Habermas and The Public Sphere
Habermas came up with the theory of the ‘public sphere’ as we learnt to read and write we could communicate with people across the country and eventually around the world. This increased when media and the internet merged.
Before this we could not communicate with people from the other side of the world and we were told what to do by the government. After this we could talk to others about these issues and can form alliances to protest against it.
Before we communicated horizontally (people of the same class) whereas now we communicate vertically too (people talk to people that are controlling them and that they are in control of).
Habermas believes that democracy depends on a public which is informed, aware and which debates the issues of the day. This is why lots of us watch the news so we have our own opinions and can say why to others. It is also because we do not want to look stupid.
Habermas believes that the mass media and globalisation has reduced the effectiveness of the public sphere. He believes that the mass media has resulted in a reduction in plurality – there are fewer voices discussing the news.
“a public space between the private domain and the state in which public opinion was formed and ‘popular’ supervision of government was established”
“the public sphere and the role of the media in relation to it has to be “reconceptualized and reincarnated in a new form.””
Mass Media in the Public Interest – Denis McQuail
- “a fundamental presumption, that the media do serve the ‘public interest’ or ‘general welfare'”
- “that the media are obliged to conform to popular will or carry out some particular mission”
- “is in the public interest if it serves the ends of the whole society rather than those of some sectors of the society”
- You can have “public control” or “deregulation and the further extension of the free market”
- “the mass media are not the same as any other business or service industry, but carry out some essential tasks for the wider benefit of society, especially in cultural and political life.
Mass Media in the Public Interest (Denis McQuail)
Mass Media and Democracy in the Public Service – James Curran
- Curran suggests that in TV programs that have higher demand get peak-time space. Public services organisations run these channels as well as these highly demanded shows they will include the news as this is in the interest of society. They will also be cheap so they can be accessed by everyone.
https://hautlieucreative.co.uk/media2020/wp-content/uploads/sites/34/2018/11/Mass-Media-and-Democracy-James-Curran-Public-Service.pdf
In the extract: Mass Media and Democracy by James Curran there is a focus on Jurgen Habermas and his concept of the ‘Public Sphere‘,basically arguing that the developments in education and the mass media allowed for a greater access to information particularly with regard to government, authority and the exercise of control. Similarly, Denis McQuail argues for a media that specifically works in the public interest and not in a purely commercial interest.
Regulation: State or Free Market
We want a free media that works in the public’s interest. However, it has to be controlled so it doesn’t get out of hand. If the state (government) makes rules (laws) so the media doesn’t take stuff too far (racism, homophobic, sexist and invasion of privacy). But if the government makes these rules they then control the media, which is something we do not want.
James Curran said “Once the media becomes subject to public regulation, it will lose its bite as a watchdog and may even be transformed into a snarling Rottweiler in the service of the state.”
The Liberal Theory of Press Freedom – James Curran
- Freedom to Publish
- Diversity and Chain Ownership
- Loss of Independence
- Competition, Choice and New Technology
- Reappraisal
- Social Market Flirtation
- Restriction on Joint Media Ownership
- Self-Regulation
- Uneasy Ambivalence
- Weak Reformism
- ‘the United Kingdom regards press freedom as an absolute freedom.’ The government leaves it to the market forces to decide which press products survive’ (1992: 53).
- In the case of the press, with certain limited exceptions, no legal restriction is placed on the right to buy or launch a newspaper. (This ensures, in liberal theory, that the press is free, diverse and representative (Curran and Seaton 2003: 346-7).
- In this view of freedom of expression, it is the interests of the press, not of its readers nor of the subjects of its coverage, which are fundamental. (‘Free enterprise is a pre-requisite of a free press’)
- Based on the assumption that democracy is best served by the free exchange of ideas, for which freedom of expression is vital. (‘the best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market’)
https://hautlieucreative.co.uk/media21al/wp-content/uploads/sites/40/2019/12/Curran-Press-Freedom-2.pdf