On Friday the 23rd of October, just before half-term we were assigned a project by the Jersey Museum. The task was to respond to the existing story at the museum called “125 years”, which I talked about in a previous post. We had to take at least 150 to 250 pictures for this. The name of our project was entitled “Our Story, Half Term: 125 hours seen through a teenager’s lens”.
Here are some of my photographs for this task:
Continue to photograph Nana
This week I decided to return to the theme of vanacular photography. I have got a lot of formal photographs of Nana lately and so I decided to make this shoot more spontaneous. Nana wasn’t feeling very well today so it waan’t a good day to geta lot of portraits of her. Instead I decided to explore much more of the house, going into different parts included upstairs and a few images in her bedroom.
I am pleased with the images I have produced today.I think that I am starting to develop an effective style, balancing vernacular photography with classic composition. The work of photographer Julian Geramin has greatly influenced me recently and I aimed to photograph in a similar manner that he achieves.
Here is an audio only version of my interview with Nana. As a start to take more photographs, I will begin to select a few images as visual aids to go over this audio. I will then incorporate these images in with film that I will take next week. This will go to create one of my outcomes for this project. I will give this audio credit for the time being as an outcome. In a way I like its simplicity. It is very basic and sounds authentic and natural. I find that this interview is very fascinating and revealing both about my Granddad, as well as about Nana’s life in general.
BEGINNING OF CONVERSATION
Me: Hi Nana.
Nana: Hello, how are you?
Me: I’m good thank you. As you know I’m doing a project about my Grandad. I’m trying to find out more about him. You knew him better than anyone else, would you be able to answer a few questions about him?
Nana: Yes, certainly.
Me: Okay thank you. Could you start off by giving a little background about him?
Nana: His name was Arthur Maitland Le Feuvre, and he was born on June 4th 1921. He was the ninth and youngest child of Francis and Lydia Le Feuvre who were farmers from St Peters. He was born at Maitland House, Trinity Hill. So he was named after his house. But they moved to St Peters when he was 10.
Me: Okay that’s really interesting. (Question 1) What year did you and Grandpa first meet?
Nana: We met in January 1947.
Me: So while a while ago now?
Nana: Yes, quite a while ago now. (laughs).
Me: (Question 2) What first attracted him to you?
Nana: Well naturally his good looks.
Me: (joking) well obviously I take after him then?
Nana: Yes you do! (laughs).
Me: (Question 3) What do you member most about your wedding day?
Nana: Well it was on April 14, 1949 – it was on Easter Monday, and we are married at the Salvation Army. And it was a bright and sunny day.
Me: So lots of happy memories then?
Nana: Oh yes some very happy memories!
Me: (Question 4) You brought up 4 children together. How important was your relationship in getting through this aspect of your life?
Nana: Well our home was a loving one so as we both pulled together we got through it. This continued right through our married life. It was no hard chore.
Me: So it was quite important?
Nana: Yes it was quite a peaceful, happy home.
Me: Okay nice. (Question 5) Obviously you lived in Kenya for 10 years. Could you describe 3 fond memories you have got of this time?
Nana: Well we had a wonderful time in Kenya, Kenya is a beautiful place. We were very privileged to go there. I think three memories (pause)…
…Firstly, getting used to the children who are not at home, but were at boarding school. It was quite difficult, it sort of broke up the family a bit…
…Secondly, I did a woman’s meeting. Teaching my ladies, 36 of them to knit. That was quite an experience…
….And then the best one, looking after the Jersey Calves, they were my responsibility. Because we had a Jersey heard.
Me: Wow! That is really, really cool! (Question 6) Meeting Grandpa meant that you you were introduced to the Salvation Army, is this right?
Nana: No, I met your Grandpa at a special meeting. That was the first time that both of us had been in the Salvation Army.
Me: So you were both new at the same time?
Nana: He was a Methodist local preacher actually, and I was not a Christian at that time. Joining the Salvation Army was calling for us both, not just a job, and it was a joy to serve the Lord together really.
Me: Okay, so you would say that it was quite important in shaping both of your lives?
Nana: Yes. It was very important.
Me: (Question 7) Is there anything you regret about moving to Kenya?
Nana: No, not at all. It was the best thing I think we did, going to Kenya. I mean life was hard at times, away from home. But you know, it was just another experience of life.
Me: So it was a big life choice?
Nana: Well helping the people to learn to farm properly, and to make a living was a joy. It was quite wonderful to help these lovely people, because they are lovely people.
Me: Okay, wow! (Question 8) So obviously Grandpa dedicated a lot of his life to the Salvation Army which obviously brought you to Kenya. If he had not been an officer for the Salvation Army, is there any other ambitions Grandpa had?
Nana: Well. (pause) He was a farmer all of his life. That is why we went to Kenya, because he had the experience as a farmer.
Me: So it was were his strengths lay?
Nana: Yes. He used those skills for the Lord and the Salvation Army. After the war, he had been offered commission with the RAF. But he never took it up. He came back to Jersey, hadn’t seen his people for six years, and his dad didn’t want him to leave the island.
Me: So he never wanted him to have this career?
Nana: No.
Me: (Question 9) That’s interesting, because I do you gather that Grandpa did actually fight in World War Two?
Nana: Yes he did.
Me: Do you know anything about this?
Nana: Yes, he was 19 when the occupation began. Despite a lot of persuasion to his father who was against it, he left the island on the last coal boat. When he reached the UK, he joined up and was in the RAF and eventually became a navigator. At the end of the war he was in Germany as an interpreter because he spoke German and French.
Me: Oh wow, so he actually went to Germany?
Nana: Yes so he went to France and then Germany with the troops. He never talked much about it. The one thing he was proud of though, was that he was in the RAF football team.
Me: Really?
Nana: Yes. (laughs).
Me: Awesome! So obviously he could speak French. (Question 10) You went to France didn’t you?
Nana: Yes, we went to France in 1982 to Paris. That was a different experience altogether. We worked with alcoholics and drug addicts. Grandpa loved it but I struggled with the language. I liked being there, doing the work, but I struggled with the language, couldn’t speak it. That was a tough assignment actually, because we were getting on in age.
Me: But you got through it?
Nana: Yes, we got through it.
Me: (Question 10) you mentioned that you had some retirement plans which were never realised?
Nana: Yes
Me: What was the plan?
Nana: Yes. (pause) Grandpa had a brother called Frank in Australia. Frank, he was five years older and grandpa and he left the island when grandpa was 11 years old to go to Australia and so they never saw him after that. A couple of the brothers and sisters went to Australia when they found out where Frank was after the war, and we planned to visit Frank when we were retired in 1986.
(My Grandad passed away in 1984. He was looking forward to a well earned retirement but sadly never got the chance).
Me: As you know I do you like to wind people up.
Nana: Yes. (laughs)
Me: (Question 11) Did my Grandad share any similar humour to me?
Nana: Yes he had a good sense of humour
Me: Did he get up to many pranks?
Nana: Yes, he used to tell jokes that no one else could understand. It was like a dry humour but we laughed anyway. One prank he did was to phone up members of his family and pretend to be someone else, and he always spoke to them in Jersey French.
Me: (Laughs) …. (Question 12) You and grandpa had some very close friends. Did you share fond memories with friends?
Nana: Yes, we had some lovely friends. We met Doug and Lil Phillips when we were stationed on the Welsh Valleys. We had lots of holidays together, before we went to Kenya, and when we came back. It was always great fun, always laughing
Me: That’s nice, I never met Doug
Nana: You’ve met Lil though?
Me: Yes I know auntie Lil, of course.
(Auntie Lil is an old family friend. She is probably Nana oldest and closest friend. Her and her sister Auntie Pearl usually come for visit once a year. They both live in Wales. It would be good to speak to either of them about my Grandad over the phone and record it).
(Question 13) From what I’ve heard Grandpa had a very difficult relationship with his father, is that right?
Nana: Well I wouldn’t exactly call it difficult. No, because he loved his father. It was a good relationship. You’ve got to understand his dad was very strict, and the problem was when he said we were going to London to go to the Salvation Army college, he wasn’t very keen on him leaving Jersey. It was so we could become a full time officer. But we got over that.
Me: Okay. (Question 15) What sports and hobbies did Grandpa have during his life?
Nana: Grandpa was a great athlete, and of course a footballer. He played for Jersey before the war actually. And he was a great cross country runner when he was at Victoria College. He won a lot of prizes.
Me: Ah cool, he did a lot a running then?
Nana: Yes.
Me: Oh that interesting.
Nana: If you go up to the college (Victoria College) you can see his name everywhere.
Me: Yeah. I might go and have a look. That really interesting that.
(Question 16) Please could you state three good traits about Grandpa?
Nana: Well this is a difficult one. He was a kind, caring man. He didn’t like a lot of fuss. Arthur Le Feuvre was the same at home (pause) same person at home that people saw outside as well. A most gracious man actually.
Me: So you couldn’t name any faults?
Nana: No I couldn’t really, we were very happily married. For 36 years.
Me: (Last Question) If I ever had the chance to meet him, do you reckon we would have got along?
Nana: Oh, like a house on fire. You would, he would have loved you to bits. He was a very family orientated man, he loved his family
Me: Okay, I think I’ve got some really good information there
Nana: Yes you have, haven’t you!
Me: Thank you Nana!
Nana: Now you know a little bit more about him.
Me: Yes I do, thanks very much.
END OF CONVERSATION
Plan
Evalution: I think that the interview went really well. Nana improvised fantastically and her answers were flowing and well developed. Personally it is a relfief as she has been quite anxious about the project recently but today she seemed a lot more happy and reassured about it. The answer I got were very fascinating and interesting, espacially after the interview when I went for a walk and played the conversation through my heaphones. The fuzzy noise in the background I wasn’t happy about at first but after reviewing it I actually quite like it because it creates a very natural and authetic feel to the coversation
On the 15th November 2015, media hit a high when terrorist attacks hit Paris, Beirut, Anarka, Latakia and over the Sinai Peninsula. Living close to France, Jersey where informed vividly of the hideous violence Islamic State (ISIS, ISIL) put to the local people of Paris, who were targeted by gunmen in theatres, local restaurants, and outside Paris’s notorious Hannover Stadium, which was immediately evacuated by Paris’s police force. 
Here is a link to the digital version of the articles which shows the attacks which occurred in Paris, Beirut, Anarka, Latakia and over the Sinai Peninsula:
https://www.liberationnews.org/psl-statement-attacks-paris-beirut/
This is my interpretations of the reactions I received as a reader when analyzing picture stories from newspaper’s and magazines. 
WEBSITES:
http://theinspirationroom.com/daily/2014/leica-100-years-of-photography/
http://www.vivianmaier.com/gallery/street-5/#slide-16
http://entelahotollari.blogspot.com/2011_10_01_archive.htmlhttp:/
/www.lilstickyrice.com/otw-portfolio/estevan-oriol-photography-book-
layout/http://proof.nationalgeographic.com/2015/08/14/american-backyard/
http://www.stillsgallery.com.au/artists/papapetrou/index.php?obj_id=series&nav=7http://greatphotojournalism.com/
http://www.wired.com/2012/10/photo-workshops-help-students-beat-the-odds-in-terrible-photojournalism-market/
Plan
Evaluation
I didn’t get as many photographs of my Grandma today as I would have liked because she wasn’t feeling to well. I decided instead to get a few still-life shots of the inside of her house. I also went into her Garden to get a few images which I had already planned. It was a good day today do it because the sun was starting to go down and there was a crsip, yellowly reflection. Photographing outisde at this time of year is very good because as it is autumn all of the leaves have fallen which makes for an interesting looking location that conveys a certain gloomy mood which can only be achieved at autumn and winter. I took about 60 photos of my Grandma in about 4 different locations with I carefully planned out beforehand. I wanted to consider composition this week as I have explored the work of photographers Alec Soth and Jonas Bendiksen for my exploration of the theme of community and so I have tried to mimic their styles of carefully composed composition, which are quite similar. I want my photographs to be a balance of formal and vernacular photography, a bit like the work of Jullian Germain. Mr Toft showed me from a copy of Germain’s book ‘For every minute of anger you lose 60 seconds of happiness’ a I have gained a lot of inspiration from studying this.
I went around different parts of Nana’s house to get old photographs of my Grandad. I went outside were there was natural lighting and unframed the images, placed then on a table of photographed them. I think that this is a good way to photograph the images because there is a candid, natural look to them and it is a very simplistic and clear way of doing so. I was nice to look at these of old photos as I take never really looked at many photos of my Grandad before. Unfortunately Nana said that my Grandad’s sister had a lot of old family photos of my Grandad and his brothers and sisters growing up. She can’t explain why but apparently she threw them all in the bin. A shame to be honest as it would have been useful and generally interesting to see them
Photos I took today …
This weekend I have decided to conduct an interview with my Grandma and Grandpa, as in my picture book I would like to have some subheadings where I display my grandparents feelings/thoughts on a chosen subject. The subjects I have chosen to interview my grandparents about are; Faith, Wales, Music, Family and Jersey.
I would also like to look into my grandparents own archive and try and find some photographs of my Grandpa during his singing career.
Finally, I plan to take a trip down to their church on Sunday and capture some images go them at their service and their contribution to their church. For example my Grandpa playing the organ. My Grandma preparing tea and coffee, for after the service.
On Friday 23rd October the whole of year 12 and 13 photography students headed down to the Jersey Art Museum where we were delivered an opportunity to get our creative work exhibited within the Jersey Museum. This was created to celebrate 125 years of the Jersey Evening Post [originally named Evening Post]. This would be a really great opportunity to get our work out there within the Jersey community as well as actually being a part of an exhibition.
The film cameras were great, as I’am fond of vintage cameras, it really brought the whole exhibition into perspective that people actually used to use these to make photographs for the papers and looking around at the images they were all so amazing without any editing being done at all. I personally was unable to attend the exhibition but from pictures and research i have done i have a clear imagery of what the room and presentation looked like. I do not like the layout of the exhibition and thought it could have been done a lot better. The very bright red background was too intense and set off the view to the images. However the contrast of the black and white images onto the red was very complimentary. The captions of the photographs were too high up the wall and very small so they were unreadable from a low level. The actually quality of the prints at the exhibition were very poor also.
The space that the exhibition was in the Jersey Museum and the space was also very small for the images shown. Ceilings were relatively low and makes the space feel cramped and small. The lighting was very harsh and did not compliment the photographs well at all, On a whole i thought the exhibition was very poor and could have been done ALOT better. This is a shame because the conceptual idea is a good and if done well could have been a successful and well perceived.