Comparative Table

THEMENEWSBEATWAR OF THE WORLDS
OWNERSHIPBBC [British Broadcasting Company]
public service broadcast, government, BBC board of trustees, first Director-General (DG) – Lord Reith, BBC multi-media/cross-media, transnational/transglobal, not a monopoly, concentration of ownership i.e. small number of firms who own TV and radio even though there are lots of different stations, left-wing libertarian ideology
CBS [Columbia Broadcasting System]
private company, cross-media conglomerate, an example of concentration of ownership i.e. just a few companies own everything – oligopoly/cartel
HABERMASTransformation of the Public Sphere
media is constantly changing, BBC keeping up, intention enshrined in their ethos – “to inform, educate, and entertain“, not to make money or profit – they put money back into programmes so quality is important, this fits into Habermas’ notion of transforming the public, the BBC is more paternalistic – what you need not what you want
most private businesses are aimed at making money – caring more about the profit than the public, populistic – more concerned with entertainment than education, commercial ethos – not in the ethos of Habermas
CHOMSKYentertainingsome people can’t distinguish truth from fiction – universal grammar
CURRAN
SEATON
REGULATIONOfcom [Office of Communications]
BBC Charter governed by Parliament, license fee regulates BBC as well, BBC ethos – “to inform, educate, and entertain“, new technologies mean BBC faced with more competition
FCC [Federal Communications Commission]
regulator for private business i.e. not necessarily in the public interest
AUDIENCEActive
audience participation, online accessibility
Passive
The hypodermic needle theory suggests a media text can have a powerful and immediate effect on the passive audience. It would seem The War of the Worlds production supports this argument because so many terrified listeners, for example, “rushed out of their houses” to escape the “gas raid”
AUDIENCE (LAZARSFELD)Two-Step Flow of Mass Communication
AUDIENCE (HALL)Theory of Preferred Reading
NEW TECHNOLOGYNewsbeat is on social media, internet radio and apps.
CROSS MEDIA CONVERGENCE
?
?

Newsbeat and War of the worlds

THEMENEWSBEATWAR OF THE WORLDS
OWNERSHIPBBC, PSB, Government, BBC board of trustees ?? DG
(Lord Reith), BBC multi-media / cross media, transnational / trans global, not a monopoly, concentration of ownership i.e. small number of firms who own tv and radio even though there are lots of different stations. I think the BBC has a left wing libertarian ideology ??
CBS, Private company, multi or cross media conglomerate, transnational / trans global ??, it is an example of the concentration of ownership i.e. just a few companies own everything (oligopoly / cartel?) vertical / horizontal integration ??
HABERMASTransformation of the public sphere – media is constantly changing with the BBC keeping up.
BBC intention to enshrined in their ethos to inform, entertain and educate. Not to make a profit or money. They put money back into programs(quality is important). This fits into Habermas notion of transforming the public. Therefore the BBC is more paternalistic – what you need not what you want.
Most private business are aimed at making a profit.
They care about profit so they are more concerned with entertainment than education.
Commercial ethos not in the spirit of Habermas.
CHOMSKY1 of the five filters is advertising, they don’t include any advertisements within the BBC. They only show the programs people want to see in order to make money and profit. They most likely include advertisements with the radio broadcast as well.
REGULATIONOfcom, BBC charter governed by parliament, license fee regulates BBC as well. BBC / PSB ethos ‘to entertain, inform and educate'(Reith)Federal Communications Commission as regulator for private business i.e. not necessarily in the public interest.
AUDIENCE (ACTIVE / PASSIVE)active, The audience look for the newsbeat broadcast that last 15 mins. However the bulletins throughout the radio broadcast would be passive as your listening to radio music, when bulletins pop up hourly or so.passive, your not actively looking for media or information, as people turn this radio on to hear anything, and nothing specific like newsbeat.
AUDIENCE (LAZARSFELD)Audiences opinions can be based on opinion leaders or famous people that are brought onto the show for a interview etc. The BBC is unbiased informed opinion leader .
AUDIENCE (HALL)
NEW TECHNOLOGYNew technology could give more competition to the BBC in terms of equipment.
?
?

NOTES: NEWSBEAT & WAR OF THE WORLDS

THEMENEWSBEATWAR OF THE WORLDS
OWNERSHIPBBC, PSB, Government, BBC board of trustees ( ??) BBC multi-media / cross-media, transnational / transglobal, not a monopoly, concentration of ownership (i.e. small number of firms who own TV and Radio even though there are lots of different stations)CBS, Private Company, Multi or cross media Conglomerate, concentration of ownership i.e. just a few companies own everything (oligopoly / cartel), vertical & horizontal integration (??)
HABERMASTransformation of the Public Sphere, media is constantly changing – BBC is adapting, BBC intention enshrined in their ethos. They put money back into programs, so Quality is important. I think this fits into Habermas’s transforming the public sphere. More paternalistic.Private business, likely to prioritise making profit. I think they only care about making a profit and are less concerned about education compared to entertainment. Just for profit is a commercial ethos – not in the spirit of Habermas. Populism
CHOMSKYSecond filter (advertising) The BBC does not run ads in the UKSecond filter (advertising) CBS runs ads which helps them accrue profit.
REGULATIONOfcom, BBC charter governed by parliament, license fee regulates BBC, BBC Ethos – educate, inform and entertain (Reith)Federal Communications Commission, regulates private business i.e. not necessarily in public interest.
AUDIENCE (ACTIVE / PASSIVE)More active as they don’t run ads so people choose to listen.Audience passively consumes CBS
AUDIENCE (LAZARSFELD)2 step flow / opinion leaders how we gravitate to people who share the same ideas as ourselves. So the BBC is an unbiased, informed opinion leader (ie BBC Charter focus on impartiality, accurate, true)The opinion leaders of CBS would be the presenters of the show as they are a lot less regulated than the BBC
AUDIENCE (HALL)Preferred reading, young people will favour Newsbeat over alternatives as it is targeted more towards them.Stuart Hall theorised how audiences decode messages, by accepting, negotiating or rejecting the sent message. This can be seen with ‘War of the Worlds’ as the people that listened to it decoded it and accepted it as being real, then ran outside of their houses in panic.
NEW TECHNOLOGYNew Technologies mean that the BBC is faced with more competition.
CROSS MEDIA CONVERGENCERadio, Podcast, WebsiteRadio, that’s it
CURRAN
SEATON

War of the Worlds

At the time of the original broadcast of War of the Worlds, radio was a new growing media platform, providing the public with far better entertainment than most were accustomed to. It had quickly risen in popularity during the late 1920s and early 1930s, with around 60% of America’s households owning radios, in what would be known as the ‘Golden Age’ of radio. Before this time, people solely received their information from newspapers

War of the Worlds was both directed and narrated by Orson Welles and was part of The Mercury Theatre on the Air segment on CBC, which helped target listeners who enjoyed fictional radio theatre and drama.

The program itself was designed like a typical news broadcasts, with orchestral music and fictional news reports that ‘interrupted’ the broadcast to talk about the supposed news of an alien invasion. There were no breaks for advertisements in the first half which added to the authenticity of the broadcast, and at 30:47, the radio falls completely silent, creating an incredibly ominous moment. All these factors had an effect that made it feel realistic towards the audience and The New York Times reported “a wave of mass hysteria” amongst radio listeners.

Many reported reactions of audiences at the time were widely varied and likely exaggerated with some people requiring “medical treatment for shock and hysteria”. The two-step flow model of communication provides some insight into the unfolding of the panic. For example, The New York Times reported how the ‘rumour’ of war “spread through the district and many persons stood on street corners hoping for a sight of the ‘battle’ in the skies”, proving that not everyone who believed the radio play had actually listened to the broadcast and instead heard from people within their social circle.

War Of The Worlds

Radio was popularized in the late 20’s early 30’s. The broadcast happened on Oct 31st 1938.

12M listeners – surveys found that 1 in 12 thought it was true – 1M people

“a “War of the Worlds” reenactment happened in the mountains of Quito, Ecuador, 1949.”

the Chase & Sanborn hour ran alongside the Mercury Theatre at the same time – this show was much more popular which is why most people missed the introduction stating it was fake. They only tuned in after Chase and Sanborn brought on an unpopular singer.

War of the worlds

  • ‘War Of The Worlds’ was a live broadcast which broadcasted on Columbia broadcasting systems (CBS) on October 30th 1938 8-9pm.
  • Producers – Urban Myth Films, Fox Networks Group, Studio Canal.
  • The broadcast was based of the book written by H.G Welles in 1898 and aired on the Halloween episode of ‘The mercury Theatre on The Air’. Listeners around the States believed that the broadcast was real and informing the public that Martians had invaded New Jersey, this instilled panic across the country.
  • The hypodermic needle theory suggests a media text can have a powerful and immediate effect on the passive audience. It would seem “The War of the Worlds” production supports this argument because so many terrified listeners, for example, “rushed out of their houses” to escape the “gas raid”.
  • The episode is famous for inciting a panic by convincing some members of the listening audience that a Martian invasion was taking place, though the scale of panic is disputed, as the program had relatively few listeners.

“The War of the Worlds” was the 17th episode of the CBS Radio series.
news bulletins would make people believe this actually happened.

Essay questions :

  1. Explain how Orson Welles’ War of the Worlds broadcast used the codes and conventions of radio to convince the audience Martians were invading New York.
  2. How do the cultural and historical circumstances affect the audience’s interpretation of media texts? Refer to the Close Study Product War of the Worlds in your answer.
  3. Discuss how and why audiences might respond to and interpret media texts differently depending on the social context they are consumed. Refer to the Close Study Product War of the Worlds in your answer.
  4. “There is no doubt the media has a profound influence on the audience’s thoughts and behaviour.” To what extent does your analysis of the Close Study Product War of the Worlds support this view?

War of the worlds – essay

Lasswell – Hypodermic needle theory –

In this model, the media is seen as powerful and able to inject ideas into an audience who are seen as weak and passive.

The hypodermic needle was proposed by Harold Lasswell in the 1920s. It explains how the audience is directly affected by what they view and hear. It is said to affect the audience/viewer immediately or in the near future. 
It suggests that a media text can ‘inject’ or ‘fire’ ideas, values and attitudes into a passive audience, who might then act upon them. This theory suggests that the audience is powerless to resist the impact of the message which, in some cases, could be dangerous. 

Lasswell’s hypodermic model fits well in the case of Orson Welles’s ‘War of the World’, where listeners were passive, and accepted the information given to them despite the lack of evidence.

  • The War of the Worlds” was a Halloween episode of the radio series The Mercury Theatre on the Air directed and narrated by Orson Welles as an adaptation of H. G. Well’s novel The War of the Worlds (1898). It was performed and broadcast live at 8 pm ET on October 30, 1938, over the CBS Radio Network. The episode is famous for inciting panic by convincing some members of the listening audience that a Martian invasion was taking place, though the scale of panic is disputed, as the program had relatively few listeners.
  • 12 million people listening was reported. More likely that just 50,000 people were listening.

CSP War of the Worlds

First, “The War of the Worlds” was aired by Columbia Broadcasting Systems (CBS) – one of only two national broadcasters who were trusted by millions of listeners every day to deliver reliable and impartial news. It is also important to note that CBS frequently interrupted scheduled programmes to inform their listeners of the latest updates from Europe. In the weeks prior to “The War of the Worlds” episode, the network reported on Hitler’s continued occupation Czechoslovakia and the inevitability of another global conflict.

“The War of the Worlds” mixes science fiction tropes with the conventions of radio broadcasts to create a very entertaining narrative. Combining these two elements into a hybrid radio form was a great innovation, but it may have duped some listeners into believing the news bulletins and reports were a true account of the Martian conquest.

The hypodermic needle theory suggests a media text can have a powerful and immediate effect on the passive audience. It would seem “The War of the Worlds” production supports this argument because so many terrified listeners, for example, “rushed out of their houses” to escape the “gas raid”.4

War of the worlds

About:

‘War Of The Worlds’ was a live broadcast which broadcasted on Columbia broadcasting systems (CBS) on October 30th 1938 8-9pm

The broadcast was based of the book written by H.G Welles in 1898 and aired on the Halloween episode of ‘The mercury Theatre on The Air’. Listeners around the States believed that the broadcast was real and informing the public that Martians had invaded New Jersey, this instilled panic across the country

Radio Conventions

Although the story of interplanetary warfare is typical of the science fiction genre, it was presented within the format of normal evening of radio programming. There appears to be a routine report from the “Government Weather Bureau” about a “slight atmospheric disturbance” along the east coast of America. We are then “entertained by the music of Ramón Raquello and his orchestra” who are playing a tango from the Park Plaza Hotel. Even the “special bulletin from the Intercontinental Radio News”, which interrupts the music, met the expectations of the contemporary audience.

By incorporating these basic radio codes into the start of the script, it is clear the writers were trying to make the story sound plausible. According to Baudrillard’s simulation theory, this would be the first stage which is a “reflection of reality”.

Baudrillard claims that our current society has replaced all reality and meaning with symbols and signs. The simulacra that Baudrillard refers to are the significations and symbolism of culture and media that construct perceived reality, this could be related to Gerberners cultivation theory.

the writers were warned against using the original names by the legal department at Columbia Broadcasting Company because they were worried about the threat of litigation. These changes are very subtle so most listeners would not be able to spot the difference. This blurring of boundaries between fact and fiction could be one of the reasons why members of audience believed aliens were attempting to destroy the human race.

Audience

The New York Times reported “a wave of mass hysteria seized thousands of radio listeners” with some adults requiring “medical treatment for shock and hysteria”. Apparently, “thousands of persons” phoned different agencies “seeking advice on protective measures against the raids”.2 The Daily News in New York went with the headline “Fake Radio ‘War’ stirs terror through U.S.”

The hypodermic needle theory suggests a media text can have a powerful and immediate effect on the passive audience. It would seem “The War of the Worlds” production supports this argument because so many terrified listeners, for example, “rushed out of their houses” to escape the “gas raid”.4

The cultivation theory can also explain some of the hysteria. Gerbner’s research suggested heavy users of television become more susceptible to its messages, especially if the texts resonate with the viewer.

Even the two-step flow model of communication provides some insight into how the panic unfolded. For instance, a “throng of playgoers had rushed” from a “theatre” because “news” of the invasion had “spread” to the audience. The New York Times also reported how the “rumor” of war “spread through the district and many persons stood on street corners hoping for a sight of the ‘battle’ in the skies”.7 Therefore, not everyone who was terrorised by the radio play was actually listening to the broadcast. They heard the rumours from people they trusted in their social circle.

Context

In a radio interview, Orson Welles revealed the preferred reading of the text, saying, “It’s supposed to show the corrupt condition and decadent state of affairs in democracy.”8 To fully appreciate why some listeners panicked, we need to consider the historical and social context behind the broadcast. In terms of Stuart Hall’s reception theory and his encoding / decoding model of communication, this is the audience’s framework of knowledge.

First, “The War of the Worlds” was aired by Columbia Broadcasting Systems (CBS) – one of only two national broadcasters who were trusted by millions of listeners every day to deliver reliable and impartial news. It is also important to note that CBS frequently interrupted scheduled programmes to inform their listeners of the latest updates from Europe. In the weeks prior to “The War of the Worlds” episode, the network reported on Hitler’s continued occupation Czechoslovakia and the inevitability of another global conflict.

Of course, Welles exploited the audience’s fear of a foreign power and their weapons of mass destruction. One concerned citizen said, “I knew it was some Germans trying to gas us all but when the announcer kept on calling them people from Mars, I just thought he was ignorant.”9

Finally, since radio was a relatively new form of mass communication, it could also be argued that many listeners lacked the media literacy needed to understand “The War of the Worlds” was a pastiche of its codes and conventions. Although Welles argued his format “was not even new” and it might seem like an obvious trick to a modern audience, many of the listeners may not have realised the drama was just entertainment.

Essay Questions:

Essay Questions

  1. Explain how Orson Welles’ War of the Worlds broadcast used the codes and conventions of radio to convince the audience Martians were invading New York.
  2. How do the cultural and historical circumstances affect the audience’s interpretation of media texts? Refer to the Close Study Product War of the Worlds in your answer.
  3. Discuss how and why audiences might respond to and interpret media texts differently depending on the social context they are consumed. Refer to the Close Study Product War of the Worlds in your answer.
  4. “There is no doubt the media has a profound influence on the audience’s thoughts and behaviour.” To what extent does your analysis of the Close Study Product War of the Worlds support this view?