For this shoot, I wanted to represent a musical journey combined with a travelling journey. I wanted to represent a girl who was on the move, but would take her music with her everywhere, but not someone who would just use their IPod and headphones to listen to music, but someone who makes their own.

The reason for the location at the start of the shoot was because it shows a beautiful environment with the sea and trees in the background, but it also shows a road which represents movement and travelling. It’s as if the girl is following the road to the sea. This is why she ends up sat in front of the sea, because its representing her journey.

For this image below, I made her face away from the camera, and then I would count down to free and she’d turn her face around and I’d capture the moment. This technique is done to capture a moment which doesn’t look as posed and make it not feel as posed for the model so they don’t feel as awkward in front of the camera, and also to create movement in the photographs. In the image below, due to the position and natural lighting there is a loop lighting technique created on the models face. The thing I would change about this portrait is I should of waited a few more minutes for the cars to pass in the background, because I find they take away from the portrait, and I should have positioned the model slightly different so she wouldn’t be blinded by the sun and her eyes would be more open. However, I think the use of focal point worked well in this image, as I wanted the model to be the main subject, yet showing the important aspects like the sea and the road.

In the image below, there is a split lighting on the models face produced by natural lighting. The model is slightly positioned to the right however she is what immediately look at, due to her skin colour being pale. The composition works nicely as one can see the road which looks like it takes you directly to the sea. The way the model is higher up than the level of the road, makes her look adventurous and takes risks to appreciate natural beauty, and views like this inspires her to write new music. In this image there is a lot of depth, except in the background behind her upped body, where there is negative space, i think this works well as you focus on the mode more and aren’t distracted by a busy background. When editing this photograph I referred back to Theo Gosselin, as he tends to have a cinematic/vintage effect which I chose to use on this image.

I love this image, as it looks so natural and in the moment, as if I just picked up my camera at the perfect time. When in reality it was staged to look the way it does, for example I wanted her to sit in this position so I could get the trees, on the right, and the wall on the left to frame her and the sea in the background. For this image I also used the technique where I would get her to turn around so it wasn’t looking posed.

This image works well due to all the different elements, such as the birds in the background. The way the models got her arm bent, holding onto her hat, the carve of her elbow almost works as an arrow therefore your eyes follow the direction the elbows pointing in, which makes your eyes focus on the birds in the background. Normally one associates birds with peace and freedom, which is what i wanted to represent in this shoot. When i think of birds, i think of fleeing the nest, which is what these young people have done, they’ve taken their vans and have gone travelling away from home. I also like the fact one quite often hears the term ‘a songbird’ which is a bird with a musical song, like what the girl in this shoot has, as she’s got her guitar with her in most photographs.

I wasn’t entirely sure how these pictures were going to turn out when i headed to the beach with an industrial light. Overall they actually went so much better then i expected them to! I really loved in Toroptsov’s photographs how the light had a very eerie quality to it and i wasn’t entirely sure i would be able to create the same effect myself in my images. I decided to start with the umbrella den as the easiest and quickest to create in case the idea of photographing the dens at night wasn’t going to come together and really work. I think overall these images achieve exactly the same effect as Toroptsov’s work. The best images are the ones in which the light is behind the material which creates a soft glow to the light which makes it look a lot less industrial.  I photographed the den just as the sun was setting and then as the sky turned from blue to black. I think these images work really well overall.

To capture these images i had to use a very low shutter speed of 2 seconds and a tripod to avoid camera shake.

The above and below photographs are both very similar compositions just taken at different times of the night when the light was different. This difference in light interestingly creates completely different impressions of the photographs. I think i prefer the above image as the bluish sky highlights the colours in the umbrellas more. I composed the photographs so as to take the photograph of the den almost straight on. The den fills the entire frame as i was close enough to the den that the front umbrellas are out of the frame as it appears as if i am just walking into the den. I then composed the light to the left of the den so as to use to rule of thirds with the light. The light is the brightest point of the images and therefore your eyes begin at this point and then travel around the rest of the den. I quite like how by having the light source as it is it casts the outer areas of the den in shadow and only illuminates certain elements. This causes like in  Toroptsov’s photographs for your eyes to try and decipher the outer areas of the dens and adds mystery and intrigue. This works even better in the below image as the sky is so dark that the den could be anywhere. The lack of light in the background also causes the light to create straight lines, beams of light outwards from behind the den. I think i also prefer the composition of the above image as it is from slightly further away then the below image.

The above image is really interesting as it is one of the few images which i actually liked which had the light shinning directly onto the umbrellas rather then behind them. In most of the pictures the light from behind was softer and therefore more eerie but in this images the reflection of light on the umbrella in the foreground works really well. The light shines directly onto the umbrella in the foreground which is composed according to the rule of thirds to the right hand side of the frame. The light from this harsh bright point right in the center of the umbrella then spread outwards to the rest of the den so you can see the shadows and silhouettes of the rest of the composition. The sky in this image is also fairly early on in the night and so it is a blueish colour and this light in the background i think helps to soften the light in the foreground. I think the angles of the umbrella in the foreground also helps to guide your eyes around the frame as your eyes travel off the umbrella and into the rest of the frame. The beach and sand itself is fairly dark and therefore the umbrellas do stand out vividly against it.

The above photograph is a more abstract composition of the den, with the umbrellas composed to all be at odd angles pointing inwards within the frame. I composed the light source to be dead in the center of the frame shinning right through the windbreak rather then an umbrella. The light source looked brighter in shinning through the windbreak as the material was thinner then the umbrellas. I then haven’t included the entirety of any of the umbrellas, instead including elements of most of them in an abstract manner. I did however think about having my composition so that the handles of all the umbrellas pointed inwards at odd angles to create an interesting arrangement. This was one of the photographs that i took later on so the sky around the umbrellas is really dark and therefore conveys contrasts more between the intense colour of the light and the darkness around it.

The above photograph has exactly the same contrast, it may even be more intense as the light source in this image isn’t directly behind the umbrella.

The above and below photographs are then some of the images i took from further away from the dens so as to capture the whole structure. These ones worked really well the darker it got to have such a vivid contrast between the light behind the dens and the darkness surrounding them. Both images i used the rule of thirds to composed the dens at an angle within the frame. I really like in these mages how your eyes are drawn to the brightest point on the image in the center and then your eyes travel around the composition trying to work out the rest of the structure which is in partial darkness.

The above and below images are ones which were taken with the light shinning directly onto the structure rather then behind. Overall i defiantly prefer the other images for generating images with a softer and more eerie light.

These images are then more photographs which explore taking pictures of the dens at different angles and from a distance. I like how as the night got darker the beams of the light across the sand became more and more prominent, so that in these images the den is radiating light out into its surrounding.

“Night came but the darkness didn’t last long. The eyes of all the skulls on the fence around the house of Baba Yaga began to gleam and the forest became as bright as day”. -From “Vassilissa The Beautiful” Russian fairy tale

Yury Toropsov was born in 1974 in a rural community near Vladivostok. His project which i’m going to be considering is called  “The House of Baba Yaga” and was his first project to get him noticed within the photographic industry. Toropsov in this project returned to his family home and photographed the daily reality of life while considering the children’s story “Baba Yaga”. His project creates a contrast between photographs of portraits of the family currently living in the house taken during the day to photographs at night of the houses exterior. The result is an eerie set of images which create a very strange impression of the house.  The night time photographs are going to be my main focus though i do really like the concept of having a contrast between day and night photographs in my work. The night time photographs are filled with long shadows from bright sources of light which illuminate elements of the house but not all of it. This contrast between the saturated colours of the house and then the darkness of the shadows creates an otherworldly appeal to the photographs which is also heavily influenced by the association with the Russian fairy tales. Toroptsov’s influence from his native fairy tales is really significant within his work as it influences how we view the photographs and gives an overall atmosphere to the photographs.

The tale of Baba Yaga is very similar to the English tale, Hansel and Gretal.  It is a Slavic tale which centers around an ugly old women who lives in a house surrounded by skeletons of the people she has eaten.  Baba Yaga has been used to instill fear into people for centuries, with various variations of the tale depending on the exact town or country. It has been said however that this tale is symbolism for the fear that people feel towards the elderly. The elderly, particularly older women  have been either despised or feared by some for generations as they signify all things that are undesirable to us. They are ageing, with wrinkles that question vanity and they signify the eventuality of death. In the 1600’s and in many other periods older women were often condemned as witches because of this fear. I feel like Toroptsov is questioning with his photographs a persons perceived reality of people; almost suggesting how people are not always as they seem and could indeed be hiding something like witchcraft. He takes these photographs of people who look perfectly normal but then juxtaposes them besides this eeire photographs he takes of their house at night which suggests a hidden layer to the people. By only photographing the house from outside at night is suggests something is going on, that there is something that we as a viewer are missing about these people by simply considering just their portraits. The link to the Baba Yaga tale influences us to think along more sinister routes though  Baba Yaga also has a warmer side to her and is believed to help lost travelers and those who seek her wisdom and advice. She  seems to represent the dichotomies present in humans, the good and the evil, real and the imagined co-existing. I think that she symbolizes both is really significant in considering Toroptsov’s project as he is seemingly presenting us with both the real and the imagined but then causing us to question both in relation to each other. The real photographs of the people are questioned by us as we view the creepy night time photographs and believe that there is more to the story.

Toroptsov’s photographs explore very cleverly a use of light that creates an ethereal atmosphere to his images. It is his use of light as well as his juxtaposition that i want to consider closely. The cottage he has photographed seems very far removed from the modern world with the use of lighting as the lighting all appears very natural. The light from the moon is very prominent in lighting the photographs as well as an intense bright light from within the house which seeps into the surroundings. Toroptsov in creating his photographs so as to be able to capture all the tiny bits of light used 30 second exposures. In creating some of my dens i want to take influence from Toroptsov and his work in having a juxtaposition between night and day. I want to photograph my dens at night time to show a completely different side to them. I think it will be interesting to consider how in the day time dens appear to be a place of safety and warmth and how these structures might look very different and many slightly sinister in a different light. I could then also have the people photographs i am planning on taking contrasting like Toroptsov’s with the night time dens. Like Toroptsov i am going to use very long exposures to create my photographs and a tripod. I will be experimenting with using both natural lighting of the moon to illuminate the dens but i think i will probably need to use artificial light in many locations due to  their remote locations. I will therefore also be experimenting with having a light inside the den shinning out or having light shining from behind and in front onto the den to see which effects work best. I think i am also going to be exploring how nature and man made objects come together to create structures which is similar to his work. I also really want to explore the influence that stories can have over my photographs of dens, like the influence of Baba Yaga.

IMAGE ANALYSIS

As light is the key element of Toroptsov’s photographs it is important to begin by considering how he has used it and what effect it creates. Within the frame below the foreground is in shadow, as well as the far background, there being a small section in the center which is illuminated. The light in the photograph spills into the frame from around the corner of the building and from a source that we can not see. The brightest point of the photograph is to the left hand side of the frame where this light directly shines onto a reflective material of the building. Your eyes therefore work their way from this point furthest from the light source at the left hand side of the frame to the right side of the frame but intrigue is created by us not being able to see where the light source is coming from.  The photograph is essentially divided into three segments of light, the photograph having been taken in the blue hour after the sun has set which gives the far backgrounds darkness more depth and distinction between the trees and the sky. The items in the immediate foreground are interesting because they are cast in such dark shadows that they are only silhouettes and therefore exactly what the objects are is questionable. This creates further intrigue in the images. The photograph then also has another dimension apart from the interesting light which is how nature and man-made objects are merging. Green plants are in all elements of the frame. growing over the objects and buildings. This creates even more of an ethereal sense to the photograph as it causes us to question the context to the photograph further and the location. The interesting light does create an atmosphere but then the random objects and over grown nature begins to add a story the photograph and raises questions. The pram right in the dead center of the frame is the most significant element in creating a story as it suggest a family, linking perfectly to how this is a family house. The pram becomes the center element to the photograph as we question what has happened to this family, where they are and the absence of people becomes even more noticeable. All all of Toroptsov’s photographs the lack of people is so striking as objects are left seemingly abandoned as if people are going to return to use them. This more than anything links with the Baba Yaga tale and we question if something sinister has happened to these people due to the association. Overall i think the most significant part of the photograph is how the foreground lacks light but we can not see the light source which leads you into noticing the other elements about the photograph.

The above photograph is perhaps the simplest of all of Toroptsov’s photographs as it doesn’t feature so much of the household clutter which dominants in the other photographs. This photograph is taken in very different light to the above photograph. The above photograph being taken in the blue hour and this photograph having been taken when the sky is black. The darkness of the sky in this photograph is what creates the eerie quality to the image. The light in the photograph shines directly onto the plant in the center of the frame from the right hand side, interestingly with shadows in the foreground and background. The light shines directly and pretty much only onto the plant. This causes the plant to be surrounded by the black sky and shadows in the foreground, it therefore standing out vividly within the frame. The plant is the only focus in the image and so has been composed right in the center. In this photograph we once again have the coming together of man made and natural objects though in this photograph it appears more intentional.  The plant has been planted within a tire and grown into a patch of flowers. Due to the intentionalality of this the photograph doesn’t have the same quality as the above photographs in raising questions. I think this photograph works well as an accompanying photograph, rather than as an explanation Toroptsov’s whole project. It doesn’t have the same impact as the other photographs as it singles in so exclusively on a small element of  the house rather than showing the bigger picture.

Once i had photographed all my day time dens i wanted to do a quick experimentation in which i layered different dens over each other. This was in consideration to as a child when i would build dens some games would role into another new den but same game and therefore the ideas of the dens would overlap. It also shows how i would borrow things which worked well with one den and bring them into another den, they weren’t completely separate ideas and concepts. I think some of this photographs have worked a lot better then other as some images are more compatible with one another but overall i think it was an interesting experimentation. 

After considering the principles of organic architecture and how animals build dens i really wanted to incorporate this into this woodland den. Alongside the beach dens this type of den was the most common type of den we would build as children as they were the most fun to create. There is a whole program of education called “forest schooling” which my mum has always bee a massive advocate for which encourages children to interact with the environment to build dens ect. When she asks the children she teaches at school they all say that this is the favourite element of school for them as children really enjoy getting dirty and engaging with their environment. I have to say making this den was by far the most fun. I think its probably got something to do with how we have an innate part of us which enjoys foraging as we used to for food in the past. When we were kids i also remember how these dens the whole process could be turned into the game, the exploring the area and finding the best spot to build the den, the gathering of branches and then the building of the structure.

I choose to do this photo shoot on quite a bright sunny day as i considered that under the trees might be quite dark and i wanted my pictures to have light shinning through the trees. I spent a really long time deciding where to build this den, considering all the principles of organic architecture and where the best starting point would therefore be. I choose this spot as all the ivy meant i would be able to wind all the branches into it to create my structure and it also had a good strong solid base of the tree to lean the structure off. This compostion also included quite a lot of light and so the woods doesn’t look like a dark, dank environment.

These process photographs are defiantly the best of all my photographs as you can really see how the structure develops and becomes more and more a part of the environment. As the den develops its disappears more and more into the environment of its surroundings.  I think this is really amazing to see in contrast to my other dens which stood out against the surroundings.

I really love the skeleton structure of branches that i created underneath all the ivy and therefore for this shoot i decided to take photographs which detailed the process more explicitly. The above photograph was an early on photograph of the structure. I took this image as i wanted to convey how the branches of the structure all fit together to create a criss cross in which ivy can be woven through. I took the photograph from a fairly low angle so that the branches appear as if they are reaching  outwards from where they begin. I think there is a slightly sinister nature to these bare structures as the den does look naked and almost quite witchy with all the gnarled branches. I deliberately only used branches which had already broken off trees and therefore the structure is made up of den wood which i think you can tell from these images. The majority of the branches are thick pieces of dead ivy which is why they are all interesting shapes and patterns. I think the light in the photograph above further adds to this feel as it is a bright white light, the picture slightly over exposed which gives the branches more of a bleached look which again is suggestive of bones. I composed the image so that the entrance of the den was dead in the center of the frame, The lightest point of the images being the branches surrounding the den and the spiral of their pattern leading you into the center of the den.

The above and below pictures are slightly more abstract compositions of the dens structure. The above images have a lot less light in them and the branches become more like silhouettes. The light source comes from the background, behind the branches and therefore the structure of the den stands out against them. I quite like the images as again the patterns of the branches gives the appearance that the branches are reaching outwards.

The below photograph is a composition from lying on the floor of the den and looking upwards. I really like this image as this is apparent from the sky an light which is behind the branches. The branches become an elaborate pattern in which the colour of the sky and the green of some leaves is behind. The light source from the sky is fairly bright, almost causing camera glare in some parts of the frame. This bleeding of the light past the branches into the den actually works quite well in suggesting a less sinister mood then the other photographs. Your eyes begin at the bottom of the frame where the light is the most intense brightness and then follow the twists and turns in the branches to the top of the frame.  I think this photograph is more like a “magical” den rather then a sinister seeming den. I think it might be quite good to have the two interpretations juxtaposed together.

The above and below photographs show the final completed den. I used clashing colours in the den of the bright red blanket and the green of the forest and leaves as i wanted my den to partially stand out within the photographs. Once i added the green leaves to the wooded structure it almost completely disappeared into its surrounding. By having the bright red blanket its almost anchors the den in the photograph. The above and below photographs are just slightly different compositions of the same concept, having the light hitting the blanket and reflecting off it as well as a section of the dens entrance. The light in both photographs is a bright intense white, both reflecting off the den in the foreground and also shining through the trees in the background. Both photographs are composed to focus on one side of the den and the entrance, rather then the whole entrance. The dark shadows in the frame however over the second half of the blanket is very suggestive of  the rest of the den surrounding this point depicted in the photograph. I also struggled in images due to the busy nature of all the leaves and branches to get a real focal point which the blanket also helped with. It broke up all the very earthy colours of the frame.

Above is my favourite photograph of the den as a whole. I composed the frame using the rule of thirds so as to have the entrance of the den to the left side of the frame. This then allowed me to include more of the environment around the den and the bright source of light in the background. In this composition the den looks as if it is apart of the tree itself and growing from its structure which i quite like. The bright light of the background helps to create a boundary of where the den ends which you struggle to see in some other photographs due to the den blending into the surroundings. The red blanket once again also helps to distinguish a depth inside the den which is hard to tell with all the leaves and earthy colours.

Below is a slightly different composition going on the same idea of having only part of the den in the frame. It doesn’t however work as well as the above composition simply because the light in the background isn’t as vibrant in defining the dens shape.

As well as children building dens, animals also build den structures in the environment through they are slightly different. I wanted to also consider these kind of natural dens before building my own natural den. Depending on the animals  the dens completely vary on material and design to suite the individual animals needs. The main different between children’s dens and animals dens are that animals dens need to be more secure and livable, as they act as a primary function as a home. Almost all animals create dens in some form or another as like humans i think dens for them provide an element of safety and particularly when animals are looking after their young they want to have somewhere where they feel like they can protect their children. The dens which appear most similar to the kind of dens that i am going to be building are the extravagant birds nest and dams built by beavers. Other dens built by animals often include holes in the ground which is not the kind of den children normally make. One of the only rules parents give children with den building is normally not to dig holes and climb into them encase they collapse. I want to consider a bit more closely why animals create dens compared to humans and to view how some of the basic structures are really similar. Below are some animals which build dens and what kind of structures they are.

Rabbits – Hollows, they are networks of tunnels underground with “rooms” which different rabbits live in. Rabbit families are often incredibly large which means an extensive network of tunnels.

Birds – Nests, different birds build very different nests depending on climate and other environmental factors. Some nest are simple circles while others have many birds living together and the structure is therefore bigger.

Beaver – Dams, this structure is not intended to be lived in by the beaver itself but the beaver uses a dam to create a better home environment for themselves. By building dams the beavers can raise water levels to create extensive wetlands which they can then live in.

Mice -Burrows, they are very very similar to rabbits apart from their burrows are much smaller.

Spiders- Webs, again this structure is more created by a spider to aid their living rather then to act as a home. It is also more of a structure in general than a den for the animal.

Squirrels -Tree cavities and leaf nests, they generally use the environment around them rather then building a nest from scratch. They simply add to the tree cavity, modifying their environment to make it more suitable.

Meerkats – Burrows, again they are very very similar to rabbits in creating a network of tunnels.

Cathedral Termites – Towers, this is perhaps the most bizarre of all the structures, a tower built up from mud and sand in which millions of insects live inside.

So after consider how different animals make very different dens i wanted to consider why animals make dens and how this then influences the structures of the dens. Animals create structures primarily for three reasons:

• to create protected habitats, homes.
• to catch prey and for foraging, traps.
• for communication between members of the species

The main reasons are the first two, they want to feel safe within their environment. This is why many animals only build dens when they have young as well as they feel the need to protect their young and want to create a space in which they feel they can do this.

In considering the structures being protection from predators, predators are attracted to animal built structures becasue of what the animals are trying to protect, food and offspring. The structures are meant to try and conceal these things from the predators wither by camouflage or by making it difficult to get to.  The camouflage element is what normally causes an animal to use materials from in their immediate environment as they want to blend into these surroundings.

Something i didn’t know about animals structures was how the animals act an engineers, using their structures to control the temperature of their surroundings. In warm environment a den underground will be extremely cool and shelter the animals from the intense glare of the sun. A really interesting example of this is the Oriental Hornet which uses something called a silk cap to trap the heat from the sun during the day and then at night when the temperature begins to drop the silk stores release an electric current to increase the temperature inside the den. Another interesting element which i hadn’t previously considered was how some animals make their own building materials. Some times of larvae cut out shapes from leaves to make the perfect den, rather then just using the leaves as they come and Paper wasps build a paper pulp themselves from their environment by mixing together many different ingredients from their environment.

After considering animal dens i think it has defiantly informed my den project in considering how similar some of the elements of den building are between humans and animals. Both use them as a form of protection and a reassurance of safety. They also both use the material in the environment around them for similar reasons. A den built by children is meant to be a secret, the whole point of it is to be a place away from adults and therefore to camouflage the den within the environment is a key element. This is also true for animals as they need to be protected from predators. I think in creating my dens which i was going to try and blend into the environment  i am going to consider closely the structure of birds nests, but mainly the ones which are large and just look like piles of leaves in the trees.

After planing to build a den with in the natural environment, using materials which come from the environment i thought it would be helpful to consider Organic architecture. My den is obviously not going to be a permanent structure like these buildings but i wanted to consider how these building are designed to fit into their environments. Organic architecture can essentially be defined as a philosophy rather than just a type of architecture which creates harmony between the human world and natural world. I think this is a really important idea because den building as i considered with the work of Goldsworthy is a philosophy. Organic architecture importantly understands that the well being of the human psyche would not be nurtured by removing people from the natural world in which they belong. This type of architecture therefore shows how the two can live harmoniously. Organic architecture is more of a way of living than a tangible thing. It involves respecting the properties of surrounding natural materials, understanding the function of the building, and making them work together with the building site in a harmonious way.

Architect David Pearson has created a list of rules towards the design of organic architecture.

• be inspired by nature and be sustainable, healthy, conserving, and diverse.
• unfold, like an organism, from the seed within.
• exist in the “continuous present” and “begin again and
• follow the flows and be flexible and adaptable.
• satisfy social, physical, and spiritual needs.
• “grow out of the site” and be unique.
• celebrate the spirit of youth, play and surprise.
• express the rhythm of music and the power of dance

What i like most about the principles of Organic Architecture is not just that the building must blend in and work with its natural surrounding but how the building itself is meant to become an organism which grows out from one point into its final design. I think this gives the buildings more of a personality as you consider the building as more than a building, it has character. I think dens are a lot like this to children because the children as so proud of their creation and how each one is completely unique that the children’s love for the dens can be seen when you look at them. A den, like these buildings as they are considered real organisms has character which is translated into their design. Literally every single element of the building is considered in relation to each other, to create a harmony throughout the whole structure. This is meant to signify the symbiotic relationship nature has with all its elements.

The term “Organic Architecture” was defined by David Pearson but made famous by Frank Lloyd Wright who used it to explain his own approach to architecture. He was unsure over the term “organic” because he realized it didn’t entirely define the type of architecture as it isn’t made by animals, it is instead based on a philosophy which is based on the way the natural world works.  Probably the most common misconception is the belief that Organic Architecture is curved and free form. Wright’s buildings are very seldom curved, and are certainly never free form. Where he does use curves, he uses circles, which are obviously governed by a strict geometry. Another common misconception is that Organic Architecture is inherently environmentally sustainable. While being environmentally sustainable is important to Organic architects, it should be integral to all architectural design, Organic or not, and therefore can’t be considered as a defining characteristic. The amazing thing about organic architecture is the completely contrasting designs but how they all follow this same philosophy. Some of them are made of straight lines and others are made of curves, each being born to suit exactly the environment they are in and developing from one point outwards. However, because the intent to create buildings that are at one with their site and that allow for connections to the exterior is a fundamental philosophy shared in all Organic Architecture, there are a few common characteristics.

Geometry

Many people have the misconception that nature is free form but this is not the case. It is predictable and comprehensible. It is governed by rules and patterns, and it is when people understand  these rules that they feel comfortable in their environments. Organic architecture utilizes strong, rational geometry to create a comprehensible building that can be understood as a single entity.

Materials

To establish a connection with the natural environment, natural materials such as stone and wood are commonly utilized in Organic architecture. Large surfaces, or those parts of the building which use artificial looking materials are often given textures or applied with patterns to break up the surface.

Mass

In order to break down the sense of enclosure, Organic architecture often is composed of recognizable, individual masses that due to their arrangement form a shelter. This differs from the typical method of creating architecture by using surfaces or envelopes to form the interior space.

Glass

The way glass is used is a critical part of organic architecture. Glass provides views to the natural environment, but also breaks up the forms of the building. This reduces the building into its individual masses, and breaks the sense of enclosure. This means when glass is used it is deliberately disguised to not distract from the sense of unity.

“So here I stand before you preaching organic architecture: declaring organic architecture to be the modern ideal and the teaching so much needed if we are to see the whole of life, and to now serve the whole of life, holding no ‘traditions’ essential to the great TRADITION. Nor cherishing any preconceived form fixing upon us either past, present or future, but—instead—exalting the simple laws of common sense—or of super-sense if you prefer—determining form by way of the nature of materials…”
— Frank Lloyd Wright, An Organic Architecture, 1939

I wanted to do a little bit of a case study on the work of Frank Lloyd Wright. When he made famous the concept of Organic Architecture it was the extension of the teachings of his mentor Louis Sullivan whose slogan “form follows function” became the mantra of modern architecture. Wright changed this phrase to “form and function are one,” using nature as the best example of this integration. Wright consider this form of architecture not to be a style of imitation, because he did not claim to be building forms which were representative of nature. Instead, organic architecture is a reinterpretation of nature’s principles of how nature grows and evolves to fit its environment.  Wright also considers  Organic architecture an attempt to integrate the spaces into a coherent whole, a marriage between the site and the structure and a union between the context and the structure. Below are just some of the structures which Wright created in his career.

Robie House

Robie Residence in Chicago, Illinois was built in 1909. This building is all about emphasizing its mass, the multiple roofs presenting the building to be bigger than it is in reality due to perception. Wright in this design shows his mastery of the Prairie style structure, this revolving around open expanses of space and sparse lack of any trees ect.

Taliesin West

Taliesin West, in Scottsdale, AZ, was Wright’s home and studio. Designed for these purposes, the site is still used as a living, working, and educational setting. Dramatic terraces and walkways display the desert and the constantly changing landscape in the form of shifting sandbars. Taliesin West demonstrates Wright’s faculty in joining interior spaces with exterior ones.

Hanna Residence

Hanna-Honeycomb House is located in Palo Alto, CA and was designed in the Usonian style. I find this structure the most interesting as a Usonian style allows the walls of the building to be moved and reconfigured according to the need of space at that particular moment. Therefore this structure is constantly undergoing change. It is referred to as the Honeycomb House because the design uses hexagons instead of octagons as building units, and all the boards and battens use this spacing. The home adjusts to the hill, complementing the landscape.

Falling water

Fallingwater in Bear Run, PA is probably the best known of all of Wright’s designs. Concrete forms hanging precipitously over a waterfall, anchored by natural rock. Rough stone floors and only two paint colors (light Ochre for the concrete and Wright’s signature Cherokee red for the steel) add to the organic feeling. Living at Falling water is living in harmony with the waterfall. The house has suffered greatly from leakage and structural damage. But the Western Pennsylvania Conservancy has tried their best to preserve this house.

 Organic architecture after considering its philosophy and how it translated into a form is very similar to den building. When building a den you start with one main point which then translates into the rest of the design. You begin with looking at the environment and how this environment has elements which will help your structures stability and starting point and then from this point you build. You always starting with one main blanket or a building material that makes the roof. The whole point of dens are always the roofs so you feel enclosed and protected, therefore this is the starting point from which the rest of the den unfolds.  Another key element is how organic architecture is also a lot about time, that there is a continuous present which must be addressed within the work. Dens are like this and also this links to Goldsworthy’s work of how a piece is about the process of creation and that sometimes the piece falls apart. The dens are constantly adapting to the environment as the wind might blow a blanket down so the piece needs to be rebuilt or restructured depending on a new game idea and therefore a new need the den needs to be able to fulfill. This element then again links to organic architecture being created to satisfy need. A den is built to fulfill the social need of children at play but then also the physical need to feel at home and comfortable within the environment. To be unique is also another major element and every den is unique as each one is built to fit the specific environment. Looking at Organic architecture has defiantly informed my project as my dens in a sense are a form of organic architecture. 

I think that as den building is at the center of my project that it could be quite interesting to consider why people build dens and where it all began. I’m hoping that in considering dens built by people in the past and also the physiological reasons behind children still making them in the present day that it will inform my own den building.

The first people, before the Neolithic’s and also at the beginning of the Neolithic period built dens for survival. Neolithic architecture ranges from the tent to the megalith (an arrangement of large stones) to rock cut architecture including temples, tombs, and dwellings. The structures i’m concerned with are the ones built by the Nomads. The Nomads who had no permanent dwelling and would instead move around depending on weather but most importantly following the food supplies. People in this time period were not tied down to the emotional connections of a place or object, their main and only priority was food which led to survival and so therefore their housing arrangements needed to be able to adapt so that they could move around. This meant that homes either needed to be portable or for new structure to be able to be made very quickly. Resources to build these structures from was also a major issue compared to the modern day as the only tools available were made from natural materials such as bone, antler, hide, stone, wood, grasses, animal fibers, and the use of water. The actual materials were also limited to bones such as mammoth ribs, hide, stone, metal, bark, bamboo, clay and lime plaster. This type of architecture is known as vernacular architecture, which is basically just using the resources around you to suite the local needs of the site. These structures were very often tent like in creation but all we can do is speculate as the whole point of these structures was not to be permanent and therefore we have none to examine. What little we can say about very early construction is mostly conjecture and based on what we know about the way nomadic hunter-gatherers and herdsmen in remote areas build shelters today.

Its ironic that the whole point that i am looking at dens for my project is how they are not permanent and can be built quickly out of anything in any environment but that this is also why there is no evidence of them for me to study in considering how to build my own dens. In history i have previously studied the Native Americans and they are one of the closest example that historians can use today to consider how the first nomad humans would have lived.

The Native Indians were also Nomads like the first people which led them to create the kind of structures we could imagine the first people to have. They were also nomads for the same reason, the herds of buffalo were their food source and therefore they followed them wherever they went all year round. The buffalo to the Native Indians was a sacred animal which they respected significantly as it provided them with their means for survival. We can see how reliant the Native Americans were on the buffalo when we consider how the white people who came to America destroyed the way of life for the Native Americans by killing all the buffalo. The mass killings of buffalo began as a sport for the white people and then eventually became deliberate as they realized how much strain it put on the Native Americans lifestyle. This is what forced the Native Americans to join the colonies as their old way of life had been destroyed.

The Native American’s lived in Tipi’s which they are able to carry around with them wherever they went. This is maybe slightly different to the first people as they may not have been able to take materials around with them wherever they went. The Native Americans were only able to do so as they had horses and the tipi structure could be created into a sled which the horses could easily drag behind them. The tipi’s themselves were made of wooden poles which were then covered in buffalo skin to trap in the warmth and create walls. The wooden poles act like some of Andy Goldsworthy’s designs; supporting themselves by each resting on each other to create a pressure in the center that kept the structure standing. The Tipi’s acted as shelter and a home to live in. They protected the Native Americans from the weather, shading them from both the scorching sun and the wind. They could also be put up and down in 15 minutes which was essential for a group of people constantly on the move.

In considering the Native Americans nomadic structure i think that there are things i can consider for my own den building. Using the natural environment seems to be a key focus as dens are built for the specific environment that they are in. They use the resources around them as well as well as the layout of the environment itself influencing how the structure is built. This will be particularity important when i experiment with making a natural den out of branches ect in the woods. 

“The den was often perceived as a place where one could be alone, to sit and ponder or just “do one’s own thing.” It was also a hidden refuge from which one could get up to different kinds of mischief, since one (hopefully) could run back and seek refuge afterwards. It was also described as a good place to tell stories.” – Maria Kylin

In considering why dens were built in the past i think it is important to also consider why they are such a massive part of childhood life in the current age. In the past they acted as a real home, the only means of shelter and protection from the outside environment. As out behavior pattern as human have changed over the years to become creatures of habit that live within one permanent location it is curious to think that den building still remains such a massive part of the culture. Many surveys have in fact been done which ask adults to think of their best childhood memories in which adults weren’t present. 9/10 the answer is building some form of den. I want to consider exactly why this is because it might explain why even at 18 i’m still fascinated with den building and the idea of creating dens for my project is distinctly thrilling. First i’m going to consider an academic essay written by Maria Kylin on den building and its influence on children. She writes adamantly about how dens and the process of den building gives children an independence and helps them grow as people. Adults are often completely excluded from den building, it is a child’s vocation and therefore they are learning to do things by themselves. She also considers how this sense of independence also moves into a sense of being in control. The children have as much power as they want within the den, it is their space away from the prying eyes of adults and therefore they make the rules. This notion of their own space also becomes important as they can influence their surroundings how they like. A den isn’t always a completely newly constructed structure, it can be a hole in a hedge with a few modifications. The significance of the den is that the child has ownership over it. They have found it and made it their own in some form or another. The den comes to signify for the child the boundaries of their own personal space and the rest of the world. Another key element which makes dens so important for children is the secrecy of their locations. Only a few people know the locations of the children’s dens and very rarely adults as the children like to have this sense of owner ship over their dens, the power to decided whether or not they will allow people inside. 

“The sites showed different degrees of “construction,” and the structures had different degrees of permanence. A few of the structures were built with planks and nails (although never with the help of adults), but most were small spaces, corners and hiding places that had been improved or modified in some way.  They had been manipulated to some extent to mark a spatial boundary between the child and the rest of the world” – Maria Kylin

 

“The children’s perception of the den as a secret place can be compared with Lieberg (1992) who found that “hideouts” were places and settings where teenagers felt they could escape from the control of adults and peers and feel free, uncontrolled and independent. From a spatial perspective, it is interesting that these “hideouts” were mostly found and created in green areas and factors such as the outdoor design and the vegetation played a role when they chose just these places.” – Maria Kylin

Maria Kylin’s Essay 

While reading about why children build dens i also  came across an article by the guardian that while

“New research by academics in the US and Scandinavia is showing both that dens are crucial to children’s development – and that the opportunities for and inclination of children to make them are in danger of disappearing completely.” –  Josie Barnard

Den building was a fundamental part of my childhood and i wouldn’t want to imagine that children would begin to move away from this thrilling and beneficial activity. It is being suggested that the technology age has a massive influence on den building as children spend a lot more time indoors but that also the environment which children are surrounded in no longer has the same potential for dens. It is being suggested that our environment are becoming too sparse and clean cut, not allowing children to be able to discover secret places in hedges and over grown woods as we as humans are striving to control too much of our environment. 

“The book critic Dinah Hall has noted a near-total absence of dens in contemporary children’s literature. “Parents are too paranoid about letting children out of their sight to even be able to bear a den in a work of children’s fiction,” she says. “The most you’re going to get is a lovely, but very tame den, under a table in a Shirley Hughes picture book.” –  Josie Barnard

Adults influences are apparently also effecting children’s den making as parents have less children in the current day and age which means there are both less children to make dens with that children spend a lot of time with and parents are more protective of the children they do have. I think den building is a really key part of childhood, i know i spent my entire childhood building den like structures.

“The den is the child’s sense of self being born,” says David Sobel, a developmental psychologist at Antioch New England graduate school. He has researched dens extensively since the 70s, in Devon, England, and the Caribbean. “In the middle childhood, ages seven to 11, a den is the child’s chance to create a home away from home that is secret, and becomes a manifestation of who they are. The den,” Sobel argues, “is the chrysalis out of which the butterfly is born.” –  Josie Barnard

The guardian article

After considering all this research on den building and its function both in the past and present it has definitely made me more informed on den building as a whole. I think it will inform more my section on considering my friends as children again. It will also cause me to think more about the secrecy of the dens and how i could present that through photographs.