Firstly I changed the brightness and contrast to brighten the image and make the colour contrast stronger
Then I changed the vibrancy to lift the colour and make it stand out more.
Firstly I changed the brightness and contrast to brighten the image and make the colour contrast stronger.
Then I changed the vibrancy to lift the colour and make it stand out more.
Evaluation
In comparison both images give a direct message of littering and how it is unacceptable. I find that my image is successful in the way that is shows the message but is unsuccessful in other ways that the original image portrays. Such as in the image with the red lighter it shows the sand in a cooler colour to then brighten out the main object in the image. Whereas in the other image the sand is a lighter more saturated colour so the background stands out too with the foreground. In the two photos the use of bright colour lighters influences the outcome and is bold showing up against the sand adding more attraction towards the image.
With the eye view of the photos are similar on how they are an ant eyes view but with the blue lighter it has a higher view point compared to the red lighter as it shows the sunset behind. With the blue lighter you can see that it has a stronger background where you can clearly see the sand and grass behind whereas with the other photo the light is covered by the lighter and that all eyes are drawn to the lighter instead of the background with the sand as the tones of the sand are very dull.
Hughes spent almost 30 years making images along various coastlines until the late 1980s when he started photographing various items of trash along the intertidal zone. As a young art student, Hughes recalls seeing the exhibition Rubbish and Recollections, by Keith Arnett, co-organised by a renascent Oriel Mostyn, Llandudno and the Photographers’ Gallery, London which the content inspired him and with his experiences of living and surfing in south Wales helped influence the inspiration. Between 1999 and 2006 the photos of the plastic waste being washed up by the waves where he surfed became so constant and time consuming of his work that this project was published in the book ‘Dominant Wave Theory’.
“Whilst Hughes’ images of plastic depicted in heroic scale may give us some concern about waste material and its impact upon a sensitive maritime environment, there is another side to these intelligent images. Hughes presents us with not only an ecological message but a knowing heady rush through artistic strategies using the power of photography’s saturated colour to highlight, frame, and play with scale, in an irreverent awareness of art historical practices”.
Andy Hughes work focuses on the littoral zone and the politics of plastic waste. His photography is focused with the idea of ‘thing-ness’ of plastic, watery worlds and coastal habitats. He has been recently venturing out into gamification (game design), ruinology (the stuidy into reconstructing ruins) and poetry. Which internally gets him to proceed in philosophy, literature, art and film, including archival film, as well as interfacing with scientific research. With the interest in radical conceptions of materialism and the impact this has for politics, ecology and the everyday way we think of others, the world, and ourselves.
In 2013 Andy Hughes was invited to be one of the three artists to join the worlds first project to explore the integration of science and art to document and interpret the issue of plastic pollution in the marine and coastal environment.
“This image rejects any attempt at trying to illicit the ‘perfect moment’, all notions of the ‘special moment’ at sunset are reversed. The upturned cigarette lighter acts as a kind of inverse black monolith. The monolith from Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey, a film that explores elements of human evolution and technology. The setting sun is precisely centred, cascading the light rays through a scratched and distorted plastic surface, plastic becomes distressed, bruised and scared like human skin.”
Image Analysis
The light is a natural sunlight coming from the centre, straight above the object, casting a directly underneath shadow. The image has very little control due to natural lighting, lack of positioning control and natural landscape. With the aperture the focus point is the paper bag with a sharp focus. The shutter speed has an under exposure time as if the image was over exposed then the image would be a bright white image due to the bright sun.
In the image there can be seen some saturated colours such as the blue sky, yellow sand and brown paper bag. As the paper bag is crumpled up the image appears to have more texture due to the creases and with the sand it has a rough surface due to people walking and the sea creating an uneven surface adding extra texture to the image. the bright lines of the sun at the top of the image leads the eye to the centre of the image, the bag.
This photo was taken at Muscle Beach, Los Angeles, 2004. This was a way to capture human behaviour at it’s worst point with little to not change on how it looks but just presented as a way of advertising that this ins’t okay with the disrespect of nature around us. We should care for our planet instead of trying to ruin it and mistreat its beauty.
With this project I want to influence the idea that we need to change our bad habits. In this project I will be using photographers who have influenced me by their Anthropocene photography in help to make people aware that we need to change and that we need to save what is lost.
The word Anthropocene comes from the Greek words ‘anthropo’ meaning human and ‘cene’ meaning recent.
What is Anthropocene?
Our species, Homo sapiens has been widely accepted that we have had such a significant impact on Earth and its inhabitants that we will have a lasting and potentially irreversible influence on its systems, environment, processes and biodiversity. Humans have only been on the Earth for 200,000 years of this 4.5 billion year old planet and yet we have altered the physical, chemical and biological systems of the planet that we and all other organisms depend on.
The human race has effected the planet dramatically with carbon dioxide emissions, global warming, ocean acidification, habitat destruction, extinction and widescale natural resource extraction. In the past 60 years the rate and scale of human impacts has reached a scale never done before also know as the Great Acceleration. Not everyone agrees that these changes represent enough evidence to declare a new formal geological epoch, the Anthropocene. Scientists all over the world are still debating.
Warning Signs
The climate of planet Earth is no longer stable and is beginning to heat up rapidly. Scientists now agree that human activity, rather than any natural progress, is the primary cause of the accelerated global warming. Some examples such as agriculture, urbanisation, deforestation and pollution are reasons why the planet has been showing signs of global warming.
There has been a disagreement over whether humans will have a lasting and meaningful impact on the chemical composition of the rocks and fossils beneath our feet. This is what needs to be proven to declare a new epoch. As humans have been around for such a short period of time that it’s too soon to tell whether our impact will be visible in the fossil record millions of years from now.
They are still debating the proof for the Anthropocene and are looking for what’s known as a ‘golden spike’ – a marker in the fossil record which could demarcate the Holocene from the Anthropocene.
The Baker explosion, a nuclear weapon test by the US in Micronesia, on 25 July 1946.
Industrial Revolution
There are some suggestions that the Anthropocene began at the start of Britain’s Industrial Revolution in the 18th century, which created the world’s first fossil fuel economy. With he burning of organic carbon in fossil fuels enable large-scale production and drove the growth of mines, factories and mills. Ever since then, other countries have been following with the increased demand in coal, with the increase of carbon dioxide emission.
Others argue that the Anthropocene began far earlier, when humans began farming. There are even more suggestions that it started in 1950, when nuclear weapons cast radioactive elements across the globe. From the nuclear bombs there were radioactive debris that made its way into rocks, trees and the atmosphere. This may represent the golden spike that scientists are looking for but there are no set conclusions.
Plastic Pollution
Plastic could become a key marker of the Anthropocene as millions of tons of plastic is produced every year which is then washed up onto the beaches but plastic isn’t biodegradable so it ends up littering soils and ocean beds. There was a 2019 study of sediments off the Californian coast found that plastic waste has be rising since the 1940s. The study of scientists are trying to find out whether plastic pollution could be another marker for the golden strike.
The photographer I have chosen to study and be inspired by for my first photoshoot is Thom and Beth Atkinson.
I chose to study them as they photograph old and destroyed buildings as well as missing sections of buildings. As I want to compare new and old jersey together I thought they would be the perfect photographers to get inspired by for my ‘old jersey’ photoshoot.
About Thom and Beth- In 2015 Thom published his first photobook, Missing Buildings through his own publishing imprint, Hwaet books The collaboration with his sister, Beth Atkinson, brings together an extensive body of work documenting the physical and imaginative landscapes of the London Blitz. Thom’s interest in Britain, conflict and mythology is ongoing.
Some of their photographs-
my contact sheets;
favourite images edited;
I wanted my images to be in black and white as I think it matches the atmosphere and mood of the images- as my images are of destroyed and broken buildings keeping them in colour wouldn’t be as effective as turning them black and white. I wanted to make sure I have a good palette of black and white shades in order to have good and clear contrast between extremely white and bright areas and very dark almost black sections. I think I achieved this well by increasing the contrast and lowering the exposure as well as increasing shadows while keeping the white balance quite high. I cropped these images down to make sure my images were focused on the buildings as the centre point as there were a couple of cars and people walking by in the background which wasn’t needed.
comparing my photography with Thom and Beths
DIFFERENCE- my image is in black and white with sharp contrast points however Thom and Beth’s image is in colour. I feel like that creates a different atmosphere and mood between our two images. Thom and Beths image is also taken slightly from the side which captures some of the windows on the building however mines more from a straight-on point of view. Beth’s and Thom’s image captures more of the building and its right in the centre however my image has two grids full of sky and the building is in the centre but on the bottom of the image.
SIMILAR- both of our images are of a broken or abandoned building that is definitely not used anymore. Both of our images are taken far away in order to capture the whole length of the building. Both of our images are taken at quick shutter speeds in order to not get a blurry photo
