All posts by Alex

Filters

Author:
Category:

Use of soviet montage techniques in Strike

There are five important soviet montage techniques, these include:

Metric editing

rhythmic montage

tonal editing methods

over tonal methods

the intellectual method

In this essay however i will only need to cover three of them:

The “Intellectual Method” (Eisenstein’s favourite,) rhythmic editing, and tonal editing.

First I will discuss the use of rhythmic editing. Rhythmic editing is when cuts are made based on time, sometimes it is also coupled with music and this shows a deeper meaning than metric editing does. It helps to keep the fluidity of the film as the cuts are in places you would expect. One example in Strike (Sergei Eisenstein, 1925) is when the building is burning down at the end: cuts are being made however it is not being cut mid action like in metric editing – where it doesn’t matter what is happening it must still cut. Here, cuts are made thoughtfully and create a sense of fluidity.

Next it is important to look at tonal editing. Tonal editing is when the emotional meaning of shots is considered – the tone of the film. For example a sleeping baby would emote calmness and relaxation. In Strike, tonal editing is used towards the end when a speech is being given at the time of the burning building. The civilians are being persuaded and pushed into rioting by fellow residents of the town. Here multiple close-ups of the person giving the speech is used, the tone of each shot here shows the determination and confidence that is emanating from him. The tonal editing of cutting between him and the crowd  entices the audience and brings them into the moment. It makes the audience feel as if they are there and being cheered on. It further creates a sense of determination and power that the civilians have over the police / government / people in charge.

Finally i will explain the intellectual method of montage. This is the combination of shots to create a meaning. By themselves they may not be very meaningful or easily understandable however when combined, a greater meaning is produced. For example in Strike when the shot of the striking workers is shown it creates a sense of violence, however it is not bringing anything new in. No new ideas have been brought up. However when combined with the shot of the cow being killed it creates a metaphor to show that the workers are being treated like cattle. This relates back to the core meaning of the meaning – showing how poorly the workers are being treated.

At this time, many movies were closely managed and in some cases used as propaganda for the government. Strike is a prime example of this. It is almost saying to the people “if you think it’s bad now remember what it used to be like, or what it could look like” It shows the audience what is happening from the worker’s perspective. For example more of the film is based on the workers and their point of view rather than the upper class. This film was meant to connect to the audience. Since much less of the film is focused on the authorities it almost dehumanizes them, which once again helps the audience to connect with the workers. This was a way that the government could idolize the Russian revolution and gain the support of the lower class.

Eisenstein’s work is incredibly influential on modern day cinema. His montage techniques that i have discussed in this essay can be seen in countless modern mainstream films. One example is in “Rocky IV” (Sylvester Stallone, 1985) in the famous training montage. Continually using Intellectual montage, cutting between Rocky and Drago – showing the good and the bad, these quick cut shots create tension just like they do in Eisenstein’s work. Additionally, just as Eisenstein’s work was idolizing the communist system, in Rocky, capitalism is being idolized int he form of Rocky Balboa. It is as if Eisenstein’s techniques are being used against him / for the opposite purpose. Additionally Eisenstein’s use of montage influenced one of, if not the, greatest films of all time “Raging Bull” (1980, Martin Scorsese) “Raging bull” is shot in black and white as an homage to  European silent films. Not only that but during a very important fight, Scorsese cuts from Black and white stills from the fight to full colour home videos, which, just like in Eisenstein’s work, provide great contrast and show the two sides of him. Showing how he works like an animal during the fight, but also how loving he is with his family.

Finally Eisenstein’s work in montage has influenced modern day music videos immensely, the technique of cutting the beat came from Eisenstein’s work, if it wasn’t for him, music videos would probably look incredibly different.

 

Cabinet Of Dr. Caligari – micro elements

Throughout “The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari” (Robert Wiene, 1920) Many different and aspects of this film are regarded as innovative – whether its cinematography, editing or mise-en-scene.

Firstly, it is important to understand that The Cabinet Of Dr Caligari was not produced by a mainstream company, therefore it had limited resources. And because of this, not a lot of money could be spent on artificial lighting so paint was used to indicate lighting and shadows. This is one of the most innovative techniques in my opinion and was a great contribution to the overall verisimilitude of the film. Although the film did not have colour, verisimilitude could still be created effectively due to these innovative techniques.

Additionally the film’s set was extremely innovative. Slanted walls and windows and abstract designs all lead the to the idea of craziness and mental instability / deterioration. It puts us inside the mind of the narrator and pulls us along the journey that follows the deterioration of his mental health. It immerses the audience in another world without the use of  CGI or other computer techniques.

Another innovative technique used is the iris wipe. This is done by closing the camera lens whilst still recording so it looks like it is zeroing in on the middle of the screen. This is a very artistic and expressive transition and so is not utilized often in modern film – sometimes it is used to draw attention to specific parts of the scene but during this film it is mostly used to create an interruption in the fluidity of the movie. It refers to the brokenness of the narrator’s and characters’ mind. Additionally the use of a slow transition such as an iris transition causes the audience to feel anticipation for what is to come next.

Finally Cesare’s make-up is considered to be innovative as it reflects the tone of the movie and of the scene. It is very bold and reveals his inner turmoil and conflicting emotions. He also has a very dark costume which further references to his personality and thoughts. Additionally it establishes him as the main villain to us.

Not only that but one must consider the effect that the culture had on German expressionism as a whole. The Weimar Republic was a democratic system that was introduced post world war 1. It was during the time of the Weimar Republic that German expressionism became very popular. This is because Germany had banned imports from other countries and this included films, therefore it was up to German artists and film-makers to create their own works of art. The Weimar Republic was affecting film in a very strong way. Most notably shown in “The Cabinet Of Dr Caligari” through the Mise-En-Scene and set design. Around this time, Germany was in a state of depression and darkness, Wiene was able to directly represent this in the film through the set design, the grass was made to look like knife blades coming out the ground, doors and windows aren’t square. Streets aren’t symmetrical and seem to wind in endlessly unpredictable ways. Everything about it seemed dark and disorderly – a direct representation of Germany at the time.

Finally, thought must be put into examining what this film influenced. “The Cabinet Of Dr Caligari” was incredibly influential and is seen as one of, if not THE, first horror movies. This style of film-making paved the way for the American genre of Noir. The use of shadows and lighting can be clearly linked back to those dark depressing German expressionist films. Additionally German Expressionism has inspired the work of Directors like Tim Burton and Ridley Scott. Shown specifically through films like “Edward Scissorhands” (Tim Burton, 1990) and “Alice In Wonderland”(Tim Burton, 2010) Aswell as “Bladerunner” (Ridley Scott, 1982).

Why Film critics label Citizen Kane as the best film ever made

Citizen Kane (Orson Welles, 1941) is widely regarded as the best film ever made by many critics largely because of its use of cinematography and editing, it was of a far higher standard than usual. At the time many camera shots were from the same heights, same angles – there was not a lot of variation.

Additionally, there was great use of editing in the film. The famous transition wipe scene in the opera house when the camera is rising and rising, the use of deep focus when Mrs Kane is signing the papers, the Xanadu miniature fading away to reveal the next shot. All these techniques were far ahead of their time and left the audience in awe.

Here is an example of a very good tracking shot, very few movies had used this kind of cinematography before and that is why Citizen Kane receives such high reviews

Here the camera is on what i presume is a crane which then moves up to a restaurant sign, through it and finally a transition is very well hidden with the stormy weather where rain covers the glass roof which then dissolves into the next scene. The creativity of this shot is what makes Welles such an amazing director and shows off his artistic capabilities in film.

Not only that but one of its most famous scenes situated at the beginning of the film in the opening sequence where the camera, through a series off dissolves transitions, zooms in on the room Kane is in, from the bottom of a mountain to the single room lit with a light. This kind of masterpiece of cinematography is what pioneered film into the wonder it is today and plays a huge part in what makes Citizen Kane one of the greatest movies of all time.

Furthermore, Welles’ use of deep focus in the scene in Mrs Kane’s boarding school causes the viewer to sympathise with Kane. Normally you would expect the camera to be focused om the conversation however in this instance it is focused on both the conversation and the subject of the conversation. We can feel as much a part of the conversation as we feel a part of Kane playing in the snow – this allows the viewer to connect with Kane on a more emotional level.

Deep focus was not widely used at the time and it was difficult to discretely create an emotional attachment with a character. That is why when these types of shots were introduced it shocked and inspired film critics and directors for decades to come.

Favourite scene from citizen Kane

My favourite scene from Citizen Kane (Orson Welles, 1941) is the scene situated in Mrs Kane’s Boarding School. To me it is one of the most masterful pieces of work in the film. The use of sound and lighting to show dominance, paired with the beautiful flowing  camera work really helps set the scene and create a sense of verisimilitude.

My first point will look at the snowy scene wherein we can see a young Charles Foster Kane playing by himself. Here the Mise En Scene conveys simplicity of life and happiness. The lighting is very bright which hints to how fond Kane was of his childhood, it shows positivity and contrasts with how his life is later on. The actual scene is extremely simple and this correlates to his simplistic and innocent life. As a child he had nothing to worry about. However when the camera tracks into the house the scene is much more complicated and full of objects. This shows how the current conversation is going to complicate Kane’s life.

Additionally, the camera work is extremely fluid and helps to push the conversation without interrupting it. This is especially good because the dialogue is fast and any interruptions may cause the viewer to lose track of the conversation and miss certain parts out. This is seen most notably in the instance where the camera tracks through a split in half table which then merges together to be seen in shot. This creates a sense of fluidity and in my opinion is an outstanding shot and shows Welles’ creativity

Not only that, but lighting plays a big part in the dialogue scene. Throughout the whole scene much of the light is focused on Mrs Kane – showing her dominance over her husband and her control over the future of her child. The lighting foregrounds Mrs Kane and shows how important her opinion is in this scene and this conversation. It is very hard to pick out unless you know what to look for but it has such a big impact and therefore is one of the reasons this is my favourite scene.

Finally i am going to look at the how the size of the adults shows dominance over young Kane as this for me really stood out. The physical size correlates to power and seeing them tower over Kane reveals that his future is in their hands, the tallest of them all being Mr Thatcher (George Coulouris). This foregrounds Thatcher and implies that he is now the person with most power and influence over Kane. Kane’s future is in his hands. For me this scene beautifully reveals Kane’s past, and the beginning of his journey to become this new man who is vastly different to his child self.

How does the production context of “Citizen Kane” influence the look and feel of the end product

Citizen Kane (Orson Welles, 1941) is widely regarded as the best film ever made. Not only being extremely famous when it came out initially but also decades on. It is constantly examined, scrutinised, compared and finally used as the high standard for many film directors, producers, actors etc.

Citizen Kane was released in 1941 by a famous studio “RKO” also know as radio-Keith-Orpheum. In 1941 the studios were nowhere near as developed as the current studios in the 21st century however one thing to note is that not all films were produced by these large studio companies. The fact that it was created in the RKO studios serves a purposes and is a show of the standard (higher than standalone film producers).

To start off with, one must look at the time that Citizen Kane was produced: the early 1940’s. Sound had already been incorporated into films and vibrant colour was starting to be used. The three strip Technicolour process had been used in the Wizard of Oz (1939, Victor Fleming) however was very expensive and so for a long movie like this it was decided that the regular monochromatic black and white film was to be used. This, however, was a useful decision as it helped create a sense of verisimilitude. The stark contrast between the lights and darks engulfed the viewer and showed the change of his personality, his health, and his wealth. Towards the end of the film the overall setting was darker – following his downfall and foreshadowing his eventual death.

Additionally the studio system had a large impact on the film’s look and feel. In 1941 the cameras had advanced to the point where the y could be moved around a good amount, cameras where placed on tracks and moved during actual recording. This gave an impressive modern look and helped improve the fluidity of film – something which not many films could boast about at the time. For example There is a scene in the beginning of the film whereby the camera tracks from the front of a room through a table that opens up for the camera to move through then closes again for when it is in shot. 

In conclusion Citizen kane was a masterpiece for many reasons but one of the most notable reasons was how sophisticated and intelligently it was made for its time. Although studios were nowhere near as developed as they are nowadays and cameras were far less portable, Welles still managed to capture the beautiful but saddening story of the famous newspaper mogul Charles Foster Kane. Its use of light and shadow, foregrounding, sound mixing and camera work were far ahead of its time and lead to the formation of one of, if not, the most famous movies of ALL time.

How is sound used as a narrative device in “Dunkirk”

“Dunkirk” (Christopher Nolan, 2017) is an intense, thrilling film about the extraction of British (and french) troops from the beaches of Dunkirk.

The film score composer – Hans Zimmer – used many different sounds, both diegetic and non-diegetic to help develop the story. The score is so well composed that the non-dietetic sound actually becomes a narrative device for the film and helps to draw the film round every corner to a final conclusion. In some ways the sound of the film is a better story-teller than the cinematography and is the main reason Dunkirk is highly appraised.

Firstly, Zimmer uses what is known as the “Shepard tone” In essence, the Shepard tone is when a few scales an octave apart are in a constant loop, from low to high pitch then instantly back to the beginning. On their own they sound like they are looping and not going any higher or lower, however when you combine them and have the lower scales increasing in VOLUME and the higher ones decreasing in volume it creates an effect that makes it seem like there is a constant ascension in tone. This auditory illusion produces a continuous sense of rising tension. This is utilised throughout the whole film and is actually a narrative device to develop the story and to alert the audience of danger that may be coming. It is applied in the film mostly when the British troops are about to be attacked. It grips the audience and helps guide them through the story so that there is a constant uninterrupted flow of tension.

Secondly, Zimmer uses the sound of  a clock ticking to show that their time is constantly running out. The ticking helps develop the story as it shows that time is moving and that things are happening, it subconsciously alludes to the sense of time and pushes the audience along as the film continues. Additionally the ticking is used very explicitly when there are enemies approaching to be very obvious that time is of the essence and that there is serious danger in the future. For example, at the start we hear the ticking before we hear the enemy, as if Zimmer is explicitly revealing to the audience that the troops need to hurry up and get going because of approaching danger. It also foreshadows danger when the troops are on the beach and are running out of time to be evacuated before the enemies attack again.

Not only that but Zimmer also uses the sound of a heartbeat as a narrative device by personally relating with the audience. The audience links the heartbeat to life and as long has the heartbeat is heard the audience knows that the characters in the film are in danger – but alive – as long as the heartbeat is heard the audience has hope for the troops, they keep on watching to see the outcome of the situation. The heartbeat is excellent at snaring the audience in the trap of the film and subconsciously forcing them to watch the film develop as they want to see the outcome due to the personal connection the heartbeat has given them.

Example of a “long take”

A “long take” is a when a very long shot is used. There are no cuts or interruptions and the camera is continuously filming for a long time. A great example of this is from the movie “A Touch of Evil” (Orson Welles, 1958):

Here, a camera was placed onto a crane in order for it to smoothly travel all the way across the street and dozens of meters more following two characters. It is widely regarded as a masterpiece and one of Welles greatest scenes due to how difficult it would be to get a perfect shot.