Category Archives: Essays

Filters

Author:
Category:

ghostown

Forms of political protests:
– Attempts to change laws or legislation
– Organised political movements
– Public protests
– Petitions
– Marches

Antonio Gramsci: Italian philosopher writing in the 1930s

The strange afterlife of Antonio Gramsci's “Prison Notebooks” | The  Economist

Gramsci is best known for his theory of cultural hegemony, which describes how the state and ruling capitalist class – the bourgeoisie – use cultural institutions to maintain power in capitalist societies.


Key Terms:
● Hegemonic: dominant, ruling-class, power-holders
● Hegemonic culture: the dominant culture
● Cultural hegemony: power, rule, or domination maintained by ideological and cultural means.
● Ideology: worldview – beliefs, assumptions and values
● Cultural hegemony functions by framing the ideologies of the dominant social group as the only legitimate
ideology.
● The ideologies of the dominant group are expressed and maintained through its economic, political, moral,
and social institutions (like the education system and the media).
● These institutions socialise people into accepting the norms, values and beliefs of the dominant social
group.
● As a result, oppressed groups believe that the social and economic conditions of society are natural and
inevitable, rather than created by the dominant group.

Margaret Thatcher:
● Prime Minister 1979-1990
● Militant campaigner for middle-class interests
● In an 1978 interview: ‘British national identity
could be swamped by people with different
culture’
● Hardline attitude towards immigrantion
● Conservative Manifesto: ‘firm immigration control
for the future is essential if we are to achieve
good community relations’
● British Nationality Act of 1981: introduced a
series of increasingly tough immigration
procedures and excluded Asian people from
entering Britain.

Blinded by the light

Blinded by the Light: (Gurinder Chadha, UK, 2019)

This is a Targeted Close Study product for which you will need to focus on the following areas ofthe Theoretical Framework:
• Media Industries
Students are not required to watch the film for the assessment.

TASK 1: Use this post (and the links provided) to build up your own post and notes in preparation for the unseen question that you will take in class. CATEGORIES: NEA, INSTITUTION & EXAM PREP

Blinded by the Light is an example of low-medium budget film making. Students do not need to watch the film but will need to be familiar with the production context and distribution
materials including:
• website (Bend it Networks)
• website (Warners)
posters
trailer
• social media presence (Twitter, Instagram, facebook etc).
The film should only be studied in relation to Media Industries

Media Industries

Blinded by the Light is an example of a US/UK co-production and distribution. Its distributor New Line Cinema is associated with ‘indie’ films although it is a subsidiary of Warner Brothers Pictures, part of the global conglomerate, WarnerMedia.

• Blinded by the Light is a low-mid budget production ($15m) co-funded by New Line Cinema (an American production studio owned by Warner Brothers Pictures Group) and independent
production companies including Levantine Films. Bend it Films and Ingenious Media.
• Identification of how Blinded by the Light is characteristic of a low-mid budget release, considering production, distribution and circulation
• The role of the use of Bruce Springsteen’s music in getting the film financed and in the marketing of the film
• The use of film festivals in finding distribution deals for films
• Use of traditional marketing and distribution techniques; trailers, posters, film festivals etc.
• Marketing techniques such as use of genre, nostalgia, identity, social consciousness
• Distribution techniques – reliance on new technology; VOD, streaming
• Regulation of the industry through BBFC (British Board of Film Classification).
• Regulation including Livingstone and Lunt

The Importance of Film Festivals

The following link discusses the use of a film festival to secure a distribution deal.

The Importance of recognisable Generic Conventions (and the use of familiar music)

Blinded by the Light has been described as a feelgood jukebox musical film using the music of Bruce Springsteen.
This link offers ideas about the importance of genre and this link about the use of recognisable music in the marketing of the film,
It was directed by Gurinder Chada, a British director known for Bend it Like Beckham

Social, economic and cultural contexts

Blinded by the Light is characteristic of contemporary cultural production in its use of new technology at production and distribution stages, reflecting shifting patterns of audience consumption. As a low-mid budget film, it can be considered in its economic context having a mix of independent and major production and distribution contexts targeting a different audience to ‘indie’ and high budget films.

These videos show how directors, their past work and the ideas they aim to communicate can be important in film marketing.

It is based on the ‘true story’ of a Pakistani boy growing up in the UK in the 1980s. These links demonstrate how the historical context, nostalgia and British-Asian identity is used in the promotion of the film.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/aug/29/my-film-blinded-by-the-light-memoirbritish-pakistani-cinema

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2019/jul/27/sarfraz-manzoor-bruce-springsteen-and-amolakchanged-my-life

Butler essay

Judith Butler describes gender as “an identity instituted through a stylized repetition of acts”. In other words, it is something learnt through repeated performance. How useful is this idea in understanding gender is represented in both the Score and Maybelline advertising campaigns?

In this essay, I am going to analyse and evaluate how gender is represented in the Score and Maybelline adverts we have studied in and outside of school. I will argue that the way that gender is represented in the Score advert conforms to the gender stereotypes of the 60s that we have thought to have “moved on from”. Contrastingly, I am going to argue that the advert Maybelline “That Boss Life” (2018) has a progressive view on gender representation because it seems to support to David Gauntlet’s concept that gender is fluid and presented throughout signs and expression.

Firstly, in SCP 4 (Maybelline’s That Boss Life advert, produced in 2018; promoting a mascara) there is a significant change in the way gender and identity is represented and gender is presented as fluid and free to self expression further supporting Butler’s ideas, in the ad there are three characters, the bell boy, Shayla and Manny Gutierrez: Maybelline’s first inclusion of a man in their campaigns, “Maybelline’s first-ever partnership with a man as the star of a campaign. Manny’s encouraging everyone, no matter their gender, to “lash like a boss.” Through the cosmetic industry doing this it encourages a shift in the outdated stereotypes that makeup is specifically for women and that men should be allowed to express their identity throughout the application of makeup, and show a more feminine side to their masculinity or present themselves completely as feminine; trying to reduce the amount of toxic masculinity widely presented throughout men claiming they can not wear cosmetic products. This is cleverly expanded on by the use of the bell boy, as he turns from someone you could easily forget in the advert at the beginning to using the makeup when the two stars of the advert turn “Bossed up” showing men who we have no insight to their sexual preference can also accept men coming to terms of makeup being androgynous and use it. Manny or widely referred to as Manny MUA is also a very popular influencer or makeup guru (with a following of over 4 Million), by using someone with a high platform and a counter-typical choice of a model in a makeup advert can also attract more audience to the advert as his viewers would want to see his success as the first man in Maybelline’s campaign, even any haters would watch- by doing so the advert plants this subliminal message taking society one step closer to seeing that gender is a constructed idea and a product shouldn’t alter the expression of someone. Furthermore, Manny could be associated as a radical representation of gender and masculinity which connotes to Judith Butlers theory of gender being performative. The term Toxic masculinity can be used describing reactions from specific men as the product “promotes the dangerous sentiment that men are supposed to adhere to hyper masculine culture.” and presents people against Butler’s ideas and leaning more towards Laura Mulvey’s idea that gender is fixed. Additionally, the advert displays the product as being gender neutral as the whole presentation of the product connotes to luxury; the golden suitcase, the New York apartment described as everything, the golden packaging, and the room transforming into full golden and glam after the two use the product. All these features create a semantic field of wealth and luxury for the user to associate with the product- despite their gender, further enhancing the products androgynousness and promoting Butler’s ideas that gender is fluid and is more based on a expression of signs.

However, in SCP 3 (Score), an advert promoting male hair groom (note how it’s promoting it towards men, anti-progressive towards Butler’s ideas as it suggests females can’t express themselves with masculine hairstyles and are fixed to a lengthy style). The advert contains a man being lifted up by numerous females who fit the theory of the male gaze (Laura Mulvey), a theory that women are used in adverts in a sexualised, reactionary way to attract male attention and increase sales by exploiting a women’s sexuality. Although the man is surrounded by females he is still the one with authority and on the top- possibly a connotation to the patriarchal mindset that men are more powerful or have more status, again could reflect the way genders are treated throughout work and the difference in the wage gap; this can be backed up as in the 1960’s females were still fighting for equality in society, compared to the the Maybelline advert that is based after 2nd and 3rd wave feminism where adverts (some still are bad to this day) should more focus on how women are treated and exploited in the industry- this is spoken about in the third wave of feminism and how Naomi Wolf, challenged and re-contextualized some of the definitions of femininity that grew out of that earlier period, they are more accepting of newer ideas and of the idea of fluidity when it comes to gender as time goes on. This shows not only how time has changed but the difference that it makes with the representation of gender throughout the years in marketing campaigns, while older ones are more likely to be anti-progressive and cater more towards outdated stereotypes and ideologies- going against Butler’s ideas: While newer ones are more likely to be more inclusive with the idea of fluidity in gender and be more progressive to break stereotypical stigmas (such as the ones we can ink in to each score- SCP 4 being men can’t wear makeup and SCP 3 being women can’t use hair groom). The advert contains women wearing quite revealing short outfits in a jungle setting, exploiting their appearance for the benefit of the male gaze- the setting however seems to be a jungle which the man seems appropriately dressed for while the women wouldn’t be wearing that in a jungle, as well as the man holding a weapon- this gives us a huge insight to how corrupt the ideas of gender were back in the 1960s as the women in the advert are represented very sexually and unrealistically, in abundance almost making them seem replaceable or reliant on the one man while the man has a weapon asserting his power (once again reflecting on the patriarchal society that the campaign was created and advertised in). Clearly the advert goes against Judith Butler’s ideas due to it’s fixed reactionary outdated representation of women vs men which gives us an insight on how times have changed and the effects of the waves of feminism.

Maybelline doesn’t have many negatives to pick out on, however, one we could note about is that Manny MUA is given very stereotypical gay slang and presented much more feminine, as much as the advert including a man is a huge step forward we need to take account that he is already presenting himself or shown as feminine in the advert- this creates a slight stigma that makeup is still for femininity rather for straight/masculinity.

In conclusion, both SCP’s give a extremely different however useful insight to the expression of gender and how it links, compliments or disagrees with Butler’s ideas. Through score I can see with effects of the corruption of society takes a huge play in the advert while in maybelline I can see how society and idea’s on gender have progressed and further promoted/backed up Butler’s idea on the fluidity of gender.

Score and Maybelline essay

Judith Butler describes gender as “an identity instituted through a stylized repetition of acts”. In other words, it is something learnt through repeated performance. How useful is this idea in understanding gender is represented in both the Score and Maybelline advertising campaigns?

In this essay i am going to discuss how Judith Butler’s idea of identity being something that is performed is very useful to understanding gender in the Maybelline and Score adverts.

I would suggest that gender as performance by Butler shown in the quote  ‘nobody is a gender from the start.’ and that our gender identity and sexuality is ever-changing depending on the context of the situation. She expresses how gender is fluid, changeable, plural, and “a set of categories to be played out and performed by individual subjects in individual moments in time and space” implying that we are able to change our gender/ identityand shouldn’t be regarded as just one identity.

Futhermore in the past women were seen as a object of a man, which is suggested by Laura Mulvey and so their identity was fixed as being there to proivde for the man and the family and not able to do anything else.

These theoretical approaches around gender, feminism and representation can be linked to both CSP 3 (Score) and CSP 4 (Maybelline).

Firstly, in the Score advert there are a number of theories relating to how the characters in it are portrayed. It is created by considering the social and historical context of what was happening at the time. For example during the 1970’s there was emerging acceptance of homosexuality and a slight lead towards change of gender roles. In this CSP it is evident that the company doesn’t support these new ideas and that you are born a gender and sexuality (heterosexual) and this doesn’t change throughout your life time. Judith Butler suggests that the “lack of alternative representations in media helps reinforce heteronormativity” which could be an explanation as to why the society was unwilling to change and the Score advert (CSP 3) further enforces heteronormativity.

However, in the Maybelline advert (CSP 4) there is a significant change in the way that gender and sexuality is portrayed. It features 3 character Manny Mau, Shayla and a bell boy. Manny is could be seen as a countertype to your stereotypical makeup artist for a few reasons. Firstly, he is a male, in the 1960’s if a male would have wanted to be in involved in ‘feminine’ activities it would have been frowned upon and the audience positioning of such advert would have been non-existent. Secondly he is a homosexual which back in the day, this trait wouldn’t have been featured for the public.

Butler’s work is very useful in allowing us to understand CSP 4 because it is clear that Manny doesn’t portray a masculine look, rather more of a feminine kind with a gentle posture. Butler says that men don’t have to perform to the masculine standards and can perform however they like and that their gender can somewhat be shifted according to a situation eg. getting ready for a party and wanting to get glammed up, proving that gender is performed.

Another idea i would like to raise is about the different waves of feminism which can be seen in both CSP’s. There are 4 different waves of feminism. The first wave of feminism occurred in the early 20th century with movements such as the suffragettes and the international council of women. Virgina Woolf was part of first wave feminism said that women don’t have equal opportunities and were encouraged not to pursue their ambitions but instead stay home and do housework. This encourgaed a second wave years later.

The score advert (CSP 3) was created in the times of the 2nd wave of feminism which was about was about civil rights, equal rights for women (equal pay, decriminalisation of abortion, exposes mechanisms of patriarchy). Although this advert doesn’t appear to support this ideas it does however give us an insight into how corrupt situations were in the 60’s due to the way women are shown. Jean Kilbourne suggested that the way in which females are seen in adverts almost encourages idea of abuse, institutional behaviour stems from sexualised female adverts. Leading it to be seen as acceptable because it is the constructed reality that media influences who we become.

Next came the third wave feminism in the early 21st centuary when the Maybelline advert was created. The third wave feminism included things like intersectionality, raunch culture and queer theory. I believe that intersectionality plays an important part in the representation of a modern day world. Shayla (the woman in the Maybelline advert) is what would be described as a positive stereotype because she doesn’t fit the ‘ideal’ beauty standards but still goes out there being confident. Additionally she is a black woman which can be seen as double burden ‘in a postcolonial context, women carry the double burden of being colonized by imperial powers and subordinated by colonial and native men’. But Maybelline wanted to show how they are breaking free from stereotypes and having a less selective representation, appealing to all kind of people across the world leading it to be a very successful business.

In conclusion, I believe that in both CSP’s gender and sexuality is presented very clearly, showing the beliefs surrounding these areas in a very coherent way linking in with Judith Butler’s theories nicely about how gender is something that is performed through actions as seen by the way they dress, the positioning of the characters and interrelationships portrayed in the adverts.

media essay

acts.” In other words, it is something learnt through repeated performance. 

How useful is this idea in understanding gender is represented in both the Score and Maybelline advertising campaigns? 

In the essay, my aim is to present how feminism and gender performance such as Butler and the representation of such topics in the two SCP’s, score, and Maybeline, which were presented to me. during my essay I will argue that over time, the media have changed their perspective on gender and feminism and how now there is an even larger number of people who are supporting the ‘new media’ and how Judith butlers work can be applied to such advertisements. 

Judith Butler talks about how in society, how gender roles play a part in day-to-day life. Butler suggests that specific qualities and other features do not define what gender you are and that gender is a choice. Butler suggests that gender is fluid, changeable, plural a set of categories to be played out and performed by individual subjects in individual moments in time and space. Butler implies things like lipstick lesbian, butch and femme and girly girl and how these traits determine the gender of the people based on attributes behavior and that being born male or female will indefinitely be the way a person acts or chooses to associate to. 

In SCP 3, score, we are presented with an ad promoting male hair groom. In the advert, the male is being carried be the females and although he is outnumbered, he is still the higher authority in the ad. In the 1960’s females where still very much below men in the social hierarchy. as such it can be examined productively by considering its historical, social, and cultural contexts, particularly as it relates to gender roles, sexuality, and the historical context of advertising techniques the audience of this ad is going to be middle-aged men who wish to look good and get the attention from the woman that the male in the add has. The second wave of feminism relates to this as it started to question things that are wrong with the way the ad is presented. ‘sexism was coined by analogy with the term racism in the American civil rights movement in the early 1960s. Defined simply, sexism refers to the systematic ways in which men and women are brought up to view each other antagonistically, on the assumption that the male is always superior to the female Indeed, feminist critical thought became much more prominent and pronounced during the counter cultural movements of the late 1960’s and early 1970’s, which heralded, among other changes: the facilitation of birth control and divorce, the acceptance of abortion and homosexuality, the abolition of hanging and theatre censorship, and the Obscene Publications Act (1959)  All this should not be seen as a straightforward displacement of dominant conservative attitudes ‘-Johnathon Dollimore, this shows how people were wanting a change and not wanting to continue the idea that woman must listen to men and must cater to the male genders every need. This however was starting to be abolished due to the innovative ideas being accepted worldwide by many people and how they were trying to modernize the way woman where treated and used in the media to sell product to males.  

In SCP 4, it is an advert promoting a mascara. In the ad we see that there are both a male and a female. “Maybelline’s first-ever partnership with a man as the star of a campaign. Manny’s encouraging everyone, no matter their gender, to “lash like a boss.”  this shows how the cosmetic industry are trying to change gender stereotypes and not adhere to the usual toxic masculinity and the idea that men cannot use make up, this is seen when they come back to the hotel room and the bellboy is now using the make up this shows that people are now more accepting of the idea that men can use makeup. Also, the fact that they have a woman of color in the ad shows how time has changed and emphasizes the differences among women due to race, ethnicity, class, nationality, religion and how now all these factors should not affect the was a woman is treated. This is spoken about in the third wave of feminism and how Naomi Wolf, challenged and re-contextualized some of the definitions of femininity that grew out of that earlier period. In particular, the third wave sees women’s lives as intersectional, demonstrating a pluralism towards race, ethnicity, class, religion, gender, and nationality when discussing feminism and they are more accepting of newer ideas and of the idea of fluidity when it comes to gender. Things such as “promotes the dangerous sentiment that men are supposed to adhere to hyper masculine culture.” and “he encourages people to think of makeup as genderless. he thinks boys deserve just as much cosmetic recognition as their female counterparts.” shows how people are trying to advertise the idea that gender isn’t fixed and so certain things shouldn’t be applied to one gender. 

To conclude, butlers theory and feminism can both be identified in the two SCP’s I was presented with. It is seen in the use of a female person of color and a male being used in a cosmetic ad to move forward with the idea that gender and not letting your gender define who you are.  

essay

Judith Butler describes gender as “an identity instituted through a stylized repetition of acts”. In other words, it is something learnt through repeated performance.

How useful is this idea in understanding gender is represented in both the Score and Maybelline advertising campaigns?

I would suggest Gender as Performance by Butler. In many ways Judith Butler counterpoints earlier ideas of gender representation, for example, some of the ideas presented by Laura Mulvey seem to suggest that gender is fixed – male/female. Butler suggests that gender is fluid, changeable, plural a set of categories to be played out and performed by individual subjects in individual moments in time and space. Judith creates the idea that there aren’t specific aspects or qualities that make you gender specific, but that gender is only a title . You can choose and change your gender, and that whatever you do will not change who you are and who you identify yourself as. Judith Butler writes to identify and break gender stereotypes, such as football being a male sport and/or makeup being feminine. She states, ‘Our bodies or sex do not define our gendered identities.’ – Meaning your identity is defiant of your gender, not your outward appearance or DNA. And additionally that ‘Our gendered identities are not naturally given, but constructed through repetition and ritual.’ – meaning the way we construct ourselves by gender, is only the persona that society wish to see. From the moment a child is born and its gender is announced, a persona of how that child should perform is apparent. When instead that child should be able to present themselves in a way they choose to, not the way the media has influenced them to do so.

The advert Score, created in 1967, advertises the idea that if you use this hair cream you will “get what you’ve always wanted”, and your attractiveness will increase. Judith Butlers notes on the representation of gender in society and the characteristics of gender as the sense of dominance and power from the male gender is clearly represented in this advert. Furthermore, it exemplifies the hair cream is a product for males and that men should be buying it. Controversially, the women seen in the alert are young and slim, wearing proposed sexualised outfits that reinforcing the idea of Laura Mulvey’s ‘male gaze’. As the advert was curated during the time of the discrimination against homosexuality, the idea of the male only attracting females by ‘using the hair cream’ would have been the only accepted result. Score is seen to focus in on the ideology of men being the dominant gender and women being the inferior. It can be viewed that the woman are parading the male protagonist through the ‘jungle’ (the set of which can be presumed that they are in). This advert is presenting males being superior to females , something Judith Butler argues and frowns upon. Judith statement ‘Our gendered identities are not naturally given but constructed through repetition and ritual.’ relates to Score as at the time of the Score creation, society would have wished to see this style of advertisement; patriarchal and contentious.

Moreover, the advert, Big shot created by Maybelline in 2020, challenges the representation of gender, and goes against the stereotypes of makeup being for women alone. Maybelline’s collection ‘That Bold Life’ features the advertisement of their new ‘Big Shot Mascara’. Maybelline’s first-ever partnership with a male as the star of a campaign, sparked interest and applause, due to the stereotypes of a typical female being the star, being cast aside. Manny Gutierrez, makeup guru and icon, has following of over 4million. Manny MUA, of whom identifies as male is seen to be using the product. This allows for the generalisation of males enjoying makeup, to be apparent. It is counter-typical to the ‘ideal’ model who would be used in a cosmetic advert, as those who use and wear make-up are considered typically feminine. It can be noted as a radical representation of gender and masculinity, and additionally connotates to Judith Butler’s theory of gender being ‘performative‘. With a large company such as Maybelline, highlighting a male star for the advertisement, other companies could potentially be influenced to collaborate with this diversity. Manny wrote “Honestly I believe that men can wear makeup, teach makeup, and vlog about it just as much as girls can and I am fighting for that equality with my channel”, in his YouTube profile. The public opinion and cliché ideas following who can represent a brand is the only thing stopping more people like Manny to have their debut of talent shown off. Despite this, the backlash of which could come with casting a male makeup representative, should be ignored and those who do objectify should be educated on the importance of equality. Manny also stated he was “Thrilled to be able to work with a global brand like Maybelline that is recognizing male influencer talent and is willing to shine a spotlight on it.” Manny’s supporters praise his work and are sure to be a suspected target audience of Maybelline’s new product. Contrasting with this, Score’s era of creation would have highly dismissed an obvious homosexual man being featured in an advertisement. This demonstrates how society has developed overtime but also that more, and more people voicing their opinions on the ‘cancel’ and dismissive culture. This has allowed for acceptance to be apparent within society.

In conclusion, both CSP’s display gender and sexuality stereotypes as well as linking to Butler’s theory and representing gender as an identity. Both Butler’s scriptures and the representations of the adverts demonstrate the development of acceptance within advertising and media. With Judith emphasizing that society is the only force labelling gender stereotypes upon people, those who wish to display themselves; not by their gender, can feel empowered to perform the way they wish to, not how they are told to.

Essay – Gender

Judith Butler describes gender as “an identity instituted through a stylized repetition of acts.” In other words, it is something learnt through repeated performance. 

How useful is this idea in understanding how gender is represented in both the Score and Maybelline advertising campaigns? 

In this essay, I am going to analyse and evaluate how gender is represented in both the Score and Maybelline adverts we have studied. I will argue that the way that gender is represented in the Score advert is alarming and conforms to the outdated gender stereotypes of the 60s. Contrastingly, I am going to argue that the advert Maybelline produced in 2018 (That Boss Life) has a progressive view on gender because it seems to adhere to David Gauntlett’s concept that gender is fluid.  

Judith Butler believes in society, gender roles play a part in the day to day life. Butler suggests that specific qualities and features don’t define what gender you are and that gender is a choice. Butler suggests that gender is fluid, changeable, plural a set of categories to be played out and performed by individual subjects in individual moments in time and space. Butler suggests things like lipstick lesbian (“Lipstick lesbian” is slang for a lesbian who exhibits a greater amount of feminine gender attributes, such as wearing makeup, dresses or skirts), butch and femme (Butch and femme – French language, meaning woman) are terms used in the lesbian subculture to ascribe or acknowledge a masculine (butch) or feminine (femme).) and girly-girl (Girly girl is a term for a girl or woman who chooses to dress and behave in a traditionally feminine style, such as wearing pink, using make-up, using perfume, dressing in skirts, dresses and blouses, and talking about relationships and other activities which are associated with the traditional gender role of a girl) and how these traits determine the gender of the people based on attributes behaviour and that being born male or female will indefinitely be the way a person acts or chooses to associate to. Judith was part of third wave of feminism, where she worked towards stopping women from being objectified and being called names such as “slut” for showing off skin. Her work helped to normalise Raunch culture, where women play into their stereotypical gender role in a way which empors themselves. By choosing to show skin, and be sexy, women are taking power of their own sexuality. This culture is a massive part of the third wave of feminism as it is seen as empowering and proggressive. The idea at the heart of raunch culture is that by taking power of their own sexual appearance, men no longer have a say in how women ‘should’ look.

Looking specifically at Score, its opinions on gender identity are clearly in line with Gauntlett’s notion that gender is constructed. The advert came out during second-wave feminism, where feminist critical thinking became much more prominent and pronounced. Despite this, the advert is fairly traditional in its views towards gender. This is evident through the mise-en-scene of the advert. By choosing to select 5 young, skinny, attractive female models the advert is suggesting that women must be young and beautiful to be desirable. Jean Kilbourne stated that “You almost never see a photograph of a woman considered beautiful that hasn’t been Photoshopped”, and this statement applies to this advert. Additionally, the one man in the advert is being carried by the women as if he’s some kind of God. He is above them and sitting comfortably, suggesting his power and superiority. By showing the man being carried by the women, it creates a mental concept of masculine power and control. Interestingly, the man is shown wearing a watch (which suggests he is reliable, responsible, and sophisticated), whilst the women in the advert aren’t wearing watches. The man is also a lot older than the women, which links to the idea that gender is constructed because older men are often seen as desirable by modern media. There is no doubt that the representation of men and women in the advert conforms to the constructed identity of gender in the 60s. The girls are objectified, wearing sexualised clothing that appeals to the male gaze (a term coined by Laura Mulvey to describe when women in media are viewed from the eyes of a heterosexual man. These women are usually represented as passive objects of male desire). The women skirts are short, and their matching shirts are tied across their chests, revealing as much skin as was allowed in a 1960s advert. Their tanned bodies, black eyeliner and luscious hair also conform to the constructed identity of women in the 60s. Similarly, the man is dressed in a short-sleeved shirt, carrying a gun, a symbol of power, violence, and masculinity. Guns are also phallic symbols (any object that resembles or might be taken as a representation of the penis), which may be one of the reasons that the man is carrying it in the advert. The indexical sign of the ad – the tagline “get what you’ve always wanted” is especially problematic because it objectifies women, suggesting that they are objects which can be bought and sold. This relates to the ad’s opinion on gender because women were frequently objectified and treated as sex objects. Therefore, by presenting women in this way, the ad is adhering to the constructed identity of women in the 60s. Furthermore, the indexical sign, animal skin, is evidence of his success as a hunter, and it suggests to the audience that they too will have success if they wear Score. Also, the man’s short-sleeved shirt reveals his muscular arms. Muscular arms are a symbol of strength, dominance, and power. The binary representation of masculinity and femininity is obvious. Liesbet van Zoonen argued femininity is traditionally represented as passive and subservient, whilst masculinity is traditionally represented as dominant and powerful – the women and men in this advert certainly reflect that identity.  

Contrastingly, Maybelline’s advert, That Boss Life, takes a more open-minded approach to gender. This is most evident through the choice of model, Manny Mua, who is an openly gay beauty blogger. Manny adopts a more gender-neutral look, wearing full make-up, and wearing feminine clothing. This links to the idea that humans are becoming less and less binary. It’s no longer expected for humans to fit into a constructed gender identity. Harry Styles stated that he wants to ‘dispel the myth of a binary existence.’ This is an example of how the once tall barriers of toxic masculinity, homophobia, and gender constructs are being broken down. Styles says “I’ll often see a colour on a flower or a specific wallpaper and think ‘Oh, I wanna put that on my nails’”. The Maybelline advert attactches to a similar viewpoint to Styles, believing that gender is fluid and unfixed. Maybelline uses a number of signifiers to show this. The most obvious signifier is the colour gold. It’s a gender-neutral colour, and it symbolises luxury. The advert also uses clothing to break down gender stereotypes. Both the man and woman in the advert are wearing similar clothing, and this clothing changes from casual to luxurious mid way through the ad. The dialogue in the advert also adheres to a more gender fluid identity. Manny speaks in a stereotypically feminine tone and says ‘camp’ things such as “giiiiirl, this room is everything”.

In conclusion, I believe that the two CSP’s we studied are juxtaposed in their representations of gender, with Score taking a stereotypical approach to gender, and Maybelline taking a more non-binary approach. This can be seen through the power dynamics at play between men and women. In CSP 3 (Score) the man in the advert is presented as strong, dominant, and on a higher social class to women. Whereas, in CSP 4 (Maybelline) women and men are as equals, with stereotypical gender constructs being disregaded in favour for a more non-binary approach.

Score and Maybelline Essay

Judith Butler describes gender as “an identity instituted through a stylized repetition of acts”. In other words, it is something learnt through repeated performance. 

How useful is this idea in understanding gender is represented in both the Score and Maybelline advertising campaigns? 

This idea is particularly useful in understanding gender representation in both Score and Maybelline advert campaigns, this is because gender and identity are something that can be changed- as David Gauntlett identified, the fluidity of identity gives ideas that you can choose to identify as the binary ‘stereotype’ male or female, or you can identify as more fluid- Non-Binary, Transgender, Gender-fluid etc. Essentially, gender is not the fixed set of rules it once used to be, which Judith Butler suggests. She also presents ideas that identity is just a social construct you are meant to abide to so you can be essentially categorised. Now, in more modern days, people are starting to realise that the world does not have to be so binary, and you are allowed to be more fluid, and that there is not a set of ground rules that separates males to females and identifies what you can and cannot do as a specific gender and you cannot cross that line. 

In the Score advertising campaign, straight away you can see a patriarchal dominance over the 5 women draped around the focal point- a man. The word ‘masculine’ is used in the description in the phrase ‘Score’s famous masculine scent.’ This indicates the fact that if you use the product, not only will you not look good and appeal to women, but you will also appear masculine AND smell masculine. The man is also being held up on a pedestal by the women while holding a gun, indicating that he is ‘above all’  Straight away you can see a sense of toxic masculinity that many males were a part of in the 1970s, linking back to fluidity of identity, you can see the time difference and how people in the 20th century agreed that you were either male or female no in-between, and you had to act like one due to a stylized repetition of acts that society agreed made you a specific gender. 

In the Maybelline advertising campaign, they advocate gender, sexuality, race, and social class. Two of the main representations are reversed gender stereotypes and sexuality, which completely contrasts the Score advertisement. They were the first beauty advertisement that cast a male, which was a huge step in the right direction to some sort of equality. Having a male, who is openly gay, in a beauty advert, allows other males and people who might not identify as female, the stereotype for beauty products, to feel comfortable purchasing the products. This differs to the Score advertisement as it attempts to eliminate the toxic masculinity that comes with beauty and cosmetic products, whereas the Score advert promotes their product to be for males and males only. 

Similar to the Maybelline advert, Harry Styles, a singer and an actor, has recently launched his own beauty/cosmetic line. Harry Styles himself, says “Me seeing a colour on a flower or a wallpaper or something and thinking ‘Oh, I wanna put that on my nails’”. Which is a clear representation of breaking the social construct of gender and toxic masculinity, as Harry, a male, enjoys painting his nails. With him releasing this beauty line, it can be seen that he is trying to break the barrier even more than it has been broken, and with a large following, he is more likely to achieve this.  

Another major thing in the Score advertisement is that the man held up on the pedestal is seen to be wearing a watch. While this may not be an important thing in modern day adverts, the fact that none of the 5 Caucasian women are wearing a watch, almost hinting at the fact that women are so subordinate to men that they do not deserve education or even an accessory that helps you with day-to-day life. Known theorist, Virginia Woolf created a character for a book as famous novelist, William Shakespeare’s sister, and used it as a metaphor for if William were born a female, the world would have missed a huge part of history. This highlights the fact that we have most likely missed other major or crucial parts of history as women were not allowed to be educated or read and write, the had immense potential but could not use it as they were females and did not have the same opportunities as males. This is known as the First Wave Feminism, where the suffragettes, Suffragists, and the International Alliance of Women (IAW), and many other women around the world started to realise that they should have the same opportunities and chances at success as men- they did not like the fact that they were extremely subordinate to males. Secondly, the watch can connote to high social class, and only people of that social class can purchase the item being advertised- essentially, if you buy the Liquid Hair Cream, you are going to be well respected, and even if you are a male, if you do not wear or buy it, you will be slightly more subordinate to men who do wear it. 

On the other hand, in the Maybelline advert, there is a lot of Second Wave and Third Wave feminism seen with the reversed gender stereotypes, inclusive sexuality, race and social class. With having both a male and a female putting on the mascara, this gives off ideas that women are less subordinate to men as they once were as they are sharing the same beauty cosmetic product. There was a massive trend in 2017 on Twitter called the #MeToo movement where women from all around the world shared similar experiences with sexual assault and other major incidents that have been controlled by a man. As Simone De Beauvoir comments, ‘If you’re around long enough, you will see that every victory turns into a defeat.’ Which indicates that even when the Suffragettes etc managed to get women to be able to vote, we are still controlled and do not have total power over ourselves. In the Third Wave Feminism, Naomi Wolf explains that there is a lot more fluidity in sexuality and ways women are allowed to express themselves, which is a substantial difference to the Second Wave Feminism. It is also more multi-dimensional, which brings me back to Judith Butler saying that gender was never there from the start, it is believed to be who you are but in reality, it’s constructed based on things you like and act. 

As Jean Kilbourne makes clear, women are overly objectified in many adverts, but mostly print ones. The Score advert is a prime example of this as the five women in it are wearing little clothing that shows off their body for men to enjoy looking at, which reinforces Laura Mulvey’s theory of the Male Gaze and how men look at women in an extremely oversexualising way. Alternatively, the Maybelline video advert contains no sexualising of women at all and includes males also getting ‘Bossed Up’ to equalise the gender stereotypes. 

To conclude, I believe that both Score and Maybelline adverts are juxtaposed by using women’s sexuality and gender. While Maybelline’s advertisement advocates gender, sexuality, race and social class, Score’s advert is all about men being the superior gender and only being able to buy the product if you’re of the correct social class. Theorists such as, Laura Mulvey, Judith Butler, David Gauntlett and many others previously mentioned all have great ideas of identity, how you express yourself and feminism that helps analyse the two adverts further. 

Essay score vs maybelline

Judith Butler describes gender as “an identity instituted through a stylized repetition of acts”. In other words, it is something learnt through repeated performance, Butler suggest that gender is not fixed however it is reinforced consistently through none verbal communication, Judith creates the idea that there aren’t specific aspects or qualities that make you gender specific, but that gender is only a title . You can choose and change your gender, and that whatever you do will not change who you are and who you identify yourself as. Judith Butler writes to identify and break gender stereotypes such as football being a male sport and/or makeup being feminine. As seen in this quote “our gender identities are not fixed objects; they are constituted as a result of our behaviours” and again “Our bodies or sex do not define our gendered identities”. Most people believe that gender is simply divided into male and female, but Butler claims that this is not the case, and that this can lead to misrepresentation. For example, in the score commercial, women are sexualized and objectified, whereas in the Maybelline “boss up” commercial, there are a variety of identities. Butler is a gender theorist who claims that gender is a performance in which everyone is portraying their own gender and that it is a fluid of identity, a term created by David Gauntlett for his own. The usage of identification is not gender-based, and I’ll talk about how gender and identity are represented in the Score and Maybelline commercials.

In contrast to Butler, Laura Mulvey identifies the sexualisation of femininity and female characters compared to male characters that we identify with due to the lack of sexualisation and the addition of development and characteristics shown to deepen their character in a lot of games and movies, Mulvey stated that female characters are forced to identity as passive objects to be looked at and desired compared to men’s representation which is more focused on how “manly” and strong their characters are. She also believes that because the majority of movie directors, game developers, big artists, and key people in the media are men, we view media through their eyes, resulting in the male gaze. An example would be panning the camera on a sexualized female scene in a film, or exaggerations of female body parts in a media game to show more depth to the character. This isn’t to say that male characters can’t be sexualized; it’s simply that female sexualization is more prevalent. If someone substituted a boy for a popular oversexualized female stance, it would still be viewed through the male gaze. The assumption that a sexualized style of seeing strengthens men and sexualized women is supported by the masculine gaze.

As a historical artifact from 1967, the Score hair cream advertisement can be productively examined by considering its historical, social, and cultural contexts, particularly as it relates to gender roles, sexuality, and the historical context of advertising techniques. 1967 can be considered as a period of gradual change in western societies, with legislation concerning and changing attitudes toward the roles of women and men in society, something that the advertisement appears to address. The first wave of feminism can be summarized by a quote: “Sexism was coined by analogy with the term racism in the early 1960s in the American civil rights movement.” Simply put, sexism is the systematic conditioning of men and women to perceive each other negatively, based on the idea that the male is always superior to the female. The Score advert can be similarly linked to this idea because we can see a total of five female figures holding up the male figure giving us the assumption that the male is superior to the females. 

Furthermore, Gauntlett’s concept of identity fluidity, the ability to change how you present yourself in any way you want is known as fluidity of identity. If you don’t want to look a specific way, identity fluidity gives you the power to modify your appearance and how you see yourself as a person. Not only that, but fluidity of identity also entails the ability to shift your behavior to something that is preferred or that may be classified as normal. The ability to change who you are as a person, from how you look to how you act, is known as fluid of identity. Gender, for example, is fluid; you may choose who you want to be. Butler’s theory is supported by this, as he states, “Biological anatomies do not determine our gender.”She concludes that masculinity and femininity are not naturally occurring states, but rather are maintained by humans via daily behaviors, implying that a person is neither born male nor female, but their gender is defined by their daily actions. Gauntlett made a comment about how men and women are shown differently in the media. Throughout the twentieth century, for example, images of aggressive women taking control of their life were progressively replacing those of submissive housewives, as exemplified by the Spice Girls’ “girl power.” Men’s energetic and confident representations were giving way to a more contemplative and emotionally sensitive interpretation of masculinity. Despite the fact that old binary representations continue to appear on magazine front covers, there is now a “great diversity of identities.” As a result of our willingness to adapt to new cultural standards, we do not always have a permanent identity.

This theory is not implied in the score advertisement, but it can be seen in the Maybelline “boss up” advertisement. This is because in the Maybelline “boss up” advertisement, we can assume that the representation of the female gender has evolved over time, and we can make this assumption because the gender roles are suggested to be more equal. Within the advertisement, there is a homosexual male celebrity (Manny Mua) with what appears to be feminine traits, as well as a female character who is represented as feeling like a “boss” after using the product, which is found near the end of the advertisement. This can be used to refute the assumption of set gender roles, as well as the historical notion that men are superior to women.

Maybelline’s commercial is thought to represent the third and fourth waves of feminism. Naomi Wolf coined third wave feminism in response to the age gap between the 1960s and 1970s feminist movements, criticizing and re-contextualizing some of the resulting notions of femininity. When debating feminism, it saw women’s lives as intersecting and exhibited a plurality toward race, ethnicity, class, religion, gender, and nationality. It can be described as a “rebellion of younger women” against what they saw as elder feminists’ prescriptive, aggressive, and “sex negative” stance. The Maybelline ad exemplifies this concept since the female depiction in the ad is neither sexualized or objectified in any manner, implying that she defies the stereotype of what it means to be a ‘female,’ as suggested by the first wave of feminism.

In conclusion, I believe Butler’s definition of gender as “an identity instituted through a stylized repetition of acts” helps people understand how gender is represented more clearly in the Maybelline ad than in the score ad, due to the score ad opposing the idea that gender is not determined by biological genders.

EXAM ESSAY

Judith Butler describes gender as “an identity instituted through a stylized repetition of acts”. In other words, it is something learnt through repeated performance.

How useful is this idea in understanding gender is represented in both the ‘Score’ and ‘Maybelline’ advertising campaigns?

In this essay, I will be discussing representation in media. I believe that Judith Butler’s ideas about gender are very useful in understanding how gender is represented in both the ‘Score’ and ‘Maybelline’ advertising campaigns.
Judith Butler describes gender as “performative” and suggests that there can be no gender identity before gendered acts (daily practices, learned and performed based on cultural norms of femininity and masculinity), because the acts are constantly forming the identity and therefore nobody can be a gender before doing gendered acts. Butler argues that the dominance of heterosexuality representation in media maintains typical male and female identities as a social norm. This is harmful for individuals who “deviate” from gender norms and is harmful to those who participate in this heteronormative culture because it limits their capacity to empathize and create. She critiques the notion that gender exists inside the body and suggests that these gendered identities are realised through our desires, sexual contacts and physical expressions of love – they are not a fixed object and are created as a result of our behaviours. Similarly with Butler, Liesbet van Zoonen sees gender as dependent on social and historical context. She suggests that the meaning of gender is a “discursive struggle and negotiation, the outcome having far-reaching socio-cultural implications.”
None of these ideologies are associated with the ‘Score’ advert, which seems to be more connected with Laura Mulvey’s ‘male gaze’ theory – the idea of how typical, heterosexual men viewing media, sexualise and objectify women.
The ‘Score’ advert shows that if you buy their product, then you can attract lots of women. This is suggested in the strapline: “Get what you’ve always wanted” and the dominant signifier of a man surrounded by women. The costumes for the women are incredibly revealing and sexualising, and have connotations of voyeurism for heterosexual men. In the advert, the women at the back are gazing lustfully at the man – which insinuates that most women look at men wearing the product like this. Another woman, on the right, is looking proud, as though she is showing off the man and the final woman, on the left, is looking directly at the camera, which could connect the advert with the potential purchaser.
The ‘Score’ advert is an artefact from 1967, a period of slow transformation in western cultures with laws about and changing attitudes to gender roles, sexuality and the historical context of advertising techniques in society – something that this advert can be seen to overcome. Feminist critical thought was becoming much more prominent at this time, which later brought many changes including a greater acceptance of birth control, divorce, abortion and homosexuality.
This period is often termed as “second wave feminism” – set after the first wave of feminism, which was influenced by organisations such as: the British Women’s Suffrage Committee (1867), the International Council of Women (1888) and others who, in early part of the 20th Century, worked to get women the right to vote. The second wave passed many laws that helped women get more reproductive rights and equal pay in the work force. It also liberated women and changed their mindset. However, the second wave of feminism overlooked other aspects of diversity – their focus on sexism did not extend to include the consideration of intersectionality, resulting in a predominantly white woman’s movement.
Media is a loudspeaker that magnifies power relations, and it can either reinforce or expose those who have political and social power. Diversity in media matters because it brings attention to an otherwise underrepresented community and gives a voice to the otherwise voiceless. When a given minority or disadvantaged group is portrayed in the media in a positive light, stereotypes can be dismantled, and this is especially important for younger generations who are more directly exposed to this.
In his investigation into the fluidity of identity, David Gauntlett noted how the representation of gender in the media was beginning to break down the old binary definitions and was now offering a more diverse range of identities. Women, who were simply stereotyped as housewives and passive in the past, were now represented as empowered and assertive. Instead of the physical and combative masculine identity, men could now be seen as sensitive and introspective without any ridicule. In “That Boss Life”, Manny embodies the merging of masculinity and femininity. He wears typical masculine clothes, but his speech and actions are quite feminine and he is also confident in his identity to use mascara.
None of this diversification came into place until third wave feminism began in the early 1990s. It was a response to the generation gap between the feminist movement of the 1960s and ’70s – challenging and changing some of the definitions of femininity that grew out of that earlier period. In particular, the third wave sees women’s lives as intersectional (the realisation that everyone has their own unique experiences of discrimination and oppression and people must consider everything and anything that can marginalise people such as: gender, race and class).
Whilst ‘Score’ completely ignores third wave feminism ideologies by having an exclusive cast of white characters, ‘Maybelline’ follows these ideologies by including a black woman and a homosexual man – showing how as time moves on, diversity becomes more common.