All posts by Lucy L

Filters

Author:
Category:

Image analsis

 

Alfried Krupp photographed by Arnold Newman in 1963.

 

Emotional response

I like this image because It looks like a photograph that would have an interesting story or meaning behind it. I feel this way due to the almost sinister feel to the image. Lots of things help to create this atmosphere in the image, like for example how the image is quite dark and also how the man in the image is presented. His pose makes me feel that he may be quite evil, or thinking of something dark.

Visual

This image is really interesting visually too due to lots of aspects. Firstly, the long depth of field means that there is a lot going on in the photo, and it also means there is a lot of detail to notice, which means you are engaged for longer. The lighting also makes this photo successful as it is dark and adds to the mysterious feel of the photo, which also makes the figure look even scarier.

Context

The man in this portrait was Alfried Krupp. He was known for using slave labour to make weapons for the Nazis. Krupp contacted Newman for a portrait but later found out he was Jewish, he no longer wanted Newman  to take his photo. Newman insisted that he take the portraits, and showed Krupp his portfolio of images. After seeing his work, Krupp agreed to let Newman take the images. They both then went to one of Krupp’s factories, where Newman made sure to make Krupp look as evil as he possibly could. When Krupp saw the image he was very angry, and Newman said that as a Jew it was his “own little moment of revenge”.

concept

When I first saw this image, I got the sense that the man being photographed looked quite evil just by the techniques used and without knowing any context. Perhaps Newman was trying to create an underlying concept of trusting your initial feelings about things. I think this because Newman made sure he made Krupp looked sinister so we would all get a gut feeling that something wasn’t right about him, and when finding out the context it turned out to be correct.

Environmental portraiture

As my first experimentation with portraiture didn’t produce many successful outcome I decided to do a 2nd photo shoot in order to get some better photographs. For this photo shoot I plan on taking pictures of my family all out together at a bonfire. I though this would be a good idea as It would be very interesting to capture a family environment dynamic in my images, rather than taking more photographs of people in work environments.

Contact sheet

My most successful outcomes

Analysing my images

Visually, this image is very successful for various reasons. Firstly, both the people are centered in the frame and they’re also both smiling while slightly engaging with the camera. Although they’re not fully looking at the camera, I think the image is still successful as it turned out to be a more candid shot. Another reason why this image is visually pleasing, is because of the emotion in the portrait. It is clear to see that they are both very happy, and their body language shows that they must be very fond of each other.

The technical elements of this image also helped to make It successful. This image was taken with a shutter speed of 1/100 meaning that it wasn’t extremely slow, but still allowing a good enough amount of exposure time for the image not to turn out very dark. I also used flash to take this image as it was dark outside, and I also set the white balance to flash so that the colouring would be accurate. I also used an f/5.6 so that the photo had a shallow depth of field, as I dint want the background to be too distracting.
Visually, I really like this image. In the frame you can see a male and a female with a child on her shoulders. I think that is a successful outcome as all three subjects are engaging well with the camera, and they are all well centered in the frame.

The technical side of the image was a bit more challenging for me as it was difficult to get good quality pictures in the dark while shooting manually. The ISO of this image was quite high, and the shutter speed was quite quick, around 1/250, but i had to be careful not to have it to quick as it would make my image turn out very overexposed. I also made sure to use flash, and to set the white balance to the flash setting also so that colours could be photographed as accurately as possible.

Evaluation

Overall I think this photoshoot was for more successful compared to my last one. This time I made sure to direct people more in order to capture the images I wanted, instead of just photographing them naturally. This meant that I had more images where the models were interacting with the camera, making the photographs more successful. I also think that the quality of the images were far better too. Although at the beginning it was very hard to shoot good quality images in the darkness while using manual settings, through trial and error I was able to find suitable settings to get me good quality images. I made sure to use a flash, and a fairly quick shutter speed of around 1/250, making sure that it wasn’t much slower or quicker so my images wouldn’t be blurry or underexposed, I also had my aperture set at around f/5 as I didn’t wanted to get a fairly long depth of field so that the surrounding environment could be seen in order to give the photos a bit more character and context, as I think that’s what truly makes an image appealing and interesting. However, next time I will experiment using a higher aperture as I think some images would also look nice with a shallow depth of field as it would mean that there would be more focus on the people as they would be the main focus of the photograph.

 

Editing my images

Here I will be editing the best outcomes from my previous photo shoot. Although these were my best images, I think that some are slightly over and under exposed so I plan to attempt to fix this by editing them on Photoshop.

Original image


Final outcome
To edit this photo I adjusted the curves so that it was slightly more saturated, as I thought this would make the overexposed white part at the bottom a little less noticeable, as the background colours would stand out a lot more. Doing that also brought down the brightness slightly, meaning that it also contributed to making sure the whiteness was less prominent. Lastly I also turned the hue and saturation right down so I was able to make the image black and white. I decided to make the image black and white instead of highly saturated for 2 reasons. Firstly, because I thought that if the image was in black and white, the overexposed part wouldn’t be as visible, and secondly, because I wanted to add an element into my image that shows I was slightly inspired by Sander as all his images were in black and white. I think this was a really good idea as it meant that I added a vintage touch into my modern day inspired environmental photography.

Original image

Final outcome

When looking at this photo, although it was far too underexposed I thought that it was an image with potential because of how the model was making intense eye contact with the camera. To edit it, I turned the brightness all the way up, so that the image wasn’t so dark. To make it fit in with my other image, and did the same technique that I mentioned previously and turned the hue and saturation all the way down to make the photo black and white.. I think that the intense stare that the model is giving, combined with a black and white filter makes the image far more successful as it makes it more dramatic and mysterious.

August Sander

August Sander was a German photographer who was born November 17, 1876 in Germany and died April 20, 1964. He got his first camera in 1892, and began taking up photography as a hobby then, after completing his military service time he eventually took up photography professionally.  In the 20s, after his service in World War 1 his friendship circle included painters and photographers who were part of the “Neue Sachlichkeit”, which was the “new objectivity movement” where artists began to move away from expressionism to capture things more realistically. He was known for documenting different types of German people by capturing portraits that represented different groups of people rather than representing the individual. One of the most interesting parts of his portraits, is how each photo has interesting context and meaning behind it. When the Nazis came to power in 1933, Sanders work was disapproved. Much of his work including his negatives were ruined either by looters or by air raids. During this time he moved away from portraiture to things less controversial like landscapes.

August Sander mood board

Image inspiration by August Sander.

 

Analysing his images

The context behind this image is what makes it stand out to me. This image was taken in the 1930s, and captures a blind miner and a blind soldier sitting on a bench. The context helps make this image really successful as it shows that Sander captured people in everyday and realistic situations, showing realism. The realism captured, helps attract the audience to the image as they can relate to it more.

The visual elements of the image are also really interesting. in the image we see 2 blind men sitting on a bench, as I mentioned previously but what makes this image visually interesting is the fact that it was not taken in a “perfect” setting, and it could be considered quite “messy”. The audience can clearly see how the wire gate behind the 2 men is quite scruffy, and also uneven, and you can also notice how the floor is also quite unclean. Normally, these qualities would mean that an image would be quite unattractive, but in this case it helps make the image very successful. Because the image doesn’t look perfectly polished and staged, it helps depict a real life situation, This helps make the photo more attractive to an audience because it allows them to see a real story behind an image and not a fake reality, which is something not normally seen in modern portraiture, where a lot of effort usually goes into making everything look picture perfect.

The technical elements, although not incredibly important, also help make this image further interesting. The image appears to be taken in a well lit area, which means that the image is very clear.

 

 

The context of this portrait is also very interesting. This is a portrait of a political prisoner that was taken in 1943, which would mean this was captured during World War 2. This portrait is very interesting because without the background information it would just be a regular photo of a man, however knowing information about who is in the image, instantly makes it more interesting. This is because learning about this person, means that we instantly feel more empathy toward the photo and it becomes more meaningful as it reveals a personality.

Visually, The image doesn’t do too much to attract attention as without the background information, it is just a regular photograph of a man. However, the subject is well placed in the frame so no unnecessary background is visible, meaning the audience can focus more on the person.

Conceptually, this picture is also very interesting. This photo shows how someone who looks so ordinary, can actually be very unique and have an interesting backstory. This photo could teach people not to be so judgemental and to not judge someone by how they look.

1st photoshoot intentions

From Sanders’ images it has became clear that he captured people in their everyday environments. My intention for my photoshoot is to also capture someone in their regular environment, but in the modern day. I plan to take photographs of my friend while she is working. As I want the images to look realistic -like Sanders’ photos- I will need to be using a quick shutter speed as I wont be able to stop her to pose. I will also have to capture a large amount of images, as it is likely that not very many of them will be too successful as they will be taken quickly and on the spot. I also plan on not making the images look very polished, and perfect in regards to the background and things in the frame, as I like how Sanders’ images look more realistic when they haven’t been perfectly planned.

Contact sheet

Best outcomes

 

 

 

 

Overall, I think my photoshoot went well however it could’ve gone better. Next time, I want to focus more on having the subject interact with the camera more as I think this way, I would get more successful images. These were the 2 best outcomes of my photoshoot. I like these images as they depict life, working as a waitress.


Visually I like the first image as you can clearly see that prior to it being taken, the model was busy making coffee, and this makes the image look a lot less planned, therefore making it more realistic.

Technically, however I think that I could’ve changed my camera settings in order to make the image look better. For example, I think the image looks slightly dark. Next time I think it would be a good idea to put the ISO higher in order to make the lighting better. On the other hand, I think that the shutter speed used was successful as it allowed me to capture the image very quickly with minimal distraction to the model

Another reason that I like this image is due to a potential underlying concept. The image was taken very quickly, just as the model looked at me and you can see that there is a lot captured in the frame, like the till and the board that has been written on to her right. All these ‘distractions’ along with the image being taken quickly, and along with the fact the model is multitasking by attempting to make coffee and looking into the camera, it shows how modern working life can be really hectic and busy.

Visually, I think this photo is quite pleasing as it uses the rule of thirds, with the model on the first third of the image. Although the model isn’t directly looking at the camera, you can still see part of her face. It is also clear that she is working, making the photo more realistic and therefore a lot more interesting to look at.

On the technical side of the image, I think it could have been improved. I think that the image turned out too bright. I think it would’ve turned out better if the ISO  was turned down slightly, to darken it a bit more. This photo was taken with a quick shutter speed, meaning that I was able to capture it quite quickly, as the model wasn’t posed like this for long.

Finalizing my final images

Now that I have narrowed down my favorite images for printing, I will do the lasts bits of editing and present how I want them to be displayed.

These are the two images from my last post that I want to adjust slightly to try and tone down the over exposure of the images.

For both of the images, I just turned the brightness down and increased the contrast so the coloured lights could stand out better.

This image, and the one below, are the outcomes that I will be using to print.

 

Next, I opened a blank document and set the width and length to make the page A3 size. I also set the background as black instead of white because I wanted the lights on the images to stand out more and this would only work on a dark background.

 

After, I opened up both the images I wanted to display together and I positioned one above the other on the black background in the order that I took them in. Below is my outcome:

 

My A3 image

My A4 image

 

My A5 image

 

I felt that my other two images would work well by themselves and they didn’t need any more editing to be done. The reason I chose these particular images together, was because they all incorporated some sort of light in the frame, either captured using a bokeh effect or with slow shutter speed.

 

Initial final pieces

In this post I will be presenting my potential final outcomes for the whole abstract unit.

Potential outcomes

 

 

 

This is the image that I will most probably be choosing for my A4 print out. The reason why I have decided to use this image is because I think it my most successful image from my Uta Barth inspired photo shoot. I think this is My the most successful bokeh image I took because the scenery around me was filled with a lot of light, and the rain helped to enhance the colour in the image helping make the colour a more prominent image.

Another reason why I picked this image is because it displays some camera techniques that i have learnt through the abstract theme. In this image I used manual focus so I was able to purposely make the scenery blurred. In this image I also adjusted the settings to a quick shutter speed so I was able to capture the lights in place, and not shaking, as this image was taken in a moving car. I also made sure that the ISO wasn’t too high as I wanted most of the background to be dark, so the blurred lights would stand out.

This is one of my best images from my experimentation with slow shutter speed. I think this image is very visually successful as the slow shutter speed meant that when I moved the camera, I created a very interesting pattern with the light, making the image very abstract.

This image also demonstrates a range of camera skills that I learnt, which is another reason why I chose it as a final outcome. In this image I used manual focus again to be able to focus primarily on the lighting, and not on anything in the background. The camera was also on a very slow shutter speed, which meant that the exposure time was longer than normal, meaning that when the camera moved, the final outcome ended up as it did.

 

For my last outcome, I am considering these two images. These pictures were also taken while I was using a slow shutter speed, and also continuous shooting. As it was on slow shutter speed I was able to capture the movement of the bus, and the continuous shoot meant that I was able to take one image straight after the other. I chose these two images because i think they would look very well, side by side when displaying them. For my final A3 print, I am going to find a way to display both of these images together in one frame as having the second image together with the first gives the images some context. However, I think that before I find a way to display them both in one image I will slightly Photoshop the images as they are both slightly overexposed due to the slow shutter increasing the exposure time.

 

 

Aaron Siskind

Aaron Siskind was an American photographer who was interested in taking images of “true to life” objects in an abstract way. He took many images of things both in natural and urban environments. Many images he has taken contained many types of unique textures. In the mood board below this is especially visible in the images he has taken of tree barks.

Mood Board

Here are some images that Siskind has taken, that will inspire my future photo shoots.

Analysing his work

In this image Siskind uses interesting technical features. Although the image is in black and white, it is clear that the image was taken in daylight, as all the details in the frame are lit up clearly. It is also clear that the shutter speed was not too high or low, as the image isn’t over or underexposed. The aperture must have also been controlled due to the balance in exposure.

Part of what makes the image successful are the visual techniques. The image shows what appears to be many different layers of a poster peeling of a wall. By capturing this, Siskind has created many intriguing visual techniques. Firstly, the image has a very interesting texture. The photographer has successfully captured  the rough and bumpy surface of the wall. This is very appealing to the audience as it gives the image a whole other level for the audience to appreciate. The image’s form is also helps to capture attention, as the different layers almost give the photo a 3D effect, making it more appealing.

The image’s context makes it further interesting. This particular image was taken in 1961, in Mexico. During this time Mexico was going through The Dirty War where there was conflict between the government and left-wing groups.

After researching to context, it became clear that Siskind may have been trying to capture a deeper,  concept with this image, about what was going on around him at the time. Because the wall he photographed was ruined, and peeling away he could have been trying to interpret the effect the conflict was having on the country.

 

This images is one of my favorites by Siskind. Similar to the last image, it also uses many technical features. Firstly, the image is in black and white and it its over or under exposed. It also appears that this image was taken in the daylight, as the details in the image are perfectly lit and visible.

The visual effects of this image help to make it very appealing. Because the paint on the wall is peeling, and Siskind has captured it from the front, this image contains various different types of interesting tones and shadows. The peeling paint also gives the photograph a very attractive form, as it gives the photo a 3D vibe to it. This makes the image really interesting, as the wall has different layers to it. The image also has a very visually pleasing texture to it. You can very clearly see the bumpy and cracked surface. This is interesting to an audience as it gives the image a very vintage feel to it.

My response

For my response I attempted to capture interesting and unique types of textures, as this is what Siskind also photographed.

 

 

 

My best outcomes

Editing

                                                                                                                                             These were the two images I begun with on Photoshop.

Next, I dragged one image on top of the other, so that the second image became a separate layer

Next I changed the image into black and white.

After, I slightly lowered the brightness so it was a little darker, and I increased the contrast a lot so that the white label would stand out more.

Next, I had to also edit my second layer which was the other image that I dragged over the top of my background. I also changed this image into black and white so the colors on the label could create an interesting contrast.

Here, I increased the contrast and also the brightness, so this image could look brighter when it was layered over the background as the background image was edited darker.

I then edited the opacity to 54% so both of the images could blend together.

This was my final outcome, after editing the two images and layering them on top of each other.

 

I then wanted to experiment further by seeing how the image would look with a bit of colour. So I then layered the original photo of the label, on top of the one that I had already Photoshoped.

Here, I lowed the opacity so I could see how the images would look over the top of each other. I decided to place the original photo slightly higher, and to the left to create this interesting effect.

After I was satisfied with the positioning of the image, I changed the opacity to 100% so I was able to edit my image. I decided to put the brightness very low and the contrast very high, so that the darkness of the photo could blend well with the black and white background.

Lastly, I then lowered the opacity again so both of the layers were visible on top of each other.

This is another potential outcome for my original two images.

 

 

 

 

To being editing this photo, I cropped it so that the dent in the wall was right in the middle of the image as I wanted it to be the main focus when an audience views my  photo.

Next, I increased the contrast dramatically and the brightness only slightly. I  did this because both parts of the wall were in different positions to the sun, meaning one side was very lit whereas the other side was in the shade. I wanted to exaggerate the contrast of lighting.

Lastly, I changed the image into black and white so the lighting contrasts would be even more noticeable.

This is the final outcome.

 

 

 

Firstly, I cropped the image to get rid of the lower left side of it as the background was visible and it was distracting.

Next, I lowered the brightness so all the colours would look darker and I increased the contrast.

I then changed the image into black and white so the contrast of all the layers of colour would be a lot more prominent.

After, I dragged the original image on top of the image i had already edited.

I then decreased the opacity to 50%, and positioned the image in a slightly different position to the version used on the background. I think it makes my image look a lot more interesting as both of the images have different opacitys and this makes the contrast between the tones really interesting.

I then layered another original version of the photo, and positioned it slightly higher and changed the opacity to 30% so it was lower than the previous one. I like how the image looks as there is an interesting fade effect.

This is my final image.

 

 

 

My best edited outcomes

This image is one of my best due to many elements. On the technical side, this image was taken in the day light, using manual focus. I used manual focus so that I was able to choose which layer of paint to focus on.

The visual elements of the image are also very interesting.  The image is of lots of different coloured layers of paint peeling of a wall. This is very interesting as it makes the image contain many different textures and layers, which gives the photo a sort of 3D effect. This is very visually pleasing because it gives the audience more details to notice.  As the image is black and white, There are a lot of interesting tonal contrasts, as originally all the layers were very varied different colours and stood out a lot.

 

This image is very visually interesting. This is due to many things but, primarily the layering of images. I think that layering of the images helps make this photo far more appealing to the audience. This is because the black and white images and the coloured image create a distinct contrast that is very eye catching. Another contrast that is also very appealing is the writing on the label. I like how there is a coloured version and a black and white version position differently. I think they complement each other very well as they are completely different. The dramatic contrast that the white and yellow creates, helps to draw people’s attention in.  There is also a big variety of different textures present in this photo, as all the individual images were focused on the different surfaces seen on a wine bottle. The textures within the photograph are interesting because they are very intricate details that will help keep the viewers attention on this photograph for longer.

The technical features of this image help to bring out the visual features I mentioned above. All the images that were layered were taken using manual focus. This helped me capture the textures of the label in a lot more detail compared to using autofocus. It was very helpful as it allowed to focus on the exact detail that I wanted to. The images were also taken in day light. This was also very helpful as it meant the images turned out very clearly, and perfectly exposed.

 

 

Experimenting with shutter speed

Shutter speed is the amount of time a sensor in a camera is exposed to light.

If the shutter speed is very slow, then the image will have a high exposure which means it will most likely be bright. This is an ideal setting to use if you are taking images in a badly lit place place as it will make the image less dark. This would not be ideal to use in a bright setting, as the image would most probably be more overexposed which means it would come out too white. A slow shutter speed is also idea if you want to purposely capture images where things are moving, to create a unique effect. This setting is used to capture light painting or a smooth water effect.

On the other hand, if the shutter speed is fast then the image would have a very low exposure this means it could cause the image to turn out underexposed, which would make the image come out darker than intended. This would be an appropriate setting to use in a properly lit scene as the sensor wouldn’t need to be exposed to light for as long in order for the image to come out with a regular exposure. Fast shutter speed is used to capture things that are moving very quickly, as the image will be taken a lot quicker

This diagram helps explain what shutter speeds are fast, and which ones are slow. 1/500 would be an example of a very quick shutter speed as the moving image is sharp and in focus, whereas 1/2 is a very slow shutter speed as the moving image is blurred.

 

This diagram is also useful in highlighting the differences in fast and slow shutter speeds. The image on the left was taken using a fast shutter speed. That is why the sparks in the image look like they have been frozen, and why the image is not over nor underexposed. However the image on the right was taken with a very slow shutter speed, which is why the sparks look like they are continuous lines.

 

Experimenting with a Quick shutter speed

1st attempt

 

2nd attempt 

 

My most successful outcomes


 

Experimenting with slow shutter speed

My most successful outcomes