Comparison:

Both images have used image and text to present a message and almost manipulate the viewers of the imagery to do as they say. Another similarity is the time at which they were created, they where both created during the war but for different reasons. Kruger created her manipulative posters to address current issues in 1945 society, like being gay and females rights, where as war propaganda was created to persuade people to leave their jobs and join the army, as that is what all men had to do. The target audience for both posters is different, Kruger’s work was aimed at anyone as she wanted to ensure that as many people are aware of these issues as possible, where as war propaganda was mainly aimed at men, as men where the gender who went and joined an army to fight in the war. Visually, both images are in black and white with colored text, which creates a color juxtaposition emphasizing the message within the message. In Kruger’s work the photograph of the man takes up the whole frame, leaving no sense of space, which reinforces the idea that we should do what the poster says. Where as, in the war propaganda we see Lord Kitchener in the center of the frame quite small, leaving a lot of space, which showcases the Lord’s importance making his message seem important. Conceptually, the two images are alike as they are both persuading viewers to do as they say, making them both successful pieces of propaganda. Both images have used male figures, as men where seen as more powerful and people where more likely to obey men during those days which justifies why the subject are that gender. In Kruger’s work she has used a chiaroscuro effect on the man to showcase how he wants to speak out but is still in doubt and scared, which emphasizes the text within the image. Where as, on the subject of the war propaganda it seems that one point or two point lighting was used on Kitchener as he is completely lit up, which may be because of his position within the war. Technically, the two images have some similarities with camera settings but also differ. One similarity is that a wide depth of field has been used as the model is completely in focus, and the models in both images are the only thing captures, making them the main focus point. In Kruger’s work there is intended noise in the model which suggests a higher ISO was used. Where as in the war propaganda there is no intended noise suggesting a low ISO. Both images have a quick shutter speed which captures the images as there is no blur on the models faces. As mentioned before both have used artificial lighting to capture the models allowing the different light up techniques to be made. In addition, the syntax of the sentences are very manipulative as it persuades and almost forces viewers to do as they say. In mu opinion I prefer Kruger’s work due to the lighting technique used, chiaroscuro, and the messages can still be utalized today. However, war propaganda has closer link to my project of the Journey of Jersey through the Second World War.