Mirror/reflection Research

I have been experimenting with the use of a mirror in relation to environment and performance. I have also seen how they have been used by artists such as Francesca Woodman, Claude Cahun and Clare Rae as well as many others who have utilised reflections.  Psychologically mirrors attract viewers attention because they reflect the “another us” and gives the impression of having a “perfect” twin.  I have done some more research about the symbolism of mirrors in culture focusing on art, literature and mythology.

Physically mirrors reflect light and the surrounding environment which has connotations of illumination and truth. Mirrors have often been compared to the human mind with the Greek root for Plato’s word idea ‘eidos’ literally meaning not just ‘image’ or ‘likeness’ but an image reflected in water or mirror. Mirrors in art suggest that the viewers should turn inwards to gain self-knowledge rather than outwards to the natural world.

Reflections are central devices in some of the great European paintings. A famous example is Jan van Eyck’s Wedding Portrait of Giovanni Arnolfini from 1434. Here, the mirror is situated centrally in the painting, directly above the clasped hands of the wedding couple. The mirror has a slightly curved form that not only reflects the objects in the room, but things happening beyond the picture’s frame, as well. The mirror shows a clear view of the couple’s back and  two witnesses standing in an open door frame. It presents something that would be occurring where the viewer is ‘standing’ and therefore they assume the position of witnesses. The mirror removes the gap between the pictorial space and the viewers space and makes them appear part of the story. 

This painting is  likely to have influenced Las Meninas by Diego Velázquez from the year 1656. This shows a large room in the Royal Alcazar of Madrid during the reign of King Philip IV of Spain. The Infanta Margarita is in the middle of the picture surrounded by her entourage. Above her head on the back wall of the room, is a mirror, although opinions vary on this and some people think it could actually be another painting . The artist himself is standing on the left side of the painting at his canvas and the painted surface is facing away from the viewer. The mirror could be reflecting two figures standing outside the picture’s borders. This would be King Philip V. and his wife Marianne, at whose court Velázquez was employed as a painter. If the royal couple are standing in front of the mirror, then they must be standing where the viewer is so that the viewer becomes part of the painting in a similar way to in that of Jan van Eyck’s Wedding Portrait. The interplay between observation and ”being observed” is caused.  The king and queen are supposedly “outside” the painting, yet their reflection in the back wall mirror also places them “inside” the pictorial space. 

The Rokeby Venus by Diego Velázquez  depicts the goddess Venus   lying on a bed and looking into a mirror. She is often thought to be looking at herself in the mirror however this is physically impossible since viewers can see her face reflected in their direction. This is known as the ‘Venus effect’ which is also seen in film when an actor will be shown  apparently looking at themselves in the mirror. What viewers see is different from what the actor sees, because the camera is not right behind the actor, but the position of the person is normally chosen so that their image is correctly framed in the mirror for the camera.

Mirrors were significant for the development of self-portraiture in painting and were also used for this purpose in the early days of photography . For example the photograph below is from the Edwardian period and shows an unidentified women  using her dresser mirror and a box camera to take a self-portrait.

Vivian Mainer is also well-known for her street photography from the 20th century and many of her photographs are self-portraits which were taken on the street using the reflections of windows in buildings.

I also came across the use of mirrors when researching Earth Art as an approach to the theme of ‘Environment’ for example by Robert Smithson. He critiqued art history’s ability to create static objects and remove them from the real world  context to museums  or galleries. His project ‘Yucatan Mirror Displacements’involved arranging mirrors in various landscapes. The mirrors reflected and refracted the surrounding environs, displacing the solidity of the landscape and shattering its forms’.  The purpose was to contemplate the moment with the mirror recording the passage of time and the photograph suspending time.

Smithson also created sculptures using mirrors such as the example below. He thought that taking natural materials out of their original contexts abstracted them and in this example coral has been arranged with mirrors so that it is multiplied and fragmented in the reflections. These reflections change in relation to the position of the viewer, so no two people experience it in precisely the same way.

Mirrors have also been significant symbols in literature. For example “The Lady of Shalott”, by Alfred, Lord Tennyson was a poem that inspired many artists. I came across this when studying the  Pre-Raphaelite movement for an earlier project featuring some contemporary responses to this style of art.  The poem is about a woman who is condemned to watch the world indirectly through a mirror that shows to her the changing scenes of Camelot. The reflected images are described as “shadows of the world”. If she does look at the world directly she will be cursed. One day the Lady sees the reflection of a man Sir Lancelot and breaks the rule and looks out of the window. The mirror cracks and she realises the curse has come true and she escapes the tower she has been living in and gets in a boat but dies before reaching the town. This representation of women has been viewed by some in the context of changing women’s roles in the 1880s and 1890s and it has been suggested that this served as a warning of imminent death to women who stepped from their restricted roles and explored their desires. William Holman Hunt has depicted the moment when the Lady turns to see Lancelot in his painting and some of Waterhouse’s most famous paintings were based on scenes from this poem. I think it is interesting to consider these connections between art and literature because in my own work I am considering combining by images with writing for the final presentations.

The Picture of Dorian Gray, by Oscar Wilde is another famous example of literature with the theme of a mirror. The character Dorian takes a mirror up to the locked room containing his portrait and compares his reflection with his painted portrait which ages instead of himself. When he realises the person he has become, he smashed the mirror “He loathed his own beauty, and flinging the mirror on the floor, crushed it into silver splinters beneath his heel”.

In the poem “Mirror”, by Sylvia Plath the object is described as uncanny. “I am silver and exact. I have no preconceptions. / Whatever I see I swallow immediately / Just as it is, unmisted by love or dislike”. The poem describes the life of a young woman growing older as she looks into her mirror.  The poem could span years or alternatively the women could be seeing a reflection of her future self. It appears that she wants to discover who she is by looking into it.

Stories about mirrors are also common in mythology and folklore with the well-known example being that if you break a mirror you will have seven years bad luck. This superstition dates back to the Romans, who believed that life renewed itself every seven years, and that breaking a mirror would damage the soul it was reflecting at the time for that duration. Many cultures believed mirrors reflected the ‘shadow soul,’ and could show the true nature of the person being reflected. This  contributed to the legends about vampires having no reflections as they are said to have no souls to reflect. Ancient Chinese believed that mirrors frightened away evil spirits who were scared by their own appearance. In Greek mythology there is a man named Narcissus who falls in love with his own reflection in a pool of water and unable to leave the beauty of his reflection loses the will to live. Narcissus is the origin of the term narcissism (a fixation with oneself and one’s physical appearance and/or public perception).This myth has inspired several artists as well with the most well known example by Caravaggio who painted a young man admiring his reflection in the water. Other artists who have explored this myth include Dali and Waterhouse.

 

Art Student – Presenting

Here are the final images I have selected for the art student stereotype. I selected these images to be presented as a diptych due to the masculine and feminine connotations of both the archetypes and coloured back drops. I selected the image on the left because it depicts the scruffier more laid back side of me, the state of concentration i often find myself in when I am painting. Although this image is constructed in a studio setting, it is a fairly accurate depiction of what I look like on days where I stay inside and work on my art, no makeup, hair uncrushed and covered in paint. I selected the image in the right to depict my more fashion conscious side because it displays all the colours I chose to wear as well as my novelty backpack which I think captures my fun and childlike side. Although the images are not strictly masculine and feminine, i think the two different coloured background work well to emphasise the contrast between the two images despite the subject being the same.

3rd Photo Shoot (Planning)

Destroying Negatives, Shoot Plan


After doing some research into different was that people have of destroying negatives to create new artwork I have decided to do this for a shoot (I don’t think “shoot” is the right word but I’m going to use it). I’m going to start off by taking a roll of film and shooting all of the images on it of the coast and possibly reservoirs and other water sources (the images will more likely be of the sea because that is the main focus of my project), and then I plan on getting the roll of negatives developed before using water to destroy, corrode or otherwise alter the negatives. By using different water sources and looking at and comparing the different ways that the images are distorted I can show how water is not all the same.

Fungus Damaged Film Slide

I have two plans for how I am going to go about this. The first is going to be involving the negatives from the roll that I will have taken, the second is going to be done using printed images that I have already taken on my digital camera. I am going to collect the water from 6 different sources for the project (about a buckets worth for each), some of the locations will produce different types of water and others will produce similar types of water. Despite this I am still looking forward to seeing the different results, the locations that I am going to source the water from are listed below:

  1. Queen’s Valley Reservoir
  2. Sea water from long beach
  3. La Rosière Desalination Plant
  4. Stream in St. Catherine’s woods
  5. Pool water
  6. Tap water from my home

Once I have collected the water I am going to bring it back to my house, once here a small amount of each sample is going to be poured into a tray that I have borrowed from the school’s science department, these are what will hold the printed images, I will use some blue tack to hold the images under the water and I will be keeping an eye on them to determine how long they should be kept in there for. I am expecting the images to run but I am not sure on specifically what will happen, this again lends to the uncertainness and ideas of the unknown and random that I am looking for in my project.

The trays that I borrowed/stole from the science department

The negatives are going to be done slightly different and will require more time and thought given to them. I have looked into the different ways to use water to edit negatives, and for the most part, simply submerging the negatives in the water will likely not do much due to the fact that negatives need water to be developed. The main cause of water damage to negatives is from fungus/mould that grows on the negatives and eats into the gelatin layer thereby destroying the image. This will make the process more involved because it will involve me removing the negatives from the water and drying them out before submerging them again. To involve the environment more I am going to also take pieces of the environment like sand or dirt, leaves and seaweed to keep in the buckets also.

To help me get the best out of this process I have been doing a lot of research online into water damaged film. Almost all of the results that came back were about how to recover film from water damage and cleaning them up afterwards. With this in mind however I will try and employ the opposite techniques to what they suggest, so this means that I will need to let the film dry to induce growth of fungus on the film and when they are drying I will not have them free floating, I will let them dry face down and curled up to induce distortion on the images. To try and understand a little more about the process of doing this I emailed someone who used to be a specialist in film restoration to see what he could tell me about this. the first thing Mick (I didn’t get his full name) told me was that:

“it’s not actually water that damages film, film is born and bred in water during processing, the issue is bacteria that will start to colonise the film once it is wet and remains wet for some time and these are responsible for the effect that is called water damage.”

He then suggested

“leaving some negatives (colour film may work better as the silver ions in B&W film are highly toxic to bacteria) in a bowl of pond water (no chlorine etc added that will impinge on the rate of growth) somewhere not too light (but it needn’t be dark) for a while.”

He could not give me specific time frames but he said anything from a few days to a week depending on where the images are stored. He also gave me one final piece of advice for possible health issues that I may encounter;

“careful, you are dealing with a potential biological hazard (known moulds on film include aspergillus fumigatus – Google it).”

Taking all of the information that I have gathered into account I have come up with a plan for how I am going to create this part of the project.

  • The first step will be to take the exposures on an appropriate roll of film, as Mick suggested I will not be using black and white film, from here I have chosen to use a roll of Fuji Superia 200 that expired last year. I chose this roll over some of the others that I have have for the main reason that it was the cheapest, because it was a little expired I got it at half price and it is not that expired so the images will turn out fine I’m sure. And as long as it is bright when I decide to shoot then I can use that film.
  • To take the exposures I will load up one of my cameras and will travel around the different waterways in Jersey (depending on time constraints I may have to just stick to photographs of the coast).
  • Once I have taken all of the exposures I will need to get the film developed, get the negatives back and cut them up into 6 sets of 6 or individually divided into 6 groups.
  • Then I need to collect the water from all of the different sources, bring them home, and submerge the negatives under the water.
  • After about an hour I will take them out and suspend them just above the water, making sure to splash them every 12 hours or so to make sure that they don’t completely dry out.
  • Other than this there is not much I can do except for handling the negatives roughly but while still wearing gloves and letting the gelatine surfaces stick to each other. Possibly touching the wet gelatine layers will distort the images but I’m not too sure.

To help me with this process I have got some negatives off a friend, these were almost all completely exposed and so are perfectly blank, this will allow me to see if there could be any changes that I might not be able to see on frames with images on them.

 

Photoshoot 4 Todd Hido/ Bill Henson Portrait Interior photoshoot

In response to Bill Henson and Todd Hido’s portraits, I wanted to explore the use of interior scenes and the use of natural lighting to build narrative and add emotion and feeling. In relation to my starting point, the natural light contrasts the dark spaces created by the walls and  small light sources. I took over 50 photographs, each experimenting with different ISO’s and exposures and I also left it on auto focus, this evoked a sense of depth without creating overly blurry photographs, I also tested long exposures to give the photos a ghostly effect. I did not use a tripod and in hindsight this would have been more beneficial for creating a sharper image especially when working with longer exposures. I decided to not use multiple exposures or HDR techniques unlike many of my previous landscape photographs as I wanted to keep the strong contrasts of dark space with the warm light. The composition of the photographs features closeups as well as shots that feature more of the open space which reflects a bigger sense of environment. I have also made the compositions to work with a book layout so they could possibly work with a double page spread but also just on a single page, complimented with a text on the opposite side.

I first edited the photograph in Photoshop by using the spot healing brush tool to remove lights and posters that cluttered the image.This would also enable more room for accompanying text. I then used the adjustments> Shadows/Highlights to add more light into the image without the lighter points being overexposed.

The strong contrasts reflect Bill Henson’s work with his use of chiaroscuoro. I wanted to keep most of them in colour as I wanted to reference how Todd Hido had created warm tones photographs with natural light, I adjusted the original images only slightly to give a slightly more even, cooler effect. I like how the light bounces off white surface which gives the photographs a softer effect.

I wanted to capture the light reflecting off Ryan’s face with Ryan facing the window, so each would be opposite each other. In the first photograph I like how the white wardrobe has reflected light into his neck, adding a sense of depth to the image. I set the image to a slower shutter speed for the second above image, creating this ghostly movement effect, I found this photograph worked best in black and white to bring out the tones and shades more. For the third image I used a quick exposure time to capture just the light that hits his face, also evoking a sharper image, the huge amount of black space creates similarities between Henson’s dark chiaroscuro style portraits.

I really like the above image for its use of Rembrandt lighting and how the lighting evokes an interesting glowing texture. I also like the contrast between the warm tones in the highlights and the cool shades in the background such as from the window. I decided to keep the window as I found it added a sense of depth to the image.

I decided to create a closeup portrait featuring only the light from he window and a plain background. I used the preset features to show experimentation, the last two images are two different cross process settings with add an interesting tint to the images inspired by how Bill Henson will often change the image white balance.

Below is an experimentation image inspired by Bill Henson. I added lots of contrast and clarity to give the photograph a grainy texture. I also added vibrancy to bring out the colours as well as changing the white balance to an overly cool tone.

Art Student Shoot 2 – Editing

Above is the initial contact sheet from my second, more fashion forward art student photoshoot. As seen above I experimented with using both my pink and blue backdrop but during the editing process I decided to use the photo with the pink backdrop incase I decided to display both art student stereotypes as a diptych. If I did decided to do this I felt that there would be a greater sense of contrast if the images had different background colours and the different coloured backgrounds connote ideas of masculinity and femininity, the first scruffy art student is more masculine and the second more fashion conscious art student is more feminine. When shortlisting the photos I also decided against using photos from the second outfit I used because I liked that the blue of the fluffy monster’s inc backpack would work well with the blue background of another images if I decide to use it as part of a diptych.

Here are the shortlisted photos from my fashion forward art student photoshoot. I selected these images because I felt that they captured the bubbly nature of the instagram active, stylish art student. As stated in my planning post I experimented with miming taking selfies and I shortlisted one of these images (above, centre). I edited these photos by cropping them as appropriate, increasing the brightness and contrast and slightly adjusting the levels. I also used the spot healing tool to remove any distracting blemishes and using the brush tool to smooth out the background as my pink backdrop was very wrinkled, even after ironing it as I couldn’t use the iron on too higher setting as I was at risk of melting the vinyl.

Bernhard and Hilla Becher – Topography inspiration

Before heading out to La Collette’s Energy from Waste facility to be escorted around I fist wanted to gather some inspiration for the kind of photography I am expecting to capture. Since the building is covered in windows I can observe that most of what I will be seeing will be complicated machinery and an extensive series of pipes. This kind of structure, along with my aim to show this facility from an intriguing yet still documentary standpoint, means that my next shoot will be focusing on using topographic photography techniques. Because of this, I have decided to look at the amazing photographers Bernhard and Hilla Bercher for their intriguing examples of capturing the beauty of industrial landscapes…

For over 40 years the pair used an 8×10 large-format camera to capture the architecture of industrialisation: water towers, coal bunkers, blast furnaces, gas tanks and factory facades. They did so in an obsessively formalist way that defined their own unique style and made them one of the most dominant influences in contemporary European photography and art. In the early years, with a young son in tow, they travelled across Europe and later the US for weeks at a time in a Volkswagen camper van, cooking and eating by the roadside. When asked in a recent interview why they only photographed industrial structures, Hilla replied: “Because they are honest. They are functional, and they reflect what they do – that is what we liked. A person always is what he or she wants to be, never what he or she is.” For Bernhard, the process of photographing and therefore fixing these brutalist structures forever was rooted in his love of the landscape he grew up in as a child. The huge buildings that dominated and defined his childhood in the Ruhr began to disappear rapidly in Germany’s postwar economic period, and he rightly sensed they would disappear elsewhere – across Europe, Britain and America. I have chosen this amazing couple as an inspiration for my next shoot at the ‘Energy from Waste’ facility because I absolutely love the simple yet fascinating way they have captured these artificial contraptions…

The Bechers were, first and foremost, formalists. “We want to offer the audience a point of view to understand and compare the different structures,” they once said. “Through photography, we try to arrange these shapes and render them comparable. To do so, the objects must be isolated from their context and freed from all association.” Much like the majority of the Becher’s work, this collection above depicts many different blast furnaces in different compositions, all printed in black and white and arranged in grids that emphasised their resemblance – what Hilla once called their “universality”. The meaning behind these images is to create straightforward historical documents of these vanishing industrial structures as well as beautiful topographic images. Although I will not be seeing this type of arrangement when visiting La Collette, I will be taking inspiration from the intricate way they have captured the angles and compositions from in between the pipes and framework.

As well as looking at the Bechers grid style outcomes I will also be taking a lot of inspiration from some of their more simple, close up work. The two photographs on the top row of the contact sheet above show detail captured from a Petrochemical Plant in 1983, Wesseling, Germany. These images depict some of the scenes I expect to find for my next shoot in the ‘Energy from Waste’ facility and I love their dynamic and structural composition. Below them, I have added three more industrial landscapes captured by the famous couple that was originally part of a much larger grid. These images depict old Stonework and Lime Kilns strategically captured against their environments. Alongside her late husband, Hilla saw structures that others might have dismissed as ugly, even threatening, and made them unforgettable.

Sewing into Photographs

Thinking about ways to display my photographs has lead me to the little experimentation below. As Hammond’s work was all about conveying the tactile nature of photographs by making them into sculptures i wanted to experiment with other ways to make my photographs tactile. Therefore i decided to sew into them. My photographs are all about the materials used to build the dens and building dens is a tactile experience. I therefore decided to create some images which revolved around a tactile experience. I photographed some plain white sheets and then decided to sew into them adding loads of bright colours. The whole point of the dens is also the bright and vibrant colours which causes them to clash with their surroundings and so i wanted to add colour to the white sheets. I think this also links quite well with my idea which came directly from Hammond’s work, the projecting of my images onto white sheets. Here instead of projecting the images i am sewing patterns and colours into the work. Overall i quite liked it as a little experimentation of creating tactile photographs. 

Artist reference: felicity Hammond

Now that i have all my photographs taken i am starting to think about how i want to display them as i final piece. Something which i thought was really interesting was how much my photographs were about process which i explored with organic architecture and photographing the adding of each element. As this became the whole point of my photographs, the photographs becoming more and more simply a recording of the dens existence i wanted to consider ways of displaying my work which revolved around keeping this tactile nature to my photographs. I therefore decided to look at an emerging photographer called Felicity Hammond who displays her work in a really interesting way.

Hammond creates her photographs as sculptures which she displays within a space. Her work explores construction sites and places of ruin and destruction.

“I spend around a year photographing the same site and documenting its development over that time. There is a Baroque feel to the landscapes I choose, and they become shrouded with tarpaulin that looks incredibly sculptural – just like dressed objects in classical paintings. There’s theatre in these building sites, especially when they are lit at night.”

Her photographs once taken can then be printed onto acrylic sheets which can be manipulated into sculptural objects. She uses advanced photographic technologies such as CGI to print her photographs. The first time Hammond experimented with printing directly onto acrylic was in her project “You Will Enter An Oasis”. Previous to this she did  a residency at Bow Arts where she made cyanotypes, which are really early print processes of making photographs. UV light is used to expose an image.This project really led her into realizing her love for the changing nature of a place into destruction and her love for blue prints and exploring the process of change. This is also where the inspiration for so much of the blue used in her work comes from, Hammond remembering as a child being obsessed with her father’s engineering manuals and drawings. She likes the idea of her work revolving around the concept ‘restore to factory settings’. I think i want to mainly take inspiration from her work in considering how it creates a more immersive viewing of the photographs to be surrounded by the images. I want to try and re-create the experience of being surrounded by the dens and therefore evoke more of the childlike wonder of the experience. I want the experiences of the photographs to go beyond the photographs as in to have more of a connection with the process of building dens.

“This was my first material investigation into working with printing directly to acrylic. I wanted to allow the imagery used on rendered images to manifest itself into the physical world.”

Considering her work has given me an idea of how i am going to display my images in another form of presentation other than a book. I am considering now also making an instillation of a den inside a studio. The whole idea being to create a mass of material which hangs from the ceiling in a den like shape and to then project the photographs of my different dens onto this generic mass of a den. The sheets to create this den will be white to allow the details of the photographs to be as clear as possible and i will light the room to be very dark with only the den with the photographs projecting onto it illuminated. I can then photograph this process to create another set of images which show the process of creating a more tactile way of viewing my images. I think the whole concept behind this comes back again to how all the dens merge into one long childhood game. How each game played in each den leads onto the other and in building each den as children we learn tips and tricks which we carry on into our next den. The instillation will show this by having all these different dens printed onto the same generic shape of a den.  This is similar to Hammond’s work as the photographs are printed onto a material which is then sculpted into a different shape but i am simply projecting the images rather then having it literally printed onto the material.