Film 1: Pasternak
What did you like about the film? The storyline was quite comedic considering that the theme is revenge, it’s absurd that a man would gather all those who’ve wronged him onto one plane just to crash it. | What didn’t you like? It looked a lot like an airline commercial with the colour grading (or lack of) amongst other elements. |
What ideas could you use? Narrative or style? The use of creative angles to establish characters, specifically when she opens the overhead locker to put her luggage away, highlighting her as the main character/driver of the story as well as the man seated beside her. The freeze frame at the end just before the plane crashes. | What ideas won’t you use? Why? I found that the domino effect of all of the passengers chiming in to give their own story of the man she was talking about – it wasn’t that effective from a comedic perspective, however it did a good job establishing what kind of man he was, adding to the climactic moment which reveals he’s flying the plane. |
In-Depth Study – Film elements
Film element | Example |
Cinematography | Example 1: Lens focusing on the entire group of passengers instead of the ones at the forefront when Gabriel Pasternak speaks over the intercom, further proving that he orchestrated this flight to have all of those individuals specifically on that flight. Example 2: Depth of field in the final shot where we’re shown the old couple in their garden, in the foreground, and we can see the airplane accelerating towards the ground in the background, forcing the audience to anticipate the inevitable crash. |
Editing | Example 1: The freeze frame at the end gives an abrupt halt to the story, implementing a cliff-hanger narrative device to keep the spectator guessing, yet giving enough information prior to allow us to connect the dots. Leaving us asking questions: what became of the old couple? Was Gabriel Pasternak caught for what he did, or did he die with the rest? What does he look like? Example 2: Fast cutting between shots as the plane begins its fatal descent, increasing the tension and fear, which is reflected from the characters in Pasternak onto the spectators. |
Sound | Example 1: Using sound to foreshadow to the spectator that the plane is approaching, hearing it before we see it in the final shot, creating anticipation for the inevitable. Example 2: The only evidence we get of Pasternak is his voice over the airplane’s intercom, almost making him seem like a god. We know he’s there, but we can’t see him, can’t put a face to the man everybody on that flight spoke so negatively of, making him even more mysterious and frightening. |
Inspirations – what ideas did this film give you for your own short film?
Cinematography: When she opened the overhead locker to reveal herself, the camera was in the locker and that gave us a high angle shot, which i would like to use in my own short film. | Editing: The freezeframe at the end which leaves the anticipation and tension suspended in the air, never resolved, leaving the viewers wondering what possibly happened. |
Sound: I enjoyed how they used the sound of the plane approaching the area, yet we can’t see it just yet, allowing the viewers to be informed of what’s about to happen without rushing into it; building suspense. | Other: Having a hidden antagonist because it effectively maintained the mystery even as the passengers shared information about him so the audience could better understand his character – like an omnipresent being who can’t be stopped. |
Film 2: The Rats/Las Ratas
What did you like about the film? I really enjoyed how they manipulated lighting to reflect the character’s ideologies – in the scene where the waitress and the chef are discussing putting rat poison in the man’s food, the waitress is stood in a cooler, brighter light which reflects the pressure and conflict she feels over killing him, however the chef is stood in a warmer light which indicates that she’s content with the idea of harming a bad person. | What didn’t you like? The monologue the waitress gave about her history with the gangster, seemed a bit melodramatic but it did carry the point home that he’s a bad man and that she has a personal link and a justifiable reason to resent him. |
What ideas could you use? Narrative or style? Beautiful colour grading and symbolic/atmospheric usage of lighting and colour, along with framing – especially when they shot the two women talking, each framed by one of the server windows, highlighting their moral divide. | What ideas won’t you use? Why? A restaurant, due to difficulties getting permission to film or even rent out the venue for the shooting session. |
In-Depth study – Mise-en-scène
Feature | Example – how does it convey meaning or create an effect |
Set Design | Whilst the waitress and the chef discuss what they should do with the gangster, the two women are framed by the concession windows, highlighting their contrasting views on harming the man. |
Costume | The gangster’s colour palette is muted aside from the slight pop of red of his cravat, hinting at his dangerous character hiding beneath the outward appearance he tries to put forward to the world. |
Space | The entire restaurant is empty except for the one table which the gangster is sat at, perhaps hinting that the waitress is all alone in this uncomfortable situation, the empty space also leads to less diegetic sound of other customers, making the scenario tense and eery. |
Lighting | Using lowkey lighting throughout the majority of the film, it’s nighttime, dark memories are resurfacing for the protagonist when the man arrives, setting the mood to be uneasy and tense. This is until the final scene when the authorities come to the restaurant and it is daytime, signifying the waitress finally receiving closure through revenge. |
Composition | In the sequence where the gangster calls over the waitress to receive her opinion on his campaign choices, they are centre-frame, medium shot to keep us at a distance, building curiosity. The only main artificial light is on the wall directly behind the waitress, illuminating her alone, once again reinforcing Levi-Strauss’ binary opposition of good versus evil. |
Hair and makeup | The waitress has a neat hairstyle, presentable and feminine, whereas the chef has brushed back grey, short hair, minimal effort put into her hair. This can point towards the waitress’ self-control and drive to conform, on the other hand the chef quite frankly doesn’t care what anybody else thinks. |
Inspirations – what ideas did this film give you for your own short film?
Cinematography/Sound/Editing: Using weather sounds to create pathetic fallacy – raining, moody, dark. I think that sound and music work well to convey messages better than words at times, the somber underscore when the waitress is retelling the story of how she knows the customer amplifies the emotions she is feeling for the audience to see. | Narrative structure: Levi-Strauss Binary Oppositions – good and evil. Clearly conveyed through the characters of the waitress (protagonist) and the gangster (antagonist), then there’s the chef who’s morally grey, so she is somewhat of a middle ground. |
Establishing characters, setting, plot, theme: Establishing shot of the restaurant from the outside, raining, diegetic sound, gritty. Allowing the protagonist to retell the story instead of using flashbacks which would’ve been a waste of time and possibly a bit clunky. | Creating enigmas: Rats, connotations of vermin, outsiders, the need to rid the world of them – which is the moral dilemma the protagonist is faced with. The rat poison intended to kill a man who’d be considered a ‘rat’ since he’s a criminal, the world eradicates criminals just as much as they vermin. |
Film 3: Bombita
What did you like about the film? The shot types e.g. through street grates or from the trunk of a car | What didn’t you like? The story was boring; the main character wasn’t that remarkable. |
What ideas could you use? Narrative or style? The style of the shots – they were stylised in a way which forces us to be involved in the story. The news clippings provide further information on how the explosion impacted society. | What ideas won’t you use? Why? The family narrative didn’t add anything to it, only showed that he was arrogant. I think the main idea of the story was that society is corrupt and is apathetic towards its citizens. |
In-Depth study: All elements
Feature | Example |
Narrative structure | Linear. We find out what his job is, knowing he has access to explosives, revealing that his car had been towed, his resolution is blowing up the car when it gets towed again, new equilibrium is him celebrating a birthday with his family unlike in the beginning sequence which he missed due to his car being towed. Todorov’s Equilibrium; base equilibrium is him with his job and family, which is strained due him working late frequently. Then the disruption of him getting his car towed, he must chase around authorities to try and get his car back. When this doesn’t work, he resorts to blowing up the DMV as a form of protest towards the government’s unfair treatment of its people. He gets sent to prison, but this is quickly resolved when he is released, and a new equilibrium is restored where he is closer with his family than ever, and the issue with his country’s government is getting media coverage in the news. |
Establishing characters, setting, plot, theme | Established his career allowed him to have access to explosives, he knows how to handle them. Simón is presented as forward and a bit arrogant, standing up for himself. The setting is an urban city, an established government which is unfair – theme of anti-establishment. |
Mise-en-scene | Simón goes to get his car back after it had been towed away, the man at the desk is behind a glass panel, essentially shutting Simón out. This could be viewed as a testament of the government’s wilful ignorance and neglect towards their citizens – even in unfair situations. Tightly framed, tricky situation. |
Cinematography | Simón picks up another ticket, it is shot from a worms-eye angle, the frame is blocked in places by the grate, and when he steps into frame it resembles a prison cell – foreshadowing where he’ll end up. |
Editing | The newspaper montage, dissolving into one another, highlighting the truth being the society which the short film is set in – impacting the viewer with harsh reality. |
Sound | The sound effect for the bomb going off, this was likely created by a foley artist in a sound stage to have an impactful effect on the audience, drawing them into the action. |
Inspirations – what ideas did this film give you for your own short film?
Cinematography/Sound/Editing: The news articles used as an overlay, dissolving into one another to convey a strong message to the audience, providing multiple viewpoints on a single topic. | Narrative structure: Circular and causality structure, having a clear cause and effect in my narrative to keep the audience engaged – something disrupts the character’s day, what will come of it? How will they fix it? |
Establishing characters, setting, plot, theme: I liked how we are first shown Simón at his job, highlighting that he’s hardworking, his job is of significance to the story – it disrupts his family life and is a reason why he decided to bomb the DMV because he has access to explosives. | Creating enigmas: The parking ticket. Each time he receives one it pushes him further to act on it drastically, at first it was just being frustrated and aggressive with the DMV worker, the second time he realised that they were being issued out unfairly and that he must do something to get his message across since words aren’t enough – therefore leading to him using explosives to make a statement. |
Film 4: Til Death do us Part/Hasta que la muerte nos separe
What did you like about the film? It was fun to watch – especially the camera work when Romina stormed off and the camera moved with the door swinging open, highlighting her distress. Two people who stooped low enough to cheat are perfect for each other – betrayal turning into union. | What didn’t you like? There wasn’t anything of note that I didn’t enjoy. |
What ideas could you use? Narrative or style? Whenever the couple were dancing together the lighting was always warm and intimate, the background was almost black, highlighting that they’re in their own world. For better or for worse. | What ideas won’t you use? Why? Aerial shots due to budget restrictions and preferably refrain from filming dialogue outside like they did on the roof because of wind interfering with audio quality. |
In-Depth study: All elements
Feature | Example |
Narrative structure | Todorov equilibrium – equilibrium was the marriage and party, disruption was finding out the husband cheated. |
Establishing characters, setting, plot, theme | The short film opens with a dark room, an intimate setting as childhood photos of the newlywed couple are presented on a screen (?). Showing wedding guests and then the couple, starting us off with a celebratory atmosphere – making the following plot twist more impactful. |
Mise-en-scene | In the final sequence when the couple forgive each other for being unfaithful, all the guests have left the room, they have sex on the table. Within the shots we’re shown the wedding cake as it crumbles apart, the centre piece of the bride and groom fallen onto the floor because of their activities. Could be highlighting to the audience that despite their messy flaws they will always have each other. |
Cinematography | When Romina is running away from the room, the door swings open and the camera is attached to the door, making the scene cathartic as we can feel her distress. |
Editing | We’re shown shots of the wedding filmed on a camera by the wedding videographer, adding to the verisimilitude. |
Sound | Once the party segment of the wedding commences, the DJ is playing ‘Titanium’ by David Guetta, this was a purposeful choice because the lyrics “got nothing to lose” sums up their relationship, and the wedding. |
Inspirations – what ideas did this film give you for your own short film?
Cinematography/Sound/Editing: Harsh overhead lighting when the cake is brought out by the bride, women crowding around it as their faces are illuminated in a bright light, the bride is seemingly ignoring the fact that she just flung a girl into a mirror. Perhaps shining an uncomfortable light on the situation. | Narrative structure: Using the Todorov equilibrium to enhance plot twists to their full potential – the new equilibrium which follows the disruption is not what the audience expected, therefore making it entertaining. |
Establishing characters, setting, plot, theme: At the beginning we’re presented with a celebratory event, everyone is happy, joining together to celebrate the union of two people. At the end, it is still a celebration of sorts as the couple forgive each other, willing to move past infidelity – however this time the guests have filtered out, mostly everyone is content. Sticking to the theme of celebration, a circular structure. | Creating enigmas: The woman the husband cheated with. If she wasn’t there at the wedding, the bride probably wouldn’t have stormed out initially, and yet we are never given any explanation from the mistress, no information from her perspective – this remains a mystery. |