Artist Reference image:

My image:

I see similarities between mine and Sherman’s work as we both explored the idea of traditional photos. This is seen in the black and white filter over both images. I like this because it gives the photo itself an ancient look, even in modern day photography taken with more technical cameras. Another similarity between both images is both models are dressed in dark clothing, which helps keep the viewer focused on the subject and their facial expressions. Finally the last similarity between the images is the use of not looking at the camera whilst the photo is being shot. I think this is a favourable touch as compared to posed photos, candid’s make observers feel more connected to the poster, feel more interested in getting to know them and like them more. This was driven by candid’s making people seem more genuine, which made others react more favourably.

However there are many noticeable differences between mine and Sherman’s final images. One of the main ones being the background; Sherman explored having a slight hint of colour to add some interest into the photo, whereas I wanted to keep my background plain as an object or model against a plain background will naturally stand out better and produce a stronger image. Another big difference between the two images is Sherman has added a grainy filter into hers, which ultimately makes it look slightly more ancient. I like this idea because grain makes the image look sharper as there is added texture. I did not add a grainy look because I wanted my image to appear softer, as I feel it symbolises femininity whilst also portraying a similar look to Marilyn Monroe. The last perceptible difference between the two photos is the hairstyle of the model. In the artist’s image she has shorter and “messier” hair with a fringe. A fringe on women was extremely trendy in the 1920s, which Sherman’s image compliments well. Whereas in my image I wanted a more sleek look, like Marilyn Monroe’s photos.