Ryan McGinley is an American photographer, renowned for his self-published book ‘The Kids were Alright’, which depicts his hedonistic teenage years. It was published in 2017 and focuses on youth in the 90s and, more specifically, documenting himself and his group of friends as they explored themselves through experimentation with sexuality, drugs and other physical pleasures. The images were taken between 1998 and 2003, consisting of portraits, old polaroids and portraits of his group.
Mcginley was declared “the most important photographer in America.” in a 2014 GQ article. His work is applauded due to its themes of emancipation and indulgence. His images dissolve the anxiety surrounding adolescents’ consumption of illicit drugs and risky sex by presenting it as a vision of a free and rebellious alternative life. Mcginley achieved this by documenting his group’s debauched lifestyle. They were presented as grating and fearless individuals, hyper-focused on moments of pleasure. Their main focus was to carry out self-indulgence.
“McGinley started out announcing that ‘The Kids Are Alright,’ fantastic, really, and suggested that a gleeful, unfettered subculture was just around the corner—’still’—if only you knew where to look.”
In Ryan Mcginley’s ‘Tree #3’, he presents how a group of people have embraced nature as a site of freedom, and in this particular piece, he captures a sense of gaiety and freedom. The individuals are completely nude and exposed, showcasing the vitality and vulnerability of humans in regards to nature’s grandeur and sublimity. It presents an expression of liberation and bliss in connection with nature, which is often an experience missed out on by many due to social expectations and the shame/embarrassment regarding nudity and public displays of bareness, despite it being our most natural form.
The raw setting of this image is highly impactful. The photo depicts a massive tree, which McGinley claims one of his subjects scaled during the process of the shoot. This inspired him, but he didn’t photograph it, however, as he felt that one person in a tree wasn’t an effective enough image. He returned the next day to clear out the branches in the tree, allowing for it to accommodate a larger group of individuals, which he felt would create a beautiful image. The photo has been taken from a low angle, with no visible ground within the frame. The effect of this gives an aspect of danger and recklessness, amplifying this sense of vulnerability. Additionally, the lack of placement and reasoning behind the nudity suggests a larger narrative, one which creates ambiguity and leaves the imagination up to the viewer.
Though Mcginley altered the tree and expressed what he wanted for the shoot, it is an arguably informal image. McGinley states that he cannot pose people for pictures, that ‘Everything has to be free…. I like to think of my photo shoots as happenings.’. He’s created a suitable environment for his subjects to experiment with. His image shows, in essence, the concept of the decisive moment, with the event itself being fleeting and spontaneous.
Nighttime and darkness often symbolise an absence of God’s presence and faith plays a huge part in McGinley’s work. Having studied religious art, Mcginley claims that Michelangelo’s ‘The creation of Adam’ had a huge impact on his photography. He states it was the first sighting he’d had of a naked man’s body. Michelangelo’s worship of the human body is reflected in McGinley’s portraits and particularly in this image. The juxtaposition between the deprivation of God (photographing at night), and this imagery of Adam (presented through nudity) creates a strong, almost ethereal image.
Jen Davis produced a body of work portraying issues surrounding beauty, identity and body image, by creating these beautiful images, using natural light and strong compositions. Davis, in an article states that photography is “the medium that I use to tell my story through life, an outlet for revealing my struggles”. her work is mainly based off of her own experiences and portrays these by reconstructing them. some of her other work consists of made up fantisies that she has relating to love, relationships and desires. jen davis describes the idea of ‘eleven years’ was to ” invite the viewer into the past eleven years of my private life, exploring the vulnerabilities that I carry associated with a life-long struggle with my body, feelings of isolation, the battle to recognize beauty, a quest for intimacy, and sense of acceptance through the camera’s eye. ‘eleven years’ was started in order for davis to reflect on her life and to tell her story of how she overcame her insecurities.
The light in this image is natural, which seeps through a gap and allows some light to shine on the face, illuminating the features. This aspect is truly beautiful and idyllic. It contrasts with the way that davis feels about herself and how society might view her. The colours are very subtle and plain. The image is framed nicely, and the face is just off centre which draws the viewers eye towards it. A question that is created by this image is one of, what is she thinking about? What is running through her mind during this image was being taken? Is she thinking about how she feels about herself? Is she reflecting on how she felt during a part of her life? This aspect is unknown to the viewer but is what makes the image so powerful. This aspect is under the interpretation of the viewer and the viewer only.
lauren greenfield was a documentary photographer and filmmaker who explores the themes of self-esteem, lifestyles of teenagers, power of money and fame and plutocracy. in her project, girl culture, she photographed girls to “explore girls’ relationships to their bodies and the ways in which they use body projects to establish their identities.”. the photographs themselves were taken to investigate modern femininity. in, girl culture, she reveals the insecurities of the girls she is photographing by adding snippets of statements they have said relating to self-esteem. lauren greenfield describes herself as being interested in “sociological issues” and with each photograph she aims to” speak for the culture we live in.”. an article described greenfields topics as “very identifiable and relatable”, even though the photos were taken way before the author were born.
The colours in this image are bright and garish and relate to childhood, in the sense that children like to dress up in vivid colours. This links to greenfields subject matter in the sense that she is taking essentially taking pictures of young girls, however they feel they should act older to be liked. Overall the composition of the image is strong and the girls in the background frame the girl in the foreground, that greenfield has decided to focus more on. The question is why is this girl the focus of the image? is she in any way different to the others? On the face of it she looks the same, just a girl in her swimming costume? But maybe she has more insecurties than the rest? Or maybe she is fearless, unlike the rest? This aspect is under the interpretation of the viewer. In ‘girl culture’ lauren greenfield aimed to explore girls relationships with their bodies and this image shows just this. On observation you can see that some of the girls are wearing shorts over their swimming costumes, this connotates to a bad relationship with their body. However these girls look no older than 12, and this image creates the question of why the girls feel self conscious? Has society molded their brain into thinking this?
what?
portraits self portraits
who?
sister- in her gym kit myself- in my show gear
where?
at the gym at the yard
how?
camera on a tripod
why?
to show how society has made us dress a certain way in order to feel better about ourselves
Jim Goldberg is an American documentary photographer, who creates long-term and heavily weighted collaborations with overlooked, neglected or underground/outcasted populations. His work is politically charged, often questioning and investigating the “American Dream” and other relevant myths about class, status, and happiness.
Goldberg’s ‘Raised by wolves’ both documents and follows the lives of adolescent runaways living on the streets of San Francisco and Los Angeles between 1987 and 1993. In creation of the project, Goldberg photographed and interviewed his teenage subjects, their social workers and the police. This adds dimension to the troubling picture of American street life and, adversely, Goldberg’s approach dives into the institutional culture surrounding street life.
Raised by Wolves is a multi-media faceted photo-book, combining photographs, found documents and snatches of poetic handwritten passages about the subjects’ lives and feelings in response to Goldberg’s encouragement. The book’s main narrative focuses on dysfunctional family life in America, about the way teenagers are led astray, how their daring rituals are driven by drugs, violence and lack of affection. Goldberg collected a sprawling cast of characters, though his project particularly focused on the stories of ‘Tweeky Dave’ and ‘Echo’, two deeply troubled yet charming young runaways whose lives became intertwined.
Goldberg describes his book as “a work of fiction that’s completely true,”. The subjects are all real people, the text, photographs and collected items (ephemera) are all authentic parts of their lives, but the subjects repeatedly redirect their anger and frustration through the stories they tell. They’re often half-truths and are sometimes fully fabricated.
Raised by Wolves’ narrative also highlights love and friendship as a key theme. The compassion Goldberg approached his subjects with revealed and reflected the kindness they showed each other, which is often overlooked and blocked out in the average person’s encounter with the destitute. The narrative is gripping, encouraging the reader to question, rather than to judge the lives of the homeless. It challenges the generalisations previously made about these homeless groups in America, in turn leaving the reader with questions about the survival of these teenagers, and what they might be motivated to survive for. This response leads to the questioning of the faults within America’s institutional society that resulted in the fateful lives of these adolescents.