essay

To what extent can we trust documentary photography to tell the truth about reality in Sian Daveys Work and Maja Daniels? 
 
Introduction: 

"Reality, witness and point of view can actually blend into one another." (Bright, S. and Van Erp, H. 2019:18) 

The quote above displays how all these factors can be completely separate from each other, a point of view from one side of a story can alter the true reality of an event, however, can align as well. Documentative photography has been around since photography began. It’s used to chronicle events and environments that are significant to everyday life, history and historical events. Documentary photographs aren’t just produced by professionals; family photo albums and phone albums can provide an insight from the everyday to the historical world of an individual. Whether it’s a photo taken of someone blowing out the candles on their birthday cake, or the fireworks on bonfire night. However, although those images are captured in a moment, often candid, how do we really know that the photographs aren’t staged? After practitioners established photography as an art form, there was “a need to define which images were based on ‘objective’ reality (documentary) and which were instead the creations of an artist’s ‘subjective’ sensibility (art)” (Rosler 2003; Sekula 1982; Soloman-Godeau 1991b; Walker 2002: 21-21).  

For my project I will be focusing and capturing my identical twin sisters. There is a cultural fascination with twins, people are confused by their striking symmetrical features and their unearthly connection towards each other. Many claim to know what each other are thinking and feeling and their undeniable bond creates curiosity towards the uniqueness that surround the ideology of twins. As their older sister, I know my sisters extremely well as we also have a close bond, however, I recognize that I could never have a bond like Phoebe and Scarlett’s. Although we sometimes describe them having a love-hate relationship, they are each other's best friend and always seem to know what the other is thinking and feeling. They have deep empathy for each other rooted in them and always defend each other, even if someone is only joking about the other, they will always back each other's corner. They often tend to copy each other when the other twin does something. For example, Scarlett cut her long hair to shoulder length and the next week Phoebe cut her hair to shoulder length as well. They also have extremely similar grades and are in the same classes as they both have the same intellectual ability. Guang Guo discusses how researchers believe that the reason identical twins have do similar actions is because of their genes. “If a physical or behavioral trait, like hair color or success at math, is shared more often by identical twins than by fraternal twins, researchers reason, genes must have played a role in developing the trait.” (Guang Guo, 2005). 

The artists I will be analysing will be Sian Davey and Maja Daniels. They both do capture twins, Daniels having a whole project on Mady and Monette: twins who both work together and dress the same. Davey’s work doesn’t feature around twins, but her stepdaughter Martha is friends with twins, and they do feature in Davey’s work, in particular, her project Martha. Both of the artists can be viewed as documentative photographers, although, because of the similarities between Mady and Monette, Daniel’s work looks more staged, whilst Davey’s work looks more naturalistic and candid. I will discuss the extend of reality portrayed in both of the artists work and the difficulties to truly believe they are authentically documentative. 

Historical Context: 

I will be incorporating both realist and pictorialist photography into my project.  

Postmodernism can be seen as a reaction against the ideas and values of modernism, as well as a description of the period that followed modernism's dominance in cultural theory and practice in the early and middle decades of the twentieth century. The term is associated with skepticism, irony and philosophical critiques of the concepts of universal truths and objective reality. Postmodern art questions the notion of authenticity and embraces 'hybridity’, blurring the lines between high art and popular culture. Postmodern photographers are particularly interested in the selective, constructed nature of the photograph. 

Realism is not so much a style, but rather one of its fundamental qualities. From its beginnings in the 1830s and 40s, photographers and viewers of photography marveled at photography’s ability to capture an imprint of nature. Photography’s capacity to depict people, objects and places realistically made it suitable for trying to record and document individual likenesses, scientific discoveries and foreign places – concerns that were of particular interest for 19th-century Europeans.   

The time period for pictorialism was the 1880’s – 1920’s. Pictorialism is an approach to photography that emphasizes the beauty of subject matter, tonality, and composition rather than the documentation of reality. I would describe pictorialist photographs to be very dreamy and reminds me of fairy tales. They focus on the dream world and oppose documentative photographs. They tend to focus on nature; however, they do also feature cityscapes. They also tend to have fog or low clouds which gives it a dream like effect. Reacting to the widespread commercial and domestic uses of photography for recording people, events and places, pictorialist photographers sought to evoke emotional sensations and states of mind. They depicted commonplace scenes in ways that suggested psychological and spiritual meanings. 

Modernism began in the late 19th century and lasted to about the mid 20th century. Industrial revolution kicked off modernism as machines were being standardised for production in factories. The industrial revolution started in 1760 and continue onwards. Modernism was a broad movement encompassing all the avant-garde isms of the first half of the 20th century. Although different modernisms were often incompatible (and occasionally antagonistic) they all rejected the dominance of older movements such as Classicism, Naturalism, and Academicism in favor of new experimental ways of producing art. Early modernity is characterized intellectually by a belief that science could save the world and that, through reason, a foundation of universal truths could be established. The common trend was to seek answers to fundamental questions about the nature of art and human experience. Modernity imbue all aspects of society and are apparent in its cultural forms including fiction, architecture, painting, popular culture, photography. 
 
Artist 1: Sian Davey 

Artists that I am interested in are Sian Davey, in particular, her project on her stepdaughter 'Martha' and her other book “Looking for Alice” which focuses on the life of her daughter who has down syndrome. Davey's is able to capture the lives of both Martha and her friends who are transitioning from child to adult. Davey's also captures a set of twins who are Martha's friends. Davey tends to use a documentative approach to her photography, capturing the natural essence of Martha's development in life. Although they look very similar due to them being identical, the audience are able to distinguish that they do have some different characteristics e.g. their different hairstyles and clothing choices. I want to study Davey's work in particular because of her approach to photographing the teenagers, she isn't trying to sugar coat or emphasize their actions, but just want to capture what they do together and how they interact with each other.  

The image below is from Davey's book "Martha". It is called "Twins". It features one of the twins staring directly into the lens and the other gazing down. The audience may have to question Davey's image and whether it truly tells the truth about the reality of the scenario that is occuring. Is Davey, truly capturing the essence of reality? Did the twin happen to glance up at the camera or did Davey direct and stage the photograph? Just because an image looks candid and authentic doesn't mean that is the true reality.  
In response to Davey’s image “Twins” I wanted to capture my sisters in a different location but doing similar things. Both the twins in Davey’s photo and mine are looking in different directions and are in beach/swim attire: Davey’s twins feature one in a surf brand jumper and the other in a bikini/bra. Whilst my sisters are in their bikini’s and one of them wearing a sarong. I also used natural lighting in my photos but wanted to make my photo a bit lighter to replicate the airy and beachy aptmosphere that was there when the photo was being taken. 

The difference between the subjects of our photos is that in Davey's photo, one of the twins is staring into the lens, meaning she is aware the photo is being taken, whereas my sisters were unaware that the photo was being taken, making the image candid and authentic to being documentative. The truth behind the reality of the photos can be questioned as both Davey or mysef could've directed our subjects to act and present themselves in a certain way, however, the natural looks to the images can infer to the audience that you can trust the documentative images produced and that they are portraying a true reality.
Artist 2: Maja Daniels 

When Daniels discusses first talking to the twins she talks about “When I finally approached them I found out that they had long stopped celebrating their birthdays and that they defy any pre-conceived notions related to growing old. I then thought that the twins could make an interesting project that could somehow comment on questions regarding ageing in today’s society a bit differently.” Daniels work can be seen as unique as there aren’t many photographers who capture adult twins. There is a fixation on identical twins, particularly when they are children, maybe because as they get older many grow out of wanting to look similar and want to lead their own lives.

Although Daniels is capturing and documenting the lives of Mady and Monette and what they do, the truth about reality can also be questionable. In the image below, both the twins are aware of the camera presence due to their stare into the camera. Although the truth is that Mady and Monette are identical twins, Daniels credibility can be doubted with the twins' dresscode: matching. Just because Daniels claims that the twins choose to dress identically doesn't mean that it is true. The audience would have to ask Parisians who either personally know Mady and Monette or who see them often whether it is their personal choice to present themselves in their particular style, or whether Daniels has been able to construct a narrative and persona for the twins.  

Daniels uses natural lighting in the image below and the colour palette of the photograph is very similar. It can also lead the audience to question whether the scene itself is constructed due to the perfect coordination with the clothing colour to the walls, or their bright red hair to match the scooter. Although Daniels is capturing the twins out on a walk and although she is not taking the images deliberately in a studio, the truth behinf the reality of her images can be questionable to whether she is truly and authentically documenting the twins or whether she is planning her shoots and directing what is happening.
The image below is my photographic response to Daniels work. Although I documented my twin sisters in the sandunes, both playing and then sunbathing (what they're doing below) I directed the images and ensured I got the  shots I wanted. For example, I ensured that theyboth would wear identical outfits and wear their hair the same to enhance the similarities between them. I decided to go for an earthy tone with the image, with the fresh white to juxtapose the tone. After Phoebe and Scarlett started to sit down, I ensured that their faces were looking up in a similar direction and that they both have a similar facial expression. Although I am documenting what the girls are doing, I am constructing a reality and manipulating the truth behind the image. 

Although Daniels work can be viewed as truthful and just happens to document the twins at the right places at the right time, I wanted to deliberately display that the truth behind the reality of an image can be confusing and misleading.
Conclusion 

In conclusion, documentative photographers, such as Maja Daniels and Sian Davey will be documenting a reality. However, there is a grey area to how truthful and authentic the images are, and whether a narrative and reality is being deliberately and misleadingly constructed. 

Both Davey and Daniels manage to capture a set of identical twins, their methods and subjects juxtapose eachother. Mady and Monette are portrayed as extremely similar in Daniels work due to the matching outfits, hair and the way they present themselves. As they are older they do tend to wear makeup and manipulate themselves to how they want to be portrayed in their reality. Whereas Davey's work has a more natural approach where the twins similarities aren't forced upon the audience, the girls are dressed differently are are doing different actions. 

Both of the artists are documentin the realities of the twins in their images, the realities the artists portray are extremely different. Davey portrays them more as individuals whereas Daniels tends to enforce the similarities between the twins and treat them as almost a collective. I took inspiration from both of the artists and I believe I managed to portray a truthful reality of my twin sisters, they are individuals and are unique in their own right, but there are also extreme similarities between themselves and they can act as a collective.
 
Bibliography 

- Bright, S. and Van Erp, h, (2019), Photography Decoded, London: Octopus Publishing House 
- Stephen Bull, (2010), Photography, Oxon, Routledge  
- James Cartwright, (2012), Photographer Maja Daniels' wonderful Monette and Mady series explores our fascination with twins, viewed 07/03/2020 https://www.itsnicethat.com/articles/maja-daniels 
- Guang Guo, (2005), Twin Studies: What can they tell us about nature and nurture?, viewed 07/03/2020 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1525/ctx.2005.4.3.43 

Personal Investigation – Essay

Can photographs actually capture feelings and emotions or can they not be taken on face value?

“Every portrait that is painted with feelings is a portrait of the artist, not of the sitter” (D. Lewis, 2015; Face)

No matter what I’m doing I’m always in deep thought about something, be it something small like thinking about what I might wear today or something seemingly more personal and relevant to just me like the way that argument was left unresolved the previous night. Every wake up is different to the day before. You know more, you’ve seen more, you’ve thought more. Even though someone can present themselves a certain way, they are the only person that they have shared every breath and life experience with. The only person that truly understands the ins and outs of their own mind. I’m a strong believer in the chaos theory, the concept that each and every one of our experiences in life shape our complete development as people, down to how we look at life, how we think and how we react in certain situations. If you knew everything someone had been through and felt, their actions and mind set could become completely predictable. This is why it is possible to understand another person on a deeper level such as a friend, family member or lover. It is the sharing and relating of ideologies and experiences that unlock the secrets to a person’s true self.

This leads me on to my personal investigation, which focuses on the close interpersonal connections between my close friends and I, and the complexities of social science involved in the making of a friendship. Is it possible to form a friendship with anyone or does there have to be a certain level of compatibility? In the same way many of us believe ‘compatibility’ to be a key factor when it comes to finding love romantically, does it have an impact in a platonic way, can you learn to love and form a bond with anyone or is the possibility of a relationship between two people predetermined by other factors?

I will be analysing the work of two photographers: Bruce Gilden and Daren You. Both photographers work very differently. Gilden often focuses on strangers, he selects individuals he knows nothing about on the streets of New York and photographs them in obscure ways to emphasise a point of their character. He will interact with a subject he finds intriguing or out of the ordinary, allowing opportunity to find him, getting up close and personal with them, inspired by Robert Capa’s saying “If your photographs aren’t good enough, you’re not close enough”. I was inspired by the fact that he just takes a photo when he sees something interesting rather than going out and looking for it. This links with my personal investigation as I use candid portrait images throughout the project. The best compositions stemming from genuine moments and expressions captured in an image.

This composition features two men, one assisting the other in lighting a cigarette. The image appears candid due to the startled facial expressions of the man on the right. The image is black and white, which draws attention to their faces, hands and the cigarette and its smoke as the focal points of the image. Both are dressed in suits and shirts and look relatively formal. The buildings and structures in the background are slanted, which when paired with the men leaning in to each other creates a bold structure. The man on the left has his eyes covered with black sunglasses and a blank expression while the man on the right seems to be aware of the photographer. Gilden’s intentions with this image are to display the characters of the subjects without having previous knowledge of them as individuals, allowing truly candid images that say something about himself as well as the two suited men. The effect of this image is that it tells the viewer something about the subjects without any prior information on the couple. It allows the viewer to create their own reality and idea of the subjects, in this sense the image is quite liberal, there are no right or wrong ways to interpret this image. Giving power to the mind of the beholder.

Daren You similarly allows the opportunity of a good photograph to find him. You uses different techniques while developing his images, using reticulated film through a high temperature developing process, inkjet printing, darkroom printing, liquid emulsion and encaustic painting. The final result of the layering of these images creates a completely random image that looks very different from the original image he shot. In this way he explores the beauty of randomness as his art is created through both skill and chance.

This image depicts the surface of the full moon against a grainy black emptiness, this light contrast draws focus to the protruding sphere front and centre. The image appears quite plain at first glance but closer inspection of the moon itself reveals an array of light and dark scratches, lines and craters which form a shade mosaic of beautiful randomness. You’s intentions with this piece are to create an eye catching monochrome image which shows something recognisable by anyone, in a different way. Through the developing process of the image he has made something ‘random’ even more so by the unique appearance of the final outcome. This piece has a powerful effect on the viewer, seeming almost three-dimensional due to the nature of the shadow cast by the moon itself.

These photographers link with my investigation as I’m exploring the ability to convey genuine feelings and emotion through photography and whether it is possible to show the deeper aspects of relationship. Both photographers work in very different ways. Gilden is more candid. His rapid approach to photographing his subjects in action results in a variety of unique shots showcasing individuals and their unique story. You works more with the manipulation of the developing process to create visual diversity in the way the image appears rather than the matter in the photo. I am inspired by his processes of changing the image and have decided to have a theme for editing my images. This theme involves changing colours and the hue of images, to then change the tessellation of the image to create a semi-random composition with a stark and unique feel to it. Following this editing process resulted in a lot of strong photographs turning out very differently and many being discarded. The final images therefore being a combination of my camera skills and controlled factors included in a photo shoot such as lighting, camera setting and subject matter and the selective editing and choosing processes.

I will be responding to the work of Daren You and Bruce Gilden and my essay question, to investigate whether photographs can convey the thoughts and emotions of the subject, through the production of a photobook called “Understated”. This photobook showcases my friends and myself in a series of images which incorporate our friendship and inter personal relationships with each other in a range of settings where we often find ourselves. The majority of the portraits developed throughout my personal investigation were candid shots as I wished to portray the genuine nature of our relationship and how we act around people we are comfortable with without it being forced or staged.

Other images in this photobook consist of still life, close up shots of items used and located in our usual environment. The combination of portrait and still life imagery are a reflection of my two inspirations for this investigation; Gilden and You. The combination of these different mediums allowed me to explore not only the relationship between the subjects and myself but how our common interests add a distinctive dynamic between friends which is totally unique to us as individuals. The visual cultures relating to my investigation are solarisation and superimposition, both of which I have showed an interest in throughout the course. Solarisation is the method by which part of, or an entire photograph is reversed. This makes the dark areas appear light and the lighter areas appear dark. This interested me as the same image can look completely different and allow the viewer to focus on different parts of the composition simply by flipping what appears light and dark. Superimposition involves the placement of an image on top of an existing image, usually this is done to add to the overall effect of the image, but this method can also be used to conceal something. I achieved this by massively lowering the shutter speed and taking a photo of the subject in action or in the middle of a movement. This created the effect of double exposure. In some cases I followed these steps while adjusting the zoom, this created a double exposure which appeared to zoom in on an image.

My personal investigation follows a post-modernist approach to photography. Post-modernism was a movement developed in the late 20th century. Architects were at the head of this movement as they criticised the international style of architecture which up until then had followed a modernist approach. These architects felt that their international style had become repressive and orthodox and was losing its artistic value. Post-modernism follows the idea that while for modernists the image is captured from the photographer’s point of view, which leads the viewer to see one meaning, while post-modernisms focuses on the notion that there can be a lot of different interpretations and different understandings of a piece of work. This allows the photographer to tap into more debatable and taboo topics which different individuals can interpret in different ways. Post-modernism also explores the social forces exerted and their power to shape individual identities and even cultures and sub-cultures as the value of this type of photography isn’t its universal and timeless nature but the fact that it is hard hitting, relevant and accessible. These post-modernist themes are displayed throughout my work as I am discussing an individual and personal topic which is easily relatable. My investigation focuses on social norms and differences, the unique factors that bring my friends and myself together and the sub-cultures that we fall into as a group of people.

While my work in this project has a certain meaning to me, it is open to interpretation on behalf of the viewer. Different people can take away different feelings and emotions from my work, relating to different aspects of it in different ways. This leads me back to my opening quote “Every portrait that is painted with feelings is a portrait of the artist, not of the sitter” (D. Lewis, 2015; Face). As it can be said that the interpretation of a portrait can be determined by the viewer, by their mood and outlook at the time of viewing a piece of work. In this way, my work is relatively open ended as it can mean different things to different people. It can represent fun and friendships as the images display the possibility to make these connotation, however there could also be an element of rebelliousness or irrationality. The almost abstract nature of my project makes it very timeless. The series can be given thought and meaning but can also be viewed as aesthetically pleasing images which are simply enjoyable to look at. Therefore I conclude that it is possible to capture true emotions in a photograph but I feel that unlocking that emotional connection is down to the artist and the viewer. Feelings can be conveyed in an image, perhaps not in the form of a smile or frown of the subject in question, but the emotion and ‘feelings’ felt when the images are interpreted inside the mind of the viewer. This makes it subjective as it is a different thing to view an image and to understand it, but the subjective nature of photography in its entirety is what allows it to be so accessible and globally powerful.

Bibliography:

https://www.picturecorrect.com/tips/the-artist-behind-the-viewfinder-emotional-photography-insight/

https://www.lensculture.com/articles/daren-you-chaos

https://www.lensc