Shoot // body

On the 23rd of January I did a photo shoot focusing on the different parts of the body such as the feet, hands and the face. I wanted to experiment a lot more with this shoot by using the environment I was in. I decided to do a self portrait shoot because I knew what sort of images I wanted to come out with. I used a bath as my environment and backdrop for the shoot because I wanted the body parts to be emerging from the water. I put milk into the bath so that the water wasn’t transparent which made the images much more interesting and effective. It was difficult doing this shoot because I had to hold the camera above the water and the steam also slightly blurred the lens.  I am mostly happy with the outcome of my images for this shoot.

After seeing the final images I decided I wanted to edit the best images using Photoshop into black and white because the images looked much more effective and the details looked more defined.

 

Shoot // white body // edits

The following shoot was done during the Christmas holidays.  The weather was bad which made the shoot much more difficult. The aim of the shoot was to capture a model painted white in a vast empty landscape. The meaning of the shoot was to resemble the feeling of being lost, or invisible among the world around us. We become trapped within ourselves as we’re forced to become part of the normal expectations. We lose who we are. This is what this shoot is meant to represent. By painting the model white and placing her in a bleak landscape she becomes part of it, almost invisible. I also decided to paint the model white to represent her losing her identity.

When editing the images I wanted to experiment with the use of colour to see how this would effect the overall mood. I really liked the black and white edits because this emphasized the bleakness of the images which I planned to exaggerate.

Shoot // white hands

On Friday 19th I organised a photo shoot in the studio at Hautlieu to obtain images based in the concept of movement and body image. I managed to achieve a wide range of images and am happy with my result. Instead of using the studio flash lights, I decided to simply use the room lights on the ceiling because I didn’t want an extreme shadow. When preparing for the shoot, I asked two of my friends if I could paint their hands and arms with white acrylic paint. I used the paint in the art room to do this. To make sure all the skin was covered we had to do several layers.

Whilst taking images I asked my friends to create different shapes with their hands symbolizing certain emotions such as pain or struggle. The aim of this shoot was to represent emotions using the hands. This was an unusual and creative perspective of viewing the body to symbolize a hidden feeling.

I framed the images so just the painted parts of the hands and arms were showing because they were the focus of the shoot. I asked the models to make sculptural shapes with their hands. Soft delicate shapes as well as rigid harsh shapes. I am very happy with the images a managed to achieve. They work especially well with my project because they express movement as well as emotion.

I wanted to start by doing simple edits. I firstly edited the images by lowering the contrast and adding brightness and exposure. I then changed the vibrance and saturation.  Although there are some shadows on the backdrop, they work really well with the image because they make it look less two dimensional.  They also add another tone to the image.  I made sure I got some portrait orientations and landscapes to see which style was best.

Experimental Edits using colour 

I really liked the effect that the white on white created because the images were very pleasing to the eye and looked very professional. I wanted to experiment a bit more by adding some colour to the images. This made them look more contemporary and modern. The coloured images suited my project more because the colour helps to expresses the different emotions I was trying to replicate such as the red symbolizing terror.

 

 

Full Essay- Final draft

How do Phillip Toledano and Laia Abril explore notions of change, fate and absence in their work?

“Photographs are the story we fail to put into words.”- Destin Sparks

Photographs can be seen as the story-telling companions of time, they direct the gaze of the spectator to look at the past, allowing us to reflect on our own lives and the lives of others. Photographs allow the ability to communicate and capture small moments in time when particular emotions are felt. As said by Alfred Eisenstaedt “It is more important to click with people than to click the shutter.” (www.brainyquote.com-alfred_eisenstaed) It is this I explore in my personal study as I consider the change, reflecting on the past and the present of my Granddad’s life after a tragic event, which has changed his life forever.

In this essay, I will be focusing on the ways that Toledano and Abril explores change, fate and absence in their work, particularly focusing on his project entitled ‘Days with my Father’ and her project entitled ‘The Epilogue.’ I will be creating links to my own personal study, which also investigates and reflects upon the fate, absence and specifically change within my Granddad’s life. Having looked at archival photographs through my own personal family photo box, it has allowed me to discuss memories of his life, which I have used to inform my current photographs with the purpose of exploring the change and absences which have taken place.

These absences and change are seen in various ways throughout the project as the two words form a relationship with the images to tell a story. Examples of the absences displayed is loved ones or friends my granddad had for many years passing; the ability to walk and the absence of his sight, shown through photographs of  his glass eye and eye patch. When referring to change, my granddad as a person has changed dramatically, he does not really talk much and does not have the same sense of humour, which is something we miss greatly. All of these factors were the result of growing old and the two strokes he experienced ten years ago.

The genre of work I have focused on is documentary and narrative photography due to the style of photographs I am making in my own project and both Toledano and Abril make work across both genres as visual story-tellers. Laia Abril particularly looks at archival imagery as well as making new photographs of objects and people within her project. Abril inspires me as she takes a different approach to the theme of absence and change, which is different to Toledano’s approach but both of which I used within my own project. She specially looks at archival images, which gives the viewers an insight of Cammy’s life previously giving us an understanding of her background. She also included images of her family and close friends while giving them a voice about the subject by including conversations she had had with them, which is a technique I have used myself.

My own images will follow this style of documentary photography to give a realistic insight into my Granddad’s life. Straight Photography, which is closely related to realism is the historical context of this style, which will inform my analysis and development of my own images. It believes in the camera’s ability to record objectively the actual world as it appears in front of the lens. The veracity of the photographs has been challenged by critics, claiming that the photographer’s subjectivity challenges this idea opening up many new possibilities for both interpretation and manipulation. Photography is a medium that possesses the precious ability to influence and transcend past, present and future.

This style of photography relates to my own project that I am working on, as well as the artists’ work I am exploring. In my own photographic study of my Granddad I wanted to capture a realistic insight into his life, struggles and illness, by taking photographs in a documentary style creating a story close to the truth of his experiences showing that manipulation of images is not needed to express this fully.  I have adopted a snapshot approach as I wanted the photographs to be raw and genuine, with hints of the vernacular present throughout. This reflects a closeness, a familiarity, intimacy and every-day connection. It is not staged. However, some images in my book have been converted to black and white or even cropped, but these are very simple and is not manipulated enough for the image to be untrue. Realism is about giving “the observer a feeling of intrusion on privacy when looking at it.” – (Theguardian.com). This is another aim of my own project as well as the artists.

Phillip Toledano’s work for example gives outsiders a personal view of his father’s last days as he has photographed him experiencing everyday life inside his home. This notion is what inspired me to follow a similar aim in my own photographs. For example, accessing archival imagery of my granddad is something which can be seen as something very personal and as a photographer, putting these images into to my own project gives outsiders an insight of his personal life behind closed doors previously as well as showing more recent photographs of his life now, letting the viewers make a comparison and detect change between then and now. On the other hand, the photographs produced by Phillip and myself can also be seen as narrative photography as the sequence of images are made to tell a story to the viewers through the pages and images produced. Narrative photography can be both documentary style photography or tableaux photography, both myself and Toledano use narrative photography in a documentary style. This means it is close to actual events and situations compared to tableaux, which are staged and constructed photographs, that they can be based on a real or imagined event. Another example of an artist who uses both documentary and narrative photography is Laia Abril, she investigated and documented how a family coped with the aftermath of losing their daughter to bulimia. Separating the work into sections allowed her to approach different aspects through different platforms, not only in the multiplicity of perspectives but also in a constantly evolving visual stimulation. All three projects ‘Days with my father’, ‘The Epilogues’ and my personal study entitled ‘The Aftermath’ all tackle emotion subjects, specifically change, absence and fate.

The word absence can be defined as the state of being away from a place or person or the non-existence or lack of something. Absence in my own work relates to the absence of people within my Granddad’s life  and the absence of a good quality life. This could be taken literally such as the absence of his eye and lack of eyesight or the absence of friends and family he has lost. But also more metaphorical absence such as the loss of hope and lack of motivation my granddad feels or how lost he feels as a person as he recognises change in himself. Both Toledano’s and Abril’s work, use an element of absence in their photographic work. When looking at the inspirations into why Toledano decided to produce the project ‘Days with my father’ I found it was due to absence or loss of his mother, who suddenly died in 2006. After she died, he realised how much she had been shielding him from his father’s mental state. As an attempt to re-connect and develop a new relationship with his father, he made this project which shows the saddening effects of Phillip’s mother’s absence in the family.

While making  the project, Toledano learnt about the illness his father faced and also what his mother had dealt with previously before her death. He realised the significance of his illness when the death of his wife was a shock to him, asking ‘Why did no one tell me?’ and ‘Why didn’t you take me to her funeral?’ (Toledano 2010: Days with my Father, page 4.) After a while, he could not keep reminding him about her death as he described ‘ it was killing both of us to constantly re-live her death.’ (www.toledano.com.) His father had short-term memory loss, so there was an absence of his memory which Toledano and his father found difficult to cope with as he was forgetting vital memories of his own life. Toledano often found notes, which his father would write to remind himself of things he could remember. He also found notes from his father explaining how he felt lost and scared, which was a coping strategy his father adopted to manage this absence. In the image we can see a A4 notebook, as well as a blue pen which is slightly diagonal. The notebook has writing on it, which I assume is his fathers as it reads “Where is Helene? Phillip? Ralph? Everybody?” (Toledano 2010: Days with my Father, page 14.) The book is placed on what looks like a bedside table, which also has a photo frame containing a photograph and a lamp which projects light onto the page to reveal the text, which means the light in the photograph is artificial lighting. This image shows his father’s confusion and frustration caused my his memory loss, which gives the viewers an insight to his father’s thought processes and creates evidence of this. Personally, I really like this image as I like how we are made aware of his feelings and thoughts. This can be seen as a documentary image, which is the style of most of the images within his project. Coping strategies and showing the effects of absence is a key theme throughout my project.

Phillip Toledano, Days with my Father 2010

Similarly, Laia Abril also tackles absence in her work, particularly in her project ‘The Epilogue.’ Again she is looking at the effects of absence on a family, who lost their daughter to Bulimia. She does this in a form of an interview or discussion with family members and close friends as they discuss Tammy and her illness, an example of this is a close friend , who writes “I spent so many years trying to make her better, trying to fix her.” (Abril 2014: The Epilogue, page 31.)This is her reflecting on her life with Cammy and explaining how she tried to help Cammy. However it is too late, as well as admitting coping mechanisms to help them grieve. Her father says “I still cannot bear to listen to music: we all mourn in different ways.” (Abril 2014: The Epilogue, page 45.) Furthermore, Abril also explores memories of her presence as we all invent and reinvent our memories of the past every day of our lives as Sigmund Freud reminds us that “the answer to our confusion were locked in the secret drawers of our past, Photography, then,provides us with the documents.” (www.bigthink.com) I feel this is a strong quote relating to this as if our past is documented it can not be changed or manipulated, which means archival photographs will give an insight into Cammy’s life before she developed her illness to help draw conclusions on why or how this may have occurred. Abril does this by including archival imagery as well as taking photographs of objects, which would have belonged to Cammy such as the weighing scale, which would have been a significant part of her life as she tackled Bulimia. These archival images also act as snapshots of memories of Cammy’s life or childhood.

There are also sections of text describing events, which had taken place in her life at previous periods of Cammy’s life. An example of this would be a short paragraph, which explained “As teens, I knew my atomic bomb to drop on her when she was getting after me was to call her fat, but she would never admit it hurt her.” (Abril 2014: The Epilogue, page 70.) This could have been the trigger to Bulimia, which could be seen as an absence of self-esteem and confidence within her own body, leading to her illness, which resulted in her death. This image is an archival photograph, which has been taken previously in her childhood of Cammy in a swimsuit sat next to a swimming pool, smiling. In the book the image is presented as a full bleed image, which really emphasises the image. The image itself looks like it has been taken in natural sun lighting as you can see where the sun is at its strongest as it lightens up parts of the image. This image shows Cammy as she was before her illness, which enables the viewers to make a comparison. In my own study I had also looked at the cause or trigger for the strokes as well as looking at memories.

Laia Abril, The Epilogue, 2014

An additional key theme is the concept of change, the word change has various different meanings such as: ‘make or become different’; ‘take or use another instead of’ and ‘an act or process through which something becomes different.’ Both Toledano and Abril develop this in very similar but also slightly different ways. Laia Abril looks at change after death and how this effects the people within Cammy’s life. This differs to Toledano’s work as he explores the change in his fathers mental state as well as referencing change after the death of his mother, which is where the two projects link.

Abril investigates the aftermath of Cammy’s death within the family showing the family life after this significant event, which has changed, smiles turning into frowns and laughter turning into silence. The project includes extracts of Cammy’s diary, which states her feelings on the specific date of the 5th of September 1995 “How I’ve felt today, let’s see if people could ignore me more, Kaky is going out w/ banks & taking Auchra & Maggie. Umph, leave me and Becky out. Bitch, she’s not cool.”  (Abril 2014: The Epilogue, page 72-73) (including a photograph of a crying animated face.) There is also an extract which her brother, who explains “She starts losing weight before college, we all thought it was a positive thing, nobody actually knew what was really going on.” (Abril 2014: The Epilogue, page 74.) This suggest this is where the crucial change in Cammy’s life began. Throughout the book there is a consistent exploration of triggers and where this change occurred in her life and when the family started noticing something was seriously wrong. This is implied through images and context developed by the family themselves. There are also images of Cammy within the project where Bulimia has not affected her and these can clearly be compared to images of her when she was distinctly unwell. This displays a change in her physical condition as well as her mental state. Finally, there is also a huge change in the family atmosphere and relationship as her brother Tommy reveals “Mother’s Day and Father’s Day are brutal holidays in our family.” (Abril 2014: The Epilogue, page 17.) However, her mother admits “I remember feeling a relief  because she is in a safe place.” (Abril 2014: The Epilogue, page 96.) There is a continuous conflict in feeling grief and happiness that she is no longer in pain or miserable as she constantly tries to reach her vision of perfection. The families emotion change as well as their relationships with each other as they feel they feel the need to be closer to prevent feeling this loss again. I personally, feel the context within the book to be truly powerful and contribute to the meaning of the photographs. This specific photograph is of Cammy, who is the mother of Cammy’s boyfriend Adam.  The image is a portrait style image, capturing her shoulders upwards as she stares straight with a glazed over look in her eyes. Suggesting she can’t focus or feel anything due to her pain.  Her eyes do not look at the camera but it appears she knows it is there but is feeling numb. The photograph reads “Everybody was waiting for Adam to propose to Cammy that fall.”  (Abril 2014: The Epilogue, page 128.) This implies she feels some sort of guilt that her son was with Cammy while she was ill, perhaps also a feeling of hurt and suffering to imagine her son’s grief as well as her own. This photograph refers to how future plans can be changed quickly and someone you love can vanish before your very eyes. As far as the quality of the image technically, I personally feel it is a strong image. The woman presented in the photograph is the main focus of the image as the background is blurred, centering our eyes to her face. The light used is natural and seems to be coming through the window, which is located behind her resulting in shadowing. The change in emotional state within this photograph reflects the effect of her death. This is something that would alter the family’s life forever.

Laia Abril, The Epilogue, 2014

On the other hand, Phillip Toledano interpreted the idea of change slightly differently. Toledano explores the change in his fathers mental state as well as referencing change after the death of his mother. We observe a son, which is Phillip Toledano trying to ask the questions that never got asked in all the preceding years. It is a tale of the mysteries and challenges of aging, the search for connection, the exposing of real selves, and the moments of love that come full circle when the roles are reversed and the child takes care of the parent. This reflects the change a  person goes through as a result of getting older. In the case of this project, memory loss is explored as well as the change in their life since the death of Toledano’s mother. One of these important changes is his fathers emotions, this refers to both his confusion due to his illness and also his grief as a result of his wife’s death. Toledano explains that “Sometimes, when we’re talking, my dad will stop, and sigh, and close his eyes. It’s then that I know he knows. About my mum.  About everything.” (Toledano 2010: Days with my Father, page 80.) Suggesting that the emotional state has changed as he starts to remember upsetting events. This could also be linked to his physical change as his father was described as ‘film-star handsome’ when he was young and this change into “a man no longer beautiful upsets him deeply.”  (Toledano 2010: Days with my Father, page 10.)  This implies he does not like the changes within his life but knows and has always known that these days would come. It is an outcome of aging and it cannot be stopped. The changes in his life are challenging and hard to comprehend, which often leads him to feel “it is time for him to go, that he’s been around for too long.” (Toledano 2010: Days with my Father, page 22.) This suggests this is a new feeling that his father expresses, the way he feels about life is altered by the experiences he is faced with and the changes which have occurred. Throughout the book there is a consistent exploration of changes and where these might have occurred in his life and due to what events or experiences. This is implied through images and context developed by Toledano himself as well as quotes taken from his father. There are only images of his father when he is ill and the changes have already occurred, these cannot be compared to what his father was like before the illness through images but can be through context provided by Toledano. This displays a change in his physical condition as well as his mental state, focusing closely on confusion and grief. The context within the project gives the audience a deeper understanding of his father’s life from the past and the present.

This image is a portrait of his father presented in a landscape format, again capturing the shoulders upwards. The main focus of the photograph is the man’s face as the background is blurred, leaving the focal point sharp and clear. He has a painful expression on his face, suggesting he is crying or hurt. This is clear as his nose is crumpled; his eyebrows frowning and his teeth clenching. His eye gaze is directed towards the floor and his back seems to be hunched over, rounding his shoulders as if he feels the pain physically. This suggests the change in his mental and emotional state, showing his frustration. This image caption states: “Eating is often a miserable experience.” Toledano explains the one thing he did love was eggs: “scrambled eggs; egg salad; egg-drop soup.” (Toledano 2010: Days with my Father, page 34.) This implies he would stick to what he knew he liked and this was probably easy to make. The main reason I like this photograph is because it radiates emotion, which makes me sympathises towards him and his family. It is a painful image, which can be compared to contrasting photographs, which show times when he is happy and cheerful. The lighting of this image is dark on the viewers left side, which is contrasted with the right as it appears to have a beam of light shining on the top of his face, which I assume is coming from an artificial light. I personally feel this image is strong, challenging and emotive  and can be linked to straight or documentary photography as he documents his father’s emotions.

Phillip Toledano, Days with my Father 2010

Finally, the last concept in my photographic study is the word ‘fate.’ This can also be interpreted in both Laia Abril’s and Phillip Toledo’s projects. The word fate can be described in various ways such as: ‘the development of events outside a person’s control, regarded as predetermined by a supernatural power’ or ‘be destined to happen, turn out, or act in a particular way.’

The word fate can also be referred to the Greek and Roman mythology about the three goddesses who preside over the birth and life of humans. Each person was thought of as a spindle, around the three Fates. These were Clotho, which is seen as the one who spins the thread of life, Lachesis, which determines how long one lives, and Atropos, which decides when individuals die and how. They all spin the thread of human destiny. Abril and Toledano look at fate in a similar way as it references to the fate of a person’s life.

In Toledano’s project ‘Days with my father’ he refers to the fate of his father. Memory loss frequently comes with old age, but can this be seen as fate or a result of previous life choices? In another one of Toledano’s project entitled ‘Maybe’, he decided to confront his fears of death and aging, by photographing his “future selves” in various stages he could imagine himself experiencing at the end of his life. Toledano began by taking a DNA test to determine illnesses he was likely to get. He consulted with fortune-tellers, hypnotists, and researched insurance company statistics. He then sought the help of Adam Morrow, who specialises in makeup and prosthetics. Toledano himself feels we as humans do not have control over our fate as he admits “When my mother died, it made me realise that you do not have any control over your destiny at all,” (www.toledano.com) This is reflected in his project as he shows different ways in which his life could turn out in years to come, indicating there is a equal possibility of all of these as his fate is out of his hands. There were various versions of photograph, showing his ‘future selves’ for example ‘Office Job’, a photograph where he sits in a office chair with stacks of paper behind him, forming the background. This contrasts with other images made within the book such as a photograph entitled ‘Plastic Surgery’ where he appears to have had his facial structure modified as he stands in a suit and bow tie, suggesting he is someone important. He described this as seeing himself as an old man. “I would envision failure and loneliness. I would be invisible. Unable to walk. Obese. I would suffer a stroke. I would lose myself. I would slip sideways, into the irrelevant.I would see my own death.” (www.toledano.com.) Our experiences could be seen as something out of our control as our life is planned for us and supports the debate of determinism vs free will. The idea of free will is the concept which believes we make our own choices in life, these choices result in consequences and these consequences are our path in life. This juxtaposes against the belief Toledano has on the outcome of lives, but is a notion many people who do not follow religion would adopt. This theory is supported by science and research which found discovered that lifestyle and poor health choices early in life not only affect memory later in life, but also affect memory among younger adults as well.  A study conducted by UCLA has shown that if you are depressed; do not get enough exercise; have lower education levels or have high blood pressure, you may notice that memory loss is becoming an issue at any age, specially in later life. This revelation indicates life choices can in fact affect your later life. This image by Toledano entitled ‘Drunk again’ can be a interpreted in both of these ways. The background of the image is mostly dark with faded lights in the distance, which almost looks like bokeh effect. This is a photographic technique where the lens renders out of focus at points of light. This background attracts the eyes naturally to the man himself, which is clearly a staged image and made to look like an action shot of a drunk man. His face and the top of his head is wet, suggesting it had been or was raining. His hair is thin, which is a sign of alcohol abuse and his left eye is bleeding, implying he has fallen over or been in a fight as a result of being drunk. He is dressed in a suit, suggesting he has a well-respected or professional job. This photograph proposes that the man is not happy in his life or job and often abuses alcohol to relieve his pain and forget about how unhappy he is. He looks almost disappointed with himself but can’t stop, expressed through the word again after drunk in the title. This could be seen as a tableaux image, based on a true situation and presented as a documentary image. Was he always going to be an alcoholic or did he choose this path? The argument is if his experiences were planned, leading to this alcohol abuse,  this be seen as fate, which is out of his control or did he chose what he did in his life, making decisions for himself including becoming an alcoholic?  Toledano would argue it is fate and we will never know our future or what will happen to us further down the line.

Phillip Toledano, Maybe, 2015

“The future became a shadowed landscape, filled with uncertain paths 
and ruinous storms”- Phillip Toledano

Similarly, Laia Abril looks at the fate of Cammy’s life and whether her death was due to fate or poor decisions throughout her life.  The experiences she faced growing up might have been seen as fate, experiences Cammy herself had no control over or it could be seen as the choices and experiences within her life were chosen by Cammy. For this specific project it is up to the interpretation of the viewer. After researching into eating disorders I found some shocking statistics such as:  “The mortality rate associated with anorexia nervosa is 12 times higher than the death rate of ALL causes of death for females 15 – 24 years old.” And: “20% of people suffering from anorexia will prematurely die from complications related to their eating disorder, including suicide and heart problems”.  This figures were taken from the South Carolina Department of Mental Health.  Personally, I feel it is a choice to stop eating knowing the damage being done. However, the experiences that lead to Cammy feeling like she had to do this was not Cammy’s choices but fate as no one has control over the experiences you face. But it is the way you react to these experiences which makes it a decision. An image made by Abril which I feel is immensely powerful is of an object. This object is a weighing scale, which displays the weight of your body. This object could be seen as the reason for Cammy’s death as she would have never been satisfied with the number on the scales. This would have led to her neglecting her food and this resulted in her becoming Bulimic. This means she would binge eat in a short amount of time and then throw up. This was in efforts to lose weight to be ‘slim’ and achieve her unrealistic goals. The scales in the photograph would have been a huge part of her daily life as she would have probably used these to track how much weight she had lost and would continue until she was happy with her weight. The sad thing about Bulimia is that it is extremely difficult to stop when you have started. The lighting is clearly artificial as it has a white tone to it, which empathises the white scales, making the viewers eyes attracted to them. It is taken in a bird line view to show the scales how Cammy would have seen them as she stepped on them when weighing herself. This would be a object of Cammy’s, which the people who loved her would have hated and therefore does not provide a good memory of Cammy like other objects might have. This photograph represents her pain.

Laia Abril, The Epilogue, 2014

Overall, Phillip Toledano’s and Laia Abril’s work uses very similar styles of photography and they both convey similar messages in their final outcomes, although they are both referring to different topics. My question aimed to identify how both artists explore notions of change, fate and absence. Throughout my essay I have discussed my reasoning behind this, considering how the work may be interpreted in different ways, linking this to my own work. From studying both Toledano’s and Abril’s projects, alongside creating my own, I have learnt the three concepts can create an overall theme and link together. Change and absence can be seen as a consequence of fate, something none of us can control. These changes and absences can bring us happiness but it can also result in our saddest moments,  I believe both photographers have explored this factor clearly within their work. I have also attempted to show this in my own book. The assumption fate is out of our control can not truly be a fact, just as the idea we make our own decisions leading us to our paths can not be proved.  However, interpretation will play a significant role in your beliefs. This essay provides mine.

“Taking an image, freezing a moment, reveals how rich reality truly is.”

— Anonymous

https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/gallery/2010/may/16/days-with-my-father

https://collectordaily.com/book-phillip-toledano-days-with-my-father/

https://www.newyorker.com/culture/photo-booth/off-the-shelf-days-with-my-father

http://www.dayswithmyfather.com/ways-cope-memory-loss/

http://aphotoeditor.com/2011/01/20/phil-toledano-interview/

http://www.theartstory.org/movement-straight-photography.htm

https://www.destinsparks.com

https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2010/apr/18/street-photography-privacy-surveillance

http://media.artic.edu/stieglitz/straight-photography/

http://www.laiaabril.com

https://www.lensculture.com/articles/laia-abril-the-epilogue

http://cphmag.com/abril-epilogue/

https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/photography-blog/2014/aug/26/laia-abril-epilogue-photobook-eating-disorders-cammy-robinson-bulimia

http://blog.photoeye.com/2014/10/book-review-epilogue.html

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b008cwzq

http://lenscratch.com/2016/02/phil-toledano-maybe/

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/photography/proof/2017/01/through-the-lens-phil-toledano/

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/20/opinion/the-many-sad-fates-of-mr-toledano.html

http://brghealth.com/are-your-lifestyle-choices-are-affecting-your-memory/

http://www.state.sc.us/dmh/anorexia/statistics.htm

‘Days with my father’- Phillip Toledano

‘The Epilogue’- Laia Abril

http://bigthink.com/Picture-This/the-minds-eye-freud-and-photography

 

PERSONAL STUDY // DRAFT 2

  • After compleating the firs draft of my essay i re-read it and considered how i could expand my arguement of subjectivity and my knowledge on the areas which this topic includes. I read works on aesthetics and the politics of photography and constructed this into my essay using useful and helpful quotes to back up my understanding of the concepts, then used these to discuss whether the aesthetics of Salgados work affects their authenticity.

How does subjectivity affect the authenticity of photographs representing third world countries?’

‘Documentary photography constructs representations of reality according to someone’s view, their desire to see.’[1]

 

The authenticity of an image can be impacted by many aspects, one being subjectiveness. Subjectivity is the allowance of the photographer to be influenced by their own personal opinion and view. In my personal study I will be investigating how subjectivity affects the authenticity of photographs which attempt to represent third world countries. Third world countries such as India and Africa have been a subject to the photographic world for decades. The colourful cultures which contrast with the heart-breaking issues of poverty and disease have been seen as a popular topic for many documentary photographs. This is due to the powerful messages and stories which can be conveyed through photographs of these captivating areas. The representation of these areas of the world has been open to criticism and often critics have highlighted the lack of authenticity portrayed and questioned the rawness of the image. Steve McCurry has gained increasing amounts of criticism over the past decade with photographic critic, Teju Cole, says that ‘The pictures where staged or made to look as if they were’[2] creating ‘a too perfect picture’. Through the exploration of straight photography I will consider whether ever since the beginning of this theory photographers have ever really been wholly objective due to their minds eye always meaning images have some personal influence, even if it is just the angle the camera is positioned at which could exaggerate a story. Furthermore with the consideration of my critical analysis of the key photographer capturing global issues of the century, Sebastiao Salgado I will investigate the impacts of the inside/outside on a photographer’s ability to be objective through the use of Abigial Solamon-Godeaus essay. Taking all of these factors into consideration I will decide whether photographs can ever represent third world countries with a sense of complete rawness of reality because everyone is unconsciously has a desire to document their view.

The idea of representing the visual world and more specifically the third world in an accurate way first emerged in the early 20th century when photographers such as Paul Strandt and Alfred Stieglitz pioneered Straight Photography. This theory aimed at creating photographs which acted as realistic, descriptive records, as photographs were not to be manipulated but sharply depict the scene or subject as the camera sees it. Straight photography similar to pure photography describes the cameras ability to realistically reproduce an image of authenticity. With these aspects as the basic concept of straight photography we would imagine that all photographers following these principles would create representations of the third world in photographs which are nearly perfect records of reality. However this is not the case. The Objectivity of a photograph was as important as its realism when photographs were being used to represent social, economic and political issues. However photographs began to introduce subjectivity were photography was freer and the images that were being taken were visual representations of a person’s feelings tastes and opinions, showing deeper personal emotion towards a subject. It became known that one photograph could be interpreted differently by different people. Now photographs are being used as persuasion, where mass media is publishing images of different levels of objectivity. Photography which is subjective is being used as propaganda material to persuade people to have a certain belief which the photographer wants. Therefore subjectivity must be effecting the levels of objectivity in photographs representing third world countries. I believe that no matter how objective the aims of a photographer may be they are always going to have a personal opinion of the angle they shoot at the amount the image is cropped and I think this this choice of unconscious manipulation from the photographer is always going to lower the extent to which an image is authentic.

Sebastiao Salgado, a world- renowned photographer, has been captivated by capturing images of environmental and social issues for the past few decades and in his third long term photo series ‘ Genesis’ he focuses on global issues through capturing images of wildlife, landscapes and human communities. The natural areas that he captures show the communities which continue to live in accordance with their ancestral traditions and cultures.  Genesis is a body of work which is regarded as a potential path to humanity’s rediscovery of nature in its true form. Salgados spectacular series of black and white images have the aim of raising public awareness about pressing environmental issues but has he as a photographer allowed subjectivity to affect the authenticity of his images?

Refugees at Korem Camp, Ethiopia, Genesis, 1984 – Sebastiao Salgado

Salgados image from Ethiopia where he captures refugees at the korem camp allows us to interpret and analyse how he captures his image and whether is it noticeable that his images are raw or he has allowed subjectivity to alter the truth behind the scene. The images shows 4 protagonists who tell the story of the image, they are located in the foreground middle and background of the image. Through the creation of layers in the image the depth of field is more appealing creating a more aesthetic image. The extensive depth of field brings all aspects of the image into focus making the audience feel like they are in the situation. This impact is also caused on the audience by the level that Salgado has shot at. By being level with the main protagonist of the image he is creating the feeling that he was a part of the scene. Salgado also skilfully fills the whole frame by having the subjects feel the majority of the picture. This could emphasise that there has been an element of planning gone into taking this photograph as it has been thoughtfully captured. This may suggest that Salgado is a subjective photographer as he has let his own opinion and mind’s eye have influence of the angles which may emphasise the meaning of the image. The arrangement of the image is also clever on Salgados part as the emptiness that surrounds the subject has the direct impact that leads us to believe that these people are lonely and receive little help. The lighting in the image is created by an over cast of clouds which creates a sober tone to the image which seems fitting with its tragic story and exaggerates its argument. Salgado use of the Kodak TRI – X film camera allows him to produce sharp images which reflect the reality of the situation he is in and as well as capture lighting which is characteristically spectacular, with plenty of backlighting and operatic contrasts.. His images are then “carefully worked on in a ‘laboratory’ or in dark rooms” [3]to create images which have vast tonal ranges and high amounts of contrast between pure white and pure black. This technique creates beautiful yet dramatized images which has led to critics such as Michael Kimmelman stating that Salgados “photographs are so stupendously gorgeous that they make you forget everything else while you are looking at them.”[4] Here we see another example of how Salgado may be subjective, as his want to create beauty in the images has drawn him away from emphasising the real subject pf global issues. Therefore subjectivity in Salgados work has affected his ability to represent third world countries authentically.

The meaning of Sebastiao Salgados most recent series of images ‘Genesis’ was to create awareness of Global issues. His image from Ethiopia is an example of global issues in Africa, one of the many countries he travelled too during his project. The image tells the story of possibly a family experiencing the very real issue of famine, poverty and disease. The image tells this story through the use of the subjects. Firstly the clothing that they are wearing are tattered pieces of cloth wrapped around them, this immediately connotes poverty and the lack of resources in this area of the world. Secondly it is noticeable that the main protagonist, the young boy, in the front of the images significance is that he shows that young children are experiences these hardships. The relevance of the child being in the Foreground of the image is that poverty stricken children have a bigger impact on the audience, therefore the image is harder hitting and may encourage more people to contribute to helping with these global issues. However we are unable to justify this as a truly realistic situation because the arrangement of the refugees may have been naturally occurring but Salgado could have also placed the young boy at the front to create this propaganda material which may lead to the image being more shocking to the audience creating more attention for his work and global issues.  

Salgado’s photography is artistically beautiful. The underlying tone of romanticism which is portrayed in his images shows his inability to be entirely object which subsequently effects the authenticity of his images as he is manipulating them to show situations which are more beautiful than what he experienced in reality. Therefore his representations of Third world countries are not entirely honest to reality. In The Telegraphs article ‘Sebastião Salgado: A God’s eye view of the planet – interview’, Sarfraz Manzoor talks to Salgado about his experiences of looking at life from behind the lens. During the interview Salgado admits that he thinks “Photography is not objective,” he continues to tell Manzoor “It is deeply subjective – my photography is consistent ideologically and ethically with the person I am.”[5] Salgado admits that photography is subjective including his own however he states that he is being subject in the way that he is making artwork which are raw realities of the third world. This suggests that as his photographs aim to be didactic and revelatory his images even though subject are authentic representations of the global issues that he captures.

Salgados beautification of global issues may present that he has been influenced less so by straight photography moment and more by the emergence of post modernity into photography. The elements of this movement are the rejection of the aesthetics upon the predecessor. It is hard to label Salgado as a post-modernist as I do not think that he consciously creates narratives in his images, but more is affected by the artistic means of creating aesthetically pleasing images. With the harsh tonal range and the almost perfect composition Salgado creates images similar to that of Ansel Adams. Adams however used aesthetics to create artworks of landscapes, the impact of this beautification of documentary photography has a bigger impact on the whole message behind the images. Has the aestheticization of Salgados images weakened their authenticity? It is evident that Salgado is subject in the form that he wants images with the beauty of paintings; this has the effect of taking away the powerfulness of the true subject of the image. As a photojournalist the implications of Salgado’s aestheticization of suffering Is that it deflects the impact of the images. The viewer is now being distanced from the authentic encounter which salgado has experienced. In ‘The aestheticization of life by photography’, Mariola Sulkowska states that ‘the modus of the contemporary world has become aesthetics’[6]. For photographers documenting matters of the third world these images should possess rawness and be true to the reality however this is becoming less of the subject of photographers.  David Levi Strauss tackles the relation between aesthetics and politics and the effects of this on the authenticity of photographs whilst analysing critic’s comments on Salgados photography. Ingrid Sischy has a negative view on Salgados representations that the aesthetics in his images have become more important than the politics and reality as she states ‘Salgado is too busy with the compositional aspects of his pictures.’[7] Furthermore she emphasises her opinion with that facts that Salgado is obsessed with finding the beauty in the ‘Twisted forms of his anguished subjects.’ [8]Sischy implies that his subjective nature to want visually aesthetic images is destroying the reality of the situation which he experienced and should have been capturing. However Strauss also explores Eduardo Galeano’s contrdictary view of salgados work. Galeano states that ‘Salgado photographs from inside solidarity.’ [9]The two views are so contradictoary it is thinkable that they may be looking at images. Galeana’s impression of salgados work suggests that he thinks his representations of third world countries are not subjective but more so a picture of reality as he is being one from the inside of these cultures and therefore his images are authentic.

Key research, which expanded my knowledge on how subjectivity can affect authenticity, included the works of Abigail Solomon-Godeau, an American art historian. Solomon-Godeau explores in depth the effects of the inside/outside approach. Her essay ‘Inside/out’ thoroughly considers how being an insider vs being an outsider may have different impacts on the representation of images. This can be linked to subjectivity and how it can affect the authenticity of images representing third world countries. Solomon-Godeau says that insiders produce more realistic images as they are experienced in that area. She states “The insider position – in particular context, the “good” position – is thus understood to imply a position of engagement, participation, and privileged knowledge, whereas the second, the outsider’s position, is taken to produce an alienated and voyeuristic relationship which heightens the distance between subject and object.” [10]Here she suggests that as the insider, a photographer who lives in a third world country taking images of the area they live in, has experience and a relationship built with the location and community they are able to represent it in a more realistic way. This implies further that outsiders are then more subjective because they don’t know the traditions of the area and what is reality for these third world countries. They are outsiders going into areas of global issue creating an opinion of what they interpret the situation as being. An outsider photographing the exotic other is more likely to exploit them and represent the situation falsefully. Therefore how can an individual in the “position of total exteriority” [11] represent a third world country objectively? This may in fact be impossible. Is Solamon-Godeau’s final paragraph states a strong opinion that insider/outsider which holds cultural bias is always going to show the truth behind the image. She states that “a truth always veiled that reflects the philosophical divide between seeing and being.”[12] I understand this closing statement to mean that not matter whether the photographer is an insider or an outsider a photograph is never going to be able to be completely objective in representing third world countries because ever photographer is seeing through the camera and trying to capture a moment which can ever really only be realistic if they are being in the situation. Ashley la Grange, critically analyses Solamon-Godeaus photo essay and concludes that “Solamon Godeau presents a logical argument”[13], view areas of the inside/outside approach are considered and studied deeply for how it results in all photographers having different representations.

Abigail Solamon-Godeau’s arguments can be used to critic Sebastiao Salgados work of representing third world countries. Salgado is an outsider and a figure of exteriority in the areas of global issue which he focuses on in Genesis. Therefore after consideration of Solamon-godeaus arguments we portray his images to be subjective because he is looking at a situation which is not natural to him. However Salgados longitudinal project may have transformed him from being an outsider creating subjective images and being influenced by his opinion and want to represent these countries in a way which showed there global issues maybe in an exaggerated way. But by the end of his projects he had spent a significant amount of time in these locations and started to be an insider understanding the cultures of these areas, this may have influenced Salgado to be more objective as a photographer and follow closer to the principles of straight photography capturing what the camera immediately sees rather than what his mind’s eye is seeing. Through my own experience of photographing third world countries I found my photographs were particularly subjective. I found that my images contained a sense of structure and falseness to reality as I had positioned myself to create angles which would tell a specific story and adapted where the subject may have been standing to create almost a commercialised image. Nonetheless I had gone to Burkina Faso, Africa with knowledge of the issues of representation and the problems with that are subjective could have altered the authenticity of my images for representing the poverty and hardship that the community was enduring. Due to this I made sure that although choosing the specific angles and moments which would create the images I wanted, showing my own subjectivity towards photography, I also considered that as an outsider I didn’t want to falsely represent the reality that I was seeing and tried at all times to make sure that the rawness of the situation was never altered. Therefore from my own works I can answer my question that my own desire for the type of images I wanted to create affected the authenticity of my images. However it is possible to still capture images of truth to the situation even when being subjective as long as you do not let your subjectivity over rule the cameras natural ability to capture a situation as we see it.

Subjectivity can affect the authenticity of photographs representing third world countries in two main ways; firstly the photographers allowance of their minds eye to control what they’re capturing. Secondly the influence of the photographer being an insider or an outsider. La Grange sums these findings up in her closing statements when analysing Abigail Solamon- Godeaus, ‘inside/out’ when she states, “In all the examples given there is always a photographer, someone who selects the angle of the view, the subject, the medium…” [14]Here she emphasises on the point that there is always going to be an opinion behind the camera, an individual which is going to interpret their situation due to their beliefs, experience and upbringing. These are the factors in which subjectivity can affect the authenticity of representations of third world countries. I agree with critic Solamon-Godeau that an outsider is always going to be more subjective than the insider. The outsider’s ability to document observations of reality is flawed as they don’t have the experience to truly understand the third world. It is further evident that there is a rigid dichotomy between how the insider and outsider represent third world countries and this may be due to either being unconsciously subjective. Moreover the authenticity of images representing third world countries is weakened by the aestheticization of the subject; the process of creating an aesthetic image is not objective but subjective. Every photograph must be a negotiation with the complex act of communication, for example if you want the message to be powerful you need eye catching images however they must not be to aesthetically composed otherwise this takes away  from the message and impact of the subject. As Susan Sontag states, ‘Beautiful photographs drain attention from the sobering subject and turns it towards the medium itself, thereby compromising the pictures status as a document.”

 

 

 

[1] Photo essay – Mary ellen mark

[2] Teju cole

[3] Paruati Nair – A different light – page 11

[4] Can suffering be to beautiful – Michael Kimmelman

[5] The Telegraph – Sarfraz Manzoor

[6] ‘The aestheticization of life by photography’, Mariola Sulkowska

[7] Ingrid sischy

[8] Ingrid sischy

[9] Eduardo Galeano

[10] Abigial solamon godeau – inside/out – page 49

[11] Abigial solamon godeau – inside/out – page 51

[12] Abigial solamon godeau – inside/out – page 61

[13] Ashley la Grange – basic critical theory for photographers – chapter 6 – page 130

[14] Ashley La Grange – basic critical theory for photographers p130

PERSONAL STUDY // DRAFT 1

How does subjectivity affect the authenticity of photographs representing third world countries?’

 

‘Documentary photography constructs representations of reality accordingto someone’s view, their desire to see.’[1]

 

The authenticity of an image can be impacted by many aspects, one being subjectiveness. Subjectivity is the allowance of the photographer to be influenced by their own personal opinion and view. In my personal study I will be investigating how subjectivity affects the authenticity of photographs which attempt to represent third world countries. Third world countries such as India and Africa have been a subject to the photographic world for decades. The colourful cultures which contrast with the heart-breaking issues of poverty and disease have been seen as a popular topic for many documentary photographs. This is due to the powerful messages and stories which can be conveyed through photographs of these captivating areas. The representation of these areas of the world has been open to criticism and often critics have highlighted the lack of authenticity portrayed and questioned the rawness of the image. Steve McCurry has gained increasing amounts of criticism over the past decade with photographic critic, Teju Cole, says that ‘The pictures where staged or made to look as if they were’[2] creating ‘a too perfect picture’. Through the exploration of straight photography I will consider whether ever since the beginning of this theory photographers have ever really been wholly objective due to their minds eye always meaning images have some personal influence, even if it is just the angle the camera is positioned at which could exaggerate a story. Furthermore with the consideration of my critical analysis of the key photographer capturing global issues of the century, Sebastiao Salgado I will investigate the impacts of the inside/outside on a photographer’s ability to be objective through the use of Abigial Solamon-Godeaus essay. Taking all of these factors into consideration I will decide whether photographs can ever represent third world countries with a sense of complete rawness of reality because everyone is unconsciously has a desire to document their view.

The idea of representing the visual world and more specifically the third world in an accurate way first emerged in the early 20th century when photographers such as Paul Strandt and Alfred Stieglitz pioneered Straight Photography. This theory aimed at creating photographs which acted as realistic, descriptive records, as photographs were not to be manipulated but sharply depict the scene or subject as the camera sees it. Straight photography similar to pure photography describes the cameras ability to realistically reproduce an image of authenticity. With these aspects as the basic concept of straight photography we would imagine that all photographers following these principles would create representations of the third world in photographs which are nearly perfect records of reality. However this is not the case. The Objectivity of a photograph was as important as its realism when photographs were being used to represent social, economic and political issues. However photographs began to introduce subjectivity were photography was freer and the images that were being taken were visual representations of a person’s feelings tastes and opinions, showing deeper personal emotion towards a subject. It became known that one photograph could be interpreted differently by different people. Now photographs are being used as persuasion, where mass media is publishing images of different levels of objectivity. Photography which is subjective is being used as propaganda material to persuade people to have a certain belief which the photographer wants. Therefore subjectivity must be effecting the levels of objectivity in photographs representing third world countries. I believe that no matter how objective the aims of a photographer may be they are always going to have a personal opinion of the angle they shoot at the amount the image is cropped and I think this this choice of unconscious manipulation from the photographer is always going to lower the extent to which an image is authentic.

Sebastiao Salgado, a world- renowned photographer, has been captivated by capturing images of environmental and social issues for the past few decades and in his third long term photo series ‘ Genesis’ he focuses on global issues through capturing images of wildlife, landscapes and human communities. The natural areas that he captures show the communities which continue to live in accordance with their ancestral traditions and cultures.  Genesis is a body of work which is regarded as a potential path to humanity’s rediscovery of nature in its true form. Salgados spectacular series of black and white images have the aim of raising public awareness about pressing environmental issues but has he as a photographer allowed subjectivity to affect the authenticity of his images?

Refugees at Korem Camp, Ethiopia, Genesis, 1984 – Sebastiao Salgado

Salgados image from Ethiopia where he captures refugees at the korem camp allows us to interpret and analyse how he captures his image and whether is it noticeable that his images are raw or he has allowed subjectivity to alter the truth behind the scene. The images shows 4 protagonists who tell the story of the image, they are located in the foreground middle and background of the image. Through the creation of layers in the image the depth of field is more appealing creating a more aesthetic image. The extensive depth of field brings all aspects of the image into focus making the audience feel like they are in the situation. This impact is also caused on the audience by the level that Salgado has shot at. By being level with the main protagonist of the image he is creating the feeling that he was a part of the scene. Salgado also skilfully fills the whole frame by having the subjects feel the majority of the picture. This could emphasise that there has been an element of planning gone into taking this photograph as it has been thoughtfully captured. This may suggest that Salgado is a subjective photographer as he has let his own opinion and mind’s eye have influence of the angles which may emphasise the meaning of the image. The arrangement of the image is also clever on Salgados part as the emptiness that surrounds the subject has the direct impact that leads us to believe that these people are lonely and receive little help. The lighting in the image is created by an over cast of clouds which creates a sober tone to the image which seems fitting with its tragic story and exaggerates its argument. Salgado use of the Kodak TRI – X film camera allows him to produce sharp images which reflect the reality of the situation he is in and as well as capture lighting which is characteristically spectacular, with plenty of backlighting and operatic contrasts.. His images are then “carefully worked on in a ‘laboratory’ or in dark rooms” [3]to create images which have vast tonal ranges and high amounts of contrast between pure white and pure black. This technique creates beautiful yet dramatized images which has led to critics such as Michael Kimmelman stating that Salgados “photographs are so stupendously gorgeous that they make you forget everything else while you are looking at them.”[4] Here we see another example of how Salgado may be subjective, as his want to create beauty in the images has drawn him away from emphasising the real subject pf global issues. Therefore subjectivity in Salgados work has affected his ability to represent third world countries authentically.

The meaning of Sebastiao Salgados most recent series of images ‘Genesis’ was to create awareness of Global issues. His image from Ethiopia is an example of global issues in Africa, one of the many countries he travelled too during his project. The image tells the story of possibly a family experiencing the very real issue of famine, poverty and disease. The image tells this story through the use of the subjects. Firstly the clothing that they are wearing are tattered pieces of cloth wrapped around them, this immediately connotes poverty and the lack of resources in this area of the world. Secondly it is noticeable that the main protagonist, the young boy, in the front of the images significance is that he shows that young children are experiences these hardships. The relevance of the child being in the Foreground of the image is that poverty stricken children have a bigger impact on the audience, therefore the image is harder hitting and may encourage more people to contribute to helping with these global issues. However we are unable to justify this as a truly realistic situation because the arrangement of the refugees may have been naturally occurring but Salgado could have also placed the young boy at the front to create this propaganda material which may lead to the image being more shocking to the audience creating more attention for his work and global issues.  

Salgado’s photography is artistically beautiful. The underlying tone of romanticism which is portrayed in his images shows his inability to be entirely object which subsequently effects the authenticity of his images as he is manipulating them to show situations which are more beautiful than what he experienced in reality. Therefore his representations of Third world countries are not entirely honest to reality. In The Telegraphs article ‘Sebastião Salgado: A God’s eye view of the planet – interview’, Sarfraz Manzoor talks to Salgado about his experiences of looking at life from behind the lens. During the interview Salgado admits that he thinks “Photography is not objective,” he continues to tell Manzoor “It is deeply subjective – my photography is consistent ideologically and ethically with the person I am.”[5] Salgado admits that photography is subjective including his own however he states that he is being subject in the way that he is making artwork which are raw realities of the third world. This suggests that as his photographs aim to be didactic and revelatory his images even though subject are authentic representations of the global issues that he captures.

Key research which expanded my knowledge on how subjectivity can affect authenticity included the works of Abigail Solomon-Godeau, an American art historian. Solomon-Godeau explores in depth the effects of the inside/outside approach. Her essay ‘Inside/out’ thoroughly considers how being an insider vs being an outsider may have different impacts on the representation of images. This can be linked to subjectivity and how it can affect the authenticity of images representing third world countries. Solomon-Godeau says that insiders produce more realistic images as they are experienced in that area. She states “The insider position – in particular context, the “good” position – is thus understood to imply a position of engagement, participation, and privileged knowledge, whereas the second, the outsider’s position, is taken to produce an alienated and voyeuristic relationship which heightens the distance between subject and object.” [6]Here she suggests that as the insider, a photographer who lives in a third world country taking images of the area they live in, has experience and a relationship built with the location and community they are able to represent it in a more realistic way. This implies further that outsiders are then more subjective because they don’t know the traditions of the area and what is reality for these third world countries. They are outsiders going into areas of global issue creating an opinion of what they interpret the situation as being. An outsider photographing the exotic other is more likely to exploit them and represent the situation falsefully. Therefore how can an individual in the “position of total exteriority” [7] represent a third world country objectively? This may in fact be impossible. Is Solamon-Godeau’s final paragraph states a strong opinion that insider/outsider which holds cultural bias is always going to show the truth behind the image. She states that “a truth always veiled that reflects the philosophical divide between seeing and being.”[8] I understand this closing statement to mean that not matter whether the photographer is an insider or an outsider a photograph is never going to be able to be completely objective in representing third world countries because ever photographer is seeing through the camera and trying to capture a moment which can ever really only be realistic if they are being in the situation. Ashley la Grange, critically analyses Solamon-Godeaus photo essay and concludes that “Solamon Godeau presents a logical argument”[9], view areas of the inside/outside approach are considered and studied deeply for how it results in all photographers having different representations.

Abigail Solamon-Godeau’s arguments can be used to critic Sebastiao Salgados work of representing third world countries. Salgado is an outsider and a figure of exteriority in the areas of global issue which he focuses on in Genesis. Therefore after consideration of Solamon-godeaus arguments we portray his images to be subjective because he is looking at a situation which is not natural to him. However Salgados longitudinal project may have transformed him from being an outsider creating subjective images and being influenced by his opinion and want to represent these countries in a way which showed there global issues maybe in an exaggerated way. But by the end of his projects he had spent a significant amount of time in these locations and started to be an insider understanding the cultures of these areas, this may have influenced Salgado to be more objective as a photographer and follow closer to the principles of straight photography capturing what the camera immediately sees rather than what his mind’s eye is seeing. Through my own experience of photographing third world countries I found my photographs were particularly subjective. I found that my images contained a sense of structure and falseness to reality as I had positioned myself to create angles which would tell a specific story and adapted where the subject may have been standing to create almost a commercialised image. Nonetheless I had gone to Burkina Faso, Africa with knowledge of the issues of representation and the problems with that are subjective could have altered the authenticity of my images for representing the poverty and hardship that the community was enduring. Due to this I made sure that although choosing the specific angles and moments which would create the images I wanted, showing my own subjectivity towards photography, I also considered that as an outsider I didn’t want to falsely represent the reality that I was seeing and tried at all times to make sure that the rawness of the situation was never altered. Therefore from my own works I can answer my question that my own desire for the type of images I wanted to create affected the authenticity of my images. However it is possible to still capture images of truth to the situation even when being subjective as long as you do not let your subjectivity over rule the cameras natural ability to capture a situation as we see it.

Subjectivity can affect the authenticity of photographs representing third world countries in two main ways; firstly the photographers allowance of their minds eye to control what they’re capturing. Secondly the influence of the photographer being an insider or an outsider. La Grange sums these findings up in her closing statements when analysing Abigail Solamon- Godeaus, ‘inside/out’ when she states, “In all the examples given there is always a photographer, someone who selects the angle of the view, the subject, the medium…” [10]Here she emphasises on the point that there is always going to be an opinion behind the camera, an individual which is going to interpret their situation due to their beliefs, experience and upbringing. These are the factors in which subjectivity can affect the authenticity of representations of third world countries. I agree with critic Solamon-Godeau that an outsider is always going to be more subjective than the insider. The outsider’s ability to document observations of reality is flawed as they don’t have the experience to truly understand the third world. It is evident that there is a rigid dichotomy between how the insider and outsider represent third world countries and this may be due to either being unconsciously subjective.

 

[1] Photo essay – Mary ellen mark

[2] Teju cole

[3] Paruati Nair – A different light – page 11

[4] Can suffering be to beautiful – Michael Kimmelman

[5] The Telegraph – Sarfraz Manzoor

[6] Abigial solamon godeau – inside/out – page 49

[7] Abigial solamon godeau – inside/out – page 51

[8] Abigial solamon godeau – inside/out – page 61

[9] Ashley la Grange – basic critical theory for photographers – chapter 6 – page 130

[10] Ashley La Grange – basic critical theory for photographers p130