Comparison:

Both images are capturing a subject and showcasing its history, but in different ways. In Talmor’s imagery we are presented with a landscape which has been torn up to showcase a detachment of memory from the images. Where as Knez’s work showcases a landscape but holds a picture of the landscape taken a while ago to the landscape now a day at the same position and location, which is creating a journey of the landscape in a more positive light. The two artists have different approachs to showing a journey, but are both high successful in what they do. Contextually, Talmor wanted to destory any memory or attachment to that location due to negative experiences within that location. Where as, the contextual reasoning behind Knez’s work is showcasing how Paris has changed but the famous landmarks have not. In Talmor’s work there is a lack of space which suggests that the landmark should not hold any space in her head, which differs from Knez’s work as there is more space due to the location of the landmark and how Knez is trying to showcase it’s beauty. Talmor has created a very distorted outcome which almost revolts viewers making the location seem unpleasent. The background of both images are plain which allows the subject, in Talmers work it is the different fragments and in Knez’s work it is the architecture presented in the foreground of the image, to be the main focus point. Technically, both images share similar camera settings although they are very contrasting in what they do. Both have used a quick shutter speed to capture the images as there is no intended blur within the image. Alongside this they have both used a low ISO as there is no intended noise being presented. In addition, both have used artificial lighting which is shown in Talmer’s work as there is a reflection of a sunset in the water, and is clearly shown in Knez’s work as the landmark is outside and the sky suggests a sunny day. In both images it seems that a wide depth of field has been used as the whole frame is in focus, in Talmer’s work all the segments seem to be in focus which showcases this technique. Moreover, a normal white balance seems to be used (outdoor/sunlight) as the images do not seem to be off color. In addition, the images do not seem to be naturally lighter or darker which suggests the aperture is set to a normal setting. In my opinion I prefer Talmor’s photography due to the abstract nature of it and how there is no set way to look around the image and how it can be interpreted differently. However, I can still appreciate Knez’s work as it is just as successful in what it does.