COMPARATIVE ESSAY – Layout and Criteria

Q. How does the ‘Serial Killer’ subgenre change when applied to different cultural contexts, shown with ‘Zodiac‘ (David Fincher, 2007) and ‘Memories of Murder‘ (Bong Joon-ho, 2003)?

Introduction

Frame of Reference – The context within which you have placed the two things you plan to compare and contrast, which may consist of an idea, theme, question, problem, or theory.

Grounds for Comparison – The reasoning behind your choice that lets your reader know why your choice is deliberate and meaningful, not random.

Thesis – Depends on how the two things you’ve chosen to compare relate to one another; do they extend, corroborate, complicate, contradict, correct, or debate one another?

Comparative Points

There are two basic ways to organise the body of your essay:

Text-By-Text – Discuss all of ‘Film A’, then all of ‘Film B’.

Point-By-Point – Alternate points about ‘Film A’ with comparable points about ‘Film B’.

All argumentative essays require you to link each point in the argument back to the thesis. Without such links, your reader will be unable to see how new sections logically and systematically advance your argument.

Conclusion

– A summary of the main points in your argument.

– Should be kept short and sweet.

– More of a round-up than an evaluation.

CRITERIA:
– Provide a credible justification for the choice of task components.
– Support your comparative study with accurate film vocabulary.
– Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the task components and the cultural context of the two selected films.
– Support your work with a suitable range of relevant sources.
– Compare and contrast the selected films, making links to the chosen topic.
– Provide an equal treatment of the two films selected for study.

COMPARATIVE ESSAY – Research on Film Movements

Film Movements:
– German Expressionism
– Soviet Constructivism
– French New Wave
– Classic Hollywood Cinema
– Parallel Cinema (India)
– South Korean New Wave
– New Hollywood Cinema
– British New Wave Cinema
– New Mexican Cinema
– Dogme 95
– Cinema Du Look (France)
– No Wave Cinema

Ideas

German Expressionism

1. The Man Who Laughs (Paul Leni, 1928) 2. The Hunchback of Notre Dame (Gary Trousdale and Kirk Wise, 1996)

Soviet Constructivism

1. Battleship Potemkin (Sergei Eisenstein, 1925) 2. The Untouchables (Brian De Palma, 1987)

French New Wave

1. Reservoir Dogs (Quentin Tarantino, 1992) 2. Band of Outsiders (Jean-Luc Godard, 1964)

Parallel Cinema

1. Aalavandhan (Suresh Krissna, 2001) 2. Kill Bill: Vol. 1 (Quentin Tarantino, 2003)

Dogme 95

1. The Idiots (Lars von Trier, 1998) 2. District 9 (Neill Blomkamp, 2009)

COMPARATIVE ESSAY – Research on Film Theories

Film and Cultural Theories:
– Feminist Theory
– Post-Colonial / Critical Race Theory
– Queer Theory (fluidity of sexuality / gender identity)
– Marxist Theory (class)
– Narrative Theory (including screenwriting theory)
– Genre Theory
– Editing Theory (Eisenstein’s methods of montage)
– Film Noir Theory
– Post Modernist Theory
– Auteur Theory

IDEAS

Queer Theory

1. Brokeback Mountain (Ang Lee, 2005) 2. The Power of the Dog (Jane Campion, 2021)

Marxist Theory

1. Metropolis (Fritz Lang, 1927) 2. Snowpiercer (Bong Joon-ho, 2013)

Genre Theory

1. Batman (Leslie H. Martinson, 1966) 2. Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (Zack Snyder, 2016)

Film Noir Theory

1. Nightcrawler (Dan Gilroy, 2014) 2. Sweet Smell of Success (Alexander Mackendrick, 1957)

Auteur Theory

1. The Duellists (Ridley Scott, 1977) 2. The Last Duel (Ridley Scott, 2021)

Comparative study (Inquiry)

Focus: (ideas)

Femme fatale – feminist theory?

Film noir theory?

Post modernism in film – manipulation of narrative/genre?

Marxism theory in film?

Editing theory – experimental film?

Film movement: (ideas)

South korean new wave?

Soviet constructivism?

No wave cinema?

Classic Hollywood/New Hollywood?

Soviet constructivism?

Films

  • Classic Hollywood/film noir : “Touch of Evil – 1958”
  • Classic Hollywood/film noir: “The Asphalt jungle – 1950”
  • Contemporary film noir: “Nightcrawler – 2014”
  • Contemporary film noir: “Sin city – 2005”
  • Femme fatale: “The Lady from Shanghai – 1947”
  • Femme fatale: “The Woman in the Window – 1944”
  • Contemporary Femme fatale: “The Batman – 2022”
  • Contemportary Femme fatale: “Gone girl – 2014” / “Atomic Blonde”
  • Experimental film: “Stan Brakage – Dog star man, 1964”
  • Experimental film: “Maya Derren – Meshes of the Afternoon, 1943”
  • Contemporary experimental film: “No data plan – 2019”
  • Contemporary experimental film: “Let Each One Go Where He May – 2009”

Questions (“Touch of Evil” & “Sin City” – Film Noir)

  • How classic film Noir was modernised?
  • Differences in classic and contemporary film noir?
  • How classic film noir has been adapted for a modern audience?

Comparative study

FOCUS:

idea of hidden/supressed identity created by American society and the American Dream (modern day vs 90s)

i.e. How do the American Dream and social expectations result in the suppression of individual identity (90s vs 2010s) ?

SPECIFIC FOCUS:

unreliable protagonists and narrative

FILMS:

Fight Club (1999, David Fincher)

Us (2019, Jordan Peele)

comparative study

Area of focus

-Theories of representation

-Genre theory

Films

-2001: A Space Odyssey- Kubrick 1968

-Interstellar- Nolan 2014

-One flew over the cuckoo’s nest- Milos Forman 1975

– A beautiful mind- Ron Howard 2001

– Shutter island- Martin Scorsese 2010