i produced a pirate adventure game and i created a dominant signifying image that was female in a role usually assosiated with males. This corresponds to Toril Mois analysis of the distinction between female, feminine, feminist categories of representation (1987). In my creation i made her a pirate which is usually seen as a males job, ignoring video game steryotypes.

further to this is have exaggerated the feminine features without over sexualising my character, through clothing that covers the legs and the back of her. The clothing i included and a large sword signifies- combat, movement, power and hints of fights… This tactic links to laura Maulveys notion of the male gaze in that my main character is not to be objectified and stared at. However, my character will still probably be sexualised due to being a female pirate.

Nevertheless, I believe that it isn’t generally accepted in society that females in video games can be the main character (aggressive, strong, powerful) and females are often seen as the ‘prize’ or the thing that needs saving. so in this sense, my product is reactionary

I think this is a positive representation of a strong female character as i personally believe, females are in the spotlight enough when it comes to video games, it is usually strong men. I do not think it is healthy for any gender to play a video game which includes a female who is powerless for no other reason than her gander. I wouldn’t change much about my character as i believe she doesn’t signify a particular type of person, and wears similar clothing to those of which men would wear in video games. However, I do believe I could’ve made my character less conventionally attractive as it would send a more positive view out to players and have them play the game for the adventure, not for the character. As Keith Stuart notes ‘the power of video games [is] a reflective, empowering and emotional influence on the lives of players’. (Why diversity matters in the modern video games industry, Guardian, 18 July 2017)