Serial killer as a genre and how its changed between 1968 – 2007

Comparative essay

The Zodiac is a film based on the pseudonym of an unidentified serial killer who operated in Northern California from the late 1960s to the early 1970s. The film was directed by David Fincher and was based off Robert Graysmith’s nonfiction book “zodiac”. Fincher is a golden globe winning director, He’ well-known for directing Se7en and Fight Club. Most of his films stick to the thriller/mystery genre and so he suited this film perfectly. Fincher also obsessed with the subject and was extremely meticulous to make sure that the film was an accurate representation to the real events. 

The Zodiac is mainly focused on Robert Graysmith (Jake Gyllenhaal) who worked at the San Francisco Chronicle as a cartoonist where he quickly became obsessed with the zodiac killer’s case and devoted his life to catch him, He works alongside Paul Avery (Robert Downey, JR.) who is the criminal journalist at the Chronical. They both strive to catch the killer and become very involved in the investigation both working with and against the detective David Toschi (Mark Ruffalo). The Zodiac killer taunted the police with letters and ciphers bragging about what he had already done to his victims or what he will do. The case remains one of the most infamous unsolved cases in history.

The Boston strangler is loosely based on the murderer or murderers of 13 women in the Boston area during the early 1960s. It was directed by Richard Fleischer who directed the first Dr Dolittle and The Narrow Margin. Fleischer had to overcome some hurdles when creating the horrific murder scenes due to the restrictions at the time.

Due to Hays code which was the set of industry moral guidelines that was applied to most United States motion pictures released by major studios from 1930 to 1968. These rules meant that films such as the Boston strangler had to be careful with how graphic the scenes were. This is why Richard Fleischer chose to shoot the murder scenes like he did. Rather than showing the killings themselves he showed the reactions of the people who found the body’s which was equally as horrific.

The Boston Strangler was one of the earliest serial killer films which paved the way for directors like David Fincher with his films like Se7en and The Zodiac. In the 60’s a “serial killer” was not a commonly recognized genre of film because it hadn’t been explored much. One of the first major serial killer films was psycho which definitely influenced Fleischer when making The Boston Strangler. This is my favourite genre of film because of how the directors portray the killers and show their motives

The film focuses on the whole city’s fears towards the strangler, the audience is shown interviews with the citizens showing their fear because of how unpredictable the killer was. The same applies for The Zodiac as his killings didn’t have a pattern and so the whole city was in fear. I think that the directors exaggerate the idea of the killings being random to scare the audience as the films are set in major cities and so one of the motifs of these films is to strike fear into the audience and make them aware of serial killers.

The zodiac was released in 2007

The Boston strangler was released in 1968 just 4 years after he was caught, this timeline means the story was still relatively fresh in the public’s memories and so would have been very meaningful for audiences of that time. As well as the strangler, there was another famous killer in the 60’s nicknamed “the railway sniper”. The sniper was active between 1963-1978 so the Boston Strangler would have really struck fear into the audience at the time.

When watching both films I realised many similarities and differences for example the layout of the films was similar in that it was a race against the clock to find the killer before he killed again. The editing in Boston strangler is very unique because it uses a lot of split screen shots when showing the murders which u don’t really see in modern films. Fleischer uses these split shots to show the reaction of the people who find the murdered bodies rather than the actual killings, this technique creates a theme for the audience so the murders stand out in the film. In The Zodiac Fincher shows the killings but never the killers face to add confusion and keep the audience guessing.

Fincher is considered by many as an auteur because of his masterful use of lighting, he is extremely skilled at creating an atmosphere just through the use of lighting, Vashi Nedomansky said “the final image is Dark Clarity and matches the mood and tone” I find this depiction represents exactly what the atmosphere is like in Finchers films, especially The Zodiac with its dark story line to coincide. Richard Fleischer on the other hand is not as renowned for any specific specialities, I personally thought that in The Boston Strangler the main element is the editing.

When we watch old thrillers today we don’t find them too shocking because modern cinema is much more graphic but the Boston strangler is shocking even today, not because of the visual aspect but because of the constant references to rape and the details given by the policemen in the film. I found the film shocking and so can’t imagine what the audiences of the 60’s were feeling after it but I’m sure it would have had a big affect on them. I think this is the main difference between the films, audiences in the 60’s wouldn’t be able to handle The Zodiac because of the graphic killings and the sinister undertones throughout the film.

Theorists main ideas

In my essay, i will use a range of theorists to cover the broad points of comparison. most notably, professors and feminist film theorists. Carol Clover and Laura Mulvey are important figures that conceive several useful ideas to understanding feminist film theory; such as the Final girl trope and the male gaze respectively. However, there are also some other theorists which provide a useful insight into understanding feminism within horror.

Carol Clover – focuses on the final girl, idea that the character is needed in horror films and is “the embodiment of what a woman should be”

Carol Clover – also on final girl, concept that the character does not truly represent feminism because they become “masculinized in their final showdown with the antagonist through phallic appropriation” eg taking up a ‘male’ weapon – chainsaw, large knife

Comparison Script Plan

Introduction:

Introduce the question and the film focus 

Film Introduction:

Introduce the two films with context 

Comparison:

Compare the main points of the Hero’s Journey of both films, state how they are similar and how they differ from each other e.g. how Luke transforms into a hero while Indy is already established as one.

Conclusion:

Sum up the comparison with final thoughts 

Bibliography

An introduction to film studies, second edition: women and film by Jill Nelmes, page 276 – developing a counter-cinema

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorothy_Arzner

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ida_Lupino

Men, Women, and Chainsaws: Gender in the Modern Horror Film, by Carol Clover

https://www.vox.com/2015/10/30/9645674/final-girls

https://theconversation.com/explainer-what-does-the-male-gaze-mean-and-what-about-a-female-gaze-52486

Essay: Women in the Horror Film – Ripley, the Alien & the Monstrous Feminine

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminist_film_theory

https://www.thrillist.com/entertainment/nation/happy-death-day-ending-explained-director-christopher-landon

Film Reel 3 Cinematography: plan

Name: The Villains Journey (a parody on the hero’s journey)

Theme: This film will be a medieval based film, i plan to have cloths and weapons to suit this theme, such as swords and rags for cloths.

Plot:

Scene 1: A man named Hendrix dressed up in sinister clothing, as well as eyeliner and face paint, is ease dropping on conversations in a bar, where he hears story’s of hero’s defeating villains. He grows angry and smash’s a glass. He then gets an idea. he runs out of the bar. an intrigued woman follows him out.

Scene 2: two shots are edited together, one of which is Hendrix packing his bag, and the other is Hendrix having a conversation with an elderly man, his farther. His farther convinces him that if he wants to see change he must make the journey himself. Hendrix talks about how he wants to be the first successful villain, while his farther says that no one can want to be a villain, everyone thinks their the hero of their own story. Hendrix ignores his advice and departs. On his way out he bumps into the woman who follows him out of the bar she asks to join him and he reluctantly accepts.

Scene 3: Hendrix is seen travelling to a nearby village, where he talks to a shopkeeper. He asks the shopkeeper where he could find a ‘damsel in distress’. The shopkeeper tells him that he must make a journey through forests and caves in order to reach a tower guarded by a dragon, all while cutting from the shopkeeper to caveman like drawing of the events taking place, as well as Hendrix travelling through these places with the woman. through this montage we also see the woman and Hendrix bonding.

Scene 4: They arrive at the tower, where they hear the low rumbling of a monster. They enter the tower, here Hendrix and the woman are able to sneak past the dragon. At the Entrance to the princess’ room he reveals his plan to the woman in which he plans to kidnap the princess in order to become a truly successful villain. The woman is confused and asks why she was allowed to come along. Then Hendrix explains he needed a sacrifice, where he push’s the woman off a ledge towards the dragon. Finally, he walks towards the door of the princess’ room. As his hand touch’s the door he hears the woman screaming for help, and Hendrix remembers what his farther said that no one is really a villain. Before he can open the door, he jumps down where he pushed the woman and it cuts to black.

Locations:

  • My house: I’m going to make it look as if a room in my house looks like a bar for the bar scene at the start. It will also be used for the scene with the shopkeeper.
  • A Farm house: The interior of a farmhouse is going to be made to look like Hendrix’s house, where he will pack his stuff in scene 2. As well as use for the interior of the castle at the end.
  • Hautlieu School TV Studio: This is where i will film the scenes of Hendrix’s farther talking, it will be a black background.
  • St Catherine’s woods: I will film shots here for the journey the shopkeeper talks about.
  • Plemont Beach: I will film shots here for the journey the shopkeeper talks about, here i will use the caves on the beach.
  • Gorey Castle: For the exterior shots of the castle

Script for Comparative Study

Intro – Film’s are built on many elements after the filming is complete. One of those elements is the way the shots are cut together or the editing of the film. One of the pioneers of this idea was a man called Sergei Einstein, a Soviet director, born 1898. Famous for films such as Battleship Potemkin and Ivan the Terrible. One of his ideas is that there are 5 methods of montage. To this day most directors follow these ideas, one of which being Edgar Wright, born 1974. A modern director who’s becoming quite well known for his work on films such as Shaun Of The Dead and Baby Driver. Today I’ll be looking at how modern directors, such as Edgar Wright, still follow Sergei Einstein’s ideas of Montage and the influence that Einstein has left upon the film industry. for this study, I’ll be looking at Sergei Einsteins Strike, as well as Edgar Wrights Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World.

Point 1 – Sergei Einstein suggested that there are 5 main methods of montage, the first of which being metric montage. Metric montage is a form of editing, where the length of each shot is based purely on the length of each shot, rather than being dependent on the contents of each shot. Metric Montage is meant to give the audience adrenaline, making them feel panicked. A quote from Sergi Einstein’s book ‘Film Form’ on Metric montage states… “The fundamental criterion for this construction is the absolute lengths of the pieces. The pieces are joined together according to their lengths, in a formula-scheme corresponding to a measure of music. Realization is in the repetition of these ‘measures’.” I think a good way of describing metric montage, is in an example given by Sergi Einstine later in this book. It goes ” A similar example may be found in Vertov’s Eleventh Year, where the metric beat is mathematically so complex that it is only ‘with a ruler’ that one can discover the proportional law that governs it. ” where Einstein says ‘only With a ruler’ is the perfect definition of metric montage, because Metric montage is not something that happens due to what happens in the clips, but rather based purely on length.

In strike, there’s an example of this just after the worker “Yakov Strongen” has committed suicide. The first example of metric montage here is while the old Capitalist is getting beat up. The cuts here are made to a rhythm, regardless of the content of the shot. There’s another example a few moments later just after a worker shouts “Stop Work!. In both of these examples, metric montage is used to show us the audience that the workers are rushing, acting on instinct.

While in Scott Pilgrim vs the world is Scott’s battle Vs. the third ex-boyfriend. In this scene, it cuts between the 2 characters to a beat that’s getting faster throughout. Here metric montage is used to build up tension through the battle, making this bass battle more intense. The use of metric montage gives the audience the feeling of the rhythm of the battle, as the battle is a musical one after all. Shocking right? 

Point 2 – The next 3 methods of montage are Rhythmic, Tonal and overtone. But for the sake of time- I’ll focus in on Tonal montage. Referencing back to Sergi Einstines book, ‘Film Form’, Einstien says that ” In tonal montage, movement is perceived in a wider sense. The concept of movement embraces all effects of the montage piece. Here montage is based on the characteristic emotional sound of the piece-of it’s dominant. The general tone of the piece. “. In essence, Tonal montage is when two clips are linked via a visual or audio medium, in order to transition between or connect the two shots.

(34:50) Strike uses tonal montage to connect the working class with the capitalist bourgeoisie, Einstien does this with the medium of smoke, first with a child making a make-shift chimney, to a working-class man smoking a cigarette, to the capitalist smoking a cigar. This use of tonal montage connects the three clips, which shows off that we’re all the same regardless of class or age.

While in Scott Pilgram, when Scott is thrown into a dream sequence, where he’s trapped in a desert, here a different form of Tonal montage is used, where a shining light is used to transition into the dream, while the dust from Ramona’s roller skates are used as a visual transition of mist into the next scene. The effect these transitions give off is the idea that all of this is happening so fluently, he’s drifting in and out of this dream so smoothly and naturally.

point 3 – The final method of montage comes in the form of intellectual montage. Einstein defines this method of montage as ” Intellectual montage is montage not of generally physiological overtonal sounds, but of sounds and overtones of an intellectual sort: i.e., conflict-juxtaposition of accompanying intellectual affects. ” or another way of putting it, intellectual montage is when two clips that seem to have no relational, are given meaning together- suggesting that the two clips hold a strong connection, by playing one after another.

For example, in Sergi Einstein’s Strike, the scene at the end of the film where the police are beating up the workers from the factory. At the same time, a clip of a cow being slaughtered is played over the top of the clip. This is there as a metaphor of the police, who are slaughtering the defenceless workers as if they were a cow being bought to the slaughter. It’s a subtle technique that can only be achieved through the medium of film, where editing can bring two seemingly un-related scenes together, to form a third meaning through connotation and association.

intellectual montage can be used in another way though, as such this example in Scott Pilgrim, where Intellectual montage is shown off a couple times, but always in a similar way. For instance, the scene where Steven Still leads everyone to a party. in the first shot, he is in a band room with the rest of the band. As he walks off the screen, the next shot it taken from the street as they walk to a party, but the way it’s edited it’s made to seem like one shot. A similar thing happens later on when Scott wakes up just before he’s introduced to the Katayanagi Twins . Where Scott turns to face the camera, just for the shot to change to one of Steven Stills doing the same thing. In Scott Pilgrim, intellectual montage is used to show how Scott is drifting through life, just as the audience are fluidly drifting through scenes. This makes the audience feel confused, and as if the film is going too fast, which is just how Scott feels in this film, eventually everything just becomes one big blur to him, and different parts of his life just seem to blur together.

Ending – Edgar Wright is only one of many directors who still use Sergi Einstein’s methods of montage, most modern directors tend to adopt his ideas, which proves Einstines theory right. Most editing can be boiled down to related to one of his 5 methods, This shows how Einsitne was clearly ahead of his time. Being one of the first world-renowned teachers in film, his influence is important for the film industry. he knew how to elicit emotion through different ways of editing films, and modern director have taken note of that and took heavy influence from him.

War of the Worlds and The World’s End

The War of the Worlds
– released 15th August, 1953
– directed by Byron Haskin
– based on the 1898 novel by HG Welles
– starring Gene Barry and Ann Robinson
– produced by Paramount Pictures
– had a budget of $2 million
– made $2 million at the box office
– it was selected for preservation in the National Film Registry in 2011 for being culturally, historically or aesthetically significant

The World’s End
– released in 10th July 2013
– directed by Edgar Wright
– starring Simon Pegg and Nick Frost
– part of the Three Flavours Cornetto Trilogy – known as the ‘green’ film
– had a budget of $20 million
– made $46.1 million at the box office
– Simon Pegg said the idea came from “the notion of alienation from your hometown taken to its literal conclusion”

Theorist bibliography

Notes on Film noir – Paul Schrader

https://jerseyedu-my.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/personal/a_audrain09_hautlieu_sch_je/EUuy0jMYpdFOuPWZlzhmRfoBdbRTzFUoHdzrkrVe9GeRXg?e=6Np7Sf

Mass Culture Modernism : Guilt and subjectivity in film noir – Fluck and Winfred

https://jerseyedu-my.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/personal/a_audrain09_hautlieu_sch_je/EZbuyXlRLxlCoP8uhfKcQC8Bp8XdQ2sHQxpjOkIVKpuRSQ?e=MCGxv8

Crime , guilt and subjectivity in film noir – Fluck

https://jerseyedu-my.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/personal/a_audrain09_hautlieu_sch_je/EUl0BTb1A6xMoNMEiSQTkroB2FBl3n6xAnoR6ZSqNFbFGA?e=HtZUVP

Does film noir mirror the culture of contemporary America ? – Lise Hordnes

Does Film Noir mirror the culture of contemporary America – Lise Hordnes

The “Bad Girl” Turned Feminist: The Femme Fatale and the Performance of Theory – Michelle Mercure

https://jerseyedu-my.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/personal/a_audrain09_hautlieu_sch_je/EXt4okYd_PVElSZoxmWZQfkBCkRgmrY5qfXY6RLtnym3zg?e=spfmqE

Noir and the urban imagery – Sean Maher

https://jerseyedu-my.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/personal/a_audrain09_hautlieu_sch_je/EU_UOCcg0wtJkzlJpeJydcUBMp68fM7UkqohdeL8wMcGaQ?e=gfvvoN

Quotes

Characters have to make sacrifices. To really, really feel the true emotion and the hero’s journey, they have to go through trials, and those trials could cost them something.  Joe Russo

I think of a hero as someone who understands the degree of responsibility that comes with his freedom.  Bob Dylan

I played characters with villainous aspect. But out-and-out villain? No.  Clint Eastwood

Audiences just naturally hate me on screen. I could play a role in a tuxedo, and people would think I was rotten. You can do much more with a villain part. Lee Van Cleef

Tarantino said, “I steal from every single movie ever made.”

Tarantino said “Great artists steal. They don’t do homages.”