La Jetée (Marker, Korea, 1962) – Analysis Sheet for Evaluative Commentary
Part 1: Brief Reference
What did you like about the film? I enjoyed its uniqueness and the plot | What didn’t you like? How it ended so abruptly |
What ideas could you use? Narrative or style? I like the idea of time travelling being used and how they used 3 different time periods, present future and past | What ideas won’t you use? Why? I wouldn’t use the use of the images simply because it takes a lot of effort to keep all the images in order and in sense. |
Part 2: In-Depth Study – Narrative
Narrative Feature | Example | Your own example |
Establishing protagonist – what information do we find out? How is it conveyed? | Introduced only in narration – first in third person as “a man marked by an image”; then in first person -memory of incident at the airport. We don’t see him until the first experiment is shown. This shows how core the act of remembering is to his identity – indeed we find out very little about him (he remains nameless) apart from his ‘remembering’ (even when he is travelling in time). | We see the scientists at the very start of the movie. One specific scientist stands out because of his glasses; this is the same scientist that goes back in time and kills the main character. The use of mise-en-scene costume keeps him sepret from the others and shows his importance in the short movie. |
Establishing other characters – what information do we find out? How is it conveyed? | The Woman is the first person we see (“the only image to survive the war”) – and she is defined only by the fact the narrator remembers her. Feminist critics may comment on the fact she barely seems to exist outside the experiences of the narrator and her growing belief in him. | The scientist that ends up killing the guy at the end. We find out that he was using prisoners to travel into the future. Once the main character managed to travel into the future the scientists were planning on killing him. We are also told that ‘his jailers will not spare him ‘we also see the scientist in a low shot looking up to him |
Establishing location (time and place) – what information do we find out? How is it conveyed? | We are told immediately that the location is Paris. The bombed out wreckage of the city (real WW2 images) don’t immediately establish that this is the future until the narrator mentions radiation. The underground location beneath the Palais de Chaillot is shown by intercut images of broken cherubs and other sculptures. | We are told we are in a museum and see a collection of frames that show art pieces in the museum. This is conveyed through mise en scene where we can see that it’s decorated with artifacts and skeletons of dinosaurs which shows how its a museum for old items. |
Creating Enigmas – what are they? How are they created? | The image the narrator obsesses over is the central enigma: who is the man he witnesses dying? How does he die? Who is the woman? The still images and voiceover powerfully evoke the nature of memory. | What other questions are posed throughout the narrative? The other question is how did society get to where it is in the future? The use of character makes up and costume help convey a totally different timeline from the present where everything is rubble and ash from WW3 to super humans |
Narrative binary oppositions | The ‘Living Present’ vs Past/Future. As the film progresses, what constitutes the ‘present’ (for the protagonist) seems to shift from his dystopian subterranean society to the ‘past’ of pre-apocalypse Paris. This is conveyed by the faster rhythm of the montage and the sequence (18:00-18:49) where the images almost become like traditional cinema. | Repeated use of the speed up heartbeat track and the murmuring of the scientism show the dystopian and horror feel the movie has. |
Crisis – how was this conveyed? | Is it the first experiment? The moment the man spots the woman from the airport? Or is it when the future society offers him the chance to escape to the future? | What do you think is the crisis point? How does this affect the rest of the narrative? I think the crisis is how the world became so damages after ww3. We see images of the world and Paris in shreds which shows us as the audience that the potential of war could be detrimental and a Crisi that people are so desperate to solve, they’re willing to do human experiments. |
Resolution – is it closed or open narrative? | The narrative is closed – but it is also in a loop: the narrator is both the dying man and the child watching the scene. This ‘time paradox’ has inspired films as diverse as The Terminator and Looper (as well as 12 Monkeys which is almost a remake). | What do you think about the end? Is it closed – or endlessly circular? I think the ending is closed since this movie shows that everything that will happen is going to happen regardless of what you do. No matter how hard he tries to escape death by fleeing timelines he still dies the same way each time (by the scientist ) |
Part 3: Meaning and Effect
What did you think was the intention of the filmmaker(s)? Intellectual message? Emotional response? Everyone is trapped in their time – they cannot escape it, even through memory. It is also about concept of photography and cinema itself, trying to ‘freeze’ time with images despite time always being in motion. | How was this achieved? The use of photomontage separates each frame of the story into a frozen image – even though these are joined together using traditional narrative film techniques such as voiceover, dissolves, fades and music. As the man begins to ‘live’ more and more in the ‘past’ with his lover, the space between these frames speeds up to resemble ‘motion picture’ speed at one point. The stuffed animals in the museum are also ‘frozen’ in a single moment. Your own idea: I think they were trying to show that everyone is apart of one timeline and the domino effect is very real and happens to everyone. This was achieved by the array of different characters introduced. For example, the woman who the main character met was affected by the entire plot ran against the main character. This is shown using close up shots of the woman at different points of the movie, both in the past while the protagonist was young and the ‘past’ when the protagonist was travelling through time |
Aesthetic binary oppositions The use of still photo images are combined with traditional narrative cinematic techniques that bring them ‘to life’… until the moment around 18:00 when they flow together. | Effect of these oppositions? Shows the intensity of emotion the narrator feels with his lover: like he is finally ‘living’ in moving time rather than a series of frozen, separated moments. Your example: The repeated use of the thumping heartbeat and the mumbled voices of the scientist whenever they are injecting the main character. The repeated audio shows how many times they have done this and how it still feels the same every time. |