habermas argues that the development of early modern capitalism brought into being an autonomous arena fof public debate
the space between the private domain and the state
public sphere came to be dominated by an expanded state and organized economical interest
people collectively determine through the processes of rational argument
the bigger companies get, the more they lose sight of people
re conceptualized and reincarnate the public sphere in a new form
media watchdog
primary democratic role of the media is to act as a public watch dog overseeing the state
regulation, state or free market
rules and regulations (government) control the media/press
james curran says you have to the media free form the state
‘only by anchoring the media to the free market is possible to ensure the media complete independence from government
‘once the media becomes subject to public regulation, it will lost its bite as a watchdog and may even be transformed into a snarling rottweiler in the service of the state
Habermas – believes that democracy is good and people should know knowledge about the world ( new )
public space through a private domain where peoples agree on opinions and set things to do together, not supporting the governments actions.
read and write though communications across the glob
the whole idea of the public sphere is that it connects people horizontally rather than vertically
communications started at home through family, the into the public society in libraries and coffee shops. coffee shop culture is known to be really important, as well as travelling as it allows you to connect to people more and allot you to know more knowledge of society.
helps society change
mass production – helps companies and co-operations start to take over and start dominating – mass media globalization has reduced the effectiveness of the public sphere = resulted in PLURALITY ( fewer people discussing the news)
new media technologies is the transformation of the public sphere
strengths
allows communications
weakness
poor quality – anonymity
TMI
concept of public interest endure quotes:
“the media do serve the public interest or general welfare whether by design or chance”
“democratic societies there are likely to be grounds on which an argued claim can be made”
how do we benefit everyone in society? public control, like government or deregulation “extension of the free market, anyone can?
Who really benefits from a digitally networked society? Big business or individuals? Refer to ‘loop theory’ and the ‘Dunbar number’
i would say that large businesses/companies are the ones who benefit form the digital network society, as linking to the ‘dumber number’ theory, the people who actually know about people and communicate the most with, are large companies. The reason why it is not individuals who are the ones who benefit the most from the digital network society, i because even though they have the potential to connect to millions of people, they only communicate/know a very small variety.
old media, for example a book, you read it and once you are finished you leave it.
new media, for example, phones, you can research more about the content ( you can look at photos, read articles, and look at similar contents.
share
old media, for example, books, once finished reading it, you can share the book by giving it to someone else to read. This is a way of sharing and promoting media
new media, for example, phones, you can share media via applications, such as twitter, email, facebook etc.
stream
for old media
for new media, for example, music, you can stream music by listening to it.