| Questions | What went well? | What could be improved? | What I am going to do to make the improvements |
| 1 | Question 1 went well because I used ideas of theorists and analysed the product rather than describing it. | further detail, include more ideas of theorists | Question 1 is unseen so I cannot revise specific products, however I can Look back over theorists and their ideologies in high detail as well as do many past papers, as I would not have seen the product. |
| 2 | not much, had a alright introduction with a few statistics and details | More writing, more detail, more info and theorists need to be used as well as contexts | Revise more on contexts as im not to keen on this topic, revise theorists ideology and look over csp. |
| 3 | Analysation of score | more info about laura mulveys gaze and how it links to the csp | Revise this topic in specific as well as look over csps in high detail |
| 4 | Good detail about the CSP itself with stats | Link it to the question, more about neale and how the csp links to his genre theory | Look over key theorists |
| 5 | I knew all three terms and their meanings | Did not know the theory asked about | Look over every theory in high detail ensuring marks if it does come up in exam |
| 6 | Good knowledge about the newspapers themselves | Not enough about contexts and etc. | look over different contexts and how different media forms can impact or reflect them. |
| 7 | | Not enough writing, write more about csp, more about industry | Look over both the csp and the film industry in general to gain high detail about it. |
