BREAKING THE RULES // THE RULE OF TECHNICALITY

PLAN:

For my response to breaking the rule of technicality i have been heavily influenced by documentary photographer Laura El Tantawy. She breaks the rule of technicality through her unusual colour tones which highlight the drama of the situation as well as not correctly exposing the image so that there is a blur on the images. these are aspects that i am going to try to recreate in my own image. The focus of my shoot will be on highlighting how women are politically free in the twenty-first century to express themselves in the way that they want to.

Over the weekend i will focus on taking images of adolescent females who are expressing themselves. in further blog posts i will be researching the freedoms and limitations of women and how they fought for political freedoms and won the right to vote as well as the feminist movement which shows how women continued to fight for gender equality and the right to express themselves. this will continue to be the basis of my project for the next 6 weeks were i explore feminist photography and how women in photograph and their representation has changed over the last century following the 100th anniversary of women’s rights to vote.

This shoot will act as a starting point for the rest of my project and i will also use it as a way to experiment in the way that i can break the rule of technicality throughout the project showing another element of freedom as photography is now a lot more free and we are able to capture documentary photographs in any way we want. Therefore i am going to use coloured plastic sheets to over the lens whilst making my photographs to firstly alter the natural colour of the image and secondly to create a slight blur to the images.

EVALUATION:

Overall, i am happy with the outcome of this shoot, i used the the filter paper as a way of distorting the natural image as well as leaving the exposure open for slightly longer so that you can see that the images are over exposed and have not been taken in a correct technical manner. The photographs that i made, due to the orange filter look like the outcome of images from the 70’s which is what i was hoping to capture. Although i have created images of females in a modern view they still highlight the new found freedoms that women have due to the females that protests in the feminist movement throughout the twentieth century. From this shoot i have considered breaking the rule of technicality more in my project to create this old fashioned images linking the theme to the time i am focusing on. In further shoots i will try to recreate images from the 1970’s when the movement was actually occurring and show women as they were first experiencing freedoms to express there sexuality and femininity.

manipulation shoot // images and edits

SHOOT

I did the shoot for the manipulation task on 27th February after school. The lighting was difficult because I needed it to be sunny to be able to capture the different shadows and shapes I wanted to use to manipulate, however, the the cloud kept covering the sun so It made it a lot harder. I decided to do the shoot in my garden because I wanted to see what different abstract images I could take in a place that was familiar to me. Before doing the shoot, I knew what types of angles and images I wanted to create. I wanted to get some reflections, some sky images with the clouds and a lot of images of branches and leaves. Also a lot of shadows and unusual shapes. I am happy with the quality and type and amount of images I managed to take. Since I managed to capture a lot of different perspectives it meant I could create a lot of different  edits. 

EDITS

When editing the original images from the shoot, I used Laura El Tantawy a lot for inspiration. She used a lot of natural pastel colours which I also wanted to include in my final edits. I wanted most of the images to not look to manipulated and to look natural as much as possible. I uses a lot of images of reflections to use in the double exposure edits because layering a shadow over this could look like a natural non manipulated image.

I used Photoshop to edit all my images using the double exposure settings. I edited the colour and exposure of most of the images to suit the style I wanted to get. The images are very soft and bright because the nature suited this theme.

I am very happy with my final edits and I have managed to achieve a wide variation of different angles and edits. I believe I want to carry on with this concept and style for the rest of my project, experimenting with shadow, light and shapes.

manipulation shoot // ideas

I wanted to start my project by breaking the rules of photography. We have the freedom express ourselves in what way we want to, and this should be the same within art and photography. The rule I decided to break was the rule of manipulation because I wanted to be really creative it and see what unusal view points I could create.

Here are two mid maps full of different ideas for the manipulation shoot. Some of the main ideas I had was staging a scene, such as using tableaux photography. Another idea I had was to physically manipulate the final images by either burning them, painting over them, cutting them and destroying them in some way. However the idea that I choose to stick with was digitally manipulating an image using Photoshop and light room.

The main photographer that has inspired me for this shoot is the photographer Laura El Tantawy. I love her abstract images full of colour and unusual framing. I loved the images by Laura El Tantawy, with the abstract angles and colorful themes and I decided to use her ideas for my shoot. I wanted to focus on nature and the shadows and shapes it creates. This is my initial idea for the manipulation task, because I also plan to do some manipulation by hand using film photography, but again focusing on the abstract unseen angles.

BREAKING THE RULES

This task involved reading through Lewis Bush’s article ‘Rule Breakers‘ which highlighted the eight ways in which the rules of documentary photography could be broken.  He emphasises the key point that as documentary photography is not photojournalism and has no requirements to truthfully portray an event/environment or subject, therefore rules can be broken which are associated with documentary. Some of the rules to be broken that Bush considers are The rule of reality, the rule of the camera and the rule that i found most interesting was the rule of technicality. During the article Bush discusses that breaking the rule of technicality involves ignoring the norm to take perfecting correct,well focused and composed images. Bush states that many young photographers are being more experimental and are, ‘among a new generation express themselves lyrically, skilfully throwing technique into the wind’. i convey this to mean that elements such as using the correct amount of exposure and having in focus images are now not the focus and not a critical part of the image.

those who had chosen the same rule to break went into pairs and together we produced a mind map of ideas that we thought would be breaking the rule of technicality. we considered how we could make images that were purposely taken to be technically bad. A few of the ideas we came up with consisted of creating grainy images which may depict and change the look of an image, blur photographs through slow shutter speed in night time situations where normally photographers would try to avoid blur or fuzz. we also began to look at a few artists that we were already aware of that we considered to take technically bad images purposes and one we came up with was Francesca woodman would blurs her subject whilst they are moving.

Laura El Tantawy was a photography that Lewis Bush mentioned in his article, i had a quick initial look at some of the work that she does which can be liked to breaking the rule of technicality and was really intrigue by the night time scenes that she captures. Bush explains that her  ‘long exposures express a very personal vision of a monumental event.’ and that ‘her work hints at the uncertainty engulfing the country at a time of change.’ Tantawy, a Egyptian photographer with egyptian parents grow up in England. Although starting university in Egypt she finished her degree of journalism and  political science in the US. In 2006 she became a freelance photographer so that she could begin to work on her own projects and this is were her sense of breaking the documentary rules began. It was her first self published photo book which drew me to the attention of her works. In 2015 ‘the shadow of pyramids’ was published showing her interest in returning to her routes in Egypt, however she documented her view of the country she was from in a compleatly free way. Her interesting use of slow shutter speed and orange tone to her images convey the heat and fast pace life which she saw during her time in Egypt. The toughness of her vision is almost mask through the use of the bright and vibrant colours to the image and you have to look beyond the aesthetics of the images to understand the true story of the protesters which lies underneath

Creative Review described her first book  as “close-up photographs of protestors and street scenes of fervent crowds in Cairo during the January revolution in Tahrir Square, are mixed in with local witness accounts, alongside old family photographs from her childhood growing up between Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the US. Shot between 2005-2014, the series is a heady combination of documentary photography, portraits, and more dynamic, abstract images, jarring with the retro, candid shapshots.”

Through conceptual photographs she creates modern documentary styled images which sway from the usual path of documentors and create eye catching and meaningful narratives. The blur which is evident in most pictures highlights the first pace of life we live in as well as making the audience have to look deeper into the image to understand the meaning which lies behind them. Due to the freedom which is now acceptable she explores the limitless themes of identity, culture and notions of home which are all evident in her project ‘ the shadow o the pyramid’. This short video (The Photographer’s Gallery, Deutsche Börse Photography Foundation Prize 2016)  Explains her reasons for starting the project and a few experiences she had during the project which enables us to understand why she takes the images which she does.

Analysis:

I chose this image to analyse as when i came across it i was the work that interested me the most. the colours and tone sin the image give it a really warm feeling. however when researching the context of her images this particular photograph comes from Tantawys photo series ‘the shadow of pyramids’ where she focuses on the riots and protests in her home country of Egypt. Therefore although the orange and red tones may convey a warm feeling this may actually be too mean heat and anger for what the people are protesting for. The way that tantawy uses colours to convey the heat and power of a situation brings such a different element to her images one which i would like to convey through my images when considering freedom and/or limitations. Tantawy breaks the rule of technicality and this can be seen in this image as there may have been a filter over the lens to create the red tone which breaks the rule of technicality through that the images aren’t conveying the correct colours and the artist has manipulated the natural colours. Furthermore there is camera shake which is considered technically wrong however i think that this was purposely done to add to the high pace of the event and adds to the realness that the protest were really going on whilst she was there and that as it was taken in the moment whilst all this was going on it is slightly blurred but this just represents the action.

initially the audience’ eye is caught by the bright yellow in the left side of the image, this is actually technically correct as she has followed the rule of thirds although this may not have been intentional. nonetheless the image can then be considered to be breaking the rule of thirds as the protagonist is directly in the center of the image, i think this fits really well with the way she breaks the rule of technicality as the subject in the center really begins to tell the story of the protests and what tantawy is trying to capture through her photo series of Egypt. furthermore the stance of the protagonist is crucial to analyse. the subject is standing tall with his arms opened out wide as if he is a symbol of the protest and he is in the centre of what is going on and he is shouting out for what he wants and fighting for what he believes in. Therefore i think that in this image especially Tantawy is almost a photojournalist as she is truly capturing what is happening in that moment in Egypt however the fact that she has then manipulated technical aspect of the images creates a documented image. She also manages to include depth of field which adds a lot to the image, the people walking on the street in the background although ma be blurred add to the depth of the meaning of the image as it is showing that there are others protesting alongside the main subject.

Through the inspiration of Laura El Tantawy, i am going to try and break the rule of technicality in similar ways. I will consider changed the colours of the image possibly through not adjusting the white balance for different situations this may lead to the colours in the images being incorrect. I am also going to experiment with long shutterspeeds which may slightly blurr the image creating a technically wrong image. My focus will be on women and how in the 21st century they women have the FREEDOM to express themselves and be free to show who they truely are. this will then hopefully link into the rest of my project of showing the story of how women that were once the gender of limitation fought for their rights and became free.

http://www.lauraeltantawy.com/

 

The Rule of Ownership – Primary Ideas

OWNERSHIP 

breaking down the word

to own is to have something as one’s own; to posses something.

ownership – define

(noun)

1.

the act, state, or right of possessing something.
possession, right of possession, holding, freehold, proprietorship, proprietary rights, title


To help me begin generating ideas surrounding the concept of ownership and how I can break this rule in relation to freedom/limitations within photography and my own work, I created, with Ben a mind map. On this large sheet of paper, we wrote the word ‘ownership’ in the centre and then drew out different ideas from this about what ownership is and how we could break it using our own photographic methods.

We can up with several ideas, as you can see from the mind map below. We though tit necessary to actually define what ownership was however and so did this first in the bottom right corner of the sheet and produced ideas from this understanding of what ownership means.

From this mood board of several ideas, I hope to be able to develop a  better idea of what I could explore for my own exploration into the activity of using photography to break the rule of ownership.

mind map on ‘ownership’

What is Freedom / Limitation?

FREEDOM

what does freedom mean to me?

freedom, to me connotes representations of one’s ability and right to be free to do what they want. it comes back to the idea that everyone in the world has a right to equal power, equal voice and equal opinion no matter what, as introduced by theorist Aleks Krotowski. freedom to me, discards any element of discrimination that may occur in this world and instead, replace it with joy and happiness among all. there should be no limitation on how one should live their life, but of course, this should be within reason. in this modern day, people can feel so isolated and dislocated form society due to the rest of the world’s population’s need to discriminate and bully. people should feel safe and as though their lives are a place of comfort and this comes from a collective effort to encourage freedom amongst all. a freedom to express ones opinions. a freedom to dress how you wish to. a freedom to be of a certain religion and for this not to matter. freedom equals joy and this concept of joy and love should prevail all aspects of limitation. however, freedom can have its downfalls and limitations, of course can be seen as beneficial as well. a freedom to access all information on the internet of the current, social media-driven world can be dangerous and can impact teenagers of society due to a lack of filters. for me, freedom is possible through clothes; fashion. freedom, for me is expression of myself and my personality and this for me is possible through the clothes I wear and how I present myself through my appearance – something I wish to explore in my exam.

breaking the word down

to be free is to be able to act or be done as one wishes; not under the control of another.

to be free means to not or no longer be confined or imprisoned.

freedom – define

(noun)

1.

the power or right to act, speak, or think as one wants.
right to, entitlement to, privilege, prerogative, due

 2.

the state of not being imprisoned or enslaved.
liberty, liberation, release, emancipation, deliverance, delivery, discharge, non-confinement, extrication, amnesty

quotes

freedom is the oxygen of the soul

people who do not move, do not notice their chains  can you remember who you were before the world told you who you could be?

freedom is not worth having if it does not include the freedom to make mistakes

freedom is being you without anyone’s permission

education is the key to unlock the golden door of freedom (George Washington)

for to be free is not merely yo cast off ones chains, but to live in a way that respects an enhances the freedom of others (Nelson Mandela

LIMITATION

what does limitation mean to me?

limitation, to me is how one may feel when trapped, isolated and in a state of no escape. this can be both in one’s mind and physically. limitation is the result of discrimination. as shown in less well-off countries in the world where children have little access the most simple of things we take for granted. limitation is the result of little money one may have. limitation can result in a dangerous outcomes and the consequences of limitation can be very negatively impactful. a limitation to the accessibility of help for mental issues is how one may become detached from the people that should be their most dear. a limitation is what can force one to believe they cannot do something, no matter what and no one should believe this; everyone can do what they wish and it comes back to the idea of equal rights, equal power and equal access. limitation is a weapon of choice for many people when stress becomes too much, when they attempt to avoid situations. limitation can result in the belief that nothing is possible. limitation should become motivation to do what you wish without the fear of being judged or doing it wrong. limits should be conquered. however, a limit can also be a positive concept. linking back to the point I made in ‘freedom’, a limit; a filter could be seen as a positive when referring to the easy accessibility of internet and what it provides. society can be harsh and one can see social media as a way to exploit the vulnerability of users. face value is not affected when on social media and is seen as an easy way to voice an opinion that the consequences of are not witnessed directly. limitation, for me is the lack of ability to be forward in my actions. I often hide-away when something is not what it seems; my sensitivity takes over. limitation for me is letting my negative thought and emotions become the engine of my body to the point of no return.

breaking the word down

to be limited is to be restricted in size, amount or extent; few, small or short.

limitation – define

(noun)

1.

a limiting rule or circumstance; a restriction.
restriction, curb, restraint, constraint, control, check, clampdown, hindrance, impediment, obstacle, obstruction, bar, barrier, block, deterrent, inhibition, damper, brake, rein

2.

law

a legally specified period beyond which an action may be defeated or a property right does not continue.

quotes

the only limitations you will ever have are the ones you put on yourself

don’t limit your challenges, challenge your limits

know your limits, but never stop trying to exceed them

in imagination, there is no limitation

the fears we don’t face become our limits

you cannot put a limitation on anything

love the life you live. live the life you love (Bob Marley)

Breaking The Rules of Photography

To aid my development of ideas for what I may wan to explore for my photography exam based around the concept of freedom and limitations, we were set a task to generate our ability to take photographs creatively when thinking about ways we can represent freedom/limitations. The task revolves around breaking a particular rule of photography that is deemed vital to follow and obey in order to create meaningful and quality imagery. However, we have been told to  break one of these rules as a way of creating exciting art. Using this criteria as a way to create photographs also encapsulates the idea of freedom/limitations because I will purposely be breaking a rule of photography, resulting in much more freedom in the way I create art, even though photography is a very free means of expressing yourself and some people may like to believe there are no limits in photography. Expanding this to the extent of breaking rules allows me to even more free, however, I believe I may find this task quite difficult because even through I am breaking the typical conventions of photography, I will be focusing on how to represent how I have broken one particular rule and my thought processes when planning a shoot will be based around how I can show that I am breaking this particular rule. This may in fact limit my abilities to be creative in my processes and from my primary planning, I realised this unexpected difficultly in thinking about how I can break a rule of photography because I had never really thought about the rule even when I make photographs normally.

From looking at a video on YouTube which outlines a brief history of the artist John Baldessari, I was able to retrieve some primary inspiration for this new task that had I just been introduced to; to break a rule of photography. John Baldessari was a very controversial artist because he challenged the conventions of photography and did  not conform to the norms of people of the industry were used to. He’s is an American conceptual artist known for his work with found archival photography and appropriated imagery. He used painting in his early work to become established in the create industry and eventually began using old found photographs and incorporating  this into his art and graphic abilities and his eye for difference and ability to differentiate himself from the others at the time allowed him to make such a name for himself  as he has done today. He works with light humor, and with materials and motifs that also reflect the influence of Pop art. In the video that introduces the work and history of Baldessari, it shows him famously burning all works he has ever produced form a period of 30 years in his career. This was a never-seen-before gesture and it shocked people because of this. He also, mid-way through his career and as a contributing factor to why he burnt his work, said that “I will no longer make boring art”. This was a way for him to encourage himself to create more exciting and controversial art. He focused on using typography and different text within his art and also worked with collage to create art.

Baldessari is a great example of breaking the rules of art and creativity because although it is is seen as a very free means of expressing yourself, it is often limited by social and culturally norms and expectations of who humans should behave. Using metaphorical means of expressing opinions and views is what Baldessari did and it has influenced the creative industry ever since. Often, breaking the rules is what we need to do in order to break from the comfort of familiarity and of what has been developed over such a period of time that it becomes a comfort. This ability to erase the once known comfort of creating “boring” art can inspire a more innovative way of creating art. Baldessari also sued the most simple forms of art to produce complex meanings, such as the use of coloured dots which covered faces of subjects in found photographs.

Image result for john baldessari

Image result for john baldessari

Here is the link to the article, entitled ‘Eight ‘rules’ of photography that are worth breaking’ written by photographer and writer Lewis Bush which outlines the different rules of photography and examples of photographers who break them.

I have chosen to produce a mini response to the theme of breaking the rules of ‘ownership’. On Lewis Hine’s article on breaking the rules of rules photography, when he talks about the rule of ownership he says:

“Our world is a raging storm of images. Photo uploads to Facebook exceed 300 million per day, with Instagram seeing around 90 million.

As a photographer, it can feel futile to keep adding to this visual blizzard, when so much can be said with those that already exist. The solution, for some, lies in a creative attitude to the old-fashioned idea of ownership and copyright.

For seven years the French collector Thomas Sauvin harvested film negatives from Beijing’s vast dump, buying them from specialist scavengers who recycle the negatives for the valuable silver they contain.

In his hunt, Sauvin has created an archive of a million images that offers a unique insight into a pivotal period in modern Chinese history, from the tail end of Mao’s cultural revolution, to the economic success story of modern China.

Belgian artist Mishka Henner, meanwhile, works with images he finds online to dissect the motivations and power of their original producers.

In 51 US Military Outposts, he uses satellite imagery of US military bases around the world to probe the extent of this modern American empire. His interest in these images, he says, lies in the fact that “the people who are running the show, that’s the stuff they’re working with.”

I have chosen to produce a response to this rule as I think I could use some creative and unique ideas to produce a mini-project about ownership and what it means in relation to freedom and limitation. I already have a couple ideas about how I could present something surrounding this idea of how I can break the rule of ownership. My main idea incorporates the use of Instagram and how I can use concept of ownership relating to Instagram, the biggest photo sharing social media software in the world, to create a response to what ownership is and whether it actually matters if the image you, as a photographer uses is not yours. Photographers themselves take inspiration from all sorts of other artists round the world because without inspiration and subtle stealing of ideas, art can be boring and this essentially alludes to the idea that ownership of the work you display is not essential and showing the work of other artists to present meaning can be even more powerful.

Mindmap-Freedom and Limitations ideas

In groups we were asked to come up with ideas surrounding the words ‘Freedom and Limitations’. Immediately we were drawn to opposites. We were constantly thinking of words then thinking of there counterparts. Such as Sound/Silence, Life/Death, Capture/Escape, Female/Male. Keywords were a large part of the mind map, the words allowed us to think of ideas and worked as a starting point to develop any thoughts we had.

One of the ideas I had was Art. Art has both freedom and limitations. Art can sometimes limit us as we are often forced to paint, take a photo, draw. Only in recent years artists have had full freedom to express themselves. Using objects and manipulating old photos artists have given new meanings to objects that already existed. This made people think differently about art.

Another idea  was money. Money can give people the freedom to travel, have new experiences, get education, indulge in materialistic things and most of the time give a better quality of life. However money can also cause a lot of pain and limit people. If someone doesn’t have much money that can stop them achieving what they want to achieve. For example many homeless people are at a dead end as they don’t have enough money to get themselves suitable clothes for a job interview and they are only living off the money that they are given by people. They are being limited by money, because in today’s society with money comes power.

Freedom and Limitations Mind Map

For this upcoming project on Freedom and Limitations I have decided to focus on the constantly changing and evolving environments found in nature that comprises of the Earth, Animals, Humans and Plants.  Because of this constant change I wanted to explore the notion of how the Earth is every bit as different 1 second ago as it was 1 year ago, or 100 years ago.  In this, I want to explore the impact of change found in nature as the old is replaced with the new but also the process of change in the natural world.  This could extend to to the sea, the land and the sky in terms of change in the Earth.  But also how plants and animals are reliant on this to survive which links to the idea of humans who also are key stakeholders in how we affect and are affected by the change in the world in which we live in.  Furthermore I want to explore the relationship between all these factors and how they are somewhat reliant off each other to pursue and venture into the unknown as new replaces old.  This represents to the idea of how freedom for change and evolution in nature is limited because change only occurs as something old becomes extinct and so the idea of freedom in nature is limited.  This is because the new areas and features found in nature set to replace the old, will too one day become old and outdated itself.