Technical

• Lighting – The majority of this lighting is very shaded in this photo with some natural lighting coming from the windows at the top of the building. Some of the photo is under exposed e.g. the foreground but towards the background the photo becomes more exposed.
• ISO – The light sensitivity is low in this image, hence why it’s sharp.
• White Balance – This image has mostly warm tones and the colour of it looks accurate.

Visual

• Visual Elements – The tones in this photo are very dark making it look more intense and gloomy and the colours look like they’ve been washed out slightly making the most eye catching thing the white lights coming from the windows in the ceiling. You can see a lot of the textures on the man in the foreground e.g. his hair, wrinkles and freckles. The symmetry of the pillars either side of the man frames the photo better making the man the main focus of the photo. The space above the man makes the building look like it’s towering over the man, although the man already looks quite evil and powerful due to his posture and the way he’s looking straight into the lens of the camera as if he was looking into the eyes of another person which would be considered intimidating, the building being greater in size gives the whole photo an intimidating feeling.
• Composition – The photo looks like its been cropped as the photo looks longer that a normal length photo, as well as this the space at each sided of the man looks like their the same size meaning it’s likely it’s been cropped or it’s been arranged that way. The eye is automatically lead towards the man in the photo because the light is hitting certain points of his skin therefore highlighting him as well as him being in the centre of the photo. The light from the top third of the photo contrasts with the bottom third of the photograph as well.

Contextual/Conceptual

The photographer, Arnold Newman, was an American Jew, giving the photo a string meaning because the main focus in the photo is Afried Krupp who was a German who was accused of slave labour (manufacturing trains) in the Nazi regime. The inspiration for the photo most likely came from this and the reason as to why he made the man in the image look so evil and why he made the photo look so ominous. The negative image Newman gave Krupp was to show Newmans hatred towards him and the Nazis overall.

Welcome to the course!

During your first lesson or two you will be expected to submit and display your summer task. As a group we will discuss the merits and limitations of the mini-projects, and your work will be assessed soon and you will receive feedback too. Your Summer Task will then form the start of your coursework (Component 1 / 50% of overall mark).

(If you have not completed a Summer Task as a new recruit…then you have until Friday 13th September to complete the task appropriately.)

We will also discuss your thoughts and feelings / knowledge and understanding of…

Photography’s function(s)

Photography as an art-form

Photography as a science

The difference between the study of photography and the practice of photography

Henri Cartier-Bresson once said…”Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst”

What do you think Cartier-Bresson meant by this…? Discuss

Other…

Blog Overview

Sharepoint Overview

Adobe Photoshop

Adobe Lightroom

Demonstrating a critical and contextual understanding of photography can be tricky, especially if the subject is relatively new to you in Year 12. The following activities have been designed to encourage you to reflect on what you know already about photography. Hopefully, some of the prompts will encourage you to further develop your understanding of photography through additional pondering and research.

In small groups, discuss the following questions and create a poster / brainstorm with your findings and answers…

• Why do people take/make photographs?
• Why is photography important?
• What skills do you need to be a good photographer?
• How many different kinds of photography can you think of?
• How does photography help us see the world?
• Can photographic images be trusted?
• What are the similarities and differences between photography and other types of visual art?
• When would it not be OK to take a photograph?
• How do you know when you’ve made a good photograph?
• Are photographers also artists?
• Where is the best place to see photographs?
• What kind of photography interests you most?
• What confuses or frustrates you about photography?

Watch this short film in which the photographer William Klein discusses his contact sheets. Make some brief notes. What does he help us to understand about photography?

https://vimeo.com/22187134

Evaluation:
I believe that my work was successful in that it followed the style of the reference photographer, Virilio, but also I made time for some of my own personal ideas. My overall idea for the three shoots was inspiration taken from how I interpreted Virilio’s work, so the contrast between nature and the man made archaeology of the bunkers. I believe I was most successful in simulating Virilio’s style in the first shoot, and the last image of the 3^rd shoot, as they are highly contrasted, in black and white, and use line to draw the eye to the image. I believe I was most successful in imitating Virilio’s use of contrast because I was able to use the sky and the natural lighting to my advantage and bring definition to the shadows and the highlights in each of the black and white images. I think that as I kept some of the images in colour, this reflects how I am able to use adapt own style and take my own ideas into the work of photography, even if the artist’s style is somewhat different. I also think that another area I was successful in was being able to frame the photographs in such a way that provided a background without completely overrunning the image with white, which was not how Virilio did it, and would have potentially ruined the images. 

When I went out and actually took the pictures, I was attempting to think about how Virilio viewed war, how he had a personal experience of it, and how he viewed photography as a way of slowing down the rapid human thinking process and giving humanity more freedom through a simple series of still images. This led to a few of the final images being very similar to his style, and even the shoot by the bunker tower, which he had taken pictures of a tower exactly like it. I was trying to communicate the idea that over time, the bunkers had become part of the landscape and do not reflect the tragedy of recent history, as they would have done when Virilio did his series of bunker photographs, but that they show further back in history, and how the past can shape the landscape of the future. Additionally, I was trying to show how nature was taking over in some of the shoots, especially the final one, where the grass had almost completely obscured the bunker wall from view, from certain angles leaving only a few chimneys.  

To improve the project I could have taken more shoots and attempted a wider variety of angles or styles of bunker to shoot in, which would have more effectively followed Virilio’s style. I see one reason to my success as the range of different bunker structures I visited: the tower, the square roofless bunker, the wall embedded into nature. This created more interest in my images as they are not all identical, and it also reflects the history of bunker archaeology, another area that the reference photographer was keen in and wrote about extensively.  

To take the project to a higher level I could have done more research into how Virilio actually carried out his photographs, his mindset and his editing techniques, and applied them to my own work for a more authentic and accurate representation of his style. This would have involved reading more of his actual work and conducting more extensive research into his life and his work in photography.  

I chose this image as my best one because I believe that all of the elements tie together and show not only my own style and idea for these shoots, but also the style of the reference photographer, Virilio. The dual black and white background adds dimension and interest to the image, as most of my other images do not show the sea at all and it was a very important aspect of the Occupation and the bunkers (and the Nazis) actually being here on the island. The black and white is flipped in the right of the image, with the black shadow on the tower being on the top and the grey-white of the cliffs being on the bottom. This makes the image good to look at and provides contrast for the smaller shadows from in between the rectangular slots of the tower itself. This angle and editing was planned, but I did not plan for the person standing next to the tower, which is another reason why this is my best and favourite image, as I see the person as an addition to the idea of humanity and nature and also this adds a sense of reality, as this image could look rather dystopian to someone who was not familiar with the Occupation and how it affected everyone on the island. It also shows the size of the tower and therefore the vastness of the ocean behind it. I believe that my editing was also successful in this image as it follows Virilio’s style of a high contrast, black and white image, with dark shadows and bright white highlights. To improve this image I think that I could try without the person, as that would suit Virilio’s style better, but I do actually believe that it compliments my own style as well as his own, and makes this image my best.