Depth of field refers to the focus and clarity of the different layers of mid, fore and background. Sometimes, they can all be clear and well-focused, but typically; some are blurred out to bring attention to a certain aspect. For example; sometimes a mid and background is blurred out to bring attention to any subject in the foreground
Shallow focus involves the emphasis on one certain aspect of
the scene, and highlights it by blurring out everything else to draw the
audience’s attention to it straight away
Deep
focus refers to the clear focus and clarity of all frames to ensure that the
scene is neat, sharp and in clear focus
A
good example of a film which utilises depth of field is ‘Social network’ (2010,
by David Fincher) The background is blurred, to allow us to instantly recognise
and focus on the main character. This indicates that the character is the
relevant thing to look at because everyone else is blurred out. The character
to our right, is not as blurred; expressing that he is also significant to the
plot
A famous example of a tracking shot is from ‘Touch of evil’ (1958, by Orson Welles) I decided on this particular shot because of how visually interesting it is. A main reason for its significance is the tension it builds up. The whole film itself is very intense, with moments of slow agonising wait compared to some bursts of fast and sharp action. This particular shot is deliberately slow, and drawn out to both excite and frighten the audience, who are eagerly anticipating the next move. The daunting irony of the audience knowing that the time bomb is inside the car heightens the tension as it makes us feel like we are in on the action, especially the irritation as the couple regularly pass the car. We are anticipating the next move, so keeping us focused on the car is an interesting tactic in ensuring that no one looks away. By using this type of camera movement, this ensures that the audience can only focus on the action in front of them, and the pace of which the action is delivered; is deliberately controlled to create a tense and fearful atmosphere
A
good example of a crane shot is from ‘Citizen Kane’ (1941, Orson Welles) This
film was directed by Welles, who also directed ‘Touch of evil’ which incorporates
various shot types into his work. I chose this film in particular because I
think that the shot has a powerful impact on the audience, because of how it
visually appease but also because of the significance it has towards the plot
and character development. This scene depicts the story of the lack of
appreciation for Susan’s performance, solidifying her character as looked down
upon and somewhat tragic. This instantly evokes sympathy from the audience, who
want to get to know the character. The camera rises up to the rafters, to
overlook the scene from such a height. This gives us a broad view of the
action, which ensures that we can observe everything going on. By ultimately
separating us from Susan, we are given the illusion that she is trapped within
this life that Kane has set for her and cannot get out. Since we are looking
over the scene, this can give the implication that people looked down and upon
the character, which can make the audience feel even further sorry for her
The film ’Animal Kingdom’ (2010, by David Michôd) showcases
a good example of a dolly shot. The shot is an excellent way of establishing
the eerie and almost frightening scene. The slow movement drags onto Pope’s longing
expression, the audience then assumes that he is staring at the TV which is
shown. But the picture cuts to Nicky, a character of which is asleep. This can
be very effective in creating a spooked atmosphere but also clearly establishing
Pope as a character not to be reckoned with. The movement is very significant,
because it is deliberately slow which keeps the audience on the edge of their
seat while equally entertained but also frightened.
‘Toy
story’ (1995, by John Lasseter) shows an excellent example of a pedestal camera
movement. The camera moves upwards from Buzz when he makes his first appearance
in the film. This is done primarily to visually showcase his implicated and
expressed superiority over Woody, who feels replaced. By showing him looking down
on Woody, this is foreshadowing the feelings of inferiority and replacement by
Woody later on in the film. This evokes an instant aspect of distain towards
Buzz by the audience, because we are rooting for Woody; the protagonist, and do
not like the idea of Buzz thinking that he is superior. Since this is our first
look at Buzz, I personally think that our first impressions are largely
negative. We get the impression that he is vain and extremely self-assured by
his confident position looming over Woody. This suggests aspects of his
character are mainly confident. By slowing lifting the camera upwards, not only
is the tension manipulated by the camera crew but we are only showed Woody’s
reaction as he first witnesses Buzz
A
good example of a tilt movement is from ‘Star Wars: Episode IV – A New Hope’
(1977, by George Lucas) This famous shot is used in the opening scene, which
implies that its main role of significance is to set the scene for the audience.
The camera tilts down from the stars, to the planet. This instantly indicates
the sci-fi aspect of the film by showing it is on a different, fictional planet.
By starting with filming the stars, the audience get a peaceful start to the
film, which contradicts all of the later action and tension. Since the opening
begins with something basic enough, we can suggest that the action will
increase later throughout the film. I think that the audience would be pleased
by this opening, because they get an interesting visual of the world which
helps create verisimilitude
The
film ‘Psycho’ (1960, by Alfred Hitchcock’ utilises an excellent example of a
pan downwards camera movement. The camera slowly pans down as Marion falls down
after being stabbed. As the protagonist, her death is arguably very significant
so her death would need to be something which engaged the audience because of
her relevance as the main character. Since the camera slowly pans, this is
important in creating tension which contradicts the frenzy and wildness of the
situation. I think that the audience would sympathize with Marion because they
understand her desperate character and do not think that she deserves to die
A good example of a high angle shot is from ‘Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2’ (2011, by David Yates) This angle is significant, particularly to the plot because it gives a representation of Voldemort’s power as he physically towers over Harry which shows the audience his sheer power. As the audience, we are frightened for Harry at the severity of his disastrous situation; this solidifies his character as a protagonist because despite the challenges he faces, we are still meant to stick by him. The angle is also well-framed, because it makes us look down on the scene as if we are a part of it. By having Voldemort tower over Harry, we feel that his situation is precarious and does not look good. There is also a sense of superiority by positioning Voldemort over Harry, insinuating that Voldemort thinks he is above Harry. This is also suggesting that he is more powerful than him, foreshadowing the ending where everyone believes that Harry was killed but it turned out that he defeated his arch rival
The film ‘Raising Arizona’ (1987, by Joel Coen) makes good use of low angles. This particular shot is highly effective in portraying Smalls as a menacing and dangerous character. This is done by forcing the camera to look up to him, implying that he believes to be superior to everyone, adding a touch of arrogance to his traits. The shot is well framed by positioning him in the centre, surrounded by guns. This implies that violence is his world, and all he ever knows. The audience should feel intimidated, or afraid for the characters because of the way that the camera is angled looking upwards at the character. He looks frightening because of the confidence expressed in his facial features, which represents his character very well
This example of a bird’s eye view is from the film ‘Psycho’ (1960, by Alfred Hitchcock) I think this is a strong example because everything seems eerie and out of place. The scene depicts the secret antagonist Norman’s attempt to hide the identity of his ‘mother’ who supposedly killed the investigator. The interesting aspect is that we do not know that his ‘mother’ is actually just the corpse, so I think this scene is very effective for the audience because it prevents them from finding out about the true identity, which creates even more tension. This type of angle is significant because it shows the entire setting, which allows our attention to drift away from ‘mother’, thus allowing her true identity to remain a secret. I think this is vital in retaining an element of mystery and surprise throughout the entire film
This
is an example of a worm’s eye view camera angle from the film ‘The ant bully’ (2006,
by John Davis) I particularly like this angle used because; although this film
isn’t usually my favourite genre I think that both the plot and cinematography
conveyed important messages. We perceive the scene in the same point of view as
the ants, so view Lucas as gigantic in comparison. His anger is evident, which
twists his character negatively, making him seen cruel and harsh; especially
when he attacks the ants. From this, we don’t particularly like Lucas, although
to a certain extent we do understand his rage; coming from his recent bullying.
However, since he is looking down on the ants, this gives us a sense of his feelings
of superiority. This is contradicted when he is shrunk down to their size and
learns that he is equal to them. I think this shot is useful in conveying the
main messages portrayed in the film, including equality
The film ‘Battlefield Earth’ (2000, by Rodger Christian) is well-known for its usage of Dutch tilt camera angles, I particularly like this one because of how abstract and complex it appears. The film itself is extremely complex; there are many different ideas and aspects which are varied. I think that this is also represented in this scene. The camera is only slightly tilted, which contrasts against the scaffolding bars and the outlines of buildings. There is a lot going on in this scene, so tilting the camera ensures that the audience can notice how uniquely balanced everything is.
This example of a canted shot is from the film ‘Inception’ (2010, by Christopher Nolan) I really like it because of how complicating it is to look at. I think that it reflects the confusing yet engaging nature of the film which ends with a complex and not fully explained ending. The whole plot revolves around the manipulation of dreams to receive what the main character Dom wants. By showing the characters swaying and manoeuvring across the corridor, this represents the shaky line separating dreams from reality. Since everything seems floaty, and on edge; it is hard to determine what is reality and dreams. I think the audience would be interested by the complexity of this shot, but might feel a bit confused about how to look at it without a headache
This is a good example of an extreme close-up, from ‘Dawn of the planet of the apes’ (2014, by Matt Reeves). This shows the detailed and highly profiled facial features of the ape which uses an interesting array of colours and textures to make the audience feel slightly intimidated by the character. I think that this shot is so significant and effective because of how realistic the ape looks, knowing that this is CGI rather than makeup or prosthetics makes this shot look so much more interesting because of how realistic and life-like that the ape looks. This particular style of shot adds greatly to the idea of verisimilitude within the film because it enforces realism within the apes because of the high levels of detail shown. I think that this is a clever technique in intriguing the audience, especially since this shot was used for some editions of the movie poster, because it draws the audience into wanting to watch the movie because of how realistic the apes look which makes the movie seem more appealing straight away
A popular example of a close-up is from ‘The Good, the Bad and the Ugly’ (1966, by Sergio Leonne). This shot is significant because it emphasises the significance of ‘Blondie’ as the main character within the film. By blurring out the background, we are forced to focus on him, which suggests what he is an important character. Using the object of a cigar represents his causal and sometimes informal behaviour. The audience could be interested by this shot because we are learning more about the character, which makes us like him more but also begin to understand his decisions and traits
Medium
close-ups can be used more frequently but I personally think that they are more
difficult to get right because they can struggle to portray the characters
facial expressions or the background at once. I particularly like this example from
‘The dark knight’ (2008, by Christopher Nolan) Heath Ledger, who played the
joker, was praised for his good acting within this movie despite being the
antagonist rather than necessarily the main character. I really like this shot
because his eccentric personality is displayed very well here. Capturing his
hair, facial expression and unconventional outfit shows how bizarre yet
interesting he is. The colour contrast of the dull and slightly withered green
against the stark red and dapper purple, adds to this unique perception of the
character. By showing all of these different aspects within the shot, the
character of the Joker is widely developed because more aspects of his personality
are visually displayed. This makes the character more likeable because we
understand him more and are learning more about him
This famous shot from The Shining (1980, by Stanley Kubrick) is a great example of a diegetic perspective, because it instantly connects the audience to ‘Johnny’ by demonstrating his wild and eccentric behavior. The shot also emphasizes the significance of the character by expressing his characteristics in such way. Since this is a closeup, it highlights the importance of emotion within the character by displaying it so erratically
This shot from Cloverfield (2008, By Matt Reeves) is a good example of intra-diegetic gaze because it intrigues the audience by putting us in the place of the character. This is an interesting concept because it is solidifying verisimilitude by immersing us in the world. The audience are part of the peripheral, since we are viewing the whole thing from the camera’s perspective. We feel like we are part of the world because the shot depicts us a the main character so we feel and believe that we are in the film
Some films only utilize aspects of breaking the fourth wall, and many only use the challenging technique only once or a few times. Deadpool (2016, by Tim Miller), is a great example, which uses this technique throughout the entire film. This is mainly for comedic purposes, and to engage with the audience. Most times, Deadpool is speaking to the audience, usually with jokes. This intrigues the audience by not only making us feel part of the film but developing a crucial relationship between the audience and Deadpool himself, which is significant in establishing him as a likable and humorous character. You would think that the technique could be overused because of the extent it is used in this film ,however; each joke or line is delivered with such comedic finesse that everything feels how it should and has a purpose. These jokes really help to solidify the significance of Deadpool in such a popular comedy/action genre
A cinematographer focuses on lenses, aptitude and the technical aspect of film. Whereas the director has a vision for the scene and works with other departments, such as the cinematographer to translate this idea onto the scene
Blade Runner was highly successful, outstanding piece of art. Not only is it visually appealing, but everything neatly ties together which develops the clarity of the film. Many aspects of Mise En scene are used to create a wonderful atmosphere within the film and add some verisimilitude to transport the audience into the world of Blade Runner
A scene of which I consider highly significant is the ending scene (referring to the US 1982 theatrical release edition). This is because I think that it cleverly utilises all aspects of Mise En scene to clarify the realism required for this film to work. In this particular shot, we can see that Batty is standing up whilst Deckard is on the ground. This clever balancing suggests that Batty believes that he is above and better than Deckard, who is trying to get away whilst in the mid-ground. Batty is positioned in the foreground, trapping Deckard from getting away. This is an interesting concept because it shows the arrogant nature of Batty who believes to have superiority over Deckard. The physical positioning of the shot reflects this, by physically towering Batty over Deckard. This particular shot is significant in developing the relationship between the two characters, which gives the audience an insight into the personality of the protagonist; Deckard
The fluorescent lighting used in this shot is significant in brightening up the dark scene, physically and also metaphorically. The bright, harsh and neon lights artificially light up the darkness of the night which brightens up the chiaroscuro of the setting compared to the stark white pigeon held by Batty. Overall, I would say excluding the neon artificial lighting provided by the commercial signs, that the lighting used is low-key. As the scene is deliberately set at night, there seems to be little natural lighting. This can convey the whole idea of a commercialised and also artificial future at the hands of technology. This is portrayed by the burst of bright, blue light which almost feels painful to the eye at the sheer brightness and unfamiliarity. I think this lighting creates an element of tension and suspense by forcing the audience to only focus on specific parts of the scene which are illuminated more than others. This diverges the focus to whatever the director wants by ensuring that the focal points are those which are constantly highlighted by the bright and shining light
I think the makeup used for Batty in his final scenes, perfectly portrays the character. Although he is smeared with violent slashes of blood, there is almost a childlike innocence with the way rain and tears have merged together. The simplicity of the makeup also works beautifully with the famously well-known ‘Tears in the rain’ monologue. This adds to the confusion about whether it is the rain staining his cheeks or the tears of which he is clearly trying to repress. Along with his prior reaction to seeing Pris dead, this allows the audience some sympathy for the antagonist because we are beginning to understand his feelings and thought process. This newly developed sympathy can be a factor in suggesting why the writers have decided to allow Batty to save Deckard, suggesting and expressing that he is an emotional and caring character despite his previous portrayal of being a blood thirsty, malicious replicant. This example of situation irony is interesting because although the film has nearly finished; it still ensures that his has lots of depth and twists to engage the audience right until the end
Film stock and aspect ratio plays a small yet important role in establishing the leitmotifs of the relationship between lighting and emotion. The film is typically set at night or late evening, maybe to set a gloomy tone. But the increased usage of bright and bold neon lighting helps to elevate this otherwise darkening tone to something of a wild atmosphere. Using the technique of night for night, and illuminating the fictional city with overly-bearing neon lights helps to categorise this film as neo-noir which adds more depth and structure
Costume does not play a vital role in this scene, mainly due to the fact that there are really only two characters (Deckard and Batty) that are shown. However; when Batty removes his shirt it signals that it is near the end. This physical change shown in his character is accompanied by the expression of his real personality as he saves Deckard before his inevitable death. This suggests that he is not in fact a villain, but rather a granted selfish, yet damaged individual
The setting bears great significance to the plot because it’s what easily emplaces verisimilitude within the audience. Personally, I think realism and verisimilitude are the hardest aspects of film to achieve successfully. This is because they are so challenging to get right, but if done to a strong extent; they can really set the atmosphere of a film. Science fiction can be a hard genre to make believable because everyone pictures different aspects of it in their head as its usually an imagined setting. I think the setting here is believable, because it was based on the world at the time with some adaptations. Nothing is too out-there, as even the flying cars which seems absurd, look somewhat realistic and not too futuristic to the point where they look fake. The large buildings are also aesthetically pleasing because they look realistic compared to some in the time, just upgraded
A good example of a film which utilizes long takes is ‘Children Of Men’ (By Alfonso Cuaron, 2006). There is around three long takes in this film, which is a great achievement; considering how challenging they can be for a director to produce. It can be agreed that when done right, a long take can provide an interesting visual and can also be integral to the plot because it sets the tone. With action, thriller or horror genre; they can be used primarily to create suspense and keep the audience on the edge of their seat
However, despite the obvious pros, there can be a lot which can go wrong with a long take. They require lots of hard work, dedication and commitment to get right, so therefore I think that they should just be used if the director thinks it will work or is necessary
Since it is all filmed in one shot, everything comes down to timing. If an actor misses their cue, or a car drives in at even a fraction of the wrong second, the whole thing will need to be restarted. This can be frustrating for both directors and actors, especially if the take was working extremely well prior to the error. Long-takes require persistence and the ability to bounce back and continue onwards
There is also the possible issue of a lack of film. Some films intend on using long-takes but their cameras cannot hold enough film to make it work. A notable example of this is the film ‘Rope’ (By Alfred Hitchcock, 1948). Hitchcock intended for the film to have a continuous long-take, but the cameras could hold no more than 1000 feet of 35 mm film. As a result, each take used up to an entire roll of film and even lasts up to 10 minutes. In the end, the film consisted of only eleven shots
In this film, the usage of multiple long-takes were aided by CGI but still looked effective and worked well. Cuaron had also experimented with long-takes in several other movies including ‘Gravity’. Most of his work is influenced by varied different shots and takes which ensures that his work is as unique as possible. As well as the interesting plot, this film is mainly famous for it’s long-takes because of how unique they are. It is not a surprise that it grossed 70 million dollars at box office, due to its sucess