The Calotype was an early photographic technique invented by William Henry Fox Talbot of Great Britain in the 1830s. Henry Fox Talbot experimented using paper and shoe boxes which he called “mousetraps” to create his image. He discovered a chemical (gallic acid) could be used to “develop” the image on the paper. The Daguerreotype, invented by Louis Daguerre and introduced worldwide in 1839. It was the first publicly available photographic process. In comparison to the calotype, Louis Daguerre used a mirrored metal plate instead of paper. Daguerre’s invention of the Daguerreotype eventually became less successful and Talbot’s Calotype became more popular. Both processes are long and tedious. Both invented in 1839 which meant there would be a competition between the two as they were invented in the same year. Both processes fix an image. I think that both the Calotype and the Daguerreotype can be considered as Mirrors and as Windows.

The image that I have chosen is a photo by Cindy Sherman. I decided that this image was a very obvious mirror for several reasons. A mirror image can be described as when the photographer is trying to demonstrate or reflect something that they feel about themselves or as John Szarkowski in his text, said a mirror is “reflecting a portrait of the artist who made it” and “a mirror- a romantic expression of the photographer’s sensibility as it projects itself on the things and sights of the world”. A photograph that is considered a mirror is a photo that reflects the self. It can reflect the subject both physically and emotionally. For example a portrait of an individual could be showing something personal like the way they are feeling in that moment or the way they wish to be perceived. Artists like Cindy Sherman uses her images to explore self-image. She uses photography as a mirror to show identity of females.

In this image, the main focus is the person in the image. Since the individual is Cindy herself, this is a strong indication that she is trying to reflect something she feels about herself by choosing herself to participate in being the model and not getting someone else to do it for her. This means the image is a type of selfie which further supports the idea of the image being a mirror. The image itself focusses on the feminine stereotypes since Sherman can be seen to be in the setting of a kitchen since the image shows things such as pans, shelving units and washing up items. This is stereotypical since it was normalised for woman to just be in the kitchens and she may be trying to show that idea. She can be seen to be looking over her shoulder and the viewer can interpret that to what they like but it was usually be a negative thing she may be looking at. Sherman is also seen holding her stomach which could be a usual comfort for a woman so this could further suggest something to make her uncomfortable is going on and further shows how she depicts the theme of vulnerability in her photos. The use of using herself in images further makes it a mirror image since she’s showing how an image reflects on how she feels and taking it to another level by actually using herself to show a stronger connection.

This is an image that I have chosen to represent Windows in photography. A photo is considered a window when the photo is attempting to offer a view into other worlds, experiences or cultures. They are photos of documentation rather than reflection which can tell us stories and expose us to environments we may have not experienced. Photographs that function as windows open up new perspectives and allow the viewer to see more. John Szarkowski explained his view of a photograph being a window by saying that a window is “through which one might better know the world?”. There are many reasons that make a photograph a window. For example they are able to transport the viewer back to that moment, evoking emotions, memories, or a sense of nostalgia. In this way, the photograph functions like a window into the past. As well as this it can be a window into other cultures which expose people to others lives and how they live differently. Windows can be interpretative and allow the viewer to decide for themselves the meaning of the photo.

in this particular photo, I think the reason that it is a window is because it is a window into another world. It is showing an insight into a world that the viewer may not have direct access to by exploring other cultures and a society different to our own. Through this photo, we can encounter new environments, people and experiences without physically being there. The image shows two boys who look happy when engaging in the photograph. However this juxtaposes their surroundings as it doesn’t look like they live in very good conditions. This image was taken on a photographers trip to India. I considered this a window image as the photographer is not from there so they aren’t ‘mirroring’ their own life but instead showing a representation of something else.

Overall, in contrast to Szarkowski’s opinions of deciding whether an image in either a mirror and a window, I believe that a photograph can also be both at the same time. It can reflect the viewer’s own inner world (a mirror) while simultaneously offering a view into something external, whether that’s a different place, culture, or moment in time (a window). The images I have chosen above have many differences and similarities. Cindy Sherman’s image is her playing a part to mirror struggles of female stereotypes. However the window image is an image of real life and not playing a part. Both images both aim to draw attention to factors in society.

What are the differences between photographs that are MIRRORS and photographs that are WINDOWS?

Photographs which are ‘reflecting a portrait of the artist who made it‘ – John Szarkowski, 1978, are considered to be mirror photography, as they are giving insight to the artists personal life. Mirror photography is often subjective and open to interpretation. Whereas window photography gives you a view into someone else’s life and experiences. Window photography allows you to explore the world and it can be a form of documentation, which is often objective. It allows you to understand more about the world as John Szarkowski said, ‘through which one might better know the world’ –  John Szarkowski, 1978.

Mirrors:

• Subjective (open to interpretation)
• Reflects artist
• Reflections
• View into your own life
• Manipulated
• Synthetic
• Personal

I believe this image is a form of mirror photography as it is personal to the photographer. It is an image of the photographers freezer which contains their food, this makes it quite a personal image as it is showing the world what they have got inside of their own home, and what they eat. It is also subjective as people may have different opinions about the freezer and its content, making it a mirror image.

Windows:

• Objective (not open to interpretation)
• Outside world
• Documents
• Real
• Public

This is a form of window photography as it is a view of the outside world, and it is real. It can also be a form of documentation as they are photographing what appears to be factories, making it a window image.

The origin of photography originated in 1822 where Nicéphore Niepce created a photography technique named heliography. Since this phenomenon, multiple interpretations of photography have also been discovered. Such as the process of the Daguerreotype created by Louis Daguerre, is created after capturing the image exposing it to mercury vapor which brings the visible image to life. There was also another significant photographic process in history named the Calotype created by Henry Fox Talbert. The Calotypes is a negative-positive process which is also known as the ‘paper negatives’, created by using different light sensitive chemicals and salts such as silver nitrate and silver chloride. These Calotypes differed from the Daguerreotypes due to people in the photos looking ‘on the edge of being present’ and seen as looking not quite alive due to a low sharpness and graininess, this caused a loss of fine detail. Whereas Daguerreotypes being very detailed and clear, making them stand out amongst other images. I believe that Daguerreotypes represent ‘mirrors’ in a multitude of ways. This is due to the fact the images produced by Louis Daguerre are very reflective and change when exposed to different angles of view. This is very well symbolized through the sharply defined one-of-a-kind photographs on silver-coated copper plates. They are also usually packaged behind glass and kept in protective cases like a mirror is. I also believe Calotypes signify windows as these images were mainly popular due to the fact they captured a moment in time, this relates to windows as whilst looking through a window you are witnessing a moment in time that will never occur again. Like the camera viewfinder, windows frame our view of the world. We see through them and light enters the window so that we can see beyond. This idea is supported through the quote “The photograph is seen either as a mirror- a romantic expression of the photographers sensibility as it projects itself onto the things and sights of this world; or as a window- through which the exterior world is explored in all its presence and reality” ¹ I believe there is a direct contrast within the concept of windows and mirrors due to the fact tableau focuses more on picturesque or dramatic effect and appear absorbed whereas documentary photography focuses more on straightforward and accurate representation through reality not fantasy. 

Paragraph 1

This image is a mirror due to the framework and people posing that have been used to produce it. This photo demonstrates a girl who is not especially rich, but her friends are. The girl is dealing with the pressures of the world and struggling with keeping up with it all. However, due to her beauty, she is able to enter the popular, higher-class group of people. However, she believes in substance over beauty and did not want to be included only for her looks and instead for her personality. This photo creates a mirror in the image as the main character in the photograph is seeking more than what the eye can see. This also demonstrates tableau photography as the models are arranged in a certain way to create a dramatic effect on the viewer, simply by posing and displaying in a potential stage-like setting. The photographer Laura Greenfield photographs acclaimed chroniclers of youth culture. These photographs reveal insight into the daily lives and rituals of women. Her photos range from extreme to more genuine photographs. She photographs girls of all ages from pre-schoolers to post-grads, with a multitude of different jobs. The thing I admire most about Lauren Greenfield’s work, is her exploration of the peer pressure, exploitation and sexualization which women experience, and how it may affect their emotions of self-worth, these themes can also be reflected through tableau photography. This topic she explores is clearly demonstrated through her photographs due to the specific scenes she chooses which show the hardships women face throughout life. I chose this photograph especially as it portrays a mirror metaphorically as it is reflecting the females place and feelings in the group as she is displaying how young people grow up quickly under the influence of Hollywood. A quote from John states “the difference between the thing that is shown in a photograph or the subject of the photograph and the photograph is the actuality in the acceptance of fact by the photographer”² this quote particularly inspires me as it reinforces the idea that the photograph might be more important than the thing itself and how every person interprets a photograph differently. This relates to a photo being a window as the image will act metaphorically as a window for the viewer to look through and create an opinion on it immediately.

Paragraph 2

This image demonstrates a ‘Window’ due to the fact it demonstrates an objective expression of darkness, sombre and danger rooted in a sense of realism. The slum in which it was photographed is named ‘The Bend’ which is known well for being filled with abuse and murder being a casual everyday occurrence. After viewing this photo, the viewer automatically feels a sense of uncomfortable and uneasy feelings as the ‘gang’ portrayed in the photo looks eerily at the camera leaning on curbs and stairs, having a not-so-welcome atmosphere. The photo also includes a woman with her child, leaning out the window, this makes the photograph even more sinister and unsettling as the idea of innocent and helpless people may face the idea of being killed due to it being a common occurrence in this area. This creates a ‘Window’ or documentary style photograph as the viewer can easily see through the photograph a sense of poverty and desperation for safety and security whilst also revealing the terror and the sorrowful lifestyle of urban immigrants facing the Mulberry Street ‘bandits’.  John Szarkowski’s words “A window is a device that invites the outside world in” ⁴, explain how windows serve as both literal and metaphorical frames in photography. This also explores how windows connect the interior world with the exterior world. This idea of ‘Windows’ through photography explores photography allowing observation and interaction with the outside environment through a picture. This relates to Bandits’ Roost as the camera lens with a slight vignette style, accompanied with the harsh light and ‘haphazard’ compositions convey the chaos of living in poverty.” 

Conclusion.

In conclusion, both of my chosen images represent the way photographs can be both ‘mirrors’ and ‘windows’ of the world as they represent human experiences and viewpoint of the world and how they are affected by issues. John Szarkowski’s theory of photography as a reflection of the Photographer’s Inner world and being a window onto the world overall, continues to create an impact and shape multiples opinions on understanding the variety of ways in which photography can engage with both the world and the self. Although Pearl might highlight the limitations of Szarkowski’s approach, he also highlights how the rise of digital photography has changed images as photos can be manipulated, layered and changed due to how images are created and consumed in the modern day. Although both of my chosen images demonstrate the ideology of ‘windows’ and ‘mirrors’ effectively, I believe the second photograph, (Bandits’ Roost, 59 1/2 Mulberry Street- Artist Jacob Riis) which portrays a well- known neighborhood famous for poverty, crime, and overcrowding, is a stronger demonstration of the metaphorical term ‘window’. The photograph demonstrates a powerful statement about the need for urban reform. This use of displaying the harshest of conditions serves as a tool for social justice, by documenting these conditions as an advocate for change. Although the first image ( Mijanou and Friends- Laura Greenfield) also demonstrates a powerful message of women’s’ lives and how they differ from men’s, I believe Bandits’ Roost conveys a more ‘real’ message as It captures a moment of social reality without any sense staging or preparation compared to tableau photography, I like how it is an example of pure documentary realism.  

Footnotes.

1. Mijanou and Friends from Beverly Hills High School on Senior Beach Day, Will Rogers State Beach | Cleveland Museum of Art ↩︎
2. The Thing Itself | COMD2330_Digital_Photography_spring16 ↩︎
3. Documentary Photography Movement Overview | TheArtStory ↩︎
4. John Szarkowski | MoMA ↩︎

WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PHOTOGRAPHS THAT ARE WINDOWS AND MIRRORS?

Mirrors and windows are ideas of a binary opposite. ‘…two creative motives…’ [Szarkowski, 1978] that have conspicuous contrasting ideas.

Windows: photos meant to act as a window for the viewer to see something that is primarily factual and external to the photographer’s own sensibility. 

Mirrors: Reflection in photography is also known as mirror photography. Its basic premise is capturing an image that also has a reflective surface that is echoing the surrounding scenery.

KEY WORDS

Mirrors: subjective, reflections, visions, psychological, expressions, manipulated, synthetic, personal.

Windows: objective, views, documents, optical, straight, public, real.

BINARY OPPOSITES

FOLDER

2. Paragraph 1 (250 words): Choose an image that in your view is a mirror and analyse how it is a subjective expression and staged approach to image-making. Choose one quote from Szarkowski’s thesis and another from Jed Pearl’s review which either supports of opposes Szarkowski’s original point of view. Make sure you comment to advance argumentation in providing a critical perspective.
4. Paragraph 2 (250 words): Choose an image that in your view is a window and analyse how it is an objective expression rooted in a sense of realism. Choose one quote from Szarkowski’s thesis and another from Jed Pearl’s review and follow similar procedure as above ie. two opposing points of view and commentary to provide a critical perspective.
6. Conclusion (250 words): Refer back to the essay question and write a conclusion where you summarise Szarkowski’s theory and Pearl’s review of his thesis. Describe differences and similarities between the two images above and their opposing concepts of objectivity and subjectivity, realism and romanticism, factual and fiction, public and private.

My 3 Chosen Quotes – John Szarkowski

1. “is it a mirror, reflecting a portrait of the artist who made it, or a window, through which one might better know the world?”
2. “The two creative motives that have been contrasted here are not discrete”
3. “ultimately each of the pictures in this book is part of a single, complex, plastic tradition”

My 3 chosen quotes – Jed pearl

Introduction

Within the origin of photography, there are two photographic processes; Daguerreotype and Calotype. The Calotype process first produced a photographic ‘negative’ in the camera, from which many ‘positive’ calotype prints could be made, whereas daguerreotypes were a one-off image. The differences between both the Daguerreotypes and the Calotypes is that Daguerreotypes are sharply detailed images preserved on a copper plate whereas Calotypes are black and white images preserved on paper. With Daguerreotypes I would say they are more referable to mirrors as Daguerreotypes are more detailed and when you look into a mirror there is only one focus point and that’s you in full detail however with calotypes they represent windows as there is a lot more to see but it is not in detail and is all seen from afar creating a much wider picture with a lot to it rather then one set story etc. A quote from Szarkowski theory is “is it a mirror, reflecting a portrait of the artist who made it, or a window, through which one might better know the world?” This is a question which he asks which I would have to say my response to this is that a mirroring image showing the artist behind the work creates a much more in depth story and meaning to it whereas a calotype being represented as a window also does create a vision into learning more about the world however with so much going on through a window its hard to know the true stories to every person, structure and animal within.

Paragraph 1

This image represents mirrors as it represents this lady’s life.

question: what are the differences between images that windows and mirrors?

John Szarkowski believes that photography falls into two categories, these categories are known as windows and mirrors. As Szarkowski states  “The distance between in terms of their conceptions of what a photograph is: it is a mirror, reflecting a portrait of the artist who made it, or a window, through which one might better know the world?”. To put it simply when making an image does it represent you as an artist if so this would be a mirror image, or does it show the exterior world, with its natural elements this would be a Window image.

words that associate with mirror photography

subjective

reflective

personal

unique

aesthetic

individual

romanticism

words that associate with window photography

documentary

realism

views

objective

optical

unaltered

genuine

artist that include windows and mirror photography

(mirror image: Richard Hamilton)

Richard Hamilton was a painter who created painting based on his views and ideals on the world which is was what made them unique and different. he produced his own atheistic which is what is known as pop art and was it to be believed to be one of the first paintings consisting if pop art. These are the reasons to why I believe this image is indeed a mirror image as it fits the criteria of Szarkowski’s theory’s about photography.

(window image: Ansel Adams)

Ansel Adams was a landscape photographer who travelled all of America to capture images similar to the one above. His photography consisted of capturing the beauty of nature in ways never seem before in photography which is was made his work so special, he visited Yosemite Valley, Yosemite National Park, all the time to capture its change over the years of his career making it documentary, realism and unaltered which is why this contributes to the mirror aspect of Szarkowski concept of his photography theory’s.

where?

school

function

streets of jersey

my home

work

who?

colleagues

family

friends

students

teachers

aim:

to present images that represents “windows or mirrors” accurately to the images and artists I have studied

how?

take photos around the school, work, home, and the streets of jersey.

artist studies:

Ansel Adams

Richard Hamilton

Mirrors Photoshoot plan #1

For my photoshoot, I plan on focusing on the mirror element (John Szarkowksi) to dive into personal identity. The shoot will be staged (tableau photography,) it will be set in his own room, which is a space which reflects personality and his personal life. The photoshoot being set in his room, plays a huge role in telling a story of his personal life with objects and his surroundings giving clues about his life and emotions. With this photoshoot I aim to create images which feel intimate and close to the model, inviting the viewer to connect with the model on a deeper level

Introduction

Photography turns the ordinary into extraordinary, with the use of different mediums it frames reality. One medium is the Daguerreotype, created by Louis Daguerre who is known as one of the fathers of photography. The Daguerreotype is a highly detailed image on a sheet of copper, plated with a thin coat of silver. The surface was polished until it looked like a mirror, which is also what the images are categorized as according to Szarkowski. Reflection of the Subject: Unlike the calotype, which is more about capturing a scene, the daguerreotype directly reflects the subject in a detailed and almost literal way. Intimacy and Presence: Szarkowski noted that daguerreotypes often convey a sense of intimacy. Clarity and detail can evoke a personal connection John Szarkowski said, ‘a mirror, reflecting a portrait of the artist who made it’.¹ The Daguerreotype was mainly used for portraits and personal images, that created a narrative. Representation of Reality: Szarkowski suggested that the calotype, like a window, offers a view into the world. Subjectivity of Perspective: While a window provides a specific view, it also filters what is seen based on the viewer’s position and the window’s frame Szarkowski presents a binary theory of photography as an art, in agreement to this we have the Calotype created by William Henry Fox Talbot. It was an improvement of the daguerreotype. A sheet of paper coated with silver chloride was exposed to light in a camera obscurers. Henry Fox created outdoors images, as Szarkowski explains ‘a window which one might better know the world’.² Overall, I agree with Szarkowski’s theory of binary opposites when it comes to window and mirror photography, opposites are what create a string, a pathway to create narrative throughout imagery. Although I do not agree that all photography stays within this binary line, I believe that some images may dip between either a mirror or a window creating a hybrid image. 

Paragraph 1: ^{Mirror Images}

This image is a mirror due to the use of models, and the framework that has gone into it. Pinckers has used tableaux, a group of motionless models to tell a story, and the story being told here is clearly linked to romanticism which is another feature of mirrors. This image is very subjective, up to an individual’s ideas, this is created by using little to no anchorage, for example the use of covering the models’ faces but leaving the face of a young boy who is taking photos of the ‘couple’. The images look like fiction, it’s not a real story it has been invited, we can see this by the use of objects, by using the exact moment the boys flash went off and using scarf to cover them, creating a staged scene. Szarkowski describes mirrors as ‘ a romantic expression’³, which is clearly portrayed here by the closeness of the models, leaving to imagination what is happening under the scarf. When he refers to mirrors as “a romantic expression,” he likely delves into the idea of reflection—not just in a literal sense, but also metaphorically. Szarkowski’s appreciation for mirrors as a romantic expression underscores the transformative power of photography—how it can reflect not just the external world but also the internal landscapes of human experience. On the other hand, Jed Pearl critiques the use of mirrors in art by highlighting their dual nature.⁴

(add a quote here by Pearl as an example of his critique)

While mirrors can create compelling visual effects and engage viewers, Perl often points out that they can also lead to a superficial understanding of art.  

Paragraph 2: ^{Window Images}

This image is a window using documentary, it consists of facts and isn’t staged, it is a fact that this place exists within the world, and this is what happens there. It is candid in the sense that it is straightforward, it portrays true realism, the actual situation it has no models within it that have had time to pose. This makes the images very objective, not letting people really put their personal opinions on it because it is so straightforward. It has a straight and optical view, with an open view it creates a public atmosphere, this landscape is not hidden to anyone or anything. Szarkowski describes windows as ‘ the exterior world explored in all its presence and reality’.⁵ Unlike mirrors, which reflect the self, windows invite viewers to engage with the world outside. They serve as frames that reveal the complexity of reality, capturing moments that are often rich with context, emotion, and narrative. They offer a glimpse into different environments, cultures, and experiences, enriching our understanding of the world. On the contrary Jed Pearl critiques, the use of windows in art by examining their potential to create a false sense of immediacy or authenticity. He argues that while windows can provide a view into the external world, they can also distance the viewer from the true essence of the scene being depicted. “An imperfect knowledge of the past” ⁶In essence, Perl’s critique serves as a reminder that while windows can enrich visual storytelling, they should be used thoughtfully to ensure that they enhance rather than detract from the depth and substance of the artwork. 

Photography is an incredibly unique art, it’s like no other in the essence of how many different forms it can create not only how many different modes it can make for example portrait vs landscape, but also in the essence of windows vs mirrors. John Szarkowski and Jed Perl offer insightful frameworks for understanding these dual roles, allowing us to explore the complex relationship between representation, reality, and perception in photography. Szarkowski describes mirrors as reflective surfaces that reveal the self, emphasizing personal introspection and the subjective experience of the viewer. Conversely, Szarkowski’s concept of windows focuses on the external world as it exists in all its presence and reality. Jed Perl provides a critical lens through which to examine these concepts. He critiques mirrors for potentially fostering a sense of narcissism, where the viewer becomes more focused on their reflection than on the artwork itself. Perl also highlights the superficiality that can arise from the use of windows in photography. Pearl argues that windows do provide a view of the external world, but they can also lead to a representation that is almost rules over and portrayed in a specific style, which might belittle and gloss over the deeper emotional engagement and understanding. In conclusion, Szarkowski’s theory of mirrors and windows provides a very valuable framework for understanding the oppositions of photography. Mirrors open the door for a subjective exploration of identity and emotion, while windows assist an objective engagement with the external world. Perl’s critique enriches this discussion by reminding us of the potential pitfalls associated with each approach, emphasizing the need for a deeper exploration beyond mere surface representations.  

1. Mirrors and Windows American Photography since 1960- John Szarkowski ↩︎
2. Mirrors and Windows American Photography since 1960- John Szarkowski ↩︎
3. Mirrors and Windows American Photography since 1960- John Szarkowski
   ↩︎
4. A Review Of Mirrors And Windows 1978- Jed Pearl ↩︎
5. Mirrors and Windows American Photography since 1960- John Szarkowski ↩︎
6. A Review Of Mirrors And Windows 1978- Jed Pearl ↩︎

We can never determine where and who started photography due to the fact that in the time that photography was being invented, many individuals were exploring and working in similar things in relation to photography. However what is certain, is the fact that many revolutionary people contributed to the history and origin of photography and many are credited till this day. The two most important processes that were introduced in the early forms of photography is the two processes called Daguerreotype and Calotype. Daguerreotype was a direct-positive process which created a highly detailed image on a sheet of copper plated with a thin coat of silver without the use of negative which was invented by Louis Jacques Mandé Daguerre. Calotype was a technique created by William Henry Fox Talbot where it consisted of a sheet of paper coated with silver chloride that was then exposed to light in camera obscura. Some may say that in terms of John Szarkowski’s thesis where he states that the world can be viewed through a ‘mirror’ or ‘window’, these two processes can be applied towards the ‘mirror’ side of the thesis. This is because most pictures produced using these two processes, were pictures of family or portrait images of people, so they were quite personal and reflective of the people who made it. Szarkowski’s implies that ‘Art is a mirror, reflecting a portrait of the artist who made it‘ which contributes to the statement above. There is a strong agreement towards this saying as I believe that a mirror can be a reflection of what the artist see’s and interprets. However, some may contradict that the process Calotype views the world as ‘window’. Some images produced using a Calotype, were quite documentary in style, and showed a better and different perspective of the world. We can prove this by the saying that is said in Szarkowski’s thesis, which is ‘window, through which one may better know the world‘. Many may even say that these two processes are both ‘windows’ as they both document the past.

The image that has been chosen that shows ‘mirror’ in terms of Szarkowski’s thesis is the image shown below. This image is seen as a ‘mirror’. This is because the image is quite subjective itself. The time, 1997, that this image was taken was the time that women were seen as housemaids and things that had to have motherly features and attitudes. This is a self portrait taken by Cindy Sherman where it shows her in a very provocative outfit doing household chores. She projects that women in those times needed to look presentable for their husband for visual pleasure yet needed to act like a responsible and role model to their kids, taking care of the chores which was something that women were obligated to do in those time periods. This image reflects Sherman’s ‘Self’ especially her views, its almost like its quite a personal and private subject for her but she still chose to use her voice and express her views using photography. This picture also connects to the theorist Laura Mulvey, who explores the male gaze and states that representation of women is quite objective and defines their identity in relation to male character, which is exactly what Cindy Sherman is posed as. Laura Mulver implies that “Woman’s desire is subjugated to her image (…) as bearer, not maker, of meaning”. This was said the good reads, a website filled with her quotes. This acts in accordance with Shermen’s intention because Laura Mulvey indicates in the quote what women are stereotypical portrayed as which Cindy also explores in the image show below and in many of her images. This picture wholeheartedly reflects the person she is which is someone who is interested in exploring identity and she even said that, “I wish I could treat every day as Halloween, and get dressed up and go out into the world as some eccentric character” which was said in the MoMA website

Szarkowski’s states that the “general movement in American photography in the past quarter-century has been from public to private concerns.”. Cindy’s images are subjective and private and we can extract the part where Szarkowski’s mentions the private concerns and apply it to her image. Although her images are quite controversial and ‘out there’, it is still private. How women were portrayed in that time was a private subject and something that was forbidden in terms of protesting about such roles within the female population. In Jed Perl review, Szarkowski’s comments on Minor White’s work as “romantic” and “self-expression,” which is something that is exactly represented in Sherman’s work. This strongly supports Szarkowski’s statement about how mirror is described.

The image that has been chosen that shows ‘window’ in terms of Szarkowski’s thesis is the image shown below. This image is seen as a ‘window’. This is because the image is objective. It literally states what its showing, it is common sense. This image was taken in 1933, Seville and entitled as, “Children Playing in Ruins”. Even in his descriptions he was objective and clear. After this image, The Spanish Civil War broke out, in the cities Henri Cartier-Bresson had navigated through. Although he did not know this would be the outcome, a war, this ruined building and crippled children became associated with the horrors of that war. If we look at Szarkowski’s theory about what a window is defined as, he says that “through which one may better the world” which is something that is exactly shown. Cartier-Bresson took this picture without realizing that three years after, war would unleash, which massively effected the way this image was read. It showed the possible outcomes of war and documented the distress of war, unintentionally.

Szarkowski’s observes that “there is a fundamental dichotomy today between photographers who believe that all art is concerned with self-expression and those who see it as a means of exploration” seen in the website called MoMA’s . Cartier-Bresson’s work, especially this image had a tendency of being documentary like and we can actually apply and extract a part from Szarkowski’s suggestion about the ‘concern’ of ‘exploration’ and apply it to this image. Especially with the known fact that this was taken few years before the Spanish Civil War in Saville. Again proof of his dangerous exploration. In Jed Perl review, Szarkowski’s comments in franks work, and notices that his work explores “realism,” and “exploration”, again complying with the first statement done by Szarkowski. It is certain that Henri’s work has a certain realism to it, the realism of War and the youth that are effected by it. Henri declares that “Of all the means of expression, photography is the only one that fixes a precise moment in time.” which was shown in John Paul Caponigro’s blog. This obey’s Szarkowski’s theory as it basically implies that expression is shown as something that is documentary like, it captures the past.

If we refer back to the question, ‘how can photographs be both mirrors and windows of the world’. If we look at Szarkowski’s theory in summary, it is obvious that he see’s mirror’s as something that is “art, reflecting a portrait of the artist who made it, and window, as those who may better know the world”. However in Perl’s review, Szarkowski’s reviews and observes mirrors as something romantic and self-reflection and windows as realism and expression. We can agree and say that photographs can be both mirrors and windows especially with the two images that were analysed, above, especially when applying Szarkowski’s theory and Jed’s review. They have similarities and these are the way they have people in the images, creating a door to a more public approach something that is considered as mirror. Both images are factual, however very different. One is about the Spanish Civil War, showing realism, and the other is about the realities of how women were portrayed, this is romanticism of how women were seen, in a specific time period. However, the image that shows how a women is projected is quite fictional. The image is made up, it was creatively constructed by the artist, even though it was factual, because that was exactly how women were characterised, it was also exaggerated and staged. Lastly if we look at the images, they can be both be mirror and windows however they individually have sides that they lean more to so in conclusion I think that in images there are mirrors , windows and in-between’s.