Economic – The financial situation of the time/place

Geographical – Where is the film set/made

Historical – The time period and events when it is set/made

Institutional – Where is it set/made within an organisation

Political – Ideologies of the time/place

Social – How the audience reflects on film

Technological- How advanced the technology is of the time/place

Being knowledgeable is useful as it can help with references to different films. 

Risk-takers are useful because they can create more impressive shoots due to the nature of their personality. 

Balanced is useful because it can help when reviewing a film to not only talk about one thing. 

Open minded-ness can be useful as it can lead to interpreting films differently. 

Reflective is useful because it allows you to self-assess your work. 

Caring is useful because it can help to show the value of your product. 

Principled is useful because it means that you want to get the perfect shot. 

Communicators are useful as they can share ideas and thoughts. 

Inquirers are useful because they ask questions and make you think about previous ideas more. 

Thinkers are useful because it can help with the creative aspect of the course e.g., film making. 

Art Film	Historically Significant Film	Mainstream Film
The Shape of Water (Alphaville) (The Seventh Samurai) (The Wizard of Oz)	Battleship Potemkin The Wizard of Oz The Seventh Samurai The Breakfast Club Once Upon a in the West Fitzcarraldo Alphaville	Bugs Life (The Breakfast Club) Love Simon (The Wizard of Oz)

What Makes A Film ‘Good’?

Throughout the history of film and filmmaking, there are certain examples that – thanks to their composition and writing – have dominated their era; be it ‘Citizen Kane’ and Orson Welles’ revolutionization of cinematography with his use of wide angle lenses and rear projection, or Alfred Hitchcock’s ‘Psycho’; with a powerful plot-twist, a bone-chilling musical score, and a performance rivaling that of even modern film. In this essay I will be comparing micro and macro aspects of the hit flick ‘Morbius’ to what truly defines a film as ‘good’.


Micro elements of a film surround the process of production, effects, editing, audio mixing and cinematography. The use of micro elements within a movie can impact the mood, create tension within a scene or the narrative, and set the pace for scenes involving combat, fast-paced movements and slow-motion shots. Take this for example; the combat scenes presented within ‘Morbius’ – where the titular character tears through eight mercenary characters, in a combination of slow-motion and quick action shots that provide gory detail to his movements whilst still retaining the breakneck speed of his vicious attacks. Director Daniel Espinosa also made use of dark, moody lighting, deep cyans and crimsons throughout production to further accentuate aspects of the horror genre, the editing maintaining the pace of the main plot and subplots. In addition, Swedish composer Jon Ekstrand creates an eerie, ominous score that raises tension, enhances the action within the film, and keeps an audience engrossed through dramatic moments involving flashbacks and scenes that have a more intimate setting. The CGI throughout the film is also impeccable, displaying realistic transformations as the two ‘pseudo-vampires’ move and change form throughout the picture, keeping a viewer absorbed in the narrative.


Macro elements of film involve the actors’ performance, writing, setting, and plot. These factors are more the deciding factors in how ‘good’ a film truly turns out to be, the word ‘macro’ referring to being larger. Examples of these factors within ‘Morbius’ include actor Jared Leto’s method acting processes – placing himself in similar stresses to his role, losing weight to portray his character with more authenticity, and regaining it after the character’s transformation, typically resulting in leaving an audience with a more realistic, grounded version of the character portrayed. The setting also has another important role; the use of more nighttime scenes toward the final acts of ‘Morbius’ adding to the frightening environment that built up during its runtime, showcasing the vibrant, yet brooding atmosphere of New York City. Furthermore, the dramatic plot of the film strays from the source material, following a dying scientist struggling to find a cure for a rare blood disease that has been plaguing him and many others since birth, only then for said cure to come with superhuman abilities – and a grave cost; an overwhelming desire to feed on human blood. The plot poses a conflict of mortality against morality, and how far a ‘good man’ might go to survive in an unforgiving world where his only sustenance is those around him.


In conclusion, what truly makes a film ‘good’ is a balance between both micro and macro elements and originality, not so much that it ‘needs’ to revolutionize the film world, but enough to move and inspire their audience, and deliver its message effectively, concisely, and while producing a truly invigorating experience that leaves audiences wanting more.

What makes a film good?
A film like most artforms is highly hard to interpret as good or bad due to every person’s unique perception and enjoyment of the film, much like all art forms as everyone will view the film differently but yet despise this I believe there are two main factors that can decide if a movie is perceived as good. Firstly I think that a movie can be judged as good due to how well it appeals to the mass audience; Films that are made to appeal to a mass audience and create a large box office or commercial success are known as ‘blockbusters’. These films utilize the micro and macro elements that will appeal to most people, generally speaking, this includes: keeping the style fairly simplistic, maintaining a chronological narrative, representation of both different races and cultures, and lastly the messages and values stay mainly straightforward and lean towards a moral conclusion. Examples of these such films are loved by many and consistently return a large profit, yet despite this more often than not the critic’s perception of these films does not share the same level of enthusiasm as these films rely on clichés and other techniques to grasp easy attention, and in doing so they lose artistic freedom and it may seem more like money grabbing than trying to spread a visionary idea of the film. However I believe it does not matter how well a film is received by the general public due to the fact I believe that a film is considered ‘good’ by many factors, the most important factor is seeing that the creative that planned the story has let his/her vision come to life. More factors of creating a ‘good’ film include when the acting, directing, writing, cinematography, and overall production value all come together to tell one cohesive, entertaining, and impactful story. In conclusion, a ‘good’ movie uses both micro and macro elements to create one piece of art created by the visionary, as a way of telling the world a story that correctly uses the beauty of motion picture to its fullest.

Art Film	Mainstream Film	Historically Significant Film
Fitzcarraldo	A Bug’s Life	Battleship Potemkin
Alphaville	The Shape of Water	Seven Samurai
Once Upon a Time in the West	Love Simon	The Wizard of Oz
	The Breakfast Club

What makes a film ‘good’? 

Darren Aronofsky’s Black Swan 

Black Swan is a psychological horror which tells the story of Nina Sayers, a ballerina who dreams of dancing the Swan Queen in Swan Lake. When she wins the lead role, Nina slowly begins losing her mind in a curious and intense mix of melodrama and horror. The movie is over the top, and some of its effects are over done but it is richly enjoyable. Nina’s hallucinations play an important part in the movie as the viewer cannot tell the difference between reality and her delusions since the movie is from her point of view. This makes the movie ’good’ because it gives the viewer a sense of complication and leaves you thinking about it for a while after. 

Most of the films visual effects are quite subtle, taking us along with Nina on her journey to insanity. However, the film’s finale where Nina transforms into the black swan shows us how she is completely converted into that persona/ alter ego. This transformation is metaphorical to the audience of the show, but to us and her, it is completely real.  

Medium shots at eye-level have been used by Aronofsky throughout Black Swan. These two contrasting medium shots were both filmed with a shaky, unstable camera. The roughness in which they are captured gives the viewer the impression that there is someone following and baring down on Nina. This shot has been used emphasise the fact that there is always somebody watching what Nina is doing. The fact that there are two contrasting shots, one well-lit and one which is backlit tells the viewer that even if Nina is to rebel and in turn venture into becoming the Black Swan, the pressure of being a ballet performer will always be existent and will forever be ‘with’ Nina. This is also important to the plot as Nina’s character is a perfectionist. 

Many props are also used to symbolise different things. For example, Mirrors are also often used in horror to increase tension, and Black Swan repeatedly uses this device to create an unsettling visual and as a weapon. Mirrors can be interpreted as one of Nina’s causes of downfall, since her perfectionism plays such a huge part in her everyday life and is the root of the films plot complication (her ability to play both the black and white swan). 

What makes films “Good”?

Aaron Roberts

I believe an important part of what makes films “good” comes from the cinematography of the film and the reality in which it is set. 

I believe the film “Se7en” is a good example of this. The director, David Fincher, has used various techniques such as; every scene set inside the city has the background noise of faint rain and people roaming around. This gives us the impression that the city is real and grounds the setting more into its part in the movie. This is done not only by the sounds but also by the way the city looks. 

By choosing to have the city be constantly raining or dark it gives this film noir genre to the city and this makes it far easier to believe as many real life cities do look and feel quite run down and old. However, choosing to have the city be run down and several buildings crumbling represents the plot of the movie and how people’s morals are crumbling along with the city, In addition to this when arriving at the scene the main characters can be seen interacting with various “citizens”. Although this might seem like an obvious thing to do, the way in which the citizens behave makes it more realistic as they are curious about what happened however do not want to become part of the gruesome crime. Additionally by having the world react around these crimes does help the movie in becoming more believable as a city standing by and letting a mass murderer on the lose without reacting in any way woukd completely shatter the illusion of the world. Fincher does this very well by not having the public outwardly panicking; however whenever we get shots inside the police station we can see various cops becoming more stressed and our main characters, Detective Mills and Somerset, becoming frantic the more crime scenes they visit.

Another brilliant film that creates a realistic and grime filled atmosphere is 2022’s “The Northman”. Directed by Robert Eggers it truly shows what living in a viking world would look like. By showing us the brutality of these warriors it shows how much this movie cares about the atmosphere it’s trying to create. Eggers does a great job at this by not only showing the protagonist’s point of view in battle but has a grand view of it so we can watch as everyone fights and not just the main character as this would break immersion. Additionally, having the main character be motivated by revenge and wanting to see his family again is a very relatable way to build up a believable character. Furthermore one of the opening shots of the film features the shoreline of the island as the choppy sea smacks against the cliff face. The slight blue tint that has been put over this shot has perfectly illustrated to the audience how Eggers wanted the audience to feel. It shows us how cold, lonely and unforgiving the environment is and how our protagonist is all of these characteristics. 

My third example of a film that’s atmosphere creates it is “Star Wars: Episode V – The Empire Strikes Back”. This being a Star Wars film obviously it’s going to be set on various planets that are not Earth, this means that having a believable atmosphere is harder to achieve as we are unfamiliar with these places. However, one example from this movie is the ice planet of Hoth. During the battle of Hoth we are shown a camera shot of “AT-AT’s” advancing towards our heroes. This truly shows how empty and barren the planet truly is. There’s nothing apart from snowy hills and the metal of the walkers. This serves to show how desperate and alone the heros are at this point in the film. This creating this type of atmosphere is most impressive considering again that it’s a foreign planet that we’re never going to visit because it’s not real and how all the technology isn’t real.

I believe there isn’t one singular thing that makes a film objectively “good”, I think it takes a lot of things such as lighting, acting, soundtrack and cinematography. However, I do believe that the most important thing is the atmosphere. As if the atmosphere isn’t believable, the film will have a harder time trying to convince its audience to believe it.