- Sisters in law would be classified as an observational documentary. this would be due to the lack of personal interviews and input from the directors of the documentary. instead giving the interview first hand original footage from cases such as the court trials we see.
I think the directors chose this documentary style as it give the audience the first hand footage from the trials. the fact that the footage is authentic having not been messed with in post production give the audience a real sense of verisimilitude and truthfulness
2. Cinema verite would be defined as shooting footage with fairly simple equipment and using hardly any effects in post other then simple cuts of footage. This is mostly used in observational documentaries to increase the verisimilitude of the story being shown. An example of cinema verite in the film would be found in the court case with Manka. due to the fact there is no script people are shouting over each other and the camera does a lot of whip pans increasing the versimilitude.
3. would sisters in law have a different narrative if the directors were men?
In my opinion the narrative of the film would not change if the directors were men. This is because they still highlight the problems of Cameroonian beliefs and how women and children are treated there. The gender of the director does not change the narrative that He or she is trying to present and the awareness they are trying to show other people worldwide.
If truths are important to documentary filmmaking which truths are revealed in sisters in law?
sisters in law reveals the truth behind Cameroonian culture in which men believe that when they are married to a woman the woman then become the mans property. the documentary also reveals how children are treated by there parents and others in which they are beaten and abused if they misbehave.