The Lady Vanishes | Hidden Mothers

When down at the Archisle I was introduced to the idea of hidden mothers. This was a craze during the Victorian period where families wanted their photographs to be taken of their children. The mother would hold the baby still with a sheet over their head so that they would not be seen. Looking at the images is hilarious as it is so obvious that there was a person behind the sheet. I find this idea so strange but it also really intrigues me. I feel that I would be able to link this to the idea of witchcraft and how they were set aside from society. I also just find this particular ‘style’ of photography very strange and something that I want to know more about! It is so odd but it somehow makes a lot of sense to just hold the baby and cover yourself with a blanket, I guess it would have been the Victorian’s way of PhotoShop. This also reminds me of Francesca Woodman and how she makes images and doesn’t retouch them afterwards, she does it live. I like this sense of making an image that is actually there in the present. It almost brings an element of truth to them, in that nothing was ever retouched or edited afterwards. It was raw, then and there and so they worked with what they had.

Screen Shot 2016-04-24 at 18.41.17

When looking at the images of the mother’s with their children I am actually surprised at how the children aren’t actually crying or smiling, they don’t seem to have any emotions. I find some of these images really obvious and the spectator is able to clearly see that there is a person underneath the blanket but in others it actually blends well and the mother looks like a chair or something because of the way she is positioned. I do like these images as they are so strange but something about them really interests me and I want to know why other than the obvious reasons they chose to photograph them in this way. I could see if the mothers was hidden away off to the side or something but the photographers chose to just have the child sat on her lap and simply put a sheet over her. When reading more about the Hidden Mothers I found out that it used to take a minute and a half for the image to register so the subject would need to remain still for that period of time which was obviously harder for a child/baby to do than that of an adult. Often photographers would be female as by the late 1800s it was seen as one of the more respectable jobs for middle-class women. Something else that I found out was that the babies weren’t allowed to smile in the photographs as this would mess with the exposure and leave it blurred in the final photograph.

Experimentation

I tried to recreate this style of photographing with my sister and niece but it didn’t really work out as my niece wasn’t in the right mood to sit still and wait for me to make a photograph of her. I have however taken inspiration from the idea of Hidden Mothers and am thinking about doing an experiment with my mum and having her pose with a blanket over her head. I came up with a spin off idea of the hidden mother and how they are supposed to blend in with the scenery and be invisible. For a shoot  that I have done with my mum is that the expected role of women is often overlooked and is almost unspoken about that we almost forget how much mothers really do. Their everyday house chores become the norm and they seem to do everything without ever being noticed. I wanted to explore this in two different ways so I decided to make some images of my mum with a sheet over her head and others where I have edited out any bare flesh and just left her with clothing. I want to show how sometimes mothers are invisible and everything that they do for their families isn’t always acknowledged. These images aren’t good at all and I am not happy with how they have turned out. I have now changed my mind and am going to leave this experimentation as it isn’t to the standard that I want and I just don’t like them.

IMG_4370editblog

This was the only decent image that came out of the mini shoot I did with my niece as she wasn’t in the best of moods and didn’t really want to do it. I could try and do another shoot with her but I am unsure whether or not I like the images and how it all looks. I feel that I wouldn’t be able to get a good location where the mother (my sister) would be able to blend well and make it look somewhat like a studio like the ones in the Victorian times. I do like that my nieces foot is moving as it looks as though she is some sort of ghost with it looking blurred which is what would have happened back in the Victorian times due to the long exposures they needed to use. Part of me likes this image and thinks that I could maybe work on it more and see what happens with it but I don’t want to make my niece do something that she doesn’t want to do. However, after she decided she didn’t want to sit still she put the sheet over her own head and started walking around wearing it which I captured and it looked quite funny. I don’t like the background of this image as I had to quickly set everything up and make do with what I had as there was a limited time that my niece was round and again she was in a bad mood.

I also tried to do a bit of experimentation with my mum but it was difficult as my mum isn’t the best at getting into all of the odd poses and positions I asked her to do as she obviously isn’t used to my obscure style of photography. I think that I could re-stage this and remake it myself as I have made images where the bare flesh on the persons body is taken away to just leave the image with their clothes and what they are doing. I think that these images are ok but I know that I can do a lot better than what I have produced so far. I might mix this into some kind of narrative and try to create more of a series in the theme of surrealism and narrative photography combined. This idea was interesting and I do think I could expand on this project some more to make stronger images. I only managed to get a few images out of this as it was just a quick experiment that I didn’t want to spend too much time on before fully committing to the idea. I now know how long each one would roughly take to edit and think that I would have plenty of time to get a mini series of possibly 8 to 12 images. The only thing about this particular set of images is it is very similar to that of my coursework as I wanted to create it as a kind of expansion onto it as I got my subject to wear the same dress and it follows the same theme. The images below aren’t the best and I can definitely do a lot better but just as a starter of experimentation they are fine.

CASE STUDY: MUSICIAL REFERENCES TO ADVERTISING IN THE 1990s

In this blog post I am going to direct my focus into a slightly different artistic medium – music. I am going to look into the song ‘Shakermaker’ by Oasis and pick out the various references to advertising included within it. It will be interesting to see how song lyrics have been used to ridicule and satirize advertising in comparison to the visual language of the photography. From this study I hope to be able to better access the effectiveness of photographs in terms of being a mechanism to tackle an idea, and judge whether an idea is clearer if it is shown visually, or expressed through written language.

This study will also be useful in the sense that I am looking into the decade of the 1990s, when Parr’s ‘Common Sense’ was published. It will be interesting to compare Parr’s artistic intentions with that of Oasis, both now seen as legendary cult figuires in the world of British music and photography respectively.

‘Shakermaker’ is a 1994 single from British rock band Oasis from their debut album ‘Definately Maybe’. This song is directly references various commercials which existed in the 1970s, when Noel Gallagher (who wrote the song) was a child. The band have been very open about ripping off the names of these old brands.

The 1990s

The context of the time this song was written, the 1990s, was a time when advertising was going through major developments; commercials were becoming more frequent; photographs were becoming sharper and more vivid; the rise of the internet led to increased networks of advertising; and the general availability of advertising was really taking off. From a modern perspective, the 90s is seen as the benchmark for the expansion of technology and the effects this had on commercial ventures; the birth of ….

  • digital photography (c.1998)
  • the internet (c.1995)
  • the SIM Card (1991)
  • email (1993)
  • DVD (1995)
  • Apple iMac (1998)

Such technology changed the way advertising not only was, but how it was percieved. Some embraced it, whereas others fear such a rapid rise. Oasis formed in 1994, just at the point when advertising changed rapidly.

The song is in many ways a response to the madness and hysteria of advertising.

 

Examples

“I’d like to build myself a house out of plasticine”

The title ‘Shakermaker’ and this quote is a direct reference to the popular toy Shaker Maker made in the early 19700s by the ‘Ideal Toy Company’. It was a mouldable plasticine/clay used to make toy figures, which Gallagher recalls as being “a toy that I used to have in the 70s”.

 

“I’ve been driving in my car with my friend Mr. Soft”

Mr Soft is a reference to the the character of “Mr Soft” was taken from a Trebor Soft Mints commercial, which featured Cockney Rebel’s song “Mr. Soft”. This advert was critised for being extremely cheesy and annoying.

“Mr. Clean and Mr. Ben are living in my loft”

“Mr. Clean” is a 1978 song by The Jam, one of Gallagher’s favourite bands.

Mr Benn was a British children’s cartoon which was aired by the BBC between 1971-72

“Mister Sifter sold me songs when I was just sixteen”

“Sifters” is a record shop in Manchester, where Galllagher used to visit regulary to buy records when he was younger.

 

One theme that links all of these references together is the 1970s. This is because Gallagher (born in 1967), remembers these adverts clearly as a part of his childhood. Arguably, they are nostalgic reminders to a past when advertising was a bit simpler and there was less scrutiny over the fact that the quality was often shocking and terrible (at least from a modern perspective!). Oasis as a band stood for the expression off ideas simply and directly. Therefore it can be agued that the reference of these adverts is perhaps a celebration of how advertising in the past was much simpler, with its cheesy nature is almost accepting in a satirical way, the acknowledgement of its sole purpose, to manipulate and exploit. Gallagher never took this song very seriously and is not afraid to criticise its tacky and absurb nature. Furthermore, the melody of song in itself ripped off a verse of the Coca-Cola song  “I’d Like to Teach the World to Sing (In Perfect Harmony)”, something which Gallagher shamelessly admits to. The Band was later sued for its uncanny likeness. Interestingly, this was yet another reference to the 1970s.

 

How does the message of this song compare to the message in Parr’s ‘Common Sense’?

Similarities

  • The purpose of this song is to show how tacky advertising really is. In many ways Parr’s images are similar in this sense because they too express advertising, through copying the visual language, in a way which makes the resulting images appear gimmicy, tacky and at times grotesque.
  • Both are similar in the sense they are very raw – Parr through his Vernacular style and Oasis through a very blunt song, sung by Liam Gallagher with his discintive coarse vocals
  • Both satirise popular advertising brands and produce comical pieces of work
  • Both send out a bright and powerful message.  Gallagher brings his abstract daydreams to life whilst Parr shows products and items in their greatest detail. As a result it can be argued that both serve to represent a positive message.
  • Both represent the surreal; ‘Shakermaker’ through Gallagher’s imagination of building a “house out of plasticine”, and Parr through highly saturated colours and use of flash photography to distort a sense of how the image really looks
  • Both were made in the 1990s, a time when advertising was rapidly changing

 

Differences

  • Parr’s photographs are a document of what he sees, whereas ‘Shakermaker’ represents more of a mindset. As an assesment, this makes Parr’s work in a sense  more credible because their is a direct and central theme. ‘Shakermaker’ on the other hand goes off on a tagent
  • Parr’s photographs were taken of a course of many years and are extensively pieced together, whereas ‘Shakermaker’ is a 5 minute song which Noel Gallagher claims took a matter of minutes to put together
  • ‘Shaker maker’ is more of a look into the past, whereas  ‘Common Sense’ is a look into the present and a hint into the future of advertising
  • Whilst ‘Shakermaker’ celebrates advertising, ‘Common Sense’ hints at it vulgarity and deceptiveness. Gallagher celebrates flaws whereas Parr seeks to exploit them

 

Conclusion

It is clear therefore that despite expressing their ideas in different ways, Gallagher and Parr both mock and satirize the role of advertising. Both are entertaining in the same way that they paint a picture in the mind of the viewer, both of the viewpoint that advertising is cheesy and tacky, done through the act of re-construction to emphasize such an agenda.

However it is apparent that Parr’s images are stronger than the song in the sense they express an actual document the viewer can see with their own eyes. Furthermore Parr is allowed more to play with in the sense that he has the means to create a 100+ page photo-book and sell commercially. Gallagher on the other can only produce a short song which hints a just a handful of ideas. Photography as a medium therefore arguably allows the artistic to express more, along with the additional advantage of being already there for the viewer to appreciate, whilst in music the listener must carefully study the limits and extract an interpretation.

Overall both are incredibly successfully in what they achieve are are equally intriguing and unique in their take on 1990s society.

 

 

Shoot Planning

Shoot 1: For my first shoot i am going to try and recreate some of Matt Crump’s photos by going through town and taking photos of the top of buildings, signs and other abstract objects that i could try and give the candy minimalistic look

Shoot 2: For my second shoot i am going to try and recreate some of Jerry Uelsmann’s photos by mixing landscape photos and maybe some portrait mixed with landscape, this means that i will have a broad range of photos to try and experiment with.