Part 1: Brief Reference
What did you like about the film? I liked how it still managed to keep me engaged through narration, shot length, and music despite it only having one motion shot. | What didn’t you like? Why was the man from the present timeline doing the experiments in the future timeline, when the protagonist was shot – this would mean that the man was there in the past where the protagonist witnessed a man die on the observation platform as a child. Plot hole. |
What ideas could you use? Narrative or style? Using liminal space to convey a sense of futurism, I liked how they got rid of all defying elements of reality in the setting when showing the future timeline. Allowing music to carry the narrative instead of dialogue, music is a universal language. | What ideas won’t you use? Why? The narration as it was taking away from the mystery. |
Part 2: In-Depth Study – Narrative
Narrative Feature | Example | Your own example |
Establishing protagonist – what information do we find out? How is it conveyed? | Introduced only in narration – first in third person as “a man marked by an image”; then in first person -memory of incident at the airport. We don’t see him until the first experiment is shown. This shows how core the act of remembering is to his identity – indeed we find out very little about him (he remains nameless) apart from his ‘remembering’ (even when he is travelling in time). | Before we are shown the man himself, the narration points out that this is a story of the child who was taken by his parents to watch the airplanes on the observation platform. Later stating: “Or had he invented that tender moment to prop up the madness to come?” This foreshadows the plot twist at the end of the short film, where he is shot. Establishing that memory is the only thing that can keep post-war citizens going. |
Establishing other characters – what information do we find out? How is it conveyed? | The Woman is the first person we see (“the only image to survive the war”) – and she is defined only by the fact the narrator remembers her. Feminist critics may comment on the fact she barely seems to exist outside the experiences of the narrator and her growing belief in him. | During the experimentation shots, there is a whispered voiceover of the experimenters speaking in German. This could be throwing shade at communist parties through film propaganda, given that Germany has links to Russia, France holds democratic values unlike the USSR. |
Establishing location (time and place) – what information do we find out? How is it conveyed? | We are told immediately that the location is Paris. The bombed out wreckage of the city (real WW2 images) don’t immediately establish that this is the future until the narrator mentions radiation. The underground location beneath the Palais de Chaillot is shown by intercut images of broken cherubs and other sculptures. | In the opening still we’re shown an observation platform, ‘la jetée’ which is also the title of the short film, establishing that this is the place where the pivotal events take place – the protagonist witnessing a man die there when he was a child and then being the man who died on the platform. Circular narrative. |
Creating Enigmas – what are they? How are they created? | The image the narrator obsesses over is the central enigma: who is the man he witnesses dying? How does he die? Who is the woman? The still images and voiceover powerfully evoke the nature of memory. What other questions are posed throughout the narrative? | Time. The short film proposes a question to the spectators, is time fixed? Therefore, questioning the inevitable, are we capable of preventing particular events? “there was no way to escape Time” is a quote spoken by the narrator when we’re shown the shooter aiming his gun at the protagonist. (Is there a reason why ‘Time’ is capitalised? Making into an entity on its own instead of a human construct.) |
Narrative binary oppositions | The ‘Living Present’ vs Past/Future. As the film progresses, what constitutes the ‘present’ (for the protagonist) seems to shift from his dystopian subterranean society to the ‘past’ of pre-apocalypse Paris. This is conveyed by the faster rhythm of the montage and the sequence (18:00-18:49) where the images almost become like traditional cinema. | Romance and Fatality. During the romantic sequences between the woman and the protagonist the shot length is significantly longer in duration, holding our attention with them for longer; also the music becomes lighter and melodic compared to the operatic and dramatic score used during scenes where experimentation takes place or the situation of Paris is being explained by the narrator. For fatality, in the final sequence where the protagonist is running towards the woman the cuts become more frequent as the intervals between each shot is shortened, creating a sense of urgency. |
Crisis – how was this conveyed? Is it the first experiment? The moment the man spots the woman from the airport? Or is it when the future society offers him the chance to escape to the future? What do you think is the crisis point? How does this affect the rest of the narrative? | I think the crisis is when the future society offers him the chance to escape to the future – by doing this the man is faced with uncovering the full story of him seeing the woman on the observation platform, revealing quickly that he was the man he witnessed dying when he was a child. The reason why the initial experiment isn’t the crisis, in my opinion, is because the protagonist has been a prisoner for much longer, preceding the beginning of the short film, so I personally don’t believe that this was a crisis, especially for him since he’s probably been subjected to similar in the past. This heavily affects the narrative because it provides us a plot twist – the sequence of events leading up to this moment didn’t indicate that he might have been the man he witnessed as a child dying, | |
Resolution – is it closed or open narrative? The narrative is closed – but it is also in a loop: the narrator is both the dying man and the child watching the scene. This ‘time paradox’ has inspired films as diverse as The Terminator and Looper (as well as 12 Monkeys which is almost a remake). What do you think about the end? Is it closed – or endlessly circular? | It is an open narrative because inevitably the narrator is bound to be stuck within this time frame. We start off with him in the underground prison being experimented on, present, his past consists of a memory witnessing a man dying on the observation platform as well as seeing the woman. His future is him dying on that platform, seeing the woman, yet there’s also a man there who kills him; he is the man who died in his past. Resolution isn’t truly met as the narrative is endlessly circular. |
Part 3: Meaning and Effect
What did you think was the intention of the filmmaker(s)? Intellectual message? Emotional response? Everyone is trapped in their time – they cannot escape it, even through memory. It is also about concept of photography and cinema itself, trying to ‘freeze’ time with images despite time always being in motion. How was this achieved? The use of photomontage separates each frame of the story into a frozen image – even though these are joined together using traditional narrative film techniques such as voiceover, dissolves, fades and music. As the man begins to ‘live’ more and more in the ‘past’ with his lover, the space between these frames speeds up to resemble ‘motion picture’ speed at one point. The stuffed animals in the museum are also ‘frozen’ in a single moment. | Your own idea: Memory is static, you cannot change it, so by continuing to use a photomontage for the final sequence where the man is being shot dead on the observation platform, it conveys a message to the audience that you also can’t outrun fate. The protagonist was bound to witness a man die, whilst being the man who dies. This would, and probably still does, coax an emotional response from the audience by eluding to ideas of existentialism. |
Aesthetic binary oppositions The use of still photo images are combined with traditional narrative cinematic techniques that bring them ‘to life’… until the moment around 18:00 when they flow together. Effect of these oppositions? Shows the intensity of emotion the narrator feels with his lover: like he is finally ‘living’ in moving time rather than a series of frozen, separated moments. | Your example: The speed of cutting between clips used to reflect slower, romantic moments between him and his lover, letting us get drawn into their world compared to the fast-paced cutting which forces us to feel the imminent danger which is felt by the protagonist. |
Inspirations – what ideas did this film give you for your own short film?
Establishing characters, setting, plot, theme The opening/establishing shot which is what the title is: an observation platform. I like how it is obvious at first, but as the story progresses it becomes clear how significant that location is for the protagonist – it’s where his most profound memory took place, as well as his death. | Creating enigmas In La Jetée the enigma is him, which only becomes apparent in the final sequence, but I like how the enigma was right in front of us the entire time. Subtly hinting at the answers throughout the short film. |
Narrative structure (non-/linear? Open/ closed ending?) I’d argue that this short film has an open ending. This is because the ending is also the beginning (his childhood memory which is why he’s selected for the experiment), a circular narrative which I think would be interesting to implement into my own short film. | Striking use of technical features The shift from still images to a second long motion shot of the lover opening her eyes was impactful because I had become so accustomed to the still images used up until that point. |