Migrant mother

Photography: A Critical Introduction Third Edition Edited by Liz Wells 

In 1939 a Documentary photographer called Dorothea Lange, was working on a government run project called Farm Security Administration.  Dorothea had stopped on the road to investigate a group of people who were employed to pick peas. Within less than 15 minutes she had photographs of the ‘migrant mother’ and her children. This photograph went on to become the most reproduced photograph in history, it was reproduced on stamps to represent the ear of 1930’s and used for cartoons.

One of the main principles of this photograph was that it should remain untouched free of photo shop even any minor changes so that the photograph could maintain it’s accuracy and genuineness.

What the photograph shows/ represents?

  • Mother and child – maternal symbolism
  • Poverty during the depression
  • Lack of presence in the mothers expression
  • Absence of the farther
  • The human condition at the time
  • Social and historical evidence
  • Resistance against the depression
  • Gender roles – femininity

Dorothea Lange – The Assignment I Will Never Forget  

Essay to go with the photograph of Migrant Mother

“I saw and approached the hungry and desperate mother, as if drawn by a magnet. I do not remember how I explained my presence or my camera to her, but I do remember she asked me no questions. I made five exposures, working closer and closer from the same direction. I did not ask her name or her history. She told me her age, she was thirty-two. “She and her children had been living on frozen vegetables from the field and wild birds the children caught. The pea crop had frozen; there was no work. Yet they could not move on, for she had just sold the tires from the car to buy food. There she sat in that lean in tent with her children huddled around her, seemed to know that my pictures might help her, so she helped me. There was a sort of equality about it.”

Ways in which the photograph can be analysed:

  • Relation to politics and ideology
  • Process and technique
  • Class, race and gender
  • Psychoanalysis
  • Aesthetics and traditions in art
  • Context
  • Essay to go with it

In 1978,  they were able to track Migrant Mother, they found her living in a trailer in Modesto California, however they said that she was an ordinary dull woman who was no longer able to be the icon of the depression.  In an interview with ‘Migrant Mother’ Florence Thompson held by the United Press 50 years after the photographs were taken Florence said that she was proud to be the subject of the photography however she didn’t make any money out of it and so it had done her no good.

3334095096_ffdce92fc4

Suffragette Movement

What is it? 

Throughout history women faced unequal standards of living and were expected to live happily without suffrage. This began to change in the early 1900s as women started to stand up against this and have a mind of their own.
In 1903 a woman in Britain founded a new organisation, her name was Emmeline Pankhurst, this was the Women’s Social and Political Union. Pankhurst knew that the movement would have to become more radical and militant if they were ever to be noticed and effective. They were given the name Suffragettes by an article in The Daily Mail. These women were often silenced and little media coverage was to be allowed on their movement as many people in politics wanted them to be silenced and not to allow them to gain any sort of following. These women did many protests against the norms that their faced in their society. They simply wanted the right to vote. Throughout campaigns these women were hit down, shamed and also sent to prison. Those who made it home were shamed in the street they lived in by police and their husbands were humiliated. Those who went to prison would often go on hunger strike but were force fed through tubes going down their noses. Women were treated so poorly all because they wanted the right to a simple vote. The suffragettes went through so much and many became martyrs to the cause. Without these women we would not be where we are today with feminism.

More about the story of British Suffragettes:   http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/the-role-of-british-women-in-the-twentieth-century/suffragettes/

“this was the beginning of a campaign the like of which was never known in England, or for that matter in any other country…..we interrupted a great many meetings……and we were violently thrown out and insulted. Often we were painfully bruised and hurt.” – Emmeline Pankhurst

What they did

The Suffragette women were willing to do whatever it took to get noticed by Parliament and demanded the right to vote through violent means of protest. They would throw stones in shop windows, shout down the streets with signs. These women faced police hitting them down and being thrown to the ground all because they had a difference in their views and supposedly these women were breaching the peace. To think of everything that these women had to go through just for the simple right to vote baffles me as it seems to be something that we all have now and that many people ignore and don’t actively use their right to vote. These women faced imprisonment instead of accepting fines as it would have defeated the whole purpose of their movement, they would never give in. When in prison women would go on hunger strike and would refuse to take any sort of food at all. These women were force fed, they were held down against their will and a tube would be shoved up their nose where they would be forcibly given milk and other liquidised foods. The movie Suffragette shows this in a lot of depth and really gives audiences a sense of what it would have been like just as one Suffragette in Britain back in the early 1900s. Suffragettes also faced police brutality being thrown to the ground and hit in attempts to stop them protesting. Somehow this has seeped through history and not a lot of people know about the Suffragette and the fight that women had to go through and are still going through just for the right to vote. Feminism now branches further into issues of equal pay, equality of life and equality of social standards as well as a more equal political state. This fight is nowhere near over and women are still fighting for their rights in 2016. Many Suffragettes died during protests and have since become martyrs to the cause.

What I think | Overview

It is so important that the Suffragettes fought for their rights back in the early 1900s because they gave women of the future a better chance and better opportunities. This was just the start of ridding of our suppression that has been bestowed upon us by men. These women actually lost their lives because they felt so passionately and believed that it was their right to have a simple vote. I am so pleased to live in a time where I don’t have to fight for my right to vote and to be seen as more of a human being rather than a robot that stays at home doing all of the cooking, cleaning and caring for the children. I do think that the movement of the Suffragettes is one of Britain’s untold histories, not many people know what these women went through. We aren’t taught this in school, almost as if it wasn’t real. I feel that many people are ashamed that this actually happened, that women had to fight hard to get the right to vote and that many died in the process. I also think that the brutality of the police really emulates what women went through and how far they would go to suppress these women. Without this movement and without these women I wouldn’t be in school today, I wouldn’t have an education and I probably wouldn’t have any where near as many rights as I do have now. I am so glad that these women saw that something was wrong and stood up for what they believed in as I find nowadays it is so easy to just ignore your feelings and not voice your own opinion in fear of being shamed or laughed at but these women did not care, they simply fought. This was the first step of feminism and now in the third wave of feminism we still haven’t got too much further, there is still so much change that needs to happen and many more fights to be fought and won but without the movement of the Suffragettes we as women wouldn’t be able to voice our opinions. We have so far to go in feminism and it is now becoming a whole lot more accepted in countries like America and Britain but other European countries are still fighting for their rights and some are still fighting for the right to vote.

VARIOUS, LONDON, BRITAIN

Personal Study: Photographers

Before I start my Personal Study, I want to do some simple research into all of the photographers I am going to write about within my essay.

The New Topographic Photographers:

“With shots of disused warehouses and eerily empty streets, the New Topographics photographers trained their cameras on the creeping urbanisation and industry of 1970s America.” – The Guardian

New Topographics: Photographs of a Man-Altered Landscape” was an exhibition curated by William Jenkins in which he selected eight young american photographers; Robert Adams, Lewis Baltz, Joe Deal, Frank Gohlke, Nicholas Nixon, John Schott, Stephen Shore, and Henry Wessel, Jr. Each photographer was represented through ten pages in the exhibition, all except for Stephen Shore worked in Black and White. Jenkins chose these photographers because their images all had a similar ‘banal’ aesthetic, but were formal images.

The pictures were stripped of any artistic frills and reduced to an essentially topographic state, conveying substantial amounts of visual information but eschewing entirely the aspects of beauty, emotion and opinion.

Of The New Topographics, I have chosen to look at Robert Adams and Lewis Baltz, as their work is very strong and well know for being part of the new topographic movement.

Robert Adams

robert-adams

Adams is an American Photographer who was part of the New Topographic’s movement. “His work is largely concerned with moments of regional transition: the suburbanization of Denver, a changing Los Angeles of the 1970s and 1980s, and the clear-cutting in Oregon in the 1990s.” 

His work demonstrates the vastness and the beauty of america and whilst have the banal aesthetic that made Jenkins chose him for the exhibition, his images are very interesting and of good quality.

Lewis Baltz

Lewis_Baltz-550x366

Baltz is a photographer I first studied last year when looking at Landscape photography, and although at the time i had very little interest in his work, I have come to appreciate it and enjoy his images much more now.

Photographers who influenced the Bechers:

Albert Renger-Patzsch

1450584_1_l

In 1925 Renger-Patzsch was a German photographer, who began to pursue photography as a full-time career in 1925. He rejected both Pictorialism, an imitation of painting, and the experimentation of photographers who relied on startling techniques. His photographs record the exact detail of objets. In his book Die Welt ist schön (“The world is beautiful”), his images showed both nature and industry in his style of photography, which was very clear and transparent. These images were closely related to painting of the Neue Sachlichkeit (“The New Objectivity”) movement.

August Sander

images-5

During military service, August Sander was an assistant in a photographic studio in Trier and By 1904 he had opened his own studio in Linz. When he moved to a suburb of Cologne in 1909 he began to photograph the rural farmers who lived nearby. Around three years later Sander left his urban studio so he could continue photographing in the field, finding subjects along the roads he traveled by bicycle.

Karl Blossfeldt

images-6
 Blossfeldt is a very clear influence for the Bechers, and you can see the similarities in the way they both photographed.  Blossfeldt was a German  photographer, sculptor, teacher, and artist.He made most of his images with a homemade camera which was able to magnify the subject u to 30x its size, which he mainly used to photograph plants. This camera revealed lots of detail about the plants natural structure.

Photographers who the Bechers have since influenced:

Bernd and Hilla Becher have influenced a large number of photographers, who are mainly German, including Thomas Struth, Candida Höfer, Axel Hütte, and Roswitha Ronkholz, who joined the first year of the new photography class run by the Bechers in 1976.

Thomas Struth

main

Struth is a German Photographer known for his images of urban scenes, jungles, and portraits.

“Much of his early works are black and white photographs of urban scenes, particularly industrial spaces and deserted streets, which reflect the changing conditions of contemporary society in his observations of architecture and urban development.”

This kind of edge to his work is what shows the influence of the Bechers work and teaching.

Andreas Gursky

andreas-gursky

“Gursky studied under Bernd and Hilla Becher at the Düsseldorf Kunstakademie in the early 1980s and first adopted a style and method closely following Becher’s systematic approach to photography, creating small, black-and-white prints. ” – http://whitecube.com/artists/andreas_gursky/

His current work is known for its scale and colour, with his images looking at the effect of capitalism and globalisation on contemporary life.

Candida Hofer

candida-hoferHofer i a german photographer, best known for her large format images on architectural interiors. Her images greatly show the influence that the Bechers had, with her images all being taken in the same way, like the typologies that the Bechers produced.