered through abstract systems. In modern social life, the notion of lifestyle takes on a particular significance. The more tradition loses it hold, and the more daily life is reconstituted . . . the more individuals are forced to negotiate lifestyle choices among a diversity of options. Of course there are standardising influences . . . Yet because of the ‘openess’ of social life today, the pluralisation of contexts of action and the diversity of ‘authorities’, lifestyle choice is increasingly important in the constitution of self-identity and daily activity.”

Can you translate some of his ideas? For example, what is reflexivity? If you need more help you can read this post from my own blog: Representation, Identity & Self

Non-Binary, Intersex, CIS and . . .

Once you have thought about this, think about the concept of a ‘non binary identity’. Follow this link to find out more. What does this mean to you? How do you feel about it? What about the concept of CIS? Or Intersex? Do these concepts help you to understand the idea behind the Maybelline marketing campaign?Again discuss this with your group of friends, make notes and be prepared to feedback to the rest of the class.

Ayesha Tan Jones is a non-binary artist and musician who goes by the stage name ‘YaYaBones’

So how is the traditional male representation adjusting to this new world from the perspective of Advertising & Marketing?

CSP 2 MENS HEALTH

The second CSP that we will look at will also fit into key theoretical frameworks of SEMIOTICS, PRINT LANGUAGE & REPRESENTATION. As before, have a look at the products, front cover, contents page and article, and discuss in a small group as to whether you consider these to be RADICAL or REACTIONARY REPRESENTATIONS OF MASCULINITY, AGE, PHYSICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH AND . . .

This is an in-depth CSP and needs to be studied with reference to all four elements of the Theoretical Framework (Language, Representation, Industries, Audience) and all relevant contexts.

Print: Magazine. The magazine should be studied in depth – the front pages and extracts from the Jan/Feb 2017 edition must be studied are shown the pages following this information.

You will also need to study the magazine in relation to Media Industries and Media Audiences. This means looking beyond the specific edition to consider issues of ownership, production, funding, technologies and regulation (Media Industries) and targeting, marketing, sales and readership, audience interpretation, fulfilment, uses and gratifications ideas and theories (Media Audiences).

Media Language

The magazine front cover and specified content should be analysed in terms of the composition of the images, positioning, layout, typography, language and mode of address etc. this will then provide detailed evidence for application of the other theoretical frameworks

Semiotics: how images signify cultural meanings

Narrative and Genre

The genre conventions of the magazine cover will need to be studied. While narrative may be more familiar to students as an approach to apply to moving image forms, it can also be very
productively applied to print media as a way of examining audience targeting, positioning and interpretation.
• Consider the way the front cover creates a narrative about character and lifestyle in order to
attract an audience
• The way in which the cover stories create enigma and anticipation for the reader – to be fulfilled by reading on.
Narratology (Structuralism) including including Todorov, Lévi-Strauss

The cover and specified content can be analysed in the context of genre in terms of conventions of layout and composition – which will overlap with analysis of visual language – but also as part
of the genre of men’s health and lifestyle magazines.

Genre study would include an analysis of the conventions of magazine front covers – a study which would overlap with visual analysis and audience positioning. Students should extend their genre approach by analysing the conventions of content of the
magazine.

Genre theory including Neale

Media Representations

Clearly the key areas of representation suggested by the magazine are to do with gender, primarily masculinity but also how this affects the representation of women. For example:

  • The emphasis on male beauty and grooming challenges some conventions of traditional stereotypes of masculinity.
  • The types of images selected refer to concepts of hyper-masculinity and gender as performance
  • Men as object of a homosexual and heterosexual gaze
  • Theories of representation including Hall
  • Feminist theories including bell hooks and Van Zoonen
  • Theories of gender performativity including Butler

Media Industries

The main focus for industry for this close study product is Hearst publishing, the multinational conglomerate which publishes Men’s Health and a range of other fashion and lifestyle magazines.

This will provide a case study of a commercial media institution where the primary – though not sole – focus is print.

• Case study of Hearst as a conglomerate.

• Developments in new technology mean that many of their brands are now online as well as in print – including the Men’s Health website.

• Institutional strategies for keeping print popular and relevant in the contexts of developing technology and competition from other brands.

• Cultural industries including Hesmondhalgh.

Media Audiences

As ever the theoretical framework of audience intersects with the study of visual codes and genre crucial to analysing mode of address and techniques of persuasion with the front cover functioning

as a form of advertising.

• The mode of address can be analysed through the visual and written codes

• Study of target audiences in terms of demographics and psychographics for magazines – publishing companies provide a great deal of data online in relation to their audience research for specific publications.

• The way in which different audience interpretations over time reflect social, cultural and historical contexts.

• Reception theory including Hall

Social and cultural contexts

Men’s Health magazine represents a notable social and cultural shift in expectations of contemporary masculinity (a shift which could be usefully compared with the advert for Score Hair cream). The study of Men’s Health can be linked to social and cultural contexts through reference to body image and changes in what society deems acceptable and unacceptable representations.

Task 1: The Tomb Raider games cover and the Men’s Health magazine are both print products. But they are different media forms. As such, using the Language of Print terms (see last post on Tomb Raider), make a Venn Diagram that clearly shows the similarities and differences between these two different print media forms.

Task 2: Define the following key words on a new blog post.

• Positive and negative stereotypes
• Counter-types
• Misrepresentation
• Selective representation
• Dominant ideology
• Constructed reality
• Hegemony
• Audience positioning

You should also consider some ideas on identity proposed by David Gauntlett, see his site Theory.org for more information, where he talks about: ‘Theories of identity [associated with representation]’ which from me would be the ideas around, people having a route to self-expression, and therefore a stronger sense of self and participation in the world, through making & exchanging . . .

• Fluidity of identity
• Constructed identity
• Negotiated identity
• Collective identity

Task 3: Write up a 750 word formal essay (ie beginning, main body and conclusion) that compares the representation of gender in both Mens Health and Tomb raider (draw on all of the pages and not just the front cover). Use key language and specifically show your knowledge of: 1. SEMIOTICS, 2. PRINT LANGUAGE, 3. REPRESENTATION & 4. AUDIENCE THEORY. This question is based on question 2 in your AS exam.

The question is marked out of 20. Click on the mark scheme below to see how it is assessed and look at some of the essay support documents

Post this on your blog by 9:00 on Wednesday 30th October.

GUIDANCE: Compare the specific choices that have been made in the representation of gender in the two products. In your answer, you must consider:

  • how gender is represented through processes of selection and combination
  • the reasons for the choices made in the representation of gender
  • the similarities and differences in the representations of gender
  • how far these representations are influenced by historical, social and political contexts of media.

Think about the following before and after you have completed your essay.

  • Go back to your notes on the key words, phrases and ideas; reflect, expand, develop and extend your thinking and your definitions. Look at notes from other students to help you develop your thinking.
  • Look at the CSP’s in more detail, try to uncover something more than the obvious or the predictable.
  • Try to structure your essay so that one point links to the next and helps to build up an overall argument rather than a series of individual points. Use a range of connecting / link words (see work document uploaded to the Men’s Health post)
  • Use more subject specific terminology – ie key media studies words.
  • Draw upon all key theoretical areas: semiotics, media language, representation, audience theory.
  • Show evidence or wider reading – my blog, the articles and videos posted etc as well as your own individual research.
  • Make sure your essay has an introduction and a conclusion.
  • Look to identify contradictions, confusions and difficulties – this kind of essay is not straightforward or easy, so engage and try to resolve the complications.
  • Make sure your essay is long enough to really convey your argument and that you use formal language throughout.

Audience Theories

A key theoretical debate is the extent to which the media influence our ideas and opinions. In the first instance, RECEPTION THEORY (developed by George Gerbner based around research on TV viewing) suggests that exposure to reinforced messages will influence our ideas, attitudes and beliefs.

On the other hand Stuart Hall suggests that messages are actually ENCODED AND DECODED.

Stuart Hall went on to suggest that audience actually decode and interpret messages in different ways. He calls this the THEORY OF PREFERRED READING and puts forward the argument that audiences either accept the dominant reading of a text (A DOMINANT READING) or they reject the dominant reading of a text (AN OPPOSITIONAL READING), or they take up a reading somewhere in between (A NEGOTIATED READING).

CSP 1: tomb raider

A key Theoretical Framework for this media course is REPRESENTATION.

We can link this theory to the first 3 CSP’s (Mens Health, Tomb Raider game cover and Boss Life. Close Study Products are the media texts that you will be examined on in your exam. There are 9 in total.

CSP 1 TOMB RAIDER

The study focuses on:

Semiotics and the Langauge of Print

One way to look analyse this image is to think about The Language of Print & The use of Semiotics. So Task 1: apply as many key terms from SEMIOTICS AND PRINT LANGUAGE to the front.

  • Photograph
  • caption
  • Illustration
  • Logo
  • Crop
  • Depth of field
  • Perspective
  • Shutter speed
  • Colour
  • contrast
  • Texture
  • Setting
  • NVC
  • Font type
  • Font size
  • Serif / sans serif
  • Colour
  • Italic/bold
  • Underline
  • Title banner
  • Heading
  • Subheading
  • Leading line
  • Tag-line
  • By line
  • Structuring / sequencing
  • Institutional information
  • Adverts
  • Rule of 1/3rds
  • Blank/white space
  • Size
  • Position
  • Orphans/Widows
  • Gutters/borders
  • Juxtaposition
  • Hard lines
  • Graphic feature
  • Watermark
  • Drop cap
  • Columns
  • Paragraphs
  • Plugs / Ears
  • Page numbers
  • Date issue no.
  • Colour blocks
  • gradient

Key language:

Semiotics

  • Sign
  • Code
  • Convention
  • Dominant Signifier,
  • Anchorage

Ferdinand de Saussure:

  • Signifier,
  • Signified,

C S Pierce:

  • Icon,
  • Index,
  • Symbol

Roland Barthes:

  • Signifcation,
  • Denotation,
  • Connotation
  • Myth

You will also need to understand these key terms:

  • Ideology,
  • radical
  • reactionary
  • Paradigm,
  • Syntagm,

Representation

Another theoretical approach is to analyse the front cover (and the game) in terms of representation. In other words, what connotations, meanings and ideas are presented here? One way to approach this is to think about the Dominant ideas or ideologies in societies and think about whether this game reinforces or challenges these dominant ideas. In other words, is this a radical or reactionary text?

Task 2: In a pair or small group discuss your own ideas with regard to above and feedback to the class as a 2 minute digital presentation. Your ideas must be supported by EVIDENCE AND KEY LANGUAGE. Upload your presentation to your blog.

POINT

What are you trying to say?

EVIDENCE

Key language (above)

the front and back cover

the article below

the videos below

CONCLUSION

Reflect on your point – are you totally convinced by your evidence? Is it possible to find and present a counter-argument?

Does it lead to another idea or point?

Do all of your points add up to a ‘meta’ / overall argument?

Read this first to help you get some ideas: https://www.bigfishgames.com/blog/tomb-raider-body-image-lara-crofts-changing-look/ copied below link

Audience Theories

A key theoretical debate is the extent to which the media influence our ideas and opinions. In the first instance, RECEPTION THEORY (developed by George Gerbner based around research on TV viewing) suggests that exposure to reinforced messages will influence our ideas, attitudes and beliefs.

On the other hand Stuart Hall suggests that messages are actually ENCODED AND DECODED.

Stuart Hall went on to suggest that audience actually decode and interpret messages in different ways. He calls this the THEORY OF PREFERRED READING and puts forward the argument that audiences either accept the dominant reading of a text (A DOMINANT READING) or they reject the dominant reading of a text (AN OPPOSITIONAL READING), or they take up a reading somewhere in between (A NEGOTIATED READING).

Task 3: Go back to your statement of intent and write up – in continuous prose – your ideas around ‘representation’ and ‘audience theory’ in reference to your NEA (specifically your games magazine front cover)

  • the dominant ideological representations in your product (ie radical / reactionary) and
  • the way in which your audience could theoretically engage with your product (ie apply audience theory to your product)

Remember you can use this information when you revisit and revise your statement of intent.

Semiotics a theory of Language

Key theorists

Usually in most media, cultural and communication courses there are three main theorists that are examined and applied:

  • C S Pierce
  • Ferdinand De Sausure
  • Roland Barthes

And generally the following key language is part of this process:

  • C S Pierce – icon / index / symbol
  • Ferdinand De Sausure – signifier / signified
  • Roland Barthes – denotation / connotation / myth

Overview

To provide some context and overview I will provide a brief explanation for each one:

C S Pierce

Pierce  (1839 -1914) was also a Linguist. Also interested in Language. Also therefore appropriate to Semiotics, when you are looking to use some key language to deconstruct a cultural text. Again he was looking to develop an understanding of the way in which Language is a way of connecting meaning to different signs. Often he is used to identify different types of sign, which can be categorised into three distinct categories:

  1. An iconic sign – which has a direct connection to its’ object (ie it looks or sounds like the object)
  2. An indexical sign – which has an indirect link to its’ object (think smells)
  3. A symbolic sign – which has a random or arbitary link based on a shared knowledge or an agreement, for example, a shared culture or language (think letters, words, writing, shapes, squiggles, colours, sound effects, facial expressions, hand gestures, clothing, hair styles, etc)

TASK 1: Go to your blog post that has your summer induction task and identify 6 x iconic signs, 6 x indexical signs & 6 x symbolic signs. Is it possible that a single sign may be in more than one category? In other words, is the colour red a symbolic and indexical sign?

Ferdinand de Sausure

Ferdinand Sausure (1857-1913) was interested in Linguistics, in other words, he was interested in Language – so you can see why we look at him in Media Studies. As a brief overview, he was interested in the connection between’ a thing’, ‘an object’, a something’ and the meaning that human beings then attach to ‘this thing’.

He wanted to explore this area, as it seemed to suggest that things don’t have an innate meaning, rather that meaning is given to things, often through some form of interaction – hence, the notion of symbolic interactionism.

Sausure then developed an approach to understanding the way in which meaning is created by detaching the signifier (the thing, the object) and the signified (the meaning). So it is important to try and use these two terms when referring to Sausure, when you are discussing key elements or signs in a text.

Roland Barthes

Roland Barthes (1915-1980) is often seen as a founding father of Media Studies, as many of his books look at the way in which media texts hold meaning. For example, Mythologies (1957) looks at wrestling, Roman films, soap powders and detergents, steak and chips, striptease, plastic . . .

Roland Barthes is often seen as a structuralist in other words, he was interested in tracing the relationship between significant societal structures, like the media and popular culture and identifying how they made an impact on society and individuals. In particular, he was interested in the ways in which dominant structures created dominant ideologies. To that end, he was keen to encourage a reading of cultural texts from an analysis of what they were (analysing the object), which operates at a denotative level (think for examples elements and signs that are in a newspaper, or radio programme, film, television, advert or web-page), to what they might mean, which is at a connotative level.

Beyond this Barthes felt that by understanding a range of meanings (connotations) from a range of similar texts (paradigms) it was possible to develop an understanding of an overarching dominant ideology or at a point that Barthes identifies as a myth. In other words, an argument is presented that suggests that the mass media contribute to a dominant ideology around gender, race, ethnicity, sexuality, religion, class and status, which are actually are myths. It could be then argued that these myths are actually in-line with the dominant ideology (attitudes, values and beliefs) of the dominant groups in society.

This aligns his views to a Marxist interpretation of society (one based on the ideas of Karl Marx), where the dominant ideology of society is actually the ideology of the dominant groups in society, which may not necessarily be in everybody’s interest or benefit.

The ideas of the ruling class are in every epoch the ruling ideas, i.e. the class which is the ruling material force of society, is at the same time its ruling intellectual force. The class which has the means of material production at its disposal, has control at the same time over the means of mental production, so that thereby, generally speaking, the ideas of those who lack the means of mental production are subject to it. The ruling ideas are nothing more than the ideal expression of the dominant material relationships, the dominant material relationships grasped as ideas.

Marx, German Ideology (1845)

Following this line of thought, cultural texts that appear to support the dominant ideology can the therefore referred to as ‘reactionary’ as opposed to texts which challenge the dominant ideology which can be referred to as ‘radical’. Although, what soon becomes apparent in any textual analysis is that most texts usually appear to have elements that are both radical and reactionary. As such, it may be necessary to think further about where meaning comes from, because if we think about it with reference to the theory of symbolic interactionism, then we need to consider the role of the audience in constructing meaning, as well as thinking about the role of the author of a text, or even the institution that made it. This idea can again be referenced to Barthes in his proposition of the ‘Death of the Author‘ and will be explored in another post. For now here is an excellent animated video that helps to explore some of the ideas that I have put forward.

TASK 2: Write up a blog post that provides a short definition and / or explanation for the following terms:

  1. Roland Barthes (his ideas of dominant signs / dominant ideology)
  2. C. S. Pierce (and his categories of sign)
  3. Ferdinand de Saussure (the separation of object and meaning)
  4. Semiotics,
  5. Sign,
  6. Signifier,
  7. Signified,
  8. an iconic sign,
  9. an indexical sign,
  10. a symbolic sign,
  11. Code,
  12. Dominant Signifier,
  13. Anchorage,
  14. Paradigm,
  15. Syntagm,
  16. Signifcation,
  17. Denotation,
  18. Connotation,
  19. Myth,
  20. Dominant Ideology,
  21. A radical text
  22. A reactionary text.