The Origins of photography

Camera obscura and Pinhole photography

The invention of the camera obscura was the first step towards the creation of modern photography. Consisting of a box or tent with a small pinhole to allow the beam of light to travel into the space and project reversed and inverted imagery of the exterior onto a surface within, the camera obscura’s name derives from the Latin for ‘dark chamber’. The earliest examples of this invention date from ancient times, with the first use being as a medium through which to safely view solar eclipses. It then, by the 16th century, had evolved to be a way for artists to trace their subject by placing them outside.

The camera obscura began to be adapted for portability, with smaller versions being created with the interior painted black and the use of a small angled mirror to allow the image to be viewed the correct way up.

Pinhole photography refers to the lensless technique of photography, utilising the most basic components of the medium, with a lightproof box, a tiny aperture and light-sensitive material. The images produced by these cameras are always wide-viewed and they have an almost infinite depth of field – owing itself to the small aperture.

Here are some images taken with a pinhole camera. You can see that they have a very wide view and long depth of field as is expected.

The earliest known record of these devices comes from the Fifth Century BC, by the Mohist philosopher Mozi. Essentially this is the same concept as that of the camera obscura, only with the use of photographic film or paper.

Nicéphore Niépce and Heliography

Nicéphore Niépce (1765 – 1833) is perhaps one of the most important figures in the birth of modern photography, providing the invention which allowed him to produce the first ever permanent photograph in 1827. He called this a ‘Heliograph‘ – meaning sun drawing.

Before this, in 1813, lithography was a popular hobby in France and Niépce found himself unable to obtain proper lithographic stone locally. He subsequently began experimenting with sheets of pewter, coating them in light-sensitive substances to capture engravings with the use of sunlight.

This was the beginning of many years of experimentation with various light sensitive materials on pewter eventually culminating in the final successful image, created using bitumen of Judea, a kind of asphalt which hardens on exposure to light. 

This is Niépce’s pioneering image.

Louis Daguerre and his Daguerreotype

Following on from Niépce’s story, in 1839, Daguerre finally persuaded him to allow partnership and further development of the technique Niépce had created, leading to the birth of the Daguerreotype.

Louis Daguerre (1787 – 1851) was a French painter who managed to greatly reduce the exposure time of heliographic production following Niépce’s death in 1833 through discovery of a chemical process that made the invisible image formed on brief exposure visible.

These experiments and Niépce’s initial findings led to the creation of the Daguerreotype, which is viewed as the first successful form of photography.

Robert Cornelius and Self-portraiture

Robert Cornelius (1809 – 1893) was the creator of the very first self-portrait image and the oldest known intentional photographic portrait of a person made in the United States.

The portrait, taken outside Cornelius’ family’s Philadelphia gas lighting business in late October 1839.His image was taken using a makeshift camera that used an opera glass as a lens, and the process required that he sit, motionless, in front of the camera for 10 to 15 minutes to allow the exposure to complete.

Henry Fox Talbot and his Calotype

Henry Fox Talbot (1800 – 1877) and his discoveries were critical in cutting down the exposure time of the Daguerreotype from one hour to one minute.

He used a sheet of paper coated in silver chloride in a camera obscura that when exposed to light became dark; resulting in the areas hit by light being dark, creating a negative image. The feature which led to his revolutionising of exposure time was his discovery of gallic acid, which allowed him to accelerate the development of the image. This discovery was made in 1840, and he named his process the ‘calotype‘. 

William Henry Fox Talbot – An oak tree in winter, Lacock, Wiltshire c.1842-43

The production of negatives was a real point of progress on the Daguerreotype, as this allowed the repeated reproduction of the image through a simple process of contact printing, as opposed to a singular positive image on metal which could not be reproduced. In 1842, he was awarded a medal by the British Royal Society for his revolutionary discovery.

Julia Margaret Cameron & Pictorialism

Julia Margaret Cameron (1815-1879), considered to be one of the greatest portrait photographers of all time, composed her images as though they aimed to imitate the popular Romantic and Pre-Raphaelite paintings of the day – a technique known as pictorialism.

Cameron received her camera late in her life, in 1863, as a gift from her daughter and son-in-law and began photographing as an amateur. Despite this she immediately viewed the activity as a professional one, ‘vigorously copyrighting, exhibiting, publishing, and marketing her photographs. Within eighteen months she had sold eighty prints to the Victoria and Albert Museum, established a studio in two of its rooms, and made arrangements with the West End printseller Colnaghi’s to publish and sell her photographs.’

She was certainly one of the pioneers in the endeavour to establish photography as an art form, with her portraits of friends, family and household staff emulating the romanticism and magic found in the painted portraits of the time.

Blessing and Blessed, 1865

However her apparent success was not celebrated by all who viewed her images; ‘The Photographic Journal, reviewing her submissions to the annual exhibition of the Photographic Society of Scotland in 1865, reported with a condescension that infuriated her: “Mrs. Cameron exhibits her series of out-of-focus portraits of celebrities. We must give this lady credit for daring originality, but at the expense of all other photographic qualities. A true artist would employ all the resources at his disposal, in whatever branch of art he might practise. In these pictures, all that is good in photography has been neglected and the shortcomings of the art are prominently exhibited. We are sorry to have to speak thus severely on the works of a lady, but we feel compelled to do so in the interest of the art.”’

Many of her models complained of discomfort when being photographed, with the apparently interminable exposure irritating them as they found it very difficult to sit still for such a long time. One said this of the experience;

“The studio, I remember, was very untidy and very uncomfortable. Mrs. Cameron put a crown on my head and posed me as the heroic queen. … The exposure began. A minute went over and I felt as if I must scream, another minute and the sensation was as if my eyes were coming out of my head; a third, and the back of my neck appeared to be afflicted with palsy; a fourth, and the crown, which was too large, began to slip down my forehead; a fifth—but here I utterly broke down, for Mr. Cameron, who was very aged, and had unconquerable fits of hilarity which always came in the wrong places, began to laugh audibly, and this was too much for my self-possession, and I was obliged to join the dear old gentleman.”

Overall, within her 12 year photographic career, she produced some 900 pictures, documenting many public figures of the time (e.g. Charles Darwin, Alfred Lord Tennyson, Robert Browning) and providing valuable insight into Victorian society.

Henry Mullins and the Carte-de-Visit

Henry Mullins was the first commercial studio photographer to have his premises in Jersey. He moved to Jersey, from Regent Street, London, in July 1848, and set up his studio as the Royal Saloon at 7 Royal Square. He worked in this studio for the next 26 years, and created many key portraits in Jersey’s history, including one of Dean Le Breton, the father of Lillie Langtry. It was a rather expensive practice, to get one’s portrait taken, and so the majority of his subjects (the exceptions being members of the Royal Militia Island of Jersey, for whom it was very popular to have one’s photo taken) were the island’s most affluent and ‘well-to-do’ inhabitants.

An advertisement from 1863
A typical Mullins family portrait

Cartes de visite where Mullins’ speciality, being small images that were the size of a business card, popular for their portability and ease. The majority of the archived images taken by Henry Mullins are in this form.

Here is a set of some of his portraits – all of prominent islanders of the time.

Bibliography

One thought on “The Origins of photography”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *