Kodachrome and Autochrome

What is Kodachrome?

Kodachrome became the first colour film that made use of a subtractive colour method successfully mass-marketed. It was the successor of Autochrome and Dufaycolor which had been used for screenplating methods. Kodachrome has become the longest living brand of colour film due to its manifacture for 74 years in various formats to suit still and motion picture cameras including 8mm, super 8, 16mm. As a result of this Kodachrome can be appreciated due to its archival and professional market regarding dark-storage and longevity making its qualities desired by many professional photographers.

The brand name itself is for a non-substantive, color reversal film introduced by Eastman Kodak in 1935, becoming one of the first successful colour materials used for both cinematography and still photography. Over years Kodachrome was widely used for professional colour photography as the images produced were intended for publication in print media. However the film started to be sold process-paid in the US until 1954 due to legal ruling which prohibited this. Due to its growth and rising popularity of alternative photographic materials and complex processing requirments, widespread transition to digital photography resulting in Kodachrome to lose market share eventually leading to it becoming discontinued in 2009 with its processing ending in December 2010.

Some examples of Kodachrome and its photographic results can be seen below:

Over the years Kodachrome became a registered trademark of the Kodak company, with its method of colour transparency becoming more commonly known as a type of colour film the company started marketing in 1935. “Kodachrome” might sound familiar. Kodak eventually had at least three different processes that went by this new trademark, the first in 1914. In the early years of the twentieth century Eastman Kodak pursued the development of a simple color photography process that could be used by amateur photographers.

What is Autochrome?

Autochrome, also known as Autochrome Lumiere was invented in France by the brothers Auguste and Louis Lumiere. Originally they presented their research into colour photography to the Academie des Sciences in 1904, with commercial manufacture of autochrome plates soon starting 1904. This led to the first autochrome process taking place on the 10th of June 1907 at the offices of the French newspaper L’Illustration. The process works by covering autochrome plates in microscopic red, green and blue coloured potato starch grains. When the photo is eventually taken the light passes through these colour filters to the photographic emulsion, with the plate becoming processed to produce a positive transparency. As a result this creates a full colour image of the original subject.

These processes were undertaken at the Limiere factory in Lyon, and included a complex process. Transparent grain was first passed through a series of sieves to isolate the grains between ten and fifteen microns in diameter. These grains are then separated into batches and dyed red, green and violet which are then once again mixed together over a glass plate coated in a sticky varnish. Charcoal powder is the spread over the plate to fill in any gaps between the grain and a roller is used to pressure the grain and flatten them out, and finally leaving the plate to be covered in a photographic emulsion.

Here are some examples of autochrome:

Overall the photos did not require much special apparatus as photographs could use their existing cameras, however they did have to remember to place their autochrome plate in the camera with the plain glass side nearest the lens so that light passed through the filter screen before reaching the sensitive emulsion. To view the image autochromes could simply be held up to the light, however for ease and comfort they were usually viewed using special stands called diascopes which incorporated mirrors. These gave the image a brighter result and allowed several people to look at the plate at the same time, they could also be presented using magic lanterns.

History Of Colour Photography

When photography was invented in 1839, it was a black-and-white medium, and it remained that way for almost one hundred years. Photography then was a fragile, cumbersome, and expensive process. In order to practice, photographers needed a lot of extra money and time, or a sponsor. In that early period, the people advancing photographic technology tended to focus not on achieving color photographs but on making improvements in the optical, chemical, and practical aspects of photography. For many, the goal was to make photography more suitable for portraiture—its most desired application. For that, photographic technology needed to be more stable, portable, and affordable, not more colorful. But people wanted color photos. (Portraits before photography were paintings—in full, glorious color.) By 1880, once the early technical hurdles had been overcome, portrait photographers began experimenting with color. They employed artists to tint photographers’ daguerreotypes and calotypes by hand.

British photographers introduced hand coloring photographs to Japan, where the practice became widespread and Japanese artists further perfected the technique. The refined, delicate hand coloring became a defining characteristic of Japanese tourist photography, the results of which were carried back to the West, influencing the art of hand coloring there. This wildly popular technique persisted in Europe and the Americas until twenty years later when Autochrome plates arrived. In Japan, hand coloring lasted yet another twenty years beyond.

When first attempted in early 1840s people were trying to find a sort of chameleon substance which would be be able to assume the colour of any light falling upon it. The first results were typically obtained from projecting a solar spectrum directly onto the sensitive surface promising an eventual success, however a comparatively dull image would form in the camera required exposures lasting for hours or even days. The quality and range of the image colour were sometimes severely limited mainly due to primary colours, such as the chemically made ‘Hillotype’ process invented by America Levi Hill in 1850. Many others tried to experiment with other methods that prevented colours from fading over time such as Edmond Becquerel who achieved better results to some extent. Over about seven decades there was continuous experiments along these lines which would occasionally raise hopes but having no value at practical level. Here are some examples of early coloured photography:

Regarding the first ever colour photograph it was taken as early as 1826 by Nicephore Niepce, however it took until 1861 to be developed by technology which could incorporate very basic colour. Overall though it was the Scottish Physicist and poet James Clerk Maxwell who produced the first true colour photograph that didn’t fade immediately or need colour adding afterwards by hand. The image can be interpreted as sinister and mysterious, this is because the colours red, green and blue have been used to take a still image of some tartan ribbon which had to be taken three times using different coloured filters each time. The technique itself was developed because of the theories about how the eye can process colour. This is the first non-fading coloured image:

The three-colour method, which is the foundation of virtually all practical color processes whether chemical or electronic, was first suggested in an 1855 paper on colour vision by Maxwell. It is based on the Young-Helmholtz theory that the normal human eye perceives colour because the retina is covered with millions of intermingled cone cells of three different types: In theory, one type is most sensitive to the end of the spectrum we call “red”, another is more sensitive to the middle or “green” region, and a third which is most strongly stimulated by “blue”. The named colours are somewhat arbitrary divisions imposed on the continuous spectrum of visible light, and the theory is not an entirely accurate description of cone sensitivity. Nevertheless, it coincides enough with the sensations experienced by the eye that when these three colors are used the three cones types are adequately and unequally stimulated.

In his studies of color vision, Maxwell showed, by using a rotating disk with which he could alter the proportions, that any visible hue or gray tone could be created by mixing only three pure colours of light red, green and blue in proportions that would stimulate the three types of cells to the same degrees under particular lighting conditions. To emphasize that each type of cell by itself did not actually see colour but was simply more or less stimulated, he drew an analogy to black-and-white photography: if three colorless photographs of the same scene were taken through red, green and blue filters, and transparencies made from them were projected through the same filters and superimposed on a screen, the result would be an image reproducing not only red, green and blue, but all of the colors in the original scene. Because Sutton’s photographic plates were in fact insensitive to red and barely sensitive to green, the results of this pioneering experiment were far from perfect.

Shoot 2

For my second shoot I decided to go out in slightly different weather conditions, on this day it was quite sunny which meant that the lighting in the photos was different and that activities going on outside created some more interesting things to photograph, because of the good weather I also was able to go on an open top bus which was particularly useful to get better angles and slightly clearer views of the things going on outside of the bus. For this shoot I went out for a few hours and took 4 bus trips to try and take photos of things happening in various areas. Below are a selection of what I think are some of my strongest images from the shoot unedited, overall I am pleased with how the shoot turned out and how I have succeeded to create some images slightly different to my first shoot, for some of my next shoots I plan to take the bus to more different areas but also to create some images earlier in the morning and later in the day and night so that and can have a final outcome with a progression of images where the lighting changes from morning to evening.

LARRY CLARK

Larry Clark, born in Tulsa, worked in his family’s commercial photographic portrait business before studying photography with Walter Sheffer at the Layton School of Art in Milwaukee. Clark served in the military during the Vietnam War and has been a freelance photographer based in New York since 1966. During the 1960s, Clark documented the culture of drug use and illicit activity of his friends in Tulsa, and his photographs from those years were published as Tulsa in 1971. Considered shocking for its graphic portrayal of the intimate details of its subjects’ risky lives, the book launched Clark’s career. After Tulsa, he produced Teenage Lust in 1983, a series of photographs depicting adolescent sexuality and The Perfect Childhood. His work has been included in group and solo exhibitions since the early 1970s, and was the recipient of a National Endowment for the Arts Photographers’ Fellowship in 1973 and a Creative Arts Public Service photographers’ grant in 1980. Clark has also produced films; Kids (1994), based on his experiences with New York City teenagers and their culture of drugs, alcohol, and sex.

Larry Clark’s photographs in Tulsa are unflinching and portrays a difficult and often unsightly circumstances viewed through a participant’s eyes. Their first hand intensity, recollects the work of Danny Lyon and Bruce Davidson, but Clark’s raw voyeurism and insistent exposure of detail results in a apprehensiveness that differentiates his work from that of others in the early 1970s.

Style EXPERIMENTATION – Long Exposures

What is a long exposure?

Long exposure photography is when we are using a much longer shutter speed, and it’s usually used as a specific technique to achieve a certain effect.  There’s no defined transition point at which a shutter speed becomes slow enough to define your shooting as ‘long exposure photography’.  Generally speaking, I tend to think of it as when we are talking about our exposure times in terms of seconds, rather than fractions of a second.  These kind of long exposure times (shutter speed is the same as exposure time), are often used to blur something in a photo, for example running water in stream, or the movement of stars across the night sky.  A long exposure helps us to trace the pattern of time and render things in a different way to how we are used to seeing them.  When we see things differently, it naturally fascinates us and that’s a significant factor in creating a compelling image.

In order to achieve long exposures during the daytime, it’s often necessary to use neutral density filters on a lens, which cuts down the light entering the lens.  With less light entering the lens, the shutter speed needs to be much longer to achieve the same exposure.  Neutral density filters can allow you to shoot exposures of several minutes long, even in bright daytime situations. Here are some examples:

For this mini shoot I wanted to explore how the twisting roads of Jersey would create long exposure by focusing on cars and the variety of coloured lights that are created from them. I want to particularly look at the different textures and patterns I could make out of moving the camera whilst keeping the camera still. However when taking some of the photos I may try at experimenting with a monochrome filter to see if it would effect the outcome of the light trails looking at whether or not they blend the colours together. Here are some of the results from the shoot overall:

Once I had finished the shoot I decided to select ten images that I thought represented the shoot best whilst also reflecting my overall intentions behind what I wanted to achieve and have the outcome of photos look like. When doing the shoto I made sure to try a variety of things such as using a monochrome filter to produce some of the pictures, my aim behind this was to experiment and see whether by devoiding the image of colour if it would provide a smoother transition between shades. Here is my selection of my ten favourite images:

From here I wanted to then go onto whittle the selection down to only three images out of the mini shoot, by doing so it would allow me to analyse each of the image to more detail and understand the visual, technical and coceptual aspects behind the photos and my thought process behind selecting it. Here are my favourite three images:

I selected this image because of how I really love the contrasting colours of red and white which also complimented each other against the emerging floor underneath. The image itself is of a moving car taken going over a speed bump during a long exposure, I really liked how its movement of bumping was captured through the pattern created with no actual goal of where its going. Overall I liked how the image relates well to long exposure as it creates an abstract pattern of the lighting, removing the car completely and leaving me with a series of lights with no coordination.

The reason I chose this image was because of the coordinated composition of the colours against the black backdrop. Personally for me I found that the lightings approach from the bottom left to top right of the photo created a great sense of aestheticism due to how the black space left behind in certain areas leaves enought room so that neither the lights or the darkness becomes too overpowering for the viewer. By mixing together a variety of different colours into the light sequence I found that it really stopped the lighting from becoming repetative and boring, as a result for me the added blues and reds emphasise the movement in the image.

Finally I selected this image because of its simplicity, here I loved how the use of black negative space to highlight a smoke like effect created from a swaying lamp on a boat. What drew me to the image was the symmetry created from the light and how by using a monochrome filter on the image it puts arcoss the impression of smoke filtering down the screen. For what the image lacked I found it made up for it in contrast against the black backdrop with the ghost like lines presenting the viewer with a great sense of aetheticism.

Overall I found the shoot to go quite well as it highlighted the movement in our everyday lives but instead by removing the subjects and leaving on the light sources they have left behind. As a result of this all textures lights and landscapes are a direct reflection of our everyday transport to and from work or school.