Murdoch x25

  1. He is worth $17.1 billion.

2. Born on the 11th of March 1931

3. Born in Melbourne, Australia.

4. Went to a very prestigious uni, Oxford.

5. In his early life he was an Australian newspaper publisher.

6. He was also a media entrepreneur.

7. This was largely because his father was a famous war correspondent and publisher.

8. His father died in 1953, leaving him to inherit two newspapers in Australia.

9. He was able to increase the newspaper’s circulation by emphasising the problems of sex, crime, and scandals.

10. He bought and built up the Perth Sunday Times in 1956.

11. In 1960 he bought the significantly declining Sydney Daily.

12. He turned the Sydney Daily into the most bought newspaper in Australia.

13. He became a US Citizen in 1985 in order to be able to expand his market to US television broadcasting.

14. For his first job, he worked as an editor on Lord Beaverbrook’s London Daily Express.

15. In Britain in 1989, he inaugurated Sky Television.

16. Murdoch’s media empire includes Fox News, Fox Sports, the Fox Network, The Wall Street Journal, and HarperCollins.

17. He wrote papers which supported the labour party in 1997, 1001 and 2005 for the elections.

18. In 2011, Murdoch along with his son James provided testimony before a British parliamentary committee regarding phone hacking.

19. This was after a young girl who was murdered had her phone hacked by reporters/journalists in order to make a story. 

20. He attended a private meeting in London with the family of the girl, where he personally apologized for the hacking of their murdered daughter’s phone.

21. In 2012 a panel wrote a critical report about him, stating that he was not fit to lead a major company.

22. In 2015 Murdoch was succeeded as CEO at 21st Century Fox by James, his son.

23. In 2017 he agreed to sell most of the holdings of 21st Century Fox to the Disney Company.

24. Two years later this deal with Disney closed and was valued at about $71 billion.

25. Fox News and various other TV channels were excluded from the sale, and they became part of the newly formed Fox Corporation.


rupert murdoch : news uk

  1. It has been alleged that News Group staff were accused of engaging in phone hacking, including Clive Goodman, illegally accessed voicemail for the mobile phones of thousands of public figures, including politicians and celebrities.
  2. News Corp UK & Ireland Limited (trading as News UK, formerly News International and NI Group), is a British newspaper publisher, and a wholly owned subsidiary of the American mass media conglomerate News Corp. It is the current publisher of The Times, The Sunday Times and The Sun newspapers
  3. Rupert Murdoch is the owner of hundreds of local, national, and international publishing outlets around the world, including in the UK (The Sun and The Times), in Australia (The Daily Telegraph, Herald Sun and The Australian), in the US (The Wall Street Journal and the New York Post)
  4. After his father’s death in 1952, Murdoch took over the running of The News, a small Adelaide newspaper owned by his father. In the 1950s and 1960s, Murdoch acquired a number of newspapers in Australia and New Zealand before expanding into the United Kingdom in 1969, taking over the News of the World.
  5. In 1981, Murdoch bought The Times, his first British broadsheet, and, in 1985, became a naturalized US citizen, giving up his Australian citizenship, to satisfy the legal requirement for US television network ownership.
  6.  Murdoch formed the British broadcaster BSkyB in 1990 and, during the 1990s, expanded into Asian networks and South American television. By 2000, Murdoch’s News Corporation owned over 800 companies in more than 50 countries, with a net worth of over $5 billion.
  7. In July 2011, Murdoch faced allegations that his companies, including the News of the World, owned by News Corporation, had been regularly hacking the phones of celebrities, royalty, and public citizens. Murdoch faced police and government investigations into bribery and corruption by the British government and FBI investigations in the US. On 21 July 2012, Murdoch resigned as a director of News International.
  8.  Ownership of The Times came to him through his relationship with Lord Thomson, who had grown tired of losing money on it as a result of an extended period of industrial action that stopped publication
  9. . In England, the move roused the anger of the print unions, resulting in a long and often violent dispute that played out in Wapping, one of London’s docklands areas, where Murdoch had installed the very latest electronic newspaper purpose-built publishing facility in an old warehouse.
  10. The Guardian newspaper, citing official company accounts, claims Rebekah Brooks received a £10.8m payoff for leaving News International.
  11. Times Newspapers was formed in 1967 when the Thomson Corporation purchased The Times from the Astor family and merged it with The Sunday Times, which it had owned since 1959. The company was purchased by Rupert Murdoch’s News International in February 1981. The acquisition followed an intense 21 days of negotiations with the print unions, conducted by John Collier and Bill O’Neill. The Times Literary Supplement, Times Educational Supplement and Times Higher Education Supplement were also part of the group; the latter two publications have since been sold.
  12. The London Paper was the first newspaper to be launched by News International rather than bought. It was an evening freesheet distributed at bus and rail stations in London. It was published five days a week from September 2006 to September 2009, when it closed down, faced with competition from other free papers.
  13. In contrast to News International’s earlier denials of knowledge, The Guardian cites suppressed evidence revealing that News of the World‘s editorial staff were involved with private investigators who engaged in illegal phone-hacking, and that both reporters and executives were commissioning purchases of confidential information; this is illegal unless it is shown to be in the public interest

David hesmodhalgh

David wrote a book called “the culture industries”He argues that major cultural organisations create products for different industries in order to maximise chances of commercial success. His work is about tracing the relationship between media work, workers, and the industry.

for every individual who succeeds, there are many who do not. For many, it will be the result of a perfectly reasonable personal decision that the commitment and determination required is not for them’

david hesmondhalgh

David is a professor of media, music and culture at the university of Leeds. His research focus and interests are on the media and cultural, creative industries, cultural policy the politics of musical experience, and how ‘cultural platforms’ are transforming media. He joined the University of Leeds in 2007.

production, contribution and reduction

David Hesmondhalgh says about the culture industry:

products exist as a result of their economic context:

* products are made within a commercial context and media is manufactured to create profit.

The media industry is a high risk business

*the impossibility of predicting audience tastes coupled with the high costs of production and the effects of mass competition mean that the business of making commercially successful media is very difficult.

The media industry is reliant on marketing and publicity functions

*Products need the oxygen of publicity if they are to thrive

Media products have limited consumption capacity

*Unlike other businesses, films, television and music – based products tend to be consumed as ‘one off purchases

David Hesmondhalgh

  • In the present day, a lot of people aspire to be in a creative occupation however it is a struggle when you aren’t in a family or know people who can get you into it, no matter the creative ability you have, e.g cultural work in the complex professional era is that many more people seem to have wanted to work professionally in the cultural industries than have succeeded in do so. Few people make it, and surprisingly little attention has been paid in research to how people do so, and what stops others from getting on.
  • David is currently a Professor of Media, music and culture at the University of Leeds.
  • He has wrote books such as Understanding Media: Inside Celebrity (Maidenhead Open University Press, 2005), Media Production (Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2006), Media and Society, 6th edition (New York: Bloomsbury, 2019) and many more.
  • Hesmondhalgh analyses the relationship between media and work as well as the media industry.
  • Applying/getting a job requires luck or a family member to be successful.
  • David Hesmondalgh says that the creative/cultural industry is a risky business.
  • Businesses are divided into three sectors such as production, distribution and consumption.
  • The strategies that minimise the risks are strategies such as the ‘Horizontal integration’ which enables large-scale institutions to achieve scale base cost savings while also allowing them to maximise profits by positioning brands so they do not compete with one another. A second way to minimise the risks is the vertical integration, this is where production, distribution, marketing specialist subsidiaries and media conglomerates can control all aspects of their supply chain while also achieving significant cost saving efficiencies. The final strategy of minimising risk is the multi-sector integration, this is the buying of companies across the culture industry, allowing for further cross-promotion opportunities and the deployment of brands across media platforms.

David Hesmonhalgh

David Hesmondhalgh is a British sociologist. He is currently Professor of Media, Music and Culture at the University of Leeds. His research focusses on the media and cultural industries, critical approaches to media in the digital age, and the sociology of music.

Hesmondhalgh Theory:

Hesmondhalgh argues that major cultural organisations create products for different industries in order to maximise chances of commercial success.

Most products are consumed when used and have to be bought again, but media products are bought once and continually used – they never wear out. So, companies have to make a lot of money out of their products initially, because they don’t often resell the same product repeatedly.

His books include The Cultural Industries, first published in 2002, described by Herbert et al. He is acknowledged as a key figure in developing the “cultural industries” approach to media, which emphasises the complex and contradictory nature of cultural production under capitalism. He is frequently named as one of the leading analysts of cultural labour, partly based on his book Creative Labour, co-written with Sarah Baker

In his book, he also talks about the relationship between media work, media workers and the media industries.

Hesmondhalgh states that going into the cultural/media industry is a risky business.

“All business is risky” “but the cultural industries constitute a particularly risky business”

Production – Distribution – Consumption

  • The media industry is reliant on marketing and publicity functions.
  • Media businesses are reliant upon changing audience consumption patterns.
  • Media products have limited consumption capacity.

The internet is dominated by a relatively small number of suppliers. Hesmondhalgh points to the dominance of search engines and their ability to point users to a small number of sources.

David Hesmondhalgh

He wrote a book called Cultural Industries.

He argues that major cultural organisations create products for different industries in order to maximise the chances of commercial success.

His research focuses on the media and cultural industries, critical approaches to media in the digital age, and the sociology of music.

In his book, he also talks about the relationship between media work, media workers and the media industries.

He notes that the most successful creative people are born into the industry. E.g. They’re the son / daughter of a successful creative person.

‘for every individual who succeeds, there are many who do not. For many, it will be the result of a perfectly reasonable personal decision that the commitment and determination required is not for them’

The individualising discourses of ‘talent’ and ‘celebrity’ and the promise of future fame or consecration, have special purchases in creative work and are often instrumental in ensuring compliance with the sometimes invidious demands of managers, organisations and the industry (Banks & Hesmondhalgh, p. 420).

David Hesmondhalgh

David Hesmondalgh wrote a book called “The culture industries”

His work is about tracing the relationship between media work, workers, and the industry.

“VH:[00:17:10] I think a lot sadly does come down to luck and who you know. 

MM: [00:34:02] So how do you see that? Looking back do you think that was, do you think basically you were lucky? The right person, in the right place, at the right time?

JL: [00:34:12] Yeah.  

Many younger people believe that the creative industry is a lot different to how it really is

LH [00:20:14] the minute that I went in I realized not everybody who works in creativity is a fun person. There are a lot more boring than you’d expect them to be. They’re not as fun.

They are drawn to the ideas of fame and wealth and that it will be easy and fun, putting them in a vulnerable position when they realise that this is not the case and the industry requires you to get very lucky.

  1. Cultural industries  – an industrialized culture, essentially produced for the sake of making profits
  2. Production – The making of a piece of media
  3. Distribution – How media products are delivered to audiences
  4. Exhibition / Consumption – How a media product is viewed
  5. Media concentration – The ownership of mass media by few individuals
  6. Conglomerates – A company that owns numerous other companies involved in media
  7. Globalisation (in terms of media ownership)
  8. Cultural imperialism – A theory that states western nations dominate media around the world
  9. Vertical Integration – When a media company owns different businesses in the same chain of production and distribution e.g. 20th century fox owns studios; cinemas; TV channels
  10. Horizontal Integration – A media company’s ownership of several businesses of the same value e.g. a magazine; radio station and TV channel
  11. Mergers – When a media company acquires another company
  12. Monopolies – A large company owning many shares of a media source
  13. Gatekeepers – People who filter information for dissemination
  14. Regulation – The process of disallowing certain things in the media through guidelines
  15. Deregulation – Removing or loosening government restrictions on the ownership of media outlets
  16. Free market – A market where the prices of services are self-regulated
  17. Commodification  – The process whereby things are transformed into objects for sale in a capitalist economic system
  18. Convergence  – blending together multiple forms of media
  19. Diversity  – Differing ideas and forms of media 
  20. Innovation  – The development of new media platforms, or new business models, or new ways of producing media etc.

David Hesmondhalgh states that the media industry is a “risky business” – However, there are many ways that companies minimise this risk.

For Example, many companies use vertical integration – where they acquire subsidiaries based in Production, Distribution AND Consumption. This allows them to control everything that happens with their product from how it is made, to how it is advertised and where it can be consumed.

Furthermore, many companies build up monopolies – which while illegal, have many workarounds that the companies use. For example, a company may only allow their films to be viewed in certain cinemas i.e. cineworld – except for one cinema in Thailand that allows for the company to deny the monopoly.

DAVE HESMONDHALGH

Book called the “culture industries”

His work is about tracing the relationship between media work, media workers and the media industry.

he says that young people can be seen to desire a career in the creative industry as it can be very influential and more popular.

its mainly down to pure luck as the media industry is such a high demand.

david Hesmondhalgh

His book is called The Cultural industries and his work is about tracing the relationship between media work, media workers and the media industry.

‘for every individual who succeeds, there are many who do not. For many, it will be the result of a perfectly reasonable personal decision that the commitment and determination required is not for them’ (p. 20)

I think a lot sadly does come down to luck and who you know. Which can be a shame, I don’t think there is a scheme set up which pushes people into just the media industry” shows that it’s difficult to make a proper career about of media and if you don’t know anyone famous at the start you will struggle to promote your work.”