All posts by Stanley Lucas

Filters

Author:
Category:

My Book Specification

My topic in 3 words: Process of consumption

Topic described in a sentence: I will be exploring how consumption leads to a change in landscape and the process leading up to this change.

My topic described in a paragraph: I will be looking at the process of consumerism. Firstly exploring the areas which the consumerism starts and then looking at the effects which warp the landscape due to this consumerism. This will be specifically looking scarred landscapes and the inhabitants around the area of it, which I will compare with more scenic areas (where the products are produced), here I can observe the sheer size of waste hidden away in Jersey and how it is dealt with whilst forming new areas of land within it designated dumping grounds.

Design:

  • Look and Feel: A Glossy/matte cover which produces a photographic paper feel would be great regarding the topic of consumerism and the process our products go through.
  • Paper and Ink: Glossy paper used to bring out the colour in each image especially the plastics, with bold black ink to highlight certain photographs.
  • Format, Size, Orientation: A landscape book could be used due to the majority of the photos being landscape themselves, I could also utilise the space buy having a large amount of negative area surrounding the photos.
  • Binding and Cover: The cover would be the image that I think best sums up the entire project, probably an image of the dump and the piles of plastic with a large amount of negative space to fit the title in.
  • Title: My title will be about the topic of consumerism, using probably one of the three topics: Producing, Consuming or Waste.
  • Structure and Architecture: The structure will mostly consist of two images per double spread, with one image used for break pages. There will be the occasional double paged image which will probably be the photos I find the strongest and highlight the topic of consumerism best.
  • Design and Layout: The design and layout will mostly consist of two images per spread, with the occasional singular image double spread.
  • Editing and Sequencing: I will be trying to sequence the images in the order and process of our consumption. The first section of the book will be the process of making products, the second being the process of consuming the products, and the last section will be the outcome of our consumerism and the waste it causes.
  • Images and Text: Between each section I would like to add an information page informing the reader of the new area of choice, I will probably have the essay at the beginning of the book to provide an insight into the book before the reader carries on.

Image Analysis From Each Section

Before starting the development of my book I decided that I should analyse an image from each of the categories to present how I intend to make it reflect the process of consumerism and its source, product and waste. This would allow me to come to a better understanding of how I should compose books layout, whilst giving me ideas on how I could go about looking at the sections within the book. Here are my chosen images on analysis:

Source:
This image reflects the source of consumerism, done through the presentation of a quarry I intend to present the viewer of the devastation caused by industrialization and its effects on the scarring of the surrounding landscape. The photo of the machinery present in the quarry to me creates an insight into the generally unseen process behind the creation of our products and its impact on our environment. Accompanied with this I will be using a variety of different images based around the quarry to compliment it and provide a broader perspective regarding the landscape used for its materials. When putting this into the book I will be making sure that the other images used consist of the same coloured imagery and representation, something I would like to do as it would set a theme throughout the section using a generalized presentation of area transformation.

Product: The second stage of consumerism I photographed is the outcome of the industrialization, the product. Here I went into shops to explore how there was a huge change in presentation from the originally messy portrayal of the quarries, to a now more organized and aesthetic presentation of aisles of food on shelves. I put this as the second section to purposely contrast the previous topic, whilst making the viewer think of the completely different atmosphere used by companies to promote and hide the origins of products sources. When implementing the food images into the book I will be making sure there is a cold theme of organization, using colder colours compared to the warm browns and reds of the source, this hopefully will be impacting the viewer opinion regarding how we now see the process of out consumerism that consists of unseen impacts made by these global companies in order to sell their product.

Waste: 
This is the final representation and outcome of consumerism, the waste. Here I photographed the piles of rubbish careless thrown away after their initial uses had been completed, left to be transported or recycled in various other locations. When taking the images here I made sure to capture the sheer mass of the rubbish in such as small area, presenting it as a jumble or unorganized mess that grows more and more by the day. Finally when I implement them into my book I will be making sure to include images that portray the same viewpoint I possess regarding the use of the landscape, in which I will be using imagery taken of landfill and the piles of dirt created from them, all the while looking at how they as a result permanently scar our environment.

Essay Draft Development

In what way do photographers Edwards Burtynsky and Henry J Fair present their perspectives regarding consumerism.

Truth portrayed in photography can be captured differently depending on the photographer’s vision, warping how the viewer sees and interprets the intended message being put across. The idea behind presenting truth in photography is unique to every individual, prompting specific feelings such as disbelief, hate, anger and happiness, all of which have been precisely thought of before taking the image, to be then presented as a singular perspective through its composition. The viewer will either agree or disagree, but these perspectives can be swayed depending on how the artist puts together each image, carefully composing it so that the result perfectly represents their intended viewpoint. Philosopher Charles Pierce states that “to represent truth, it must resemble the object it represents “and is known as ‘iconicity’. This relationship between the subject matter and the image, usually reflects the photographer’s stance regarding current, future or past world issues. The photographer is either provoking the viewer or questioning the viewers perspective of events.  

What interests me is that depending on how a photo is composed, and what is present within that image, our perspective regarding that topic can either be reinforced or diminished, forming our opinion in the process. To illustrate this, I will be referencing photographers Edward Burtynsky and J Henry Fair. Burtynsky looks at how global industrialisation can scar and warp the landscapes around us, and Fair explores the effects of pollution from these global industries and how they almost stagnate and dissolve the very land used. I will be using both artist’s viewpoints and ideas to illustrate my response to the question, whilst comparing my own responses to theirs in order to broaden my understanding of the subject. 

I will be responding to this idea regarding truth by going on various shoots around the island, looking at how consumerism has changed and warped the landscape of Jersey, whilst capturing the source and outcome of the every growing demands of society. To do this I would need to explore areas such as quarries (granite industries) and dumps (unwanted and unused items) as an attempt to portray how I see it affecting those who live around, whilst presenting the gradual change it forces upon the landscape in a negative but aesthetic light. Much like the photographers I will be exploring below, I wanted to identify and capture the ugliness of these landscapes but also the hidden beauty they possess, presenting each photograph in a way which is bias to my perspective regarding the topic. 

Burtynsky takes on a more documentary approach, applying what can be seen in these landscapes in a more formal and symmetrical manner, choosing to portray each landscape using both intense and dull colours as an attempt to link thoughts to features, with man-made structures portrayed dully and natural ones depicted vividly. However, contrasted to this Fair almost portrays the opposite of Burtynsky’s perspective, he chooses instead to present the pollution created by these industries as aesthetic implementations that bring harmful life into the environment, where nature seems to be portrayed as the duller aspect to the surrounding area, overshadowed by the mesmerising destruction of chemicals. Both photographers here present similar, but different viewpoints regarding truth of the camera, drawing on both unconventional and symbolic ways of presenting this perspective to the viewer. Whose role? is now to interpret the image on a more personal level, known as straight photography. 

Chapter One - Straight Photography

Originating in 1904, and pioneered by photographers Paul Strand and Alfred Stieglitz, straight photography presented viewers with a new system of photos that consisted of unmanipulated imagery as an attempt to engage with the viewers. Often known as a form of ‘pure’ photography, the aim was to contrast the Pictorialist stance which produced painting like results, mimicking this Impressionist art using a ‘soft focus’ effect. The idea behind this was move away from imitating pictures, and instead develop a separate art form where the natural environment would be used, which at the time in the 1950s was a very alternative concept. This gave way to a more documentary styled approach, where photographers now sought to achieve graphical structure within their photos, which could then be accompanied by unconventional viewpoints and new techniques that presented fresh perspectives into the visible, industrial world. 

Although straight photographers would deliberately lack manipulation in their photography, they did make use of applied techniques commonly seen in darkrooms which could enhance the appearance of their prints. The term ‘straight photographer’ soon came to imply a style of photography that used aesthetic characteristics, amplified by higher contrast, rich tonality, sharp focus and most importantly cropping, all of which now can be seen in relation to a Modernist-inspired approach, using a variety of underlying abstract geometric structures around their subjects. An example of this can be seen through Paul Strand’s ‘Wall Street’, a piece in which Strand moves away from the portraiture of subjects, and instead attempts to portray the bankers in a purer manner using sharp contrast of shapes and angles, leading to a more abstract piece due to it representing his own personal vision. Quoted “Your photography is a record of your living, for anyone who really sees”.   Regarding my work on political landscapes, I will be drawing most of my inspiration from straight photography, where I will be portraying my perspective concerning consumerism and the effects of it on our landscape, using as little photo manipulation as possible. The photographs which I will be comparing below from my shoots I have taken from various areas of Jersey that have been affected by consumerism and the consequent scarring of landscape around it, looking at both straight and modern photography as a guideline for my progress and intended results. 

The photographers whose work I will be exploring (Edward Burtynsky and Henry J Fair) individually portray their photography in their own unique way. I have chosen both these photographs because of the link they have to my area of political landscapes, consumerism. With both using a form of straight photography to photograph industrialised areas polluting the landscape. Each photographer has taken on a rather different stance regarding how the matter at hand has progressed, using abstract and modernist styles of photography to do so. Exaggerating and influencing the perspective of the view through the enhancement of specific aspects within the image, such as saturation.  

Chapter Two – Edward Burtynsky – Truth of The Camera                                                      
Regarded as one of the most accomplished contemporary photographers of all time No Tributes, Burtynsky’s interest in photography sparked when his father bought a darkroom. Here they practiced amateur photography together, leading to his eventual study of graphic arts between 1970-80, where he found his love of photographing consumerist industries. From here Burtynsky started travelling the world, depicting a unique perspective over industrial landscapes and the consequences they had on the surrounding environment. Burtynsky states that “we come from nature… There is an importance to having a certain reverence for what nature is because we are connected to it… If we destroy nature, we destroy ourselves”. Evident in the project ‘Oil’ (2009), Burtynsky travels internationally to photograph the production, distribution and the use of the most critical fuel of our time. Exaggeration is crucial aspect in the Burtynsky’s work for revealing the context behind the intended message of each image, without it specific viewpoints could not be put across or could be misunderstood if not for being obvious what is trying to be said. This is evident through Burtynsky’s focus on usually one aspect of trade, the production stage. Providing a huge amount of influence for the viewer who now is only presented with a single sided perspective (much of his work argues against the damage caused by consumerism). Seen in the piece ‘Oil Refinery’, by concentrating much of his imagery on one particular characteristic of that landscape, it sets a bias perspective for the viewer who begins to automatically associate and link the images towards current and worldwide political issues which relate to the type of consumerism at hand, such as global warming and the race to achieve sustainable power. However, by portraying and exaggerating a mostly one-sided perspective like Burtynsky has done, it removes a lot of our ability to debate and possess a personal interpretation regarding the images taken. As providing a single sided outlook of the topic, narrating itself without the input of other viewpoints, only allows room for those who share similar opinions not those who don’t. This opens the topic for debate, as though Burtynsky presents a single-sided perspective, without the explicit imagery representing his vision of the oil industries, there could be no debate concerning how society is progressing and the impact on our planet its causing. Consequentially exaggeration is a necessity in photography, as without it there would be no photos to cause awareness regarding topics open to controversy which affect our everyday lives.I’ve responded to Burtynsky’s work by exploring the resultant garbage collection of our ever-increasing consumerism at La Collette, especially the plastic waste which consists of mostly vividly coloured electronics. 

When taking each image, I made sure to use a straight photography approach, here I would use a none zoom lens to photograph the objects as accurately as I’ve seen them, editing only the brightness which would have been available in darkrooms to enhance each photo. My main focus was to bring into light the amount we throw away and wanted to do so by presenting this issue to the viewers through size comparison. To accomplish this, I found the biggest assortment of plastic waste and photographed it next to a hangar wall, making sure to carefully crop out any suggestion of a decrease of its mass. Here I purposely gave my image a one-sided political perspective, by presenting only my own bias viewpoint it would allow for debate to occur regarding the topic, as I encouraged criticism towards the result of our greed. For me this was more effective as it limited the vision of the viewer to only one aspect of the area, opposed to the whole area. This also proved a challenge as I wanted to provoke opinions regarding the outcome of waste, and only using my composition to accomplish provided more difficultly than expected. Here I deliberately disagreed with the essay question, as I wanted to provide evidence of how perception could alter perspectives regarding any chosen topic, essentially using a snippet of evidence to build a claim. 
Chapter Three – Henry J Fair

Born 1959, Henry J Fair had a fascination for the scarring of landscapes caused by large industrial companies. As his photography developed he soon found himself based in both New York and Berlin, travelling the world in search of environmental pollution. His most influential project ‘Industrial Scars’ focuses on small range environmental issues such as coal ash and oil, to large-scale ones such as abandoned mining operations. Here Fair uses mostly aerial photography to accomplish his images as they provide a perspective not usually seen by the general public. Much like Burtynsky, Fair focuses on the effects of these consumerist industries, alternativly choosing to present them in an almost devastating and destructive beauty, using vivid and aesthetic colours as a means of portraying contrast within the landscape. Fair here seems to stray from the idea of straight photography, as instead he uses increased saturation and heavy cropping to produce the outcomes desired, the result of this is extremely exaggerated imagery, where the colours of the landscape seem too dreamlike and otherworldly to exist. By using a more modern approach consisting of photo-manipulation the image gives rise to political themes, this is due to how the layout of each image makes the earth’s landscape unrecognizable to the viewer, causing disbelief and uncertainty regarding the possible future of society if this carries on. Exaggeration becomes a key aspect in telling stories through this documentary style approach, as each photo needs to be hard hitting to assert a change in mind-set for people. If the pictures were not beautiful, the viewer would not stop to consider them, or cherish them, a technique not commonly seen in documentary styled photography. These vibrant results which use an abstract approach, can be interpreted as the anchor point for drawing in audiences, with colours acting as a motif for the overflowing consumerist effects warping our landscape. Responding to this I then produced my own set of images based around consumerist landscapes. My own photos took inspiration from the bright contrasting colours that popped out in Fair’s work. Here I explored how chemicals had corroded metals based around water distilleries, finding that they produced a lava like pattern which trickled down the sheets. Much like Fair’s work I then proceeded to edit and increase the saturation of rust in software, creating abstract landscapes of the environment it was created in. I found that this exaggerated hugely the effects of chemicals on varying surfaces in the area, presenting the environment that it’s subjected to in a more demeaning light, whilst influencing the viewer’s mind-set towards un-hygienic conditions. This reflected my perspective regarding the treatment of relied upon areas (such as dumps and distillation plants), where mistreatment could lead to a shift in political landscapes. Leading many to rely on alternative methods of consumption. Although both photographers share the same vision regarding their perspective over waste produced by the industrialisation of areas, the techniques and style used differ. The work of Burtynsky takes up a more literal and formal approach, using only composition of the camera to overwhelm viewers through the inclusion of one area of interest. This limits the audience’s perspective over the topic, as presenting a partial snippet of man’s creation only allows for the images produced to create a single-sided bias perspective concerning how the landscape may look. Contrasted to this Fair uses a broader take on the landscape to present his viewpoint, producing images looking at the entire landscape using aerial photography, choosing to push the boundaries of straight photography. This provides a larger view of the environment surrounding these industries and the effects of human scarring upon it, accompanied by Fair’s exaggerated vibrant imagery this appeals hugely to the audience whilst gaining a greater chance of drawing awareness to these global issues. However the method used by both photographs to depict the issues at hand do so aesthetically. Looking at their strongest projects, ‘Oil’ and ‘Industrial Scars’, there is an underlying sense of aestheticism beneath the abstract compositions, where each photographer uses intricate design as the major ‘go to’ in both structures and chemicals. I found that my work linked well with their style. I tried mostly to incorporate straight photography compliments with abstract aestheticism, depicting consumerism devastating the landscape

Incorporate Andreas Gursky in there and look at photographer Mishka Henner for aerial shots.

Political Landscapes – Shoot #5

8One of my final ideas regarding consumerism was the concept of the product and result of consumerism. To do this I wanted to go to various shops in Jersey and photograph the aisles of food and the occasional customer buying, this would help in telling the story of societies consumerist habits. Here I wanted to capture vibrant and colourful items which would contrast the previous shoots that focused on dull landscapes scarred by industrialisation. For the shoot itself I wanted to reference back to Andrea Gursky, a photographer who had inspired a previous shoot.

When going ahead with the shoot I decided that I should make a mood-board, by doing this it would allow me to explore ideas that I wished to produce when commencing with the shoot itself.  The most important thing I wanted to portray in the image are the colours of the shop and its organisation compared to that of the source and outcome of consumerism. Here are examples of what I’m aiming towards in the shoot:After I had finished producing the mood-board, I then decided to create a mind-map. This would allow me to physically write down my ideas and approach the shoot with clear intentions for what I wish to achieve. My ideas can be seen below:Once I was happy with the ideas for the shoot I then proceeded to go out and photograph the chosen area. I had asked certain shops to photograph their aisles in the local area to capture the aestheticism of the rows. Here are my responses: After I had finished the shoot I went on to pick ten images that I thought best reflected the entire shoot, looking at how the related to the topic of consumerism and their overall look. By doing this it would make it easier to pick out the best image of the shoot whilst ridding me of any images that I thought were not up to scratch. These are my choices for the top ten image of the shoot:

Once I had chosen my selected ten image I then proceeded to change whittle down again into only five, by doing this I could analyse the photos to more detail, looking at how their technical, visual and conceptual aspects that defined them from the rest of the batch. Here are my selected five image of the shoot:  I selected this image because of the bright colours brought in by the chocolate wrappers. I found that this contrasted against the black backdrop made by decreasing the brightness making the shelves become more aesthetic as a result. I really like how the composition of the shelves shifting from different heights, this to me added differentiation into the piece through its depth. The neatness of the chocolate bars in the centre of the image provided a sense of organisation compared to the rest of the image which seemed to be more messy due to the placement of the items.  Finally I thought that this image best reflected one of the most consumed items world-wide, the sugar industry, and especially with the news regarding the destruction of landscapes to produce chocolate products I found that the implicit meaning behind the photo really complimented the topic.  I chose this image because of how I thought the contrast between the meats and the lady in the red jacket really brought the image together. What can be seen as a predominantly dull piece is brought to life through the implementation of red, giving life to what would typically be seen as a cold section of the shop. This is really complimented through her composition and placement in the bottom right corner, as it adds room to view the rest of the aisle presenting a comparison within. I made sure to add the beers on the left to add a sense of depth into the piece and provide a broader sense of the shop as if you were there. Overall I found this image to be effective through its representation of someone buying the products, showing a mid-point between producing and the waste.  What made me choose this image was the assortment of colours present through the stacked cans on the shelf. This variation every can or two for me added a huge sense of aestheticism to the photo, with the occasional tin missing adding a much-needed bit of depth into the photo. By including the tags dangling off the edges and the sides of the shelf it breaks up the otherwise symmetrical piece, preventing it from becoming too eye sore for the viewer and instead separates the focus of the audience. Overall I found this piece really represented the intended topic of consumerism as it provided a sense of order, something that I made sure not to make present in any other of the shoots. The reason I chose this image was because of the sign illuminating over the food aisles. This for brought much-needed colour into the photo, whilst providing order and categorisation for the food which can be seen as stacked in a rushed manner, providing order amongst the maze of food. For me the signed added an insight into the typical sight in a local shop, where everything is labelled and easily found, compared to that of the dump where everything is thrown in together, with items becoming lost forever. To me this image worked because it was the style of photography I wanted to achieve within the store, being straight photography, where I would only photograph what I witnessed using no manipulation to adjust the image whatsoever.
Finally I selected this image because I found it to be the best representation of straight photography out of the entire shoot, bringing through bleak colours and an ultimately dull image. For me this image was a great representation of how a typical local store would be laid out, with a look of organisation on the shelves and empty spaces. I really liked how the right side of the photo emerges from a crisp packet which for me adds depth to the piece as if you were walking down the aisle and this what you would see.

Once I had analysed all five images I thought I had enough evidence to select the best image out of the shoot. I would be taking into consideration its overall relevance in the shoot and topic of consumerism, with it needing to be a representation of the half-way point between producing and waste:

Final Image: The reason I selected this image as my final piece is because of its relevance to the topic of consumerism, done through an aesthetic and appealing way. The capturing of a red jacket against a backdrop of dull coloured meats really sold this piece for me, producing a quite conceptual result that hid the face of the buyer. By only seeing a slither of the floor and section of various other shelves added a sense of you really being there witnessing the customer buying something, with the blurred beer cans adding depth into the photo. This image would be a great implementation into the presentation of the mid-section of consumerism, the product, showing someone buying food which will later be thrown away into the dump.

Image Analysis

Image result for J Henry FairImage taken by J Henry Fair: Industrial scars

Taken by photographer J Henry Fair, the image aims to highlight the tragic effects that human actions have caused and their impact on our planet. Each image is made purposely beautiful due to the colours which give it an aesthetic quality, however there is a deeper meaning underlying every photo, represented through our ever-increasing demand for energy, which rapidly changes because of our ever-increasing consumerism. This image itself aims at exposing what is left over from the results of our societies demands, by revealing these devastating results Fair hopes to shed light onto people’s perspective of the planet, attempting to make us realize how responsible we are for the environmental future of this planet. Visually the image mixes vibrant and earth like colours together to produce an aesthetically pleasing results, by placing these contrasting colours against each other in an environment that you would not usually associate them together in really sheds light onto the almost permanent scars left behind from our demands and consumerism. By photographing the layers of the mine it portrays the depths that we go to achieve what we want and how deep these scars left behind from it have become, giving us an insight into the sheer size of our global crisis.

By portraying the scarred landscape in such a symmetrical way it almost distracts us from the actual problem at hand and how unnatural it is to see something like this present on our landscape. The use of earthy browns combined with violets and blues can be seen as symbolic to through the unnatural colours, represented by the red and blue chemicals it could be seen as the humans marks that have been placed using chemicals and other means to acquire the materials we desire, however the dark earth brown colours can be seen as the natural landscape which surrounds the areas wherever we leave scars, and how once disturbed cannot be replaced and replenished.

Visually the image is very aesthetic, as the dark mixture of colours such as deep reds, browns and blues compliment each other so that it no longer becomes an earthy texture but a stained and scarred landscape. The layering of the earth hills itself provides a clear perspective into the sheer size of the actual quarry, with each step providing depth into the overall photo, however this is broken up through the use of the road which runs horizontally down the hill, preventing the generic patterns from becoming too overpowering and dull. By doing this no only do it bring the image together but also adds contrast and definition to the piece from the implementation of shadows which surround it.

Technically this image itself has a fairly regular exposure where only dark shadows have been captured and probably a slightly higher shutter speed in order to capture the full quality of the landscape. The road within the image provides the main focal point for the viewer whose attention is instantly drawn towards it due to it being the break of the continual pattern, from there it allows the viewer to explore the rest of the landscape in contrast to the actual pathway itself which seems almost out-of-place. The roads which separate each section of the hill really provide an overall look of aestheticism in the picture as by capture the image any lower would have blocked them out thus resulting in a continual hill of colours.

Artist References For Essay

For my essay I decided to relate two photographers in relation to truth of the camera regarding consumerism. Both Edward Burtynsky and Henry J Fair posed as ideal artists to incorporate due to their imagery being based around industrial scarring and landscape change in the consumerist world. Their styles using a mixture or straight and abstract photograph really appealed to me as I found I could relate more to it, thus using them as examples in my essay would provide further context regarding my chosen topic and how it could relate to my photo book once put together. Here are some quick analysis of each of them:

Edward Burtynsky:Burtynsky is a photographer who specialises in photographing industrial landscapes altering the area through mines and quarries. He provides a very one-sided perspective regarding the treatment of our natural environments, presenting them in an aesthetic but negative light in order to draw in the audience’s attention. Motifs are a clear indication of his work through colours, where the duller greys and browns represent the influence of man’s structures on the area and the vibrant greens and reds represent the beauty of nature as its being intervened by our industrialisation. The presentation of his images are key, as they usually resemble cuts and slashes on the surface of the landscape as a constant reminder of what we have destroyed, usually seen through deforestation and slash and burn techniques. The main focus of his work tends to be based around quarries where he presents the huge impact  on our environment through composing them in a menacing way, that almost makes them seem unrecognisable and alien like, portraying his perspective regarding how we have invaded and disrupted our Earth. The the purpose of much of Burtynsky’s work seem to be a plea at raising awareness for how we treat our planet, and does so through the implementation of vibrant and aesthetic imagery which even from a distance draws the viewer in, question what it could be and how it ended up like that. From these images a huge political theme arises, as by only presenting a single sided perspective around a topic it raises viewpoints that could disagree and debate, however by allowing this negativity it draws in attention to the concern and therefore presents itself to others who may not have been aware.

Henry J Fair: Much like Burtynsky, Fair focuses on the impact of industrialisation on the landscape. Presenting once again a predominantly negative light upon the issue of consumerism, Fair chooses to instead focus on the more chemical effect of industrial impact of the natural world. Photographing toxic waste and leaked chemicals in a beautiful and aesthetic way, capturing this devastating beauty clearly intends to inform the viewer of how we have chosen to lead our ever-growing needs in the world, disregarding the consequences of our choices. However Fair chooses to use a contrasting motif to that of Burtynsky, instead using the opposite of him, where vibrant colours represent the toxicity of the waste and its destructiveness, and the dull colours being the landscape in its natural state. Fair sees that the only way to make aware the impacts of industrialisation are through its exaggeration, making colours and scenes that aren’t really there a typical portrayal of his vision. This perspective he possesses create mainly one-sided view that disregards the efforts made to help these issues, instead choosing to over-exaggerate.

Essay Question And Plan

Essay Question: 

Previous examples: 

How does people control, interact and construct the environment in which they live?

How can photography bear witness to the ways of life and events of the world?

Voyeurism and the nature of observation and intervention in documentary photography.

Is it possible for photography to capture moments in time objectively and truthfully?

In what way do photographers Edwards Burtynsky and Henry J Fair present their perspectives regarding consumerism.

CHOSEN QUESTION: 

In what way do photographers Edwards Burtynsky and Henry J Fair present their perspectives regarding consumerism.


Planning my essay:

Introduction.

  • Introduction (250-500 words): What is your area study? Which artists will you be analyzing and why? How will you be responding to their work and essay question?
Regarding the essay question I have written and chosen, I will be looking specifically at the photographic areas of composition and using it to manipulate a perspective and opinion from viewers. The thought process behind these ideas are down to my interest in documentary photography, and how it's able to become a major factor in the influencing of people worldwide. By switching between what can be seen as conventional and unconventional photography, I found that by changing the way you portrayed specific scenes (such as abstract or realism) it would create a certain impression of the photo, placing the viewers in the same mind-set as you. What particularly attracted me to this style of photography was that by using a documentary stance I could incorporate political viewpoints underlying what is seen, thus creating a political landscape with the piece which only with an understanding of the area can be understood. Photographers that I found to be predominantly inspiring are J Henry Fair, a photographer who explores the scarring of landscapes caused by our societies every increasing consumerism, and Edward Burtynsky, a landscape photographer who captures the scarring results of industrialization through aesthetic and almost abstract imagery. What appealed to me through the works of J Henry Fair was his way approach towards scarred landscapes, using symmetry and vivid colours to portray his vision in aesthetic but devastating ways, with his main focuses consisting of industrial areas and how the area is effected. By presenting landscapes this way, it can not only influence the viewer, but also create particular feelings towards the events photographed, especially with the knowledge behind the image of why it occurred and how the use of higher saturation creates a more drastic and effective response. Edward Burtynsky however influences me with his stance on abstract documentary style photography, here Burtynsky uses symmetry and patterns to break conventions to create results that look to beautiful to be real. However his work has an underlying meaning from how all aesthetic patterns are created through the destruction of the natural environments, and thus is the result of destroying our landscape, implicitly contrasted to Fair who tends to photograph the industrial sites rather than the area around them like Burtynsky does. Overall for me this presents evidence to how the processes and outcomes to consumerism can be heavily defined by the angle of the photographer, who can choose the perspective that we take regarding the meaning and message of the photographed landscapes.
  • Pg 1 (500 words): Historical/ theoretical context within art, photography and visual culture relevant to your area of study. Make links to art movements/ isms and some of the methods employed by critics and historian. Link to power points about isms and movements M:\Departments\Photography\Students\Resources\Personal Study
  • Pg 2 (500 words): Analyse first artist/photographer in relation to your essay question. Present and evaluate your own images and responses.
  • Pg 3 (500 words): Analyse second artist/photographer in relation to your essay question. Present and evaluate your own images and responses.
  • Conclusion (250-500 words): Draw parallels, explore differences/ similarities between artists/photographers and that of your own work that you have produced
  • Bibliography: List all relevant sources used

Academic Sources

Bibliography:

What is a bibliography?: A complete of selective list of workings that has been complied into some common principles such as authorship, subject, place of publication, or printer. Because of this it can be seen as source materials that are used or consulted in the preparation of a work that are referring to a text, with many branches of library science dealing with the history, physical description, comparison, and classification of books and other work. Here are some examples of bibliographies I have made:

  • Rexer, L. (2013). The edge of vision. New York: Aperture Foundation, p.9.
  • Disphotic. (2018). The GIF of Life: Vestigial File Formats as Documentary. [online] Available at: http://www.disphotic.com/the-gif-of-life-vestigial-file-formats-as-documentary/ [Accessed 22 Nov. 2018].

Below is a annotated diagram of a bibliography I will be using in my essay: 

Contextual Study

Pictorialism

Time Period: 1885 to 1915 
Key Characteristics/Conventions: Pictorialism wished to approach photography like a painting, where the images taken resemble brush strokes etc rather than a photo. The style places beauty, tonality and composition above anything else when creating an accurate visual record. They wanted to move photography away from scientific uses and instead to artistic ideologies, to do this they took inspiration from certain artworks from which they adapted the style it was painted and composed in. Pictorialists were the first photographers to have their work recognized as a form of art, committing their lives to photographic manipulation exploration, leading many to find new techniques not previously used or seen before.     
Artists Associated: Henry Peach Robinson, Julia Margaret Cameron, Peter Henry Emerson, The Vienna Camera Clud (Group), The Brotherhood of the Linked Ring (Group), Photo-Secession (Group).
Key Works: Morning (1908 - Clarence H.White), Pond in Winter (1888, Peter Henry Emerson), I wait (1972, Rachel Gurney), The Steerage (1907, Alfred Stieglitz).
Methods/Techniques/Processes: The style of work was created by manipulating images in the darkroom, scratching and marking their prints so that they imitate the texture of a canvas, using soft focus, blurred and fuzzy imagery based on allegorical and spiritual subject matter, including religious scenes.
Realism/Straight Photography 

Time Period: 1910 to present day
Key Characteristics/Conventions: Straight photography emphasizes and engages the camera's own technical capability to produce images sharp and in focus with lots of detail. The photographers wished to makes images that were more 'photographic' rather than 'painterly', not wanting to treat photography as some monochrome painting. It is a process of time and represents immediacy, the passing time in history or the freezing of time in a snapshot, quoted by Henri Cartier-Bresson as "we work in unison with movement as though it were a presentiment on the way in which life itself unfolds. But inside movement there is one moment in which the elements in motion are in balance". 
Artists Associated: Alfred Stieglitz, Paul Strand, Walker Evans, Lewis W Hine, Jacob Riis, Dorothea Lange, Ansel Adams.
Key Works: Porch Shadows (1916, Paul Strand), Blind Woman New York (1916, Paul Strand), The Tetons and the Snake River (1942, Ansel Adams).
Methods/Techniques/Processes: The process is generally not manipulated but instead sharply depicts the image as someone sees it. Straight photographers visualize the image before taking it, stated by Ansel Adams "Get your lighting and exposure correct at the start and both the developing and printing can be practically automatic".

Reviewing and Reflecting

Lesson 1 – Reviewing and reflecting:
Objective:
 Criteria from the Syllabus

  • Write an overview from my personal investigation about what I’ve learned and how I intend to develop it.
  • I will be describing the themes, artists, approaches, skills and photographic process/techniques that have inspired me the most and why.
Regarding my personal investigations I intend to approach it by using and exploring various techniques but a continuous style, examples consist of documentary and abstract to allow me to produce the results I desired. The themes I found to be the most interesting were the ones concerning consumerism and its effect on Jersey's landscape, I found that this allowed for a new insight into what happens with out waste and how much it affects the environment around it. From this it would allow me to give viewers a different perspective into what the outcome of our consumerism is, using software such as Photoshop and Lightroom to highlight specific details that I want to be focused on. Because of this I am able to portray each image differently from the next, as yes they all have a theme in common, but rather each explore a different aspect of consumerism and its impact. Two photographers who to me are particularly inspiring are Henry J Fair, someone who uses abstract imagery to capture the pollution of the world in aesthetic and stunning ways, and Edward Burtynsky, a photographer who captures the hidden beauty in consumerism, but also highlights the impact and devastation it causes on the environment. Both photographers use of vivid and harsh lighting accompanied by high saturation create landscapes that seem to surreal to be an actual place, drawing in my interest from how I loved the idea of using lighting as a conventional way in which photos are presented. I found that it would be most effective in end result areas of consumerism, as by portraying these dumping grounds in specific ways I believe that it would bring otherwise ugly imagery to life.