| Questions | What went well? | What could be improved? | What I am going to do to make the improvements |
| 1. 5/9 | Good analysis of the product that is clear and sometimes engages with how meanings are constructed by specific signs. | More perceptive concepts in analysis and diversity in meanings | practice unseen essay questions and focus on including more theoretical frameworks |
| 2. 9/12 | Good understanding of the theoretical framework that has appropriate explanations of issues of representation in media products. | use of subject specific terminology throughout. | revise contextual factors of products and terminology that correlates |
| 3. 9/9 | Good analysis of the product that is detailed and critically engages with the feminist theory of male gaze and how they relate to the CSP. | more theory links and maybe juxtapose to male gaze | revise other similar theories to link and/or contrast |
| 4. 16/20 | Judgements and conclusions regarding the validity of genre theory are perceptive and fully supported with detailed reference to specific aspects of the CSP | draw more detailed and perceptive conclusions regarding the theory | practice essays to develop drawing judgements linking theorist and csp’s |
| 5. 6/6 | good knowledge of key terms | a more solidified understanding of terms | revise specific terms |
| 6. 8/9 | knowledge and understanding of the influences of social and cultural contexts and subject specific terminology | use specific data to support points | memories both qualitative and quantitative data for newspapers |
| 7. 17/20 | judgments and conclusions that are consistently well supported by relevant examples and appropriate evaluation of the extent to which the film industry demonstrates diversity in production and distribution. | use specific data to support points | memories both qualitative and quantitative data for the film industry |
overall mark = 70/84 = A