All posts by Lawrence B

Filters

Author:
Category:

History of Photomontage

Photomontage is the process of overlapping 2 or more images to create one photo. This can be done physically, using editing software or a mixture of the both. “The Two Ways of Life” (1857) by Oscar Rejlander was the first and most famous photomontage. Rejlander had shown everyone this new style of art and he contributed to it’s popularity today. At first, photomontage was used practically for post cards or large events which could not be captured on film. Although the first recorded photomontage was in 1857, the style of photography peaked in popularity during WW1 when photographers from France, Great Britain, Germany, Austria and Hungary produced postcards showing soldiers on one plane and friends, family and loved ones on another. During WW2 photomontage was still very popular and its influence in propaganda was optimised in this time by the Nazi party and Joseph Goebbels. Photomontages being produced became very political for example from 1930-1938, John Heartfield used photomontage to create 240 “Photomontages of The Nazi Period” to use art as a weapon against fascism and The Third Reich. Hannah Hoch was another example of a photographer who’s photomontage work was heavily politically based. She too lived in Berlin, German most her life and a lot of her work support women and even contributed to the liberation of women during the Weimar republic.

Hannah Hoch

John Heartfield

Hannah Hoch

Hannah Hoch was a German photographer born in 1889. She has been referred to as one of the ‘originators of photomontage’. Hoch’s work often appeared to support feminism and encouraged the liberation of women during the weimar republic.

She was the last member of the Berlin Dada group to remain in Germany during the third Reich. She bought and lived in a small garden house in Berlin-Heiligensee, a remote area on the outskirts of Berlin.

She married businessman, Kurt Matthies, in 1938 and divorced him in 1944. She suffered from the Nazi censorship of art with her work deemed as “degenerate art”, which made it even more difficult for her to show her works.

Visual

Black and white photos contrast with the colour background. Represents Hoch’s attitude towards the weimar republic at the time and the difference between the treatment of men and women. Most of the images are sharp and grainy adding to the overall effect of this image.

Technical

grainy / low light adds to the meaning of this photomontage. There is a low contrast on the B&W photos with low highlights. There is a hint of natural light with the orange/yellow tint on the colour photos.

Contexual

Höch was a feminist during the weimar republic so this photomontage has a lot to say about women’s right during a tough period in German history. It is also likely that it wasn’t seen until late after the war due to the nazi censorship that restricted her work.

Conceptual

This was only one of many montages Höch created that support women during a time where there appeared to be no hope for women’s rights and equality. Höch received criticism from the nazi party and many politicians during her time and was even banned from exhibiting during the Nazi reign.

Image Analysis

Image result for arnold newman alfred krupp
Technical – Low light at the bottom of the photo and majority of the natural light coming in from the top and in the background.
Visual – Symmetry between the pillars on the left and right, framing the subject. Also there is a contrast in colour between the foreground and background where the foreground has minimal colour and its mainly dark and grey but the background has blue, orange, light and dark
Contextual – Subject was heavily afflicted with the Nazi party during WW2 and the photographer was a Jewish American. The conflict between Jews and Nazis adds great meaning to this photo and increases its impact. Krupp was arrested soon after this photo for his war crimes.
Conceptual – Newman was a political photographer and in this photo he was trying to expose Krupp and show everyone that this man is evil (through the expression on his face).