All posts by Rory Lambert

Filters

Author:
Category:

Citizen Kane task 1.

Task 1 – Explain how the production context of Citizen Kane influenced the “look and feel” of the end product. 

Citizen Kane was distributed by RKO pictures in 1941. before the films release Welles was only known for a radio broadcast in 1938 called ‘The War Of The Worlds’. The show was based on an alien invasion of earth and it terrified some listeners as they thought the events were actually happening in reality. Hollywood was interested in Welles due to his persistence and work ethic when it came to his radio show, It was the offer of complete control over the film that finally convinced Welles to transfer from theatre to Hollywood to pursue his creative career.

Citizen Kane was releases in 1941 and was the first movie that Orson Welles was involved in, he Directed, Produced and co-wrote the film. because of Hollywood’s desire for Welles to come and work for them they allowed him full control of the film meaning he got to choose the actors/crew as well as directing, producing, co writing and even staring in the film himself. All at the young age of just 2, this was every young directors dream and it was destine to be his big break into the industry.

Alongside complete control over the film he was also gifted a budget of $500,000 which was an immense amount of money at the time. $500,000 in 1941 is the equivalent to $9,031,607 in 2018. In 1991 the film was re-released by RKO pictures and it broke the charts with a total of $737,000,000  at box office .

The film was seen to be based on William Randolph Hearst was an American businessman, politician, and newspaper publisher who built the nation’s largest newspaper chain and media company, Hearst communications. Hearst  ran unsuccessfully for President of the united states in 1904.There are many correlations between Kane and Hearst, Welles’s stated that “Citizen Kane is the story of a wholly fictitious character”. Although he said this I personally think it was probably very obvious at the time that Kane’s character was based on William Randolph Hearst and Welles said this to avoid argument.

 

Shot Types And Examples

shot types and examples

Depth of field in pulp fiction, the use of this effect creates a focus on the character and helps the audience to concentrate on just the  characters emotions by blurring out the background and focusing on the characters face.

Subjective camera shot in the incredible hulk. In the start of this scene the camera shows the soldiers running up some stairs Kinetic camera shot showing us a 1st person shot so it feels like we are in the action and allows the viewer to be more involved in the film and feel emphasise with the character more.

Sound in Dunkirk

Sound In Dunkirk

Dunkirk (2017, By Christopher Nolan) won the Oscar for best sound mixing and editing, a sound editor is a professional responsible for selecting/choosing and assembling sound recordings in preparation for the final sound mixing. a sound mixer is the member of a film crew responsible for recording all sound recording on set during the filmmaking  production.

Dunkirk is known for having very little dialogue and this is to make the film more realistic because in reality there wouldn’t be much conversation if you were a soldier waiting on a beach like sitting ducks. Nolan himself said prior to the films release “The empathy for the characters has nothing to do with their story. I did not want to go through the dialogue, tell the story of my characters. The problem is not who they are, who they claim to be or where they come from. The only question I was interested in was – will they get out of it? Will they be killed by the next bomb while trying to join the mole? Or will they be crushed by a boat while crossing?”

During the closing scene of Dunkirk there is little dialogue. This is effective because the scene doesn’t need to be explained or glorified by dialogue, The silence of the plane and the men on the beaches is enough to fill the audience with pride. Silence can be very powerful for an audience as it allows them to focus more on the visuals of a scene, in this case the audience focuses on the plane landing, the use of little diegetic sound allows the viewer to empathise with the pilot because in reality the pilot wouldn’t of heard much at all because his engine was dead.

Another effect used is the ominous sound of a ticking watch, this sound is repeated throughout the film prior to when something bad will happen like the bombs being dropped, the non-diegetic sound of the watch is subtle but reminds the viewer that something terrible is about to happen. The sound itself signifies time running out for the soldiers on the beach as they wait to be saved and taken off the beaches.

Most the sound in Dunkirk had to be recorded out of filming because it was mostly useless apart from the dialogue. the sound mixer explained that for the sounds of the planes they wouldn’t settle for regular plane sounds so they dotted 25 microphones around a spitfire in various areas like the engine cockpit, this was to make the film more authentic. Some ww2 enthusiasts would easily notice the incorrect sound of the spitfire and the film would get discouraged in the media.

There is an ongoing narrative during the final scene of the film where a soldier is reading the famous inspirational speech from Winston Churchill from a newspaper on the train. The scene skips between the soldier on the train and the main pilot landing whilst the narrative is in the background, this effect keeps the reader engaged and gives us examples of what Churchill is referring to in his speech, for example he says “we will fight on the beaches” whilst there is a long distance shot of the soldier on the beaches.

 

 

 

Editing in Whiplash

Whiplash’s final scene was edited by Tom Cross and directed by Damian Chazelle. It is said that the final scene of this film is the one that concluded the decision for the film to be awarded best edited film. The use of cuts throughout the scene  build up the tension and make the viewer more and more anxious to see if he successfully performs the song that he failed at so many times during the rest of the film. The song (caravan) is an indication to the viewer that he will fail, we get this feeling because until the final scene very time the song is played he fails and annoys his teacher Terence Fletcher (JK Simmons: Oscar for Best Supporting Actor) so when Andrew completes the song successfully we are filled with joy.

At the very start of this scene there are 2 distinctive shots that are held for longer than most other shots in the film, these shots are close ups of Andrews face after he has been embarrassed by his former teacher, Terence Fletcher, These shots are held to express Andrews emotions and allow the audience to sympathies him even more. After the first held shot it cuts to a shorter shot of the audience who all look very unimpressed and judgmental, It then cuts back to another held shot of Andrew, this is an example of the Kuleshov effect (The Kuleshov effect is a film editing effect demonstrated by Soviet film-maker Lev Kuleshov in the 1910s and 1920s. It is a mental phenomenon by which viewers derive more meaning from the interaction of two sequential shots than from a single shot in isolation) the shot begins with Andrews face and then cuts to the audience and then back to his face again showing his emotion and reaction towards the second shot (the audience).

When Andrew comes back on to the stage and begins to play again and the rest of the band join in there is a montage of all the different musicians, a Montage is a technique in film editing in which a series of short shots are edited into a sequence. this particular montage  is in time with the music which is aesthetically pleasing for the viewer. This excites the viewer and allows us to feel a sense of pride for Andrew because of how good the music is and the camera cuts make it even better for the viewer.

 

 

 

 

Kuleshov effect

Kuleshov effect

The Kuleshov effect is a film editing effect demonstrated by Soviet film-maker Lev Kuleshov in the 1910s and 1920s. It is a mental phenomenon by which viewers derive more meaning from the interaction of two sequential shots than from a single shot in isolation.

The effect is used when there is a shot of an expression on someones face then a shot of what they were looking at and finally their reaction to the second shot.

Although this was a film effect/technique it was originally an experiment, kuleshov used shots 1 and 3 (the characters face) several times but changed shot 2 each time. He used very different images for the second shot such as a new born baby to a murder scene. Kuleshov concluded that even if shot 1 and 3 are the same for each attempt, its shot 2 that determines the characters emotional thinking and intent.

 

Story board

shot 1: a zoom out from a close up of the turning windmill to the a more distant shot of the windmill and surroundings, this shows the calm atmosphere. this gives the scene tranquility and makes shows the viewer there isn’t any dangers because it is a slow zoom out in a country side.

shot 2: a medium distance still shot of the windmill and White walking out of the windmill towards camera where he bumps into Black which surprises the viewer because of how so far both shots have been tranquil and calm, this adds humour.

shot 3: a panning shot of the two looking at each other angrily like in the western films as shown^ but beginning with them standing face to face symmetrically showing the obvious difference of one wearing all black and one wearing all white but also showing their similarities.

shot 4: point of view shot from each characters perspective, reverse shots from each character as they begin to push each other, much like in animé.

shot 5: a high angle rotation of the two fighting to give the viewer authority over the character which emphasises how petty their fight is.

shot 6: an extra long shot of white and black running out of shot with the villagers closely chasing behind them, at such a distance that you cannot here any sound affect from the action but just country side sounds like birds chirping, adding humour to the scene .

long take shots

Birdman is most famous for the fact it is shown as one whole continuous long shot, although it is shown like this it isn’t all shot at once as there is some camera trickery, but even then it is a masterpiece because its the first of its kind. through the film there are lots of difficult long take shots, a lot of these scenes have many people doing complicated things and so the directer needed to be very organised so that everything ran smoothly without mistakes and people bumping into each other and messing up the scene, these shots most likely weren’t first try so it could become very frustrating for the actors and people working on the scene.

Cinematography In The Shining

Cinematography In The Shining

The shining (1980) was based on a Steven King novel that was released in 1977. The film was directed by Stanley Kubrick who was an American film director, screenwriter, and producer. The film was visually amazing when released (and still is) because it had lots of new techniques and technology such as the Steadicam.

Stanley Kubrick is a perfectionist when it comes to mise-en-scene,  The shining was a huge breakthrough in the film industry due to the first real use of Steadicam in cinema, the Steadicam was a device which meant you could film smoothly whilst moving. Having the camera free hand meant it wasn’t on another device like a track .

The use of the Steadicam creates a sense of unease for the viewer as it seems like we are following the characters around or someone else is. A perfect example for this is throughout the film (The shining) there are shots where the camera is following Danny on his cart through the corridors although this seems like a harmless idea, through the use of the Steadicam it makes it more sinister. This feature is important for the viewer as there are lots of corners in the corridors and we don’t know what is going to be around the next corner which creates suspense and adds to the horror.

Stanley Kubrick is also well known for his subtle use of symmetry, this subtle feature is aesthetically pleasing for the viewer and in the shining it symbolizes the connection between jack and the hotel, making them a pair. An example of this is where Jack first enters the hotel and one of the waiters Is stepping in sync to him and crosses a square shape on the floor at the exact same time as him, although this is a very subtle feature it explains a lot when you take it into consideration to the rest of the film and especially the photo at the end where we are shown that jack has been absorbed by the hotel. There is also a more obvious symmetry during the shots of the daughters which is very unsettling for the viewer because of the unreal perfection in the shot (2 identical twins standing next to each other perfectly in the middle of a corridor).

camera movements

Camera movements

 

In the opening scene to the Hobbit an unexpected journey, where bilbo is old and begins to write the letter to Frodo explaining his own journey. As he begins to write the camera moves backwards out of the room slowly probably on a Dolly. This symbolises him going back in time. It also shows that we are leaving his character behind for the rest of the story. 

 

 

The zoom: In the Shining, when Wendy is walking up the stairs with her bat, she reaches the floor where there is a man in a bear costume in one of the bedrooms. Then suddenly there is a fast zoom into the bears face. This scares the viewer because of the speed of the zoom and the fact the bear is looking right at the camera which seems like it is looking right at us!

 

 

The pan: a pan is where the camera moves from the action and averts away from the main focus. In reservoir dogs this is used when Vega chops the cop’s ear off, after showing a little bit of brutality when Vega slashes at the cop’s face. He then holds his ear and the camera pans out to the top left of the screen. This is a great method because it tells the viewer there is no hope for the victim and what is about to happen is inevitable, as a viewer we are left with no hope or suspicion that the victim may have averted the attack (This method also saves a lot of time and money on CGI or screen play).