Introduction

Photography started with many years ago with a camera obscura, and using this camera obscura we began creating different ways of capturing the light. Some of the first ways where the Daguerreotype and Calotype process. The Daguerreotype process required a perfectly reflective silver plated copper, almost like a mirror, to capture the light. The Calotype process used a sheet of paper coated with silver chloride and exposed to light in a camera obscura, which is basically a small window into the real world, creating a negative image (the Daguerreotype process also used a camera obscura). So the idea of windows and mirrors in practical photography have been around for hundreds of years. However, as cameras become more common with a larger and larger catalogue of images, there became a pattern which most images followed, with some images being more subjective and romantic (a term used to show the indispensable presence of its maker in the picture), and others being more documentary like and objective. These ideas relate to mirrors and windows respectively. However, using the ideas of how a camera works, with view finder, or the window into the camera, and how the photographers view is almost always reflected onto the photo, means its hard to find an image that fits into one category.

Mirror

This image by Cristina-de-Middel is clearly very staged and manipulated. Its one photo in a collection by her to rebuild some a little Zambian story about astronauts, you can learn more here. It is of a person, with homemade clothing walking like there are on the moon almost. The background contrasts the subject in a way that makes it look edited (with the background being dark and rocky and the subject having colourful native clothing on), further enhancing this manipulated look. The covered up face with the helmet adds a sense of curiosity to the image as we don’t know who is under it. Its also a tableau as it has a model positioned by the photographer, reflecting there views on the scene. This also links to John Szarkowski’s quote about mirror in photography, “reflecting a portrait of the artist who made it”, as she added her own twist to the original Zambian story. However Jed Pearl’s review on Szarkowski’s thesis opposes this view of a clear ‘mirrored’ image of the artist, as all of photography by its very nature can create a inclusive acceptance of fact and objective structure, yet the choosing of images and the facts to show for them is the romantic/mirrored part of a photograph. In my opinion, I think Szarkowski’s thesis is the most correct as he believes all photographs are on a continuous axis but most lean towards one side. So with this image, the romanticism side is obvious with the planned shots and the modifications of the original story of the Zambian astronaut, but the fact that there was an original story leans the axis slightly less towards the staged side and towards the factual side.

Window

This picture was taken in 1969 by the Garry Winogrand in Los Angeles, in public. He is a famous street photographer so already the photographer cannot add his own input to the subjects in the photo, only the subjects can change from the photographer being there. For example, the three women that are in the light may notice the camera and make themself appear better. This already makes this image more of a truthful, and natural image, and removing the romanticism from the image, contrasting the tableau image above. The person on the left, with his curved back, contrasting the straight lines of the lights and buildings, further emphases the truthful nature of this image. The photographer can, however, add input to the composition of the photo, like how he tilted the camera to create more diagonals in his images, adding more dynamism and drama, as well as cropping images to remove some of the truth, to create an image that matches the photographers desire. in Szarkowski’s thesis realist is ‘generous and inclusive acceptance of fact, objective structure, and the logic of process and system’, however, this image can never be a realist image by those standards as its already subjective by the photographers modification on the composition of the image. In Jed Pearl’s review of Szarkowski’s thesis, he states that his thesis, ‘gives little value to photography’s a priori status as a realist activity’. I agree with this point as with this photo, its objectively unedited and natural, making it a documentary photo, instead of a tableau, where as Szarkowski believe there is not a definitive line between those two categories.

@t-little14

So, How can photographs be both mirrors and Windows of the world, I believe its because we cannot draw a line between the mirror photographs and the window photographs. Above I said that drawing a line between a documentary and tableau photo makes sense. This is because those words cannot be subjective otherwise they would be pointless to use. However, when it comes to mirror and window photographs, like Szarkowski said, its very hard to leave one photo in one category as even with documentary photos, its hard to not reflect some of the photographers visions (consciously or unconsciously) onto the final photo. I disagree with Pearl’s review, which was that no photos can be mirrors as, by nature, they are a window into the world, because of the fact that the photographers visions will always be reflected onto the photo. The opposing concepts of objectivity and subjectivity with windows and mirrors both features displayed in almost aspects of a photo, as I have explained above with two images. Even with the the image being more ‘Window’ like or ‘Mirror’ like, I have shown that it will still display aspects that oppose its original ‘designated’ category.