Sebnem Coskun is an underwater photographic fine artist, who has recently won the first prize in Nature and Environment category and the finalist award in the Photographer of the Year. As for the category in which she won the award, it is the Asia category.
Coskun won the prize in Nature and Environment category with her image. In her image, she took a diver surrounded by COVID-19 waste in the Mediterranean Sea. So, she took this photo of a Turkish diver last year in the Bosporus Strait (similar to a river).
The goal for Coskun as a photojournalist was to raise awareness about plastic pollution in the seas.
This was the award winning photo :
She has taken many other photos which visualise the plastic pollution in our seas.
SOME OF HER OTHER PHOTOS
ANALYSE
Coskun took this photo in Istanbul, Turkey. She quoted the UNDP’s World Free Diving Record-man Sahika Ercumen, who said, “I’ve been swimming between plastic more than fish in recent years in the Istanbul Strait”
The photo clearly and successfully visualises how much plastic there is in the ocean, by using a underwater dome for the camera. This way you can see under and above the water. This creates a nice contrast between the dark teal of the ocean and the bright white in the clouds.
The composition has been nicely executed, as the underwater part is the main focus it takes up most of the image, compared to the sky. The sky is partially blurred, although this does draw attention to the main focal point the plastic pollution.
There aren’t many vivid colours, except for the pieces of plastic, this helps highlights the main problem, as you notice it first.
Overall, I like the whole concept of the image, as it gives a whole new unique perspective. It successfully highlights Coskun’s main goal, which was to raise awareness about the water pollution as well as plastic pollution.
WHY I CHOSE HER?
Coskun has inspired me to follow her footsteps and create a piece which raises awareness about plastic and water pollution in our ocean. I thought it was a good topic as it is a big part of Jersey’s “lifestyle”, as we are on an island.
HOW IM GOING TO ACHIEVE THIS?
There are many ways to achieve this effect, such as :
Option 1 : I could actually arrange a diver to swim under water and I take photos with a GoPro or underwater camera. I could take plastic props and float/sink them under water (them clean them up after) or, edit them in the Photoshop. However, this is time consuming, could cost money and, the props might not work or the water could be too murky. So this may not be the best way.
Option 2 : I could simulate being underwater, for example, going to a studio, fill the room with a fog/smoke then make the studio light blue, to create the illusion of being underwater. Then hang the props from the ceiling with invisible fish line. Although, they would like they are hovering instead of floating. Also, it would not look identical to the ocean, but its is more creative.
Option 3 : Finally, I could create an almost 100% realistic image in Adobe Photoshop, I would take photos of coastal/beach features, such as, rocks, the sea, buoys, and boats. Edit them, and create an environment to put the images of plastic/rubbish into. Overall, I think this idea is the best, as I have experience at using Adobe Photoshop, and would be relatively easy to get images for.
EXPANSION ON OPTION 3 (FINAL IDEA)
For my final piece, I plan to have a half underwater/ half above water like Coskun’s image I analysed, the under water part would have lots of plastic bottles, fishing equipment (crab nets) and, other rubbish in, and maybe a boat in the centre of the image, as it would help the viewer work out the perspective of the image.
I would use the photos of plastic bottles, nets and other rubbish that I got from my photoshoots. Then, I would add them into the water, after I have made the landscape and sea.
For the underwater shot I would use an old photograph a fish tank/aquarium to get a clearer vision underwater (checked if I was allowed to use it first with Mr Cole), and the above water shot I would go to the beach. And finally put it all together in Photoshop.
WHO IS DILLON SAW? – (1st Artist/Photographer. Altered Landscapes)
Dillon started taking photos to capture beautiful sunsets in full detail that his phone couldn’t. After, he shot mostly landscapes and city-scapes, although he also enjoys portraiture. However he creates unique pieces in Adobe Photoshop by manipulating photos.
This is his Website where he showcases his work and information.
WHY I CHOSE DILLON SAW?
The main reason I chose him was to incorporate his way of work into my work and final piece, with the photo manipulation.
Although, Dillon Saw also focuses on natural landscapes and views, such as waterfalls and space and photos of galaxy’s.
I plan to make a main piece focusing on water/plastic pollution pollution inspired by Sebnem Coskun, but in the style of Saw’s work.
After, I make the water/plastic pollution piece, and still have time, I will create a piece in Saw’s style. I plan to take photos of the stars, galaxy and the Moon, as well as landscapes to create a final altered landscape in Adobe Photoshop, inspired by Dillon Saw, as a secondary piece.
IMAGE ANALYSE
I chose to analyse this image as it displays the fantasy and surrealism aspect that I’m looking to incorporate into my work.
Firstly, this image was created in Photoshop, I estimate the amount of images used in this image to be 5-7. Starting with the hills (maybe the hills in the foreground +1), possibly the tree, the birds, the sky, the Moon, and the stars.
Saw has positioned the two main elements along the vertical centre line, the tree and the Moon. This creates a focus on mainly the moon as the sky takes up most of the image. It being on the centre line allows the moon the take up a larger space in the image, which shows that Saw has thought about composition. This creates a theme and mood, which is a space/galactic, that can come across as calming.
Keeping the calming aspect, the dominant colours being blue and purple is its own dynamic in itself. The colour purple is often associated with power, mystery, and grandeur which links back to space and the never-ending universe. The colour blue represents faith, confidence, and loyalty, which has ties to the planet that we live on, that we see everyday, and are familiar with. The combination of blue and purple creates a sunset/evening scene that shows the transition to night fall that exposes the view into space.
The moon having pointed ends and being brighter then its surroundings, it draws attention to itself and separates it form the calming environment, which is full of natural lines, therefore it contrasts with the prefect curves of the moon. Making the moon the main focus. This creates an uneasy feeling as space is the main focus. The fact that it is in a surreal/man-made, created environment can cause people the think how much of space is unknown, and how we will never know 100% what is out there.
Anthropocene can eventually be regarded as an era in which people have had an enormous influence on the earth. Climate change, for example; atmospheric, air and ocean warming from fossil fuels. But human age is not just a change in the climate. It involves plastic pollution that has hit whole ecosystems.
In 2019, Climate activist Greta Thunberg (16) addresses the United Nations Climate Change Action Summit in New York City by saying:
“You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words. And yet I’m one of the lucky ones. People are suffering. People are dying. Entire ecosystems are collapsing. We are in the beginning of a mass extinction, and all you can talk about is money and fairy tales of eternal economic growth. How dare you!”
You could think, “How did we get there?” Greta tackled the key problem vigorously; covetousness. Man is greedy and seeks for his own want ever since the beginning of the time. Whether it’s land, money, oil, religion, revenge or more, our world’s selfish and clever race, man, is likely to be destroyed. Having said this, experts have indicated that, because of global warming, we have now seen 75% of species disappear, and that the level of sea has increased, leading to many deaths.
The elder generation is dying with our world, so that the damage inflicted by our predecessors might be resolved for our younger generation. Greta says, “
“This is all wrong. I shouldn’t be up here. I should be back in school on the other side of the ocean. Yet you all come to us young people for hope..”
This quote shows how unfair this is to all of the young people. Another important point she raises is:
“You say you hear us and that you understand the urgency. But no matter how sad and angry I am, I do not want to believe that. Because if you really understood the situation and still kept on failing to act, then you would be evil. And that I refuse to believe.”
This depicts successfully how powerful people do nothing. The Supreme Macists have used it as their attempt to populate Mars instead of using the billions (or possibly trillions of dollars) of renewable energy to resolve climate change or increase our defence against asteroids. The rich first go, because the rich most likely do. This already shows human egotism.
I hope you can see our initiative open-mindedly, grasp the risk and help us do something. What am I doing? What are you doing? I’m spreading awareness.
Planning and ideas
My purpose is to give my photographs with a message of danger and terror so that I become more conscious of climate change, Anthropocene, pollution and much more.
In order to accomplish so, I want to take photographs of dead fish, similar to the one above, with some plastic in them. I’ll do this to illustrate how our garbage, which we toss away, is “fine,” hurts and kills other species. I’m going to require a white and black backdrop to make Scott Laserow’s image of a fish with plastic on it, which is in black and white.
I will also try to reproduce the plastic sushi photos to represent how plastics has entered the food chain, leading to plastic consumption.
I have also thought about making a double exposure with my polaroid camera. This picture would show a twofold fire- and land exposure combined to raise awareness of climate change and how the fire danger in some kind of a natural environment has grown.
One of my thoughts was to take a cardiovascular picture. I plan from the market to acquire this heart. The photo would look like it was floating in a cow’s heart with a black or blank background. I aim to snap a shot with my heart and then add garbage slowly, plastic, paper, straws, etc. This is to attempt to send out the idea that if you or anybody wouldn’t let it to your heart, why would you? I can also make this heart a heart-fashioned earth by double exposure; double exposure enables me to keep the form and texture of the heart while the earth is overlaid.
My final plan is, for now, to photograph my 1930 box Brownie Junior n.2 and try to spoil the fire-fighting pic. Not everything, only enough to shoot a blazing image. This will generate a sense of worry as I damage the picture… But they might also assume that we do the same, not literally, for our world, but we think that it’s worth collecting our waste as someone takes it up, but who knows where that trash ends?
Location: The location for this photoshoot will most likely be at home due to easy accessibility. Since I’m doing a double exposure of land vs fire I will be clearly be shooting outside too.
Lighting: The lighting for this project will obviously be some parts natural and some artificial since I’m shooting both inside and outside.
I will choose to shoot during bright hours so that the Box Brownie can capture the scene in a successful way. Otherwise, I’ll try shooting with a slower shutter speed.
For the inside shooting, I will have to use my room lights, table light, phone light and natural lighting from the windows to powerfully capture the texture and structure of my objects while also creating some strong shadows.
Camera Setting: I plan to use Automatic mode for this shoot, since it’s faster, automatically chooses the best ISO, shutter-speed, and aperture which means my images will come out as clear as possible.
I may also try using other shooting modes like manual in order to demonstrate greater understanding and manoeuvre of the cameras.
For the polaroid camera I will attempt to use the double exposure mode to bring my ideas into reality.
Displaying my final ideas: My main plan to display my final ideas is to create a video with music, if this fails, I’ll try doing a virtual gallery through photoshop or create a VR gallery as usual. Although, I have done this enough times.
Artists
Scott Laserow
Scott Laserow has worked for over 30 years in the media sector and showcases his distinct and creative style in print media, online designs and animations. He won 75 significant national and international honours and was included in 60 publications in 48 shows covering 16 countries.
He has been a full-time professor of graphics and interactive design from foundation through graduate classes at the Tyler School of Art at Temple University in Philadelphia. Scott was the one responsible at school for introducing new technology and set up his own interactive curriculum, teaching identities and branding, animation, web design, digital apps and tablets and more.
He states that,
“In 2004, I discovered the power of the poster and how it could help support humanitarian causes throughout the world,”
That’s right because he has taken part in several causes. In many international magazines, for example, his posters were published in the cover of GRAPHIS posters in 2015. Now he is a judge for a large number of poster races.
Mary Mattingly
Mary Mattingly is an activist of climate change and utilizes photography to communicate a message about topics such as sustainability and climate change and displacement via her work on portable building and sculptural ecosystems. An example of this is given in the above picture; the following answers are provided on your website:
We can clearly see here her efforts to encourage people not just to warn against environmental degradation, but to take care of the environment.
In her other projects, however, we are witnessing the vast majority of their labour under the weight of their possessions, refugees of a tainted past seeking a better future in the natural environment, we see how they try to build a better existence, and make easy and useful survival strategies.
Image Analysis
Scott Laserow
Substance:
We can assume that this image was originally in a digital format for the reason that it’s of higher quality than film.
The image was taken inside of a studio with a black background (which could be easily edited in).
This image was most likely a poster since Scott has worked in posters since 2004. This being said, the aim of this image was probably to tell a message about plastic pollution in the oceans. This can also be seen as protest art since it’s trying to bring our attention to how our own actions are impacting other beings, slowly destroying and suffocating them.
Composition:
The main focal point of this image is in fact the fish with plastic wrapped around it.
Author has powerfully used the rule of thirds to compose this image as the fish is positioned in the centre.
The main colours of this image are black and white tones. He purposely used the black and white technique to create this image to portray a sense of light vs dark and may also have used it to show the type of darkness our sea life are starting to live in, but the lighter tones may suggest a better future for our ecosystems if we take action now.
Lighting:
The light in this black and white image seems to be coming from the front as there are some shadows behind their head which could suggest that the light is indeed coming from the front. Evidently, the light seems to be artificial as the background is black and
There are soft shadows and dark tones throughout the image. For example, the bottom of the picture is darker than the top. The image is artificial, but the camera seems to have focused on the bright sides first as the image seems to be a bit naturally underexposed as there are soft lights and soft shadows throughout the image.
Techniques and editing: (evidently black and white filter or camera were used)
A fast shutter speed was powerfully used to produce this image as the subject (fish) has been shot to a razor-sharp focus.
The depth of field for this image appears to be quite large as most of the image is fixed. This was used to capture as most of the setting as possible while keeping a crisp detail to the image.
The artist may have purposely artificially underexposed the image to keep it in focus and so it isn’t too bright or too dark just the perfect tone.
The camera is still as this is a shot of a subject and all the details are in focus suggesting that the camera was stationary; a tripod was likely used.
Atmosphere:
The photograph makes me feel shocked at knowing that fish live and grow in this type of environment, all because of us and our toxic waste.
The photograph seems to be communicating a message of plastic pollution since the fish is half made of / covered with plastic. And, at the bottom it reads, “2/3 of the worlds fish suffer from plastic ingestion.”
My response to this image is shock and disgust due to the thought of, “how have we come to this?”
Response:
I will attempt to use the same black and white techniques to capture my shots to make it alike the original artist.
In order to incorporate elements into my own work I will need to make sure most or some of my subjects are of fish and there are elements of plastic throughout the images.
Similarly, Scott has influenced my shots by following his key theme which is the theme of Anthropocene. The alignment of subjects and set-up have also influenced my own future set of images.
I like this photograph since it portrays just exactly how dangerous plastic indigestion can be for our ecosystems and us since we have, at some point, eaten microplastics.
Mary Mattingly
Substance:
We may presume that this image was initially captured in digital format since it is higher quality than film, has a higher ISO, and is cleaner because film contains more dust particles than digital.
The image was taken outside with a street view.
According to Mary, the objective of this image is to assist her “avoid superfluous product purchases and use things for their entire useful life” as well as “measure my Ecological Footprint and identify ways to lessen it.”
Composition:
The key focus of this image is the woman carrying her own plastic waste around.
The author has effectively employed the rule of thirds to design this image, with the woman and the mound of garbage in the center.
The dominant colors in this image are grey and white; there are many other colors, such as green and blue, but the major ones are grey and white. This was most likely done to demonstrate how gloomy and dreary our planet has become as a result of our own garbage.
Similar to Scott’s image, the white could represent a hopeful future.
Lighting:
In this shot, the light is coming from above, effectively lighting the whole landscape. This allows the camera to focus more easily.
There are a variety of lighter tones across the image, which provides better illumination for the camera to concentrate on, resulting in a higher quality image that is precisely exposed.
Techniques and editing: (evidently black and white filter or camera were used)
A fast shutter speed was powerfully used to produce this image as the subject (fish) has been shot to a razor-sharp focus.
The depth of field for this image appears to be quite large as most of the image is fixed and there is a wide show of scene. This was used to capture as most of the setting as possible while keeping a crisp detail to the image.
The artist may have strongly used editing technology like Lightroom to energetically adjust the photograph to its perfect brilliance
A tripod was visibly used since there is 0 to no shake in the image which would be difficult to do with just holding the camera, unless a fast enough shutter-speed was used.
Atmosphere:
This image makes me wonder how much litter a single person is capable of making in a couple of months. Also, I feel fairly forewarned and motivated to take better care of our environment and, most likely, to begin recycling more, since there are several objects that might be turned into something new while effectively decreasing hazardous waste.
Response:
I plan to employ a similar strategy to Mary in order to educate people about the corruption and degeneration of our ecosystems, as well as to propose easy solutions that will motivate them to alter little behaviors that will have a big influence one day.
I will incorporate elements of plastic in my images so that it makes it easier to show how this artist has inspired me.
I appreciate this shot because it enlightens us on how much people have changed the environment in order to make our lives simpler, but in doing so, we have made it more difficult for ourselves.
Comparing Scott and Mary’s images
Scott:
implements his ideas through posters / protest art and propaganda
uses fish as models and subjects in his photographs to help us get intrigued in the toxic waste issue
more inclined to shoot in black and white suggesting his maturity towards the matter
tends to use a darker type of background to bring the attention to the issue
implements his image using portrait size to target the issue more easily and make it the focus of our attention
more likely to use image editing software since he has used it to merge the plastic and the fish together creating an illusion of a realistic plastic fish. This may make the viewer think, “is it real? is our sea life really dying due to plastic ingestion?”
What their work have in common:
both artists have used a tripod to completely capture their scenes in full detail
both implement elements of plastic in their images since it is a common cause of pollution
the pair appear to use lighter tones in their images to manifest a better tomorrow
Mary:
produces real portable sculptures made of plastic so that it can be used in her photoshoots
uses more colour in her photos in order to show the different aspects of Anthropocene
uses landscape format to capture a wider view of the setting
uses natural lighting from the sun to adequately brighten the image and capture every detail
Additional artists
Man ray
Man ray was a famous photographer who explored surrealism and had a huge impact on the DADA and surrealist movement.
He was most known for, as stated above, surrealistic photographs to which he called “rayographs”, which makes reference to his name.
Willem Claesz Heda
Willem Claesz Heda was a Dutch, golden age artist who explored still life art / vanitas.
Vanitas used to be quite dull, as they were usually monochrome.
Through Vanitas, artists would represent great power and wealth, as the art would contain only a few objects like a skull, fruit, books. However, as time went by, Vanitas began to lighten the mood, the palettes became more diverse. Objects were often tumbled together, suggesting the conditional overthrow of the achievements they represent.
Contact sheets
Final Outcomes
Fish plant
Fish’s diet
These are my favourite outcomes as they strongly matched my imagination of what I wanted these images to look like.
The first is an image of a fish, with plastic straws, in a plastic bottle filled with water. This was done to look like some sort of surrealistic plant; the bottle is the vase, the fish is the plant and the straws are the flowers, hence the name, “Fish plant”.
In a similar manner, the second image is of a fish with plastic coming out of its stomach. To which I gave the name of “Fish’s diet”.
These were done to indicate to the viewer that the plastic we throw away starts becoming part of sea life’s diet which ultimately kills them as they can’t digest plastic.
Furthermore, these photographs were shot to depict the concept of the Anthropocene; human effect on the environment. This is intimately related to the Anthropocene since it demonstrates human effect on other eco-systems.
Props, models, and composition are clearly used in these image sets. For example, I’ve placed the topics in the centre to direct the viewer’s attention to the problem first.
I’m hoping that by sharing these photographs, others may be inspired to take better care of their plastic waste.
Relation to my key artists:
Similarity / Relations:
relates to Scott since it’s in black and white, implements elements of plastic and are of similar size for a poster.
Both Scott and I attempt to portray the same message; toxic waste in the oceans.
Relates to Mary for similar reasons; includes elements of plastic, attempts to talk about human impact on the environment.
Relates to Man Ray since these images are quite surreal and makes it seem as something that came out of a dream.
Relates to Willem for the fact it quite links with still-life, fairly literal.
Difference / own adaptation:
Scott adds writing to his images whereas I have kept my images entirely clean of writing to bring the viewers attention to the main issue (plastic waste in the oceans) since “an image speaks more than 1000 words.”
I have obviously adapted the plastic elements differently to Mary and Scott. For example, turning it into some sort of plastic plant vase.
Plastic diet
This image was created to show how microplastics are starting to become part of our food chain since “2/3 of the worlds fish suffer from plastic ingestion.”
You may notice this image is one of the only ones with colour, this was purposely done to show an example of the different types of plastic that we could be eating without knowing. It was also done to differentiate from the monochromatic theme inspired by Scott Laserow and have some relation to Mary since she uses colour in most of her projects.
Relation to my key artists:
Similarity / Relations:
Realistically relates to one of my images in my mood board
The colours are quite similar between this image and the one in my ideas block. Plus, Mary also uses colour in her images
Relates to both Mary and Scott since there are plastic elements in the image and talks about similar type of issues.
Both Scott and I have talked about plastic ingestion
Could be argued it’s a portable type of sculpture so relates to Mary’s photographic method
Difference / own adaptation:
Scott talks about fish ingesting plastic whereas I attempt to talk about US ingesting microplastics
The composition of my image is different to Scott’s since his subject is further up the centre whereas mine is in the middle (rule of thirds)
My image has no shadow considering the one on my mood board does
Irreversible
Never the same
These images were actually taken with a Box brownie jr. 2 (1930).
These 2 images above were created to show 2 things:
We have wrecked our natural environment, and no matter how hard we try to repair it, it will never be the same as it was before, making it irreversible – this is demonstrated in my photographs through the use of collage / photomontage, with the shredded pictures indicating damage to the shot.
Even if we are successful in repairing our environment, it will never be the same as it was 50 years ago (for example) – this is demonstrated by the random collage of the same picture, which was created in an attempt to depict a human modifying “an environment,” attempting to bring it back together, and failing.
Relation to my key artists:
Similarity / Relations:
Relates to the theme of Anthropocene as it clearly talks about human impact on the environment
Monochromatic so it relates to Scott
The use of white tones also provides the same hopeful future as Scott and Mary’s images
Difference / own adaptation:
Landscape for the others are mainly of a subject or item/s
These images are a set of collages whereas Scott, Mary, etc, are not collages, they’re more still-life
End of an era…
I chose the title “End of an era…” since people are, in a sense, putting an end to our planet. With sea levels and greenhouse gas emissions growing, only God knows how long we will be on this planet. This is also evident in the image, which depicts a gorgeous landscape photograph being torched by a person, reinforcing the idea that people are ruining the environment.
In some ways, the repercussions of global warming can be seen in this image, as the fire is burning the photograph and, as a result of global warming, we are seeing more fire breakouts worldwide. Here is an example of the harm done in Australia 2020:
“As of 14 January 2020, 18.626 million hectares (46.03 million acres) was burnt or is burning across all Australian states and territories. … In New South Wales, the fires burnt through more land than any other blazes in the past 25 years, in addition to being the state’s worst bushfire season on record.”
The image also features an individual clutching the burning picture, which was done to communicate a sense of concern to the spectator; not only because the picture is burning (since developing the film and printing the image is extremely expensive and time consuming), but also because the viewer can see the flames moving closer to the human’s fingers, which may burn them. This might imply that humans are the ones causing damage to the planet but they will one day suffer because of it.
However, the use of ellipsis was used to demonstrate that THIS DOES NOT HAVE TO BE THE END; there is still hope for humankind by doing simple things like not driving as much to cut pollution.
Relation to my key artists:
Similarity / Relations:
Powerfully talks about humans negative impact on the environment which successfully links with Scott and Mary’s ideologies
Mary and I have used a “human” to hold our “portable sculptures” / image
Again, mentions similar topics like climate change, global warming, Anthropocene
Contains a black background powerfully associating with Scott Laserow
Difference / own adaptation:
This image uses fire rather than plastic
Editing
The editing for these photographs was primarily done by hand. The fish with plastic, for example, were all made by hand. My photographs were captured with my Samsung A80 48 megapixel 3D camera (better at increasing depth of images). And, owing to Samsung’s innovative image processing software, the camera was able to take a single image and alter it with several filters all on its own. As a result, I picked the black and white photograph as the best. It also fits with the Anthropocene idea.
I’ve also used editing software like Snapseed to remove some dirt and lines from the backgrounds of my photographs to make them seem clearer, and I’ve used the perspective tool to modify the angle of my products and subjects to centre them, which could be done to implement the rule of thirds. I’ve used Photoshop to resize my photographs, and I’ve used the healing + duplicating tool to smooth out the background on my photographs. I utilized Samsung Gallery’s editing tools to convert my photographs to monochrome since it has a stronger monochrome filter than other applications, which makes them seem fairly grey and high in contrast.
Furthermore, another man-made image alteration was attempted with the “End of an era…” image, but owing to the DSLR’s inability to concentrate on other things other than the fire, I wasn’t able to record a wide range of photographs of one of my photographs of the Sand dunes burning. As a result, I discovered Photofunia, a website that edited the fire for me.
Presentation
YouTube video I made on Anthropocene as a way to present my images
Final Evaluation
To be honest, I am really thrilled about sharing with you this initiative and helping to open your eyes to the reality we all claim to conceal or ignore.
My favourite photographs are the “Fish Plant”, the “End of an era…” and “Fish’s diet” since they fit with my imagination, are excellent quality and strongly connected with the topic of Anthropocene/human environmental influence and are pretty weird and artistic.
On the other hand, for different reasons, the further pictures made for this project did not prevail. For example, the contrasts are rather deeper, not so strange as the triumphant results, are really low in quality and, in my opinion, rather difficult to look at. However, they achieve their goal by sending the word of human effect to biodiversity, biophysical habitats and other resources.
The presentation of my images was a remarkable and unusual method to show my pictures in a new and original way. Since I used VR galleries for some time, it has changed. For I used Canva to make this movie, the music was free to use. In addition, I have used the Anthropocene topic in the YouTube video presentation to encourage the public to look after our planet better and therefore make a connection between Mary and I.
Finally, I accept this assignment to some extent and my final results were successful in achieving their major objective.
Lewis Baltz was an American Photographer Born 1945 who had an important role in the New Topographics movement of the 70s.
He was one of the first photographers to challenge the dominant methods of landscape photography at the time. He confronted the ideas of the “zero club” photographers at the time and along with 9 other photographers pioneered the New Topographics movement which turned photography’s perspective towards shooting urban man made features.
Lewis was trained to use photography as an art medium, to intersect with other aesthetic social questions rather than a practical form of diarizing and documentation.
Baltz grew up in one of the most rapidly urbanizing placing in the world – Southern California in the post war period. He watched the changes taking place he described it as a new world being born however not a very pleasant one.
It was a new homogenized American environment that was marching across the land and being exported. He noticed that no one wanted to confront this. This realization was the initiation of his interest in shooting the urban and igniting the New Topographic.
The above image was taken in 1974 and it is called “The New Industrial Parks” and it is part of a monographic series along side “The Tract Houses”, “Maryland”, “Nevada” and “Park City” wherein Baltz addresses cultural and philosophical questions about industrial zones and an artistic documentation of the boom in the urban landscape.
This piece relates well to Lewis’ motive to focusing on the familiar and creating an aesthetic out of the mundane. He does this by shooting a mundane building but making use of a deadpan viewpoint to create a somewhat symmetrical image with many leading lines. These leading lines create a grid like triad which splits the image vertically to comply with the rule of thirds.
The image has a shallow depth of field which gives it a 2D shape which can be an allusion to the lack of humanity which comes from urbanization.
The three slender trees on the right of the image are positioned strategically in line with the rule of thirds grid Lewis created and they add a sort of contrasting tension to the composition as they look like they are being overpowered by the colossal building behind them which consumes the whole frame. This could have been an attempt at pointing to the idea of mans impact on natural landscapes and how they are being overpowered.
The low saturation and more greyscale colours in the images convey the gloomy emotions of the industrialisation. The image also has a very wide tonal range.
I used my own style which implements photography (a photo which it took), and 3D modelling in Blender. Then edited it in Photoshop.
I planned to make an image based on climate change, rising temperature, and deforestation.
I planned to use the freedom tree, as was make of metal, therefore it wouldn’t burn in a fire. I chose fire as it was a heat source, which represented rise temperatures. After, there would be no trees, signifying deforestation.
First I took a landscape into Blender, modified it, and changed the land, and scaled up mountains, where I would Photoshop the Freedom tree onto. I added many trees to the landscape. After I added fire to the trees and, put a camera-raw filter the change small details in Photoshop.
This is the final image after all the Photoshop:
It is called, “Freedom Tree 2072”, due to the rapidly increasing changing climate, I created an exaggeration of the future if rising heats is ignored. It is based off of the Freedom Tree in town; my image, which is in the middle of a forest fire. I wanted to show how the man-made, metal tree was not affected by the fire, compared to the burning natural forest around it, with CO2 gasses giving the sky a hazed look, due to the smoke. Hopefully, it can visualise the serious impact of climate change!
I was awarded a prize for this and it is getting featured in an exhibition in, Liberty Wharf on May 13th-15th.
These were the photos that took to represent the “New Topographic’s” on the Highlands/Hautlieu photoshoot.
I mainly took straight-on photos of the buildings and sheds/warehouses around the area.
I used multiple exposure bracketing on some of them to get a more dramatic image.
I edited these images in Photoshop ACR / Camera-Raw.
My favourite is the bottom left image, as there is a contrast between the bright blue sky and the dirty building. And lots of detail in the texture of the metal.
New topographics was a term created by William Jenkins in 1975 to describe a group of American photographers (such as Robert Adams and Lewis Baltz) whose pictures had a similar repeated aesthetic, mostly black and white prints of the urban landscapes, a human-environment with the natural terrain hiding in the background.
Image taken by Robert Adams, Mobile Homes, Jefferson County, Colorado, 1973.
What was the new topographics a reaction to?
It was a reaction to the increasingly suburbanised world around them, and a reaction of idealised landscape photography that raised the natural elemental.
Rut Blees Luxemburg – (Case Study 1 / Night)
Rut Blees Luxemburg was born in 1967 is a German-born photographer. Her technique is to take photographs at night, mostly exploring the urban landscape. She experiments with exposure time and low light conditions to get an image that captures the night life in the city.
As you can see, Luxemburg uses warm colours and reflections in water puddles, which creates a unique view of her scene. Also, experiments which long exposure.
Analyses Of One Of Her Images :
All the lighting in this image is artificial, due to it being night time. It seems that there is a tungsten tone in the lights, as there is a orange/red tint on the surface that the light hits. This means that the image has a warm temperature to it, as the colour red is represented by heat. There is also a washed out green colour to the buildings in the back, most likely caused by the reflection of the flood lights on the football pitch. The colours are muted, which gives off a serene atmosphere as it feels abandoned. Although this isn’t the case as motion is captured by using a long shutter speed, this makes it so the car lights show as a long red or white lines; depending on what way the car is driving. Since, it is night the camera will not overexpose the image, as there is no natural sunlight, therefore she would of been using a high ISO, eg 800-3200. There is a high depth of field as all the image is in focus, and also Rut Blees Luxemburg displays a wide range of tonal values, achieved by including and showing a light source and shadows under the overpass. There are many horizontal lines and geometric shapes in the image. The horizontal lines suggest a feeling of rest, because objects parallel to the earth are at rest. In this landscape, horizontal lines also help give a sense of space and attention to the 3D aspect to help visualise that the image was taken from a high place. As she is a tutor at the Royal Collage of Art, this may mean that she has a higher status position over her students, which is why the image is taken higher up.
Where Can I Take Night Urban Landscapes?
Mood Board
Photo-shoot Plan
Night photos – (Contact Sheet)
Final Night Photos (Titled)
Go.
Roundabout turn off.
Crossing.
Roundabout.
Overpass.
Above the tunnel light trails.
My Image Comparison To Luxemburgs Image – Venn diagram
Overall, my I really like my image as it captures motion and, I have created a unique pattern with the buses lights. The colours are vibrant and the bus lights are in focus, which is the main focus point in the image. As I used a high aperture the still lights appeared as stars. For composition I go low to the ground the shoot more upwards, the lights from the bus fill up most of the image. The image is balanced and exposed perfectly even thought it was taken at night time.
Stephen Shore – (Case Study 2 / Day)
Stephen Shore’s work has been widely published and exhibited for the past forty-five years. He was the first living photographer to have a one-man show at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York since Alfred Stieglitz.
He has also had one-man shows, his most rememberable at : Los Angeles; Jeu de Paume, Paris; and Art Institute of Chicago.
In 2017, the Museum of Modern Art opened a major retrospective spanning Stephen Shore’s entire career. He has received fellowships from the Guggenheim Foundation and the National Endowment for the Arts.
When he was in New York; in the early 1970s, he sparked new interest in colour photography, and in the use of the view camera for documentary work.
Analyse Of One Of His Images:
This image shows a busy American street in 1975, Shore’s took this image next to a gas station, which had a wide view over the streets. The image is bottom heavy, which means that the viewers eye is directed toward the bottom half of the image, compared to the empty blue skies.
The contrast of a busy, chaotic street and the clam, tranquil mountains in the background, signify the difference between man and mother nature. Even thought the mountains are small they are still present. The fact that the mountains don’t take up a large portion of the image shows that the industrial and urbanising world is taking over natural land.
The main colours in this image are red, blue, and white. That just happens to be a colours in the American flag. It can suggest that Shore’s is proud to be an American citizen, which he displays through his work of photography.
Overall, I think this image mostly basic, with a normal “street photography” composition, that doesn’t use any objects/techniques to grab the viewers eye. The colours are normal, but mostly blues, which gives off a cool feelings, despite being in a desert in Los Angles. Although, I do like how Shore’s has captured the history of America, by including the old cars, and billboards, (not digital).
Where Can I Take Night Urban Landscapes?
Mood Board
Photo-shoot Plan
I plan to walk around town and take photos of unique buildings and scenes that I find. I would go to Weighbridge first then maybe, round the back of the tunnel to La Collette then finish off at Millennium park and the small streets round there.
Urban Day Photos – (Contact Sheet)
Final Photos
Analyse–(Shores Vs Mine)
This is my final image I chose, as I feel that it linked to Stephen Shore’s style the best.
Similarly, both the image capture a historical value. My image captures the liberation statue, and Shore’s capturing change over time.
Both, include nature in a build up urban environment. In my image its the flowers in the foreground, and Shore’s its the mountains in the background.
Also, both use vibrant colours, except mine has a more vibrant summer feel. However Shore’s uses a smaller colour range, compared to mine which uses bright yellows and ultra blues.
Overall, I like mine more as there is more of a focus point; being the statue, this is achieved by using a unique composition with the flowers to almost “frame” the statue. To draw more attention to the statue I used a lower aperture to blur the flowers.
“New Topographic”, a term coined in 1975 by William Jenkins which referred to a photographic movement undertaken by a group of American photographers whose works had a similar look – mostly uniform, black and white urban landscapes.
Some of the photographers associated with this movement where Robert Adams, Lewis Baltz, Nicholas Nixon and Bernd and Hiller Becher.
Bernd and Hiller Becher
Lewis Baltz
Lewis Baltz
Lewis Baltz
Nicholas Nixon
Nicholas Nixon
Robert Adams
Robert Adams
The movement captures mans impact, they photographed urban landscapes such as garages, parking lots, warehouses in a similar way to how early rural landscape photographers would shoot natural landscapes.
As environmentalism took hold of the public conscience in the 1970s landscape photography began to capture natural landscapes and human activity as a singular connected body.
New topographic pieces captured the essence and beauty of these depressing, mundane, industrialized landscapes. This aura created around the aesthetic of these images is an ironic juxtaposition to the unease the photographers felt about mans erosion of the natural environment. This was represented in their work from the emotional disparity they created in their pieces with a lack of human presence, flat contrast, lowkey tones, centred framing and unassuming depth and lighting.
On the other hand this divide they portrayed between man and nature was done with aesthetic precession. The Artists that made up the new topographic noticed how there seemed to be a sense of obscenity around photographing these urban landscapes. There was a sort of fear man had around looking at its own creations. They wanted to highlight this by photographing the urban and providing it with an aesthetic… The photographers created beauty in these images by shooting from a unique viewpoint. They shot with a deadpan aesthetic in mind and looked for sharp angles or structural elements.
