Category Archives: Research and analysis

Filters

Author:
Category:

INITIAL IDEAS // BODY IMAGE

For my personal study, I want to explore different ways we can represent the human body. Within the project I want to show how body image has changed throughout time. The ‘ideal’ body image has constantly been developed and manipulated to suite the views of society and the media. I aim to be creative with my shoots, while at the same time, showing through my images the development and manipulation of body image.  I want to do a wide range of shoots containing completely different perceptions of the human body. Although I don’t want to focus my whole project on the issues of Body Image, I am including some aspects of body dysmorphia within the context of my project. I mostly want to be creative with my ideas, but at the same time include meaning and context.

I will be researching many artists and photographers who will influence my work, such as Jenny Saville. I aim to Incorporate their ideas into my own shoots, but at the same time include my own concepts and contexts. I will explore in many ways how the human body can be represented and perceived. I want to include my love for art within this project by using and working with different materials, including paint, Clingfilm and other objects. At some point in the project I want to create some sort of suit or outfit that someone will wear during a shoot. The point of this is to express and symbolize how the ‘ideal’ body image has changed through time. It will also represent people dealing with dysmorphia, and how what they endure. The images bellow are ideas that I aim to incorporate within the outfit.

Another view I want to incorporate and research within my project is the use of the body to represent emotions. The body is an expressive tool and I aim to photograph it in a creative way symbolising certain emotions. I believe this will end up being the main aspect of my project based on body image.

Contrast between carolle benitah and Pete Pin

PETE PIN 

http://www.petepin.com/#mi=1&pt=0&pi=2&p=-1&a=0&at=0

http://www.huckmagazine.com/art-and-culture/photography-2/pete-pin-origins-issue/

http://time.com/3785818/displaced-the-cambodian-diaspora/

Pete Pin was born in 1982 in a refugee camp which his family had fled to after fleeing  from the Cambodian genocide. Pin mother was 17 years old when he was born. The refugee camp was along the Thai-Cambodian border. Pin was born during the revolution. His family resettled in Stockton, CA, home to a large Cambodian American community.  Pin has said that he has “struggled for most of my life to understand the legacy of my people.”  He had little or no connection to his identity as a Cambodian American.

Peter Pin is a Documentary photographer and teaching artist.  He decided to use his photography to tell the stories of the Cambodian genocide. He is retracing his roots to bridge the gap between Cambodian Americans and their parents’ dramatic past through photography. In the fall of 2010, Pin set up a makeshift portrait studio in his grandmother’s garage in Stockton, California. With the assistance of his uncle, during one of the portrait sessions, Pin spoke to his Grandmother about his family’s experiences during the Killing Fields. Pete Pin found out that as well as the few possessions that was saved from the war, there was also a family portrait that had been saved during the revolution.  Pin describes the moment he first saw the family portrait. He says “I did not yet know that it was the start of a project that would take me across the country and back, into the homes of Cambodian Americans who would speak of their experiences during the Killing Fields and refugee camps, often for the first time in front of their children. Although I couldn’t imagine it then, the truth is that I became a photographer, in part, in order to tell this story.”

Pete Pin, Untitled, from the series Cambodian Diaspora: Memory, 2013, archival

These are Pete Pins images from the series called Cambodian Diaspora.

Portrait of Pete Pin’s grandmother, Stockton, CA. The Cambodian

 CAROLLE BENITAH

http://www.souslesetoilesgallery.net/artists/carolle-benitah

https://www.lensculture.com/articles/carolle-benitah-photos-souvenirs

Carolle Benitah is a French Moroccan photographer, born in Casablanca, Morocco. She had previously been a fashion designer before deciding to become a photographer in 2001. Throughout her photography, she loves to explore memory, family and the passage of time. She often chooses to pair family snapshots with handmade accents, such as embroidery, beading and ink drawings. Her main aim is to reinterpret her own history as a daughter, wife and mother.

In an interview, Benitah explains how she first became interested in family pictures, ‘I was leafing through a family album and found myself overwhelmed by an emotion’. The photos were taken 4o years earlier, and Benitah describes her annoyance because she couldn’t even remember the moment they were taken, or ‘what preceded’. In the interview, she talks about how the photos ‘reawakened an anguish of something both familiar and totally unknown’. She decided to explore the memories of her childhood to help her understand who she is, and to define her current identity.

She describes the images as ‘fragments of my past.’ The first step in her process is choosing what images she would experiment with. Once these choices of images were made, she would then add needlework, embroidery and beads. In the interview, this is how Benitah describes the process, ‘With each stitch I make a hole with a needle. Each hole is putting to death of my demons. It’s like an exorcism. I make holes in paper until I am not hurting any more.’ Benitah has done three photo series, they’re called PHOTO SOUVENIRS, WHAT CANNOT BE SAID and WHAT CANNOT BE SEEN. Here are three images, one from each of the series.

Carolle Bénitah, Photos-Souvenirs, Adolescence, l'amour est aveugle (love is blind), 2012, Sous Les Etoiles Gallery
love it blind, 2012, Archival Pigment Print with gold thread, Photo souvenirs series
Carolle Bénitah, What cannot be said (Ce qu’on ne peut pas dire), je veux m'extraire de ce corps coincé dans une tenaille géante (I want to extract my body trapped in a giant pincer), 2013, Sous Les Etoiles Gallery
I want to extract my body trapped in a giant pincer, 2013, Red Ink on Archival Pigment Print, WHAT CANNOT BE SAID series
Carolle Benitah, What cannot be seen, villosités intestinale (intestinal villi), 2012, Sous Les Etoiles Gallery
Intestinal villi, 2012, Red Ink on Archival Pigment Print

 

 

 

Plan for Tableaux Photoshoot

Over the last couple days after doing some research into different artists who specialise in tableaux style images, I decided to start planning for my own tableaux photoshoot inspired by tableaux in contemporary photography.

I started jotting down some ideas in the form of a mind-map to get my mind flowing and so I could write down anything that came to my min and I was commenting on the idea of re-creating my own childhood memories by looking at my own personal archive and to do this I would pay close attention to the use of costumes and props in order to tell a narrative. This was a great idea when I first cam up with it because I would take inspiration form artist such ass Irene Werning who looks at her own old childhood memories in the form of images her parents took when she was younger. This was something I was very keen to pursue but I the realised it would not show a very interesting narrative or let me explore the idea of memories and our relationship with our past and the memories we hold in our lives – the moments we cherish which has brought us happiness – I feel like this shoot would not allow me to explore this in the depth I wanted.

I also begun discussing the idea d using certain apps on my iPhone which allow users to take pictures in the effect of old and retro images – an analogue film effect that adds graininess and low quality to your photos to create a sense of nostalgia. The app I won called ‘8mm’ also alters the proportions of the frame/aspect ratio to add to the notion of creating a photo that looks like it was taken on an old film/disposable camera and this is something I still wish to explore but for the shoot I aim to complete this week, I want to look at something more contemporary – something inspired actually by an artist that I have not studied – being Rita Puig-Serra Costa – this is because I was not fully attached to either Almendros or Kapajeva’s images. I love Almendros’ contemporary, very polished style of his photos and I hope to transfer this over to my images but I will be mainly documenting on Costa’s work and in particular her series which focuses on portraits of family members and the objects they cherish themselves.

I hope to, this week compete this shoot once I have planned some more and I full understand what I wish to achieve and how I am going to go about it. I will need to contact several people who are close to me and ask them if I can photograph them individually and I will also ask them to collect an object whether that be a document, a teddy bear, a photo, a pencil – anything that has some meaning to them, preferably something which takes their mind back to when they were a child. I will then photograph this object against a black background in a mini studio set up and once both images of the person and the object which relates to them are done, I will then pair each corresponding one up. I hope to do this task with my mum, my step-dad, my girlfriend, my papa, my nan as well as myself and perhaps my dad and my sister.

Although I am not directly linking this tableaux shoot to my own childhood and re-creating my own childhood memory, I am doing it with my other family members and their own childhood memories so that I am linking the theme of family and archives. As well, I believe it will be nice effect to get each relative to write up a little passage, almost like a diary entry or a description of the object they have chosen and the relevance it has to them for me to then insert and quote this in the final production/sequence of images so it tells more of a narrative.

Rita Puig-Serra Costa
WHERE MIMOSA BLOOM
Rita Puig-Serra Costa
Rita Puig-Serra Costa

 

https://vimeo.com/124694405

Image result for chris verene photography family
Chris Verene used handwritten text over his images to tell a story
Image result for chris verene photography family
Chris Verene

ANNA GASKELL VS HANNAH STARKEY

Anna Gaskell

Anna Gaskell is most well known for producing works similar to Cindy Sherman. The American art photographer Elliptical narratives are photo series which have been influenced by paintings and film rather than the typical norms of photography. Now living and working in new york she has produced many tableaux photo series, including ‘Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland’ and hide. There is a basic theme of young girls running throughout her photo series and her ideas are usually drawn from her own imagination.

Gaskell usually has a deeper meaning that is portrayed through her images and the techniques she uses. For example in her photo series ‘Half Life’ she uses dynamic camera angles and decorates the location that she is using to create a claustrophobic sense to the images as well as interesting lighting to build a sense of vertigo.

Her narrative images through staged and planned photo shops creates tableaux which after portray deep and meaningful messages in the way that she wants them to convey. Here are a few of her images from her book which include most of her photo series’ from ‘wonder’ to override’

Photo Analysis

This image is of a young girl jumping in the air. It is hard to decipher whether she got into this position from just standing and then jumping up or what i think probably happened is that she was on a trampoline and the image has been captured hen she was mid bounce. in the image we do not see the young girls face but we can tell that i is a girl and probably of a young age because of the shape and form of the subject. She is captured in a garden and is surrounded by trees. We also when first looking at the image see that the subject is in unusual clothing, relation to what Alice would wear in Alice in wonderland and this is the main link in the photo to the the photo series title ‘Alice’s adventures in wonderland’. From what we see we can begin to build up an image in our mind of what the meaning is behind the image and how the photographer, Anna Gaskell, wanted us to feel when looking at the image. I think that the message behind the image might be Gaskell trying to convey her childhood memories of enjoying watching Alice in wonder or her dressing up as Alice wanting to be her. So this image may be showing connotations to family and childhood memories. As her typical style as a tablx photographer i feel like she has staged and created this seen from her own childhood imagination and it is her telling the audience about her childhood and the memories she has but may also be relate able to many other young girls. However i then think  that the image has a darker message that comes across as, like in all her other photos in the series of photos, the girls head/face is being kept out of the image. This could be because she wants to hide that its not actually Anna and wants us as the audience to picture that it is her as a young girl or be able to relate it to be ourselves or any young girl it remind us of. Or it could mean that it is a distance memory which is blurred and not all is remember and the girl that once wanted to be Alice has been left behind and forgotten.

The genre of this image is portrait through the meanings of tableaux photography so it aims to have a meaning, message or tell a story.  Gaskell must have used a range of photographical techniques to ensure that this photo was not blurred due to the moving subject at the time. She has caught a freeze frame image which means she probably used a tri-pod to keep the camera as still and steady as possible and then the camera would have been set on a very fast shutter of about 1/60 second and then the ISO on the higher settings of maybe 2600 so that as much light was captured as possible because the aperture would of had to be closed for the fast shutter speed letting in a small amount of light. Therefore i think this took a lot of technical work and would have taken a few attempts hence it is tableaux photography which is staged rather than documentary which would of meant she just took the photo in the moment of a random girl bouncing on a trampoline which wouldn’t of conveyed the story that she wanted to get across.

It has already been  discussed why the girl being photographed is in the position that she is in as the head may be purposely not in shot for a specific message in the photograph. When considering the rule of thirds is think that this image breaks the rules in a modern way as she is using the subjects body to take up a significant amount of the image however still leaving a gap. however she may have still considered the rules grid when photographing her image as the subject is along the right axis of the photo sticking to the rule slightly but then breaking it with the limbs spreading across the image. When looking at this image i notice that there is one significant leading line which my eyes where drawn to and this is the tree trunk in the background running behind the girl. As it is the darkest area of the photo it is the section which my eyes are drawn to the most and because it runs from the bottom of the image to the top just behind the subject it focus out eye on that focal point of the image where the girl is and the main message of the image can be considered. another aspect to notice is that symmetry is created in the image through the subject body position. the right side of her body is a reflection to the left this brings a sense of art and beauty to the image making it nice to look at. The photograph has been taken at a eye level angel from the ground and i think this has been used to make it as obvious as possible that she is playing on something like a trampoline as she is high in the air and moved out of eye level sight because she is jumping up. The shot is also a wide angle portrait to fit in most of the subjects body but also a significant amount of the background which creates a frame around the subject. The colours used in this image are also a crucial element to what makes the image. the use of bright bold colours (green,yellow and blue) all together works really well in this image at keeping all the elements seperate and stand out. The image is almost striking because of these colours but they work well together because the yellow and blue of the dress counters the dark green which could have been over powering. Furthermore the image has been taken on a partially cloudy day as there is no specific direction of a hard harsh light. The lighting in the image is soft and quite dark and this could be due to not much natural light as well as the sheltered location the image has been taken in creating a soft lighting with no shadows in the image.

Hannah Starkey

The British photographer, Hannah Starkey, creates scenes through her photography which resembles everyday life, she captures images of women usually partaking in regular daily activities such as sitting in a restaurant or coffee shop, chatting in the street and so on. Starkey focuses on capturing these ‘in between moments’, which i find is a really interesting concept, she doesn’t document them at work or home, she captures them maybe on their way to work and the smaller elements of these women’s routines that you wouldn’t usually photograph.

Her in the moment freeze frame images have a narrative and often focus on the isolated problems in society such as gender, class and social status, which are problems which women may encounter in there day to day experiences. The Saatchi gallery says that “Starkey often uses composition to heighten this sense of personal and emotional disconnection, with arrangements of lone figures separated from a group, or segregated with metaphoric physical divides such as tables or mirrors.” This emphasizes her use of planning to create these stage photographs (tableaux photography) which have this deeper meaning which she wants to convey through her photography.

Born in Ireland in 1971 and now living and working in England she has produced a vast amount of images and exhibited her works in a variety of exhibitions all over the world, including solo exhibitions in the Tanya Bonakdar Gallery in New York on various occasions.

Photo Analysis

This image by Hannah Starkey was taken in May 1997 and takes her typical approach of photographing woman. This particular image is a two women sitting in maybe a coffee shop or cafe in England. The protagonist is the woman in the blue top sitting at the table looking into the mirror. As i have already research Starkey’s work i have a basic knowledge and understanding of the concepts which she tries to capture in her images. Therefore i am going to use this knowledge and try to understand what might being going on in this image. The woman in blue is the subject and she is on a normal day maybe in a break at work or on her lunch break, so Starkey is continuing her stylist form of capturing women in their daily routine but then she builds on this creating a narrative with a meaning and message behind it. For example in this image the woman is looking into the mirror at herself touching her reflection, this could symbolize that she is reflecting on her life or on her self image. A big problem in today’s society is the stereo types and exceptions of women’s image. There is a stigmatization that women should look and act a certain way and for most women they are conscious about there self image and feel like they need to fit in with the social norms. Therefore i think that this image could symbolize the woman looking at herself and judging herself, she could also be thinking that she doesn’t recognize herself anymore due to trying to change to fit in with what she has been made to think is socially accepted. Furthermore in the back of the image is another woman also looking at the subject through the mirror, this can be seen as woman always looking at each other judging them seeing if they are fitting in with what society stereotypes the typical woman as.

Starkey’s image is a narrative creating a story with meaning about problems in society but she has also had to consider photographical techniques and composition to make this image work and be effective. I don’t think that Starkey uses any specific techniques in her image as it seems to be a simplistic image taken in the moment and therefore not much setting up has been done before this image was taking. She will have considered the ISO levels and aperture to ensure she has the correct amount of lighting in the image. However we can assume that a tri-pod was not used to capture this image as it has been taken at an angle not just a straight on shot. The purpose to this may have been to make sure that the mirror reflection was included in the image with the second women in the background showing her almost face of judgment as this is key to the narrative of the photograph. i consider the rule of thirds to have been followed in this image because each aspect of the image seems to belong to a different sector of the rule of thirds grid. For example the subject (woman) is in the right third of the image and the the second woman is in the left side of the photograph and then the mirror runs throughout the image as the main story telling aspect of the image. this therefore fills the whole frame of the image making it an interesting image with lots going on, so i think that the photo has also been framed well as she has got everything needed in  the image for the narrative included as well as having nearly an even amount of gap both below and above the wall giving the image a small sense of symmetry and pattern. I specifically find this image interesting as leading lines is created through this image through the use of the rectangular image running throughout the center of the image which draws your eye to this central part of the image. This is effective because your eye is immediately drawn to the biggest sector of the image and i find it interesting that you look at the reflection first before the real people in the image. The mirror has multiple purposes in this image and another example is that it creates depth in the image as it is almost a three dimensional image because of the reflection we are seeing the room in double making the image possible look deeper than it actual is because of the illusion of the mirror. The lighting is the image creates the atmosphere that it is a natural moment because of the natural use of lighting coming in the window from behind the subject, which illuminates the narrative in a natural non intentional way. The lighting is soft keeping it a calm, mellow image where nothing is striking taking away from the calmness of the image created through the warm tones of colour.

 

Visit to CCA Galleries, Tanja Deman & Jonny Briggs Exhibition, 12/09/17

Image result for cca galleriesOn 12/09/17, we visited the recent exhibition of Jonny Briggs and Tanja Deman’s work. The exhibition consisted of the work they had produced during their residency in Jersey and they were hoping to show off the research and efforts they made in an attempt to impress the locals of Jersey by showing them a side to the island the hadn’t seen before in this exhibition that was great experience and it was very impressive to see the extent of their work, especially having the opportunity to look at two world-renowned photographers who have had their work displayed in art galleries such as Saatchi, I was honoured to have this amazing chance to speak to them on a personal level about their work and get an insight into the style and aims from the series of images they had put on display for us.

 

Image result for cca galleries jersey

In the words of the Balliwick Express website from their publication and the very successful joint exhibition, “both artists were awarded £10,000 to work in the island and have both chosen different projects, Tania photographed underwater landscapes while Jonny focused on the island’s ancient landscape, monuments, institutions and archives through the motif of the mouth.” In my opinion, the contrast that showed two sides of Jersey rich in beauty and wonder was amazing.

CCA Galleries
Pictured: From left to right, Jonny Briggs, Tanja Deman, Sasha Gibb, Director of CCA Gallery International and Gareth Syvret, Société Jersiaise Photographic Archivist and Archisle Project Leader.

I had kindly received a private invitation to the opening night of this exhibition sent in the ail from Societe Jersiaise and I was very honoured to be given the opportunity personally to attend the opening night to be one of the first to see the amazing array of works produced by both artists. As well, on Tuesday 12th the following week, I attended the event again with my school and got another opportunity to speak to both photographers about what they had created on a more one-to-one, immersive basis and it was great to experience. As well, during both artists residency, I began to work with them both very closely on the workshops the set up for myself and other like-mind people and this was an opportunity to produce my own set of work influenced by both of them and the conversations I managed to have them throughout has benefitted my artistic mind and when I got to see the work they had been conjuring up behind the scene when I visited the exhibition, it was a amazing experience I that mad me feel very grateful.

Tanja’s exhibition, entitled ‘Sunken Garden’ focuses on the hidden wonders underneath the surface of the sea – the garden we don’t get to see in such great detail which we were given the opportunity to through the captivating series of works Tanja had produced looking at the types of seaweed that lie beneath the ocean which surrounds our island. There was something quite mesmerising and magical about her work which is what she stated her intentions were – to provoke a certain emotion out of her audience. She wasn’t intending to ell a particular message through the works which were consistent throughout to produce a very truthful series, but instead wanted to force a feeling out of her audience from the magic that was on display – very dream-like images which were underpinned by the very professional skills shown in the photographs with use of lighting to illuminate the texturized seaweeds and highlight their patterns often not noticed when going for a swim in shallow waters. For the project, Tanja had to plan thoroughly to determine the best bays of Jersey which would give her the chance to capture the different types of seaweeds. This wasn’t a very simple effort that required just a couple dips in the shore of St Brelade’s Bay and instead a much more conscious effort to locate perfect locations for the few shoots Tania created in between choosing final images and framing them ready for the exhibition. Tanja’s style and process through producing her images is very different to that of Jonny’s but the behaviour of both of them in terms of their work makes for very different results which both have tell a powerful story encapsulating the rich beauties of Jersey which is often not realised by the locals but the two artists forces the information through to us when exhibiting their work and articulating their intentions from it.

Tanja told Archisle at the beginning of her time in Jersey that she is concerned with ‘the perceptions of space and her relationship to  nature’ and this was evident in the work she put on display because she as a photographer and to really make a effort to make a physical relationship between herself and her surroundings – what she was photographing as this would make for the best results.

Tanja wanted us to explore her exhibition and then after 5 minuets of observing the images, she wanted us to choose a photograph we liked and one we disliked and then show her our choices and tell her why we chose the images we did. When I was first handed this task, I felt a bit sceptical about the prospect of criticising a professional photographer on her work she has spent 6 months producing for the locals of Jersey but this was part of the experience I would go onto embrace to allow me understand more bout her work.

This (right) is the image I chose as the one I ‘disliked’ due to the fact that I wasn’t too sure what it was and it seemed very dislocated from the serirs as it wasn’t too similar to other images Tanja had produced as the others showed clear subjects in that you could tell what was in the frame. I showed this to her explain it was my least favourite and told her why this was and she then went on to explain that it was a seabed and I then understood and forced myself to understand that in every series of images, there is going to be an anomalous result that may not always fit in however, this is what makes it special and interesting.

I chose these two images (above) which were displayed in a paring at the exhibition as my favourite because I thought they worked really well together and their wondrous nature is what attracted me to them because they look so fairy-tale-like. I love the haziness which is present in the images. The streak of seaweed which takes its place in the centre of each of image stands out beautifully from the clouded background of the sea and the lighting is what accentuates the detail of seaweed. It is as though the seaweed is so lonesome and it’s dream-like beauty is seen through the effect that the seaweed is floating in this clouded seascape but the effort to pair the two images together makes them much less lonely as opposed to hanging them separately. I explained my reasoning for these two being my favourite to Tanja and she understood why I liked them so much. Tanja’s other works were much bigger in sixe but the smaller size of them both and simplicity of it is what drew my attention to the photographs.

Jonny Briggs exhibition, although within very close proximity, being in the same building with Tanjas’ was actually very different in the type of work produced. Tanja’s was landscape based and Jonny’s was based around photo collaging and using other objects to create images which encouraged much more talk and thoughts from the viewer, in my experience because they ate not as self-explanatory as Tanja’s due to the very contemporary and untraditional techniques used to produce the images.

Jonny found himself during his time on the exploring the idea of censorship and controversy which comes with the motif of the human mouth and the relationship between the eyes and mouth – speaking and seeing. His works were much more muddled and there was no real sense of cohesion but they all worked together to complement each other even though the narrative was not fully direct to the audience however this is what I enjoyed about looking at Jonny’s work. The chance to see the exhibition twice gave me the opportunity to see images twice and therefore conjure up two different meanings which I thought the exhibition was intending to show. The first night was a chance for me to view the array of works but because of the busyness of the night, I could not speak to either Tanja or Jonny which was very frustrating but going back on the following Tuesday allowed me to speak to both artists one-to-one to allow me to get a better understanding of the purposes of the images and Jonny’s work really resonated with me due to the sole message he wanted to tell and hoe actually did this through the unusual and contemporary style of his 6 month project but also the way he articulated his intentions made me very grateful to be in his presence so he could, with much passion, tell us about each and every image.

Jonny’s passion for photography originally came from his failure at architecture at university where he realised he found himself immersing more so into other media where je could find more freedom to do whatever – this is evident in what he produced on the island where you could see works which would put some people off because of the pure unusuality of it. He displayed works such as a pair of shoes with a second pair of feet branching off the end it which walked up the wall of the building. As well, a portrait the size of a credit card with a piece of used chewing gum spread across the two faces of the subjects hanging from the wall. Something I found particular unusual yet satisfying and intriguing was the candle which stood lonesome on pedestal; something I first thought was a normal candle used to freshen the air but in my second return, Jonny explained to us that it was a candle he had produced when working with specialists that burns the smell of burning human flesh. This was inspired by the concentration camps at war times where people inside would find themselves feasting in human flesh as cannibals.

The exhibition overall held this unnerving and disconcerting sense of invasion into the human comfort zone. It was a series of works which played with the human need to be neat and for things to be directly explanatory. In Jonny’s work, he forced a sense of irritation from the audience by creating candles that exuded a pungent whiff of burning human flesh. He sticks chewing gum over images – something we would see as damaging. He takes the time out to create a set where everything within is sliced in half and then moved by one millimetre to create a sense of annoyance for the viewers.

Shoes to Walk up Stairs in an Orderly Fashion, Sculpture, 2017Lips Hierarchies series - Mirror, Objects within a room sliced through and photographed, 2017, 111 x 118 cm

Here, you can see the effort Jonny has made to show the relationship between the mouth and eyes and what is not seen is heard or vice versa. Again. it all about censorship and in his time in Jersey he visited the old police station. During his time here, he would attempt to cover objects in the dark room in red lipstick – a very repetitive and irritating process I can imagine but something that paid off to be very effective to show the relationship between the mouth and lipsticks and beauty and red lipstick and how it can, when applied in large amounts become something of disgust and unattraction. The sue of red lipstick was something that showed in Jonny work throughout and it is again reiterating the idea of purposely getting on the nerves of the viewers by ruffling their feathers with regards to OCD but how, in the end, it creates a beautiful and powerful catalogue of works.

 

 

 

 

Alfonso Almendros/ Tableaux photographer

Alfonso Almendros

http://www.alfonsoalmendros.com/

http://www.gupmagazine.com/articles/family-reflections-an-interview-with-alfonso-almendros

http://www.catalysti.fi/artists/alfonso-almendros

As well as comparing the photographers Anna Gaskell and Hannah Starkey,  I was interest in researching and analyzing the photographer  Alfonso Almendros. What intrigued me to his work the most was the unusual and mysterious images that he captures. I noticed that in his images he doesn’t usually include the face of the subject in the frame. He either crops out the head, or uses the lighting in a certain way so that the features are obscured. I really like the sinister feel that Almendros creates in his images, and I wanted to try and include this somehow in my tableaux shoot.

Almendros is a photographer from Spain who lives in Helsinski. The most recent series that Almendros has completed is called Family Reflections.  In this series his aim is to capture the differences between ‘now and then’. Each image within the series focuses on a particular concept, for example, the roots, obsession with death, glorification of maternity, or the sacred character of some objects. Almendros defines the series as ‘A series about family, struggle and intimacy that creates a parallel reality’. He explains how the idea of the series Family Reflections came at time when his life was full of indecision. After a period of living abroad, and being separated from his family, he felt a parallel between his mum, siblings and himself. He used this to provoke, and provide influence to the series. Here are some of the images from the series.

I really like the mysterious, sinister atmosphere Alfonso manages to create. Similarly to  Anna Gaskell, he has this hint of a fairy tale, story like theme that he provokes. Alfonso and Anna are the two main tableaux photographers that I want to use as inspiration for my childhood memory shoot. I aim to create this sinister, mysterious atmosphere within my images.

Alfonso Almendros vs. Maria Kapajeva / Tableaux Portraits

Now I find myself looking at tableaux photography, I have chosen to study the pairing of these two artist by looking at each of their work individually and then comparing and contrasting their photographs by looking at their style and aims of their series of images. I have chosen to look at Alfonso Almendros and Maria Kapajeva because I feel like their is something very unique and perhaps quite sinister and unnerving abut each of their series of images which relate to theme of family, and in some way also underpinning the theme of environment also. After looking at Almendros’ series entitled ‘Family Reflections’, I found a quite strange connection I had with the series in that it made me feel a little uncomfortable looking though the photos but it also made me question the message behind each of them resulting in an enjoyable experience as interrogate back and  fourth with myself what the series’ attempts to represent. I will expand n my thoughts on his work later on this post. As well, Kapajeva’s series ‘Family’ again possesses an effective sense of eeriness due to the lighting techniques used and the way she divides two halves of the each photo down the middle to provide seven different images for the series. The split down the middle of her photos which is a recurring theme in all of her images makes us feel as though we as the audience are looking at new different images in what is one frame but divided t sow two different stories – one of the subject in one half an the other of the subject in the other half. One attracts me to the works of both artists is the captivating way in which they have addressed the style of tableaux photography. As well, I love how Almendros’ series seems very, sometimes overly staged in this one environment which you can see throughout the works as it does not changed where the actions in several photographs seem very dramatised. On the other hand, there is Kapajeva’s catalogue of works which does not seem at all romanticised in the actions performed in each image, instead it seems very natural and, almost like documentary imagery.

An image from Almendros’ series, Family Reflections

Both artists take a tableaux approach, however, I believe there is a fine line, which is near enough blurred between what tableaux imagery and documentary imagery is the way they look. There is very extreme tableaux photography where there is several subjective and people within the frame accompanied by film-like locations and props; mise-en-scene is vital in tableaux image. However, in documentary, although much moire informal, with the aim to capture an unexpected, unplanned moment in time, the look can be very similar to tableaux photography. Much like in the image above, however, we as the audience are aware that the photographer has arranged this shot and for the man to stand, naked in the middle of a road. Furthermore, both styles do provoke thoughts from the viewers which ask what the meaning behind an image was because as the audience, we are very much unaware of the happenings ‘behind-the-scenes’ as such. The aim of both styles is to give an insight.

What I like about the two series I am about to look at is the evident theme in each image. This contributes to the very powerful images that speak for themselves. The types of photographs set up are very captivating and in each photographers works based around the them of family you can see the very careful thought process that went in to making each image and together, the images in both artists selection complement each other.

Alfonso Almendros

Alfonso Almendros is an emerging photographer from Spain who lives and works in Helsinki. In a published article on photography website, GUP, they talk to Almendros about his work, Family Reflections and the described his work in a short paragraph which encapsulates the series and what it is about. They said: “Family Reflections captures the parallel of the now and then, each image defining one basic concept – the roots, obsession with death, virility as a symbol of authority, glorification of maternity or the sacred character of some objects. A series about family, struggle and intimacy that creates a parallel reality – words dissolve and become slightly dark, incomplete, almost invisible. The photographs evoke nostalgia, solitude, melancholy among others.”

Particularly in Alemendros’ work, you can notice the style of his work due form the colours used. This would have been a conscious decision, as well as the location used. He takes each image in the same location – a room in a house and you cans see the same furniture as you progress through the different images which would have appeared beforehand. Throughout the series, there is a division of the main series achieved through other images which can be classified as anomalies, in that they don’t fit the theme as such due to the change of location and subject. This is an effect I really like and hope to use in my own study.

A Collection of Images from the Series

 

On his website, Almendros does not provide any explanation about the series and the meanings behind his series, Family Reflections, however, GUP interviewed the photographer on the release of his series which provides answers to why he produced the images and what they mean.

Looking at the grouping of the images he has produced, I can draw my own conclusions from them but it is likely to be very far from the actual meanings and concept for the construction of the work. However, I am aware that the theme is based around family, and, form the title, I can conclude that Almendros is perhaps looking back at his own family, which, at the time of him making the series, may not have existed and it is therefore an homage to the relationship he may have had with his family members.

Alemendros states that’ Family Reflections’ came at a point in his life where he was full indecision. He also says “after living abroad for a few years, I decided to go back to my hometown and spend a few months with my family. There, I found things that had changed during my absence.” This was what spurred his choice ot make a photographic series of works relating to the changes that occurred in his environment that he remembered in a different way before his absence. As well, he wanted to document the change in his family members attitudes and behaviours since coming back from being abroad.

Alfonso Almendros also states that his father was a photographer beofre he ws born, however he died when Almendros was two years old but he cameras and photographs remained in their house – influencing his need to pick up a camera and begin shooting.

Image Analysis 

This, for me, is one of the most powerful images in the whole series because it is so unusual and quite difficult to decode because of its eeriness.

However, if I was to attempt to decode the image, I would suggest that the dead bird could be a metaphor for the relationship between Almendros and his mother and sister after coming back from travelling in that it is now non-existent and itself is dead because he feels as though he doesn’t have that previous, special relationship with his family members but his absence has resulted in them all becoming distant and therefore, when he arrived back in Spain, he came back to something that change dramatically to what he remembered and to him, he may have seen this as very upsetting that the previous memories stored in his mind did not exist when he cam back to his hometown. Now the relationships has to be rekindled and re-created in order for the family to become attached and ‘as one’ again. I believe this image is well representative of the series title as Almendros is looking back and reflecting on what had previously been part of his life – a paramount factor of his happiness when he had that special bond with his mother and sister which now, as he talks, is different as the environment around him and the people he loves has changed.

Talking about the environment, this is the first image of several in the series and it is a great image to have as the opening frame as it sets the mood and atmosphere for the images to come. This image is taken in a room which is a recurrence throughout he series as you notice ht dame wall beyond the subject in most of the images. It is, what looks like a barren and dark room which possess no emotion and it seems very melancholy, deriving the same feeling from audience – a feeling of emptiness and hardship in a way because of the theme throughout of loneliness and trauma, regret, nakedness. A whole array of emotions make up this series and contributes to the whole mood.

Looking at the technical factors in the image and how it is composed, the use of depth of field is used to full extent to make the image very visually pleasing. There is a very shallow depth of field where only the foreground is in focus and it is focused solely on the bird lying just over the edge of table just off the center of the frame. Everything else gradually become blurred, whether it be to the right of the bird where the bowl on the table is out of focus or behind the bird where as you look further into the image, the table cloth comes more and more blurred as well as the glass behind This effect leaves just the bird in focus and it has a great effect and forces our eyes t be drawn to the bird only.

The colour within the images are very similar an there is a very stimulating colour palette because although they are all very bland and dark, they all work very well together. There are different shades of brown that complement the off white of the table cloth and the yellow of the bowl as well as the brown bird. The colours all seem quite faded and it is create a vintage effect. This was perhaps the style of homes in Spain. There seem to be a source of light coming from the right also which illuminates the frame.

Maria Kapajeva 

Maria Kapajeva is a Russian artist from Estonia based in London who left her career in Economics behind and moved to the UK to get her BA and then MA in Photography at University of Westminster.  Her work has been exhibited internationally including Belfast, FORMAT and Guernsey photo festivals.

In her work Maria focuses on the issues of women representation in contemporary society and cultural and social stereotypes around that representation – shown through a very strong message in her series ‘Family’ In her practice she expands the borders of photography working also with found images, video and textile crafts.

I am Usual Woman, 2013 © Maria Kapajeva

Detail from I am Usual Woman, 2013 © Maria Kapajeva

For this piece above entitled ‘I Am Usual Women’, the used photographs on the quilt were found on the matrimonial websites specially created for Russian women to find a Western husband. The images for the quilt are carefully selected from the ones which were shown on these websites as ‘the best samples’ of how women should be photographed for the best matchmaking. She looks at the fantasies of Russian women and is one of several works she has produced which relate to the role of women in society and how the are perceived to be – that they are often objectified due to their gender and therefore sexualised but also seen as the leaders of the home-life in that they do the work to cater for the husband. 

About the series ‘Family’ taken form Kapajeva’s website:

“The series is an exploration of family as an integrated institution within its problems such as miscommunication or misunderstanding between its members. During her research she collected a lots of stories from people about how badly the misunderstanding could end up because of lack of an essential communication in the families on daily basis. Maria selected seven most common scenarios and interpreted them in her images. Each story consists of two separate photographs placed close to each other for an installation. The physical division between two prints visualise a distance between family members who are involved in each story. Even though Maria staged peculiar scenarios, she is open to other interpretations by the viewers. Thus, each pair left with no caption to give a space for people to find their reading of the set-ups.”

A Collection of Images from the Series

As well, it is evident that lighting is important feature of Kapajeva’s work, in particular, this series which focuses on divisions of family life and relationships between family members, as well as contrasting characters and how these clash and produce an “empty family” which has no cohesion or bond no more. She illuminates each subject in each half of every image to show the spotlight on them and this is also a popular technique in most tableaux images. It creates shadows and they high key lighting shone upon the subject’s face puts them in spotlight of the audience – under pressure as such.

Kapajeva’s work is very well produced as she has created a consistent series of images that all work together in harmony to create a documentation through tableaux photography that speaks to the women of Russia through the visualization she provides of family life in terms of how a wife and husband and their potential kids may behave in their home. Each image int the series is divided through the middle by cropping one side and then the other to create the effect as if you are looking at two different images but then on closer inspection, is one because the two sides often work together to show tow different environments with different subjects in, however, a hint that they are a whole image maybe given through the body positioning of the subjects or where they are looking. Although the environments in both halves often seem different, they produce a contrast of the characters in them and the audience are forced to see the two images combined to create a narrative. Her images often follow the theme of showing a husband and wife and their physical and mental divide and breakdown as they may begin to become two as opposed to the previous one harmonic couple the once were. This is also backed up by the physical divide of Kapajeva’s images.

Image Analysis 

This is one of the images form the series and is one of my favourites due to he complete contrast ad powerful and evident message it is trying to get across.

Like I mentioned above, it sows the physical; divide between family life between a husband and wife and then often the child involved as well – in the frame – the child glued to her mother’s side – reiterating the desire for children to be attached to their mums at the early stages of their life as they feel safe mum due to the connection built with them form birth. It creates this sense of fragility and preciousness – that this child possesses and she is at the fore front of everything done in the house and the parents’ life revolves around her. But also the fragility of family

As well, the image is illuminated on both side with the use of high key lighting on both subjects and the activity they are doing. Te women of the house is in the typical potion of doing work and providing for the others in the house. In the frame, she is doing the ironing whilst looking at the man with an expression showing no emotion – it is as though she is fed up and sh is looming in envy as the husband sits in the armchair with his beer watching the TV – he is ot watching over his daughter and it is instead left up to the wide even though is currently busy. As well, the kid is in a position of anger underneath the iron the mother is using, yet the male is not paying attention and it gives the sense that there is no communication between the two and they are at their worst where they cant bare to look at each directly and instead live their life trapped inside themselves.

 

contrast between Anna gaskell and hannah starkey

ANNA GASKELL

https://www.guggenheim.org/artwork/artist/anna-gaskell

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_Gaskell

Anna Gaskell was born on October 22, 1969 in Des Moines, Iowa. She studied at Bennington College before attending the Art Institute of Chicago. Gaskell’s early photos were self-portraits. However, she decided to begin photographing people acting out stories mainly characters of Alice, from Alice in Wonderland.  Gaskell is best known for her photographic series that she calls “elliptical narratives”  Her works are influenced by film and painting. She lives and works in New York.

The images of the girls are taken through the use of photographic tableaux. Within the images she references children’s games, literature and psychology.  She isolates dramatic moments from larger plots form particular stories. Each images is carefully planned and staged to create an ‘artificial scene’ Gaskell manages to create a dreamlike world that suspends time.

The Girls in the images don’t represent individuals, they act out certain contradictions and desires. The identical clothing that they wear in the series creates a unity within the figures. The mysterious acts that they form in the pictures may be seen as metaphors for “disorientation and metal illness.” Here are a few examples of images from Gaskell’s series “Wonder” in 1996.

Untitled work from Anna Gaskell’s ‘Wonder’ series. (1996)

HANNAH STARKEY

http://www.saatchigallery.com/artists/hannah_starkey.htm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannah_Starkey

http://www.tanyabonakdargallery.com/artists/hannah-starkey/series-photography_4/27

Hannah Starkey, was born in Belfast in 1971. She lives and works in London. Her Photographs aim to explore the physical and psychological connections between the individual shes photographing and the everyday urban surroundings around them. Since the beginning of her photography career Starkey has mainly focused on using women as her main subjects. She likes to use artificial backgrounds and strong, symbolic  associations of colour and imagery to make her compositions more interesting with a deeper meaning.

Hannah Starkey has described her photographs as exploring ‘women’s lives through their everyday interactions’. In her staged scenes, actresses and other hired models re-enact ostensibly insignificant and banal moments, of the kind that often go unnoticed in daily life. By freezing such moments in time, Starkey hopes to elevate them above the mundane and create lasting allegories for modern life. Her carefully planned and directed compositions fuse influences from painting and cinema. However, she withholds the possibility of any narrative conclusion, leaving viewers to construct their own fictions around her images.

Untitled – March 1999 1999 Hannah Starkey born 1971 Purchased 1999 http://www.tate.org.uk/art/work/P78332
Hannah Starkey Untitled – October 1998 1998 C-type print 122 x 152 cm

Butterfly Catchers is a large, colour photograph of two teenage girls on a demolition site. They are viewed in the process of picking their way across a landscape of rubble which fills nearly half of the image. Behind them are industrial buildings. Dark clouds  in the distance create an ominous atmosphere. A  white light shining off the roof of a nearby building and reflecting off metallic surfaces in the rubble creates a break in the dark atmosphere. The girls, who face towards the camera, are backlit. Both appear preoccupied; their eyes are lowered as though they are scanning the floor at their feet. A few weeds and grasses emerge from between the bricks on the right side of the image which adds a bit of colour to the grey atmosphere. The photograph was shot in Belfast at the site of a former linen mill which, despite being of particular historical interest, was demolished to make way for a supermarket. The girls are adolescents recruited locally.

Hannah Starkey Butterfly Catchers 1999 C-type print 122 x 152 cm

Tableux Photography: Anna Gaskall vs Hannah Starkey; childhood vs adolescent; memories vs fairytales; literature vs cinema

Anna Gaskall

This photograph is interesting to me because of it’s mysterious, abnormal nature that is constructed in which it allows us to delve deeper into the deeper meaning of the photograph, in other words: what is the purpose of the photograph and what is it trying to tell us?  Clearly, this appears to be a direct reference to a childhood memory, reconstructed to tell us how this photographer looks back in the past.  Interestingly, the loss of saturation in the photograph appears to us as quite an old and distant memory because there is a lack of detail on the features of the memory and therefore because of this age of this memory suggests this is quite personnel.  The trees through the use of increased contrast almost show an intricate and diverse environment or world within a world.  This in a sense suggests that this is the girls natural environment in which she should feel  comfortable.  However the fact that through the darkening shades of green and the shadows, the woodland appears quite ghost like and that there is some sort of a creepy and quite scary presence surrounding the girl.  This is interesting because of the girls clothes/  She is initially wearing white which suggests innocence and vulnerability however the slow tint towards more of a cream color suggests a sense of worn use and how the environment has started to have an effect on the girl.  The photograph has been taken from a face on angle and this has helped the viewer to distinguish clearly the effects the hostile environment has had on the girl, for example: she is in the air with her arms and legs stretched out.  This uncomfortable position reminds me that she doesn’t appear to actually want to be there, however she doesn’t have a choice in the matter due to the fact that by her ghostly presence she appears to be of under some sort of influence, reminding me of the dangerous nature of the environment.  This use of tableaux photography is interesting because it allows us to essentially interpret the story in which the photograph is trying to tell us in our own way but still in saying that somehow really understand and connect with the photographer’s emotions that she is expressing.

Image result for anna gaskell Image result for anna gaskell Image result for anna gaskell

 Hannah Starkey

This photograph is strikingly the opposite of the previous photograph in terms of the environment surrounding the subjects but similarly however, both girls appear to be young, impressionable and vulnerable while being presented under some sort of influence.   I find it particularly interesting how Hannah Starkey has chosen to use Tableaux photography to tell a story of the feelings and emotions of the young girl, however I like how the style of documentary photography is incorporated to extradite the very dangers, pressures and struggles that are experienced in young people’s day to day lives in a modern day interpretation.  The elements of Tableaux photography that prevail in this image are the strong features of how the girl’s body language in response to presumably her mother but the fact there doesn’t appear to be much motherly contact or affection being expressed towards her daughter shows how the relationship appears particularly strained or damaged.  This allows us to pose questions that make us naturally curious to find out what these root causes were in this strained relationship.  I particularly like how we can interpret what these causes could be, and through Tableaux we can appreciate the feelings of the subject more easily.  Clearly through the dark surroundings, suggests to me  that the girl is perhaps going through some of her own difficulties that is part of growing up as she although appears confident and comfortable, it doesn’t look like her natural self.  For example by the fact it looks the parent has had to speak to her and put her in her place even though she appears comfortable in her own environment.  This shows by the fact that this environment isn’t actually her environment as there is her parent putting her in her place despite the parent clearly doesn’t belong there.  This therefore explains and tells the story of growing up through teenage years that many experience differing phases and how the parent is a model or guide for a growing up teenager.

Image result for hannah starkey Image result for hannah starkeyImage result for hannah starkey

Tableaux photography

Tableaux Photography

Tableaux is a style of photography where people are staged in a constructed environment and a pictorial narrative is conveyed often in a single image, or a series of images that often makes references to fables, fairy tales, myths, unreal and real events from a variety of sources such as paintings, film, theatre, literature and the media.

This type of photography offers a much more open-ended explanation, which allows the viewer to make a subjective judgement on the interpretation of the image. Tableaux photographs often tell a story, which could be created by a model posing for the camera, with theatrical props, costumes and dramatic lighting.

Tableaux Photography is mostly looked through a subjective lens, which allows the viewers to interpret the image in several different ways, creating their own reason for the images creation. I prefer images, which are subjective as I personally like the image of everyone seeing the image differently.


Artist Reference– Anna Gaskell vs Hannah Starkey 

These are two artists who either looks at childhood or teenage years in the theme of memories or fairy tales either using literature or cinema photography to do so.

Anna Gaskell

https://www.guggenheim.org/artwork/artist/anna-gaskell

She was born in Des Moines, Iowa, her early photography was based on self-portraits. However, soon she began photographing girls at they acted out stories, embodying characters from Alice in Wonderland. These images are seen in her series of “wonder” and “Override” where groups of girls dressed in matching uniforms are shown in ambiguous and ominous situations.

These images are either from the series “Wonder” or “Override” they both explore a similar theme and relate in some way. She often takes a literary starting point in her photography, as they can see these photographs are all based on the story of Alice in Wonderland. Her frequently uses adolescent girls as her models within her photography. You can see that her photographs are carefully planned and staged as the environments used are ‘artificial’ as they only exist to be photographed.

Gaskell’s photos are taken as if they are taking the viewer through the events, which appear in Alice in Wonderland. In one of the photographs (untitled #9) a wet bar of soap has been dragged along a wooden floor. In another image later on (untitled #17) it appears again, forced into a girl’s mouth. This suspension of time and causality lends Gaskell’s images a remarkable ambiguity that she uses to evoke a vivid and dreamlike world.

The models in Gaskell’s photographs do not represent individuals, but act out the contradictions and desires of a single person. While their unity is suggested by their identical clothing, the mysterious and often cruel rituals they act out upon each other may be metaphors for disorientation and mental illness. In wonder and override, the character collectively evoked is Alice, perhaps lost in the Wonderland of her own mind, unable to determine whether the bizarre things happening to her are real or the result of her imagination.


ANALYSIS:

This image uses the colour scheme of blue, yellow and green, the yellow stands out within the image and is exaggerated by the bleach blonde hair. There is artificial lighting coming from the models right hand bottom corner, which makes the models face look almost eery and spooky. She looks over her left shoulder as if she feels she always needs to watch her back, which is a scary idea this is displayed through the image. The model looks away from the camera and appears to not know it is there, as if it is a still shoot of a scene, which is moving.  Alice in Wonderland is very strange and unpredictable, which would make Alice feel cautious and apprehensive to what would happen next. She wears the colours, which are seen in the original Alice in Wonderland, which makes it clear which character she is trying to portray. Alice in Wonderland has a spine-chilling story line, which is not what we believed as children, in fact the story was about something a bit more disturbing.


The meaning behind Alice in Wonderland:

Alice was the daughter of the dean of Christ Church, she attended the Oxford college where Dodgson taught mathematics, and she wasn’t the only young girl he befriended. To the 21st Century mind, there is something that makes one deeply uneasy about this scenario. Though there is no evidence of anything untoward in Dodgson’s relationships, it’s hard not to view as suspect a grown man who enjoyed having his young playmates sit on his lap and pose for photographs, often under-dressed.

She begins to take drugs, which makes her feel uncomfortable in her body, which undergoes a series of extreme changes; her sense of her self becomes destabilised, leaving her uncertain of her own identity; she butts heads with authority and strives to understand seemingly arbitrary rules, the games that people around her play, and even death.

Since the 1960s, drug-lovers have read Alice’s antics as one big trip. The lyrics to Jefferson Airplane’s White Rabbit did a fair bit to cement the association: “Remember what the Dormouse said / Feed your head, feed your head”. From its heat-addled opening scene, there is a psychedelic vibe – besides all those pills, time moves erratically, and the grinning Cheshire Cat is here one minute, gone the next.

“You take the blue pill, the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill, you stay in Wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes.”

An article on what it’s about


Hannah Starkey

She was born in Belfast, and studied photography at the Royal College of Art. Her more recent images have an almost theatrical character, often depicting women in staged settings, for example with a Coca Cola in a pub or inside a public lavatory. She describes her work as “explorations of everyday experiences and observations of inner city life from a female perspective.”

These are all images from her series entitled “woman”, which focuses a woman’s perspective and put women front and center in her photographs. Her life influences her work greatly as she herself is female and her perception of what its like to be a female in our culture and therefore what the expectations are of the woman of this particular culture. She finds it interesting to look at the two different generations between herself and her daughter as expectations have changed, which has made them much more unrealistic. Therefore, are work explores what is expected from a young woman to an older woman.

This project took over 20 years to make and was slightly biographic as she revealed herself in some of these images as well as using models and strangers.  She explored this idea on a personal level but also on a socialite level. Her images show different types of woman and what would be their perception of being this sort of women.  In all the images they are all engaging in regular routines, showing the everyday life of women. Starkey captures these generic ‘in between’ moments of daily life with a sense of relational detachment. Her still images operate as discomforting ‘pauses’; where the banality of existence is freeze-framed in crisis point, creating reflective instances of inner contemplation, isolation, and conflicting emotion.

Through the staging of her scenes, Starkey’s images evoke suggestive narratives through their appropriation of cultural templates: issues of class, race, gender, and identity are implied through the physical appearance of her models or places.Starkey often uses composition to heighten this sense of personal and emotional disconnection, with arrangements of lone figures separated from a group, or segregated with metaphoric physical divides such as tables or mirrors.

Often titling her work as Untitled, followed by a generalised date of creation, her photographs parallel the interconnected vagueness of memory, recalling suggestions of events and emotions without fixed location or context. Her work presents a platform where fiction and reality are blurred, illustrating the gap between personal fragility and social construction, and merging the experiences of strangers with our own.

When asked about her photography being staged she answers:

“I control most elements of the image, however there’s an element I do not control and that is chance or luck. What happens when the shutter is open for that split second is where the magic happens.” 


ANALYSIS:

In this photograph the two women are sat in a bar/pub opposite each other, maybe mother and daughter.  The pub looks dark and grotty the only light coming in is from the window behind the table, which means it is natural light being used. The man focus of the image is the woman directly in the middle of the image, this is because the light is shining on her, which makes her the lightest part of the photograph, which is what we are usually attracted to the most. They are both from different generations, which is obvious through the different styles of hair and clothes. The younger girl is wearing what looks like a football top as she sits with her head tilted to the side, leaning on her hand, with a bored look on her. This could be because the older woman is talking too much and she is finding it boring and tedious, she is wearing a blue velvet dress, with vintage style earrings, smoking a cigarette. Both of the women’s hairstyles are completely different, which could be showing the difference in style or expectations of their generation. Going back to their clothing, the fact that the younger girl is wearing a football kit shows that society has changed as that would have been seen as boy or men clothing. ‘Tomboys’ are now socially acceptable in today’s society, this would have not been the case in the older women’s generation as this would have not been socially acceptable, which is shown through the way she is dressed, as she is dressed like a “middle class/higher class lady.” Overall, I feel this image is about the different generations and how the expectations of women have also changed with that.


Comparison:

By Hannah Starkey 

By Anna Gaskell

In both of these photographs a girl is the subject and therefore the main focus, they are both looking away from the camera with a particular expression on their faces showing their emotion. In the first photo its more of a casual setting as she sits in a bar with more natural lighting, which creates a spotlight on the girl in the centre of the photograph as the light comes through the window behind the subject. She has an almost bored or fed up look on her face, as if the older figure opposite her is boring her with a conversation she does not want to have.

This is different to the second photograph as the lighting is more dramatic as the light is artificial, which makes the image have a more sinister feel to the photograph. This creates shadows and dark parts of the image empathising the girls face and the second figures body in the right side of the image. She has a scared or frightened look on her face, while she looks over her shoulder to the figure to the right.

The mood of each image is completely different as one is telling a story through character and could be linked to fairytale, while another is showing a mood or a cinema shot through body language and facial expressions. However, they are both tackling the idea of portraying emotion through a photograph.


“Construct a childhood memory in a photograph.”

This photo was recreated from a childhood photograph, of me and my dad on holiday. I am sat on my dad’s shoulders, which is what I did a lot when I was younger as I was short and often got called mini or teeny by my teachers, which then turned into my nickname at school by my class mates. It was not done in a horrible way but I didn’t like being shorter than other people in my class and be classed as the smallest in my year group. My dad always put my on his shoulders so that I was taller than everyone else, making me feel happy that for that 5 minutes, I was no longer seen as the shortest person there. My dad told me not to worry about being the smallest and that I would grow ‘big and strong’ when I was old enough, being one of the tallest. I can’t describe the happiness I felt when being on his shoulders and I would beg him to let me be up there longer, which explains his bored face, he also looks a bit in pain, probably because I had been on his shoulders for that long. When I think of my childhood, I remember being really close to my dad, my dad would do anything to make me happy and we still to this day are still extremely close. I remember always going swimming with my dad on a Sunday and we would go for a walk and when my legs got tired I would get on his shoulders again.  This image reminds me that my dad has always been there for me, making sure I am the happiest I could be and reminds me of how close we have always been.

For this image, I edited it in photoshop by over laying the original photograph on top of the new photograph I had taken, which was a reenactment of the original photograph. Behind the original photograph you can see the shaded outline of the new photo I took on a self timer.  This represents how we have both changed over time, but we still have a close relationship and our bound is still just as strong.