Identity and Place – Claude Cahun/Julian Germain Case Study

Claude Cahun

Claude Cahun (1894-1954) was a French surrealist photographer known for her highly staged self-portraits exploring gender and identity. Cahun experimented with photographing herself in clothing that was not conventionally feminine or masculine, she was born ‘Lucy Renee Mathilde Schwob’ and in 1919 chose the pseudonym Claude Cahun as it was more sexually ambiguous. In 1937 Cahun settled in Jersey, disguised as a non-Jew, and during WW2, being passionately against war, produced anti-German fliers and placed them in soldier’s pockets secretly. It is clear that Cahun’s beliefs undermined the authority and society at the time as she went out of her way to disrupt ‘normality’ in her images. Additionally, Cahun’s androgynous appearance reflects her views on how identity and gender are just ideas formed by society, not set rules everyone needs to follow. Many of Cahun’s works can be found in The Museum of Modern Art in New York, the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston and the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, along with many others.

Julian Germain

Julian Germain is a British photographer who studied photography at The Royal College of Art in London. Germain’s project ‘for every minute you are angry you lose 60 seconds of happiness’ is a series of photographs made over 8 years of the quiet, contemplative existence of Charles Snelling, an elderly man living alone in a small house in Portsmouth, shown alongside pages from Snelling’s own photo albums. Germain met Snelling in 1992, he describes how his subject lived in a very unique house full of colours like orange and yellow- it was unlike anything he’d seen before. I really love this particular project of Germain’s because of it’s beautiful message depicting how the most important things in life cost nothing at all, he wanted to show people with a profound understanding of who they are and what they stand for, something that cuts across all cultures. I believe this holds a strong link to ‘identity’ as Germain captures the individuality of his subject in an environment important to him. This project really stood out to me when deciding on initial ideas because of it’s close link to family also, I hope to take images of a similar standard in my study.

Image Comparison

Although Cahun and Germain’s style of photography does not focus on the same concept of identity, these 2 images hold many visual and technical similarities. For example, the composition of each image is extremely similar as both subject’s are looking away from the camera with their bodies angled side-on to the lens. In Germain’s image, this may symbolise his subject’s bright view on the world, as if he is looking out of a window and seeing it’s beauty, furthered by his smiling facial expression. However, in Cahun’s image this composition creates a more closed-off atmosphere, suggesting Cahun has a more negative view on the world and on society. In addition, both images seem to have similar lighting coming from the right of the photo, which creates the main highlights on the front of the subject’s face. This lighting also produces similar shadows in the images, falling behind the subject’s neck and across the left side of their face. Nevertheless, it is clear that Cahun has used a more harsh artificial lighting and that Germain has made use of natural sunlight through a window to capture these images. This sharp lighting in Cahun’s image initiates a more intense dramatic atmosphere whereas Germain’s creates a soft cheerful mood. Another difference between these images are the photographer’s choice of background. Cahun is positioned in front of a dark blank background, possibly symbolising their views on how society’s minds are blank to new ideas and beliefs revolving gender and identity. Contrastingly, Germain’s subject is stood in front of a highly patterned background. The repetition in the wallpaper could suggest the subject has a large family, with the repeated shapes representing family members like a family tree. Furthermore, both of the image’s subjects have similar facial features. Cahun portrays themself with conventionally masculine attributes, such as short hair, in order to disrupt gender norms and go against what society expects. Germain’s masculine subject has a very similar hairline to Cahun, showing that certain facial features or hairstyles are not reserved for a certain gender.

Identity and Place – Claude Cahun AND Carolle Benitah comparison

Gillian Wearing and Claude Cahun: Behind the mask, another mask - Who was Claude  Cahun?
“Self – portrait (shaved head, material draped across body) – Claude Cahun (1920)
CAROLLE BENITAH - Artists - Sous Les Etoiles Gallery | Photography
“à la plage (at the beach)” – Carolle Benitah (2009)

Carolle Benitah and Claude Cahun share both differences and similarities in their works. The theme of identity is an iconic similarity between the two pieces of work, however these artists display them in different ways. Claude Cahun focuses on the idea of self-expression in terms of identity, whereas Carolle Benitah displays how her identity has been formed through childhood and the cultural tradition of embroidery.

Both pieces also have a vintage aesthetic to them, with the use of the monochrome tones and the grainy appearance of the images. Claude Cahun’s self-portrait was taken in 1920, and as the use of colour photography was not widely accessible, all of Cahun’s photos lack colour. On the other hand, although the original images used by Carolle Benitah are also monochromatic, she adds colour physically through sewing and embroidery.

In terms of the actual photography used, Claude Cahun often uses herself as the model in her images, meanwhile Carolle Benitah uses old family photos which display her relations as well as herself. Carolle Benitah’s work could be argued as whether or not they are photography or art as Benitah did not physically take the images herself. The depth of field in both images are difficult to determine as the background consists of empty, negative space.

Another difference between the two images is that Carolle Benitah’s images are often heavily edited, whether it is digitally or physically. This contrasts to Cahun’s work as there is a sense of rawness to them, as digital editing was impossible and there is no evidence of Cahun physically editing her images after printing. However there is an obvious, large time gap between the images being produced, so Carolle Benitah had the accessibility to digitally edit her photographs.